{"id":220393,"date":"2019-10-01T10:05:52","date_gmt":"2019-10-01T04:35:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=220393"},"modified":"2019-10-09T15:47:24","modified_gmt":"2019-10-09T10:17:24","slug":"chh-hc-s-3781b-crpc-bars-appeal-in-hc-against-acquittal-order-passed-by-magistrate-in-a-cognizable-and-non-bailable-offence-reiterated","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/01\/chh-hc-s-3781b-crpc-bars-appeal-in-hc-against-acquittal-order-passed-by-magistrate-in-a-cognizable-and-non-bailable-offence-reiterated\/","title":{"rendered":"Chh HC | S.378(1)(b) CrPC bars appeal in HC against acquittal order passed by Magistrate in a cognizable and non-bailable offence, reiterated"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Chhattisgarh High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>A Division Bench of Prashant Kumar Mishra and Goutam Chourdiya, JJ. dismissed an application filed by the State seeking leave to appeal against the order of acquittal rendered by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, as not maintainable.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The application by the State sought leave to appeal against the order of acquittal rendered by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, whereby the accused was acquitted of the charges under Section 409 IPC <em>(criminal breach of trust by public servant or by banker, merchant or agent).<br \/>\n<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The High Court was of the opinion that instead of preferring the instant application in the High Court, the State should have preferred an appeal before the Sessions Court under Section 378(1)(a) CrPC. Reliance was placed on\u00a0<em>Subhash Chand v. State (NCT of Delhi),<\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/wpBk2x08\"> (2013) 2 SCC 17<\/a>, wherein the Supreme Court laid down the law thus:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>If we analyse Section 378(1)(a) &amp; (b), it is clear that the State Government cannot direct the Public Prosecutor to file an appeal against an order of acquittal passed by a Magistrate in respect of a cognizable and nonbailable offence because of the categorical bar created by Section 378(1)(b). Such appeals, that is appealed against orders of acquittal passed by a Magistrate in <\/strong><strong>respect of a cognizable and non-bailable offence can only be filed in the Sessions Court at the instance of the Public Prosecutor as directed by the District Magistrate.<\/strong> Section 378(1)(b) uses the words \u201cin any case\u201d but leaves out orders of acquittal passed by a Magistrate in respect of a cognizable and non-bailable offence from the control of the State Government. Therefore, in all other cases where orders of acquittal are passed appeals can be filed by the Public Prosecutor as directed by the State Government to the High Court.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In such view of the matter, the instant application filed by the State was dismissed as not maintainable, reserving the liberty in favour of the State to prefer acquittal appeal before the Sessions Court within a period of 30 days from the date of the instant order.[State of Chhattisgarh v. Mohanlal Bagde, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/v6kmT4Xh\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Chh 102<\/b><\/a>, decided on 25-09-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Chhattisgarh High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of Prashant Kumar Mishra and Goutam Chourdiya, JJ. dismissed an application filed by the State seeking leave <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[36395,33741,37790,37789],"class_list":["post-220393","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-acquittal-order","tag-cognizable-offence","tag-non-bailable-offence","tag-section-3781-crpc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Chh HC | S.378(1)(b) CrPC bars appeal in HC against acquittal order passed by Magistrate in a cognizable and non-bailable offence, reiterated | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/01\/chh-hc-s-3781b-crpc-bars-appeal-in-hc-against-acquittal-order-passed-by-magistrate-in-a-cognizable-and-non-bailable-offence-reiterated\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Chh HC | S.378(1)(b) CrPC bars appeal in HC against acquittal order passed by Magistrate in a cognizable and non-bailable offence, reiterated\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Chhattisgarh High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of Prashant Kumar Mishra and Goutam Chourdiya, JJ. dismissed an application filed by the State seeking leave\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/01\/chh-hc-s-3781b-crpc-bars-appeal-in-hc-against-acquittal-order-passed-by-magistrate-in-a-cognizable-and-non-bailable-offence-reiterated\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-10-01T04:35:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-10-09T10:17:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/chattisgarh_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/01\/chh-hc-s-3781b-crpc-bars-appeal-in-hc-against-acquittal-order-passed-by-magistrate-in-a-cognizable-and-non-bailable-offence-reiterated\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/01\/chh-hc-s-3781b-crpc-bars-appeal-in-hc-against-acquittal-order-passed-by-magistrate-in-a-cognizable-and-non-bailable-offence-reiterated\/\",\"name\":\"Chh HC | S.378(1)(b) CrPC bars appeal in HC against acquittal order passed by Magistrate in a cognizable and non-bailable offence, reiterated | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-10-01T04:35:52+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-10-09T10:17:24+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/01\/chh-hc-s-3781b-crpc-bars-appeal-in-hc-against-acquittal-order-passed-by-magistrate-in-a-cognizable-and-non-bailable-offence-reiterated\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/01\/chh-hc-s-3781b-crpc-bars-appeal-in-hc-against-acquittal-order-passed-by-magistrate-in-a-cognizable-and-non-bailable-offence-reiterated\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/01\/chh-hc-s-3781b-crpc-bars-appeal-in-hc-against-acquittal-order-passed-by-magistrate-in-a-cognizable-and-non-bailable-offence-reiterated\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Chh HC | S.378(1)(b) CrPC bars appeal in HC against acquittal order passed by Magistrate in a cognizable and non-bailable offence, reiterated\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Chh HC | S.378(1)(b) CrPC bars appeal in HC against acquittal order passed by Magistrate in a cognizable and non-bailable offence, reiterated | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/01\/chh-hc-s-3781b-crpc-bars-appeal-in-hc-against-acquittal-order-passed-by-magistrate-in-a-cognizable-and-non-bailable-offence-reiterated\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Chh HC | S.378(1)(b) CrPC bars appeal in HC against acquittal order passed by Magistrate in a cognizable and non-bailable offence, reiterated","og_description":"Chhattisgarh High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of Prashant Kumar Mishra and Goutam Chourdiya, JJ. dismissed an application filed by the State seeking leave","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/01\/chh-hc-s-3781b-crpc-bars-appeal-in-hc-against-acquittal-order-passed-by-magistrate-in-a-cognizable-and-non-bailable-offence-reiterated\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-10-01T04:35:52+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-10-09T10:17:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/chattisgarh_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/01\/chh-hc-s-3781b-crpc-bars-appeal-in-hc-against-acquittal-order-passed-by-magistrate-in-a-cognizable-and-non-bailable-offence-reiterated\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/01\/chh-hc-s-3781b-crpc-bars-appeal-in-hc-against-acquittal-order-passed-by-magistrate-in-a-cognizable-and-non-bailable-offence-reiterated\/","name":"Chh HC | S.378(1)(b) CrPC bars appeal in HC against acquittal order passed by Magistrate in a cognizable and non-bailable offence, reiterated | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-10-01T04:35:52+00:00","dateModified":"2019-10-09T10:17:24+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/01\/chh-hc-s-3781b-crpc-bars-appeal-in-hc-against-acquittal-order-passed-by-magistrate-in-a-cognizable-and-non-bailable-offence-reiterated\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/01\/chh-hc-s-3781b-crpc-bars-appeal-in-hc-against-acquittal-order-passed-by-magistrate-in-a-cognizable-and-non-bailable-offence-reiterated\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/01\/chh-hc-s-3781b-crpc-bars-appeal-in-hc-against-acquittal-order-passed-by-magistrate-in-a-cognizable-and-non-bailable-offence-reiterated\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Chh HC | S.378(1)(b) CrPC bars appeal in HC against acquittal order passed by Magistrate in a cognizable and non-bailable offence, reiterated"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":213995,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/26\/bom-hc-victims-right-to-appeal-against-acquittal-of-accused-upheld-in-light-of-amendment-to-s-372-crpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":220393,"position":0},"title":"Bom HC | Victim&#8217;s right to appeal against acquittal of accused upheld in light of amendment to S. 372 CrPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 26, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0M.G. Giratkar, J. quashed an order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge wherein the victim's (applicant's) appeal against the acquittal of the accused was dismissed as not maintainable. The accused was prosecuted for the offences punishable under Sections 354-A, 354-D, 323 and 506 IPC. He was, however, acquitted\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":311518,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/16\/chhattisgarh-hc-appeal-against-order-of-acquittal-u-s-138-of-ni-act-lies-to-high-court-u-s-3784-of-crpc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":220393,"position":1},"title":"Appeal against order of acquittal u\/s 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 lies to High Court u\/s 378(4) of CrPC: Chhattisgarh High Court","author":"Editor","date":"January 16, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cAny allegation made orally or in writing to a Magistrate that some person, has committed an offence, will fall within the meaning of \u2018complaint\u2019. Pertinently, the definition specifically excludes a police report.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"chhattisgarh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/chhattisgarh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/chhattisgarh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/chhattisgarh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/chhattisgarh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":233658,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/chh-hc-s-195-crpc-is-a-limitation-on-powers-of-magistrate-to-take-cognizance-for-an-offence-under-s-188-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":220393,"position":2},"title":"Chh HC | S. 195 CrPC is a limitation on powers of Magistrate to take cognizance for an offence under S. 188 IPC","author":"Editor","date":"August 10, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has put this story together","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":179644,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/02\/appeal-acquittal-bailable-non-cognizable-offences-not-maintainable-sessions-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":220393,"position":3},"title":"Appeal against an acquittal in bailable and non-cognizable offences is not maintainable in Sessions Court","author":"Saba","date":"January 2, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Himachal Pradesh: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Ajay Mohan Goel, J., allowed a criminal revision petition holding that an appeal against an acquittal, where offences are bailable and non-cognizable, lies in the High Court and not in the Court of Sessions Judge. The petitioner was acquitted\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":257143,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/16\/bom-hc-discusses-law-where-accused-already-granted-bail-but-further-non-bailable-offences-are-added-by-prosecution\/","url_meta":{"origin":220393,"position":4},"title":"Bom HC discusses law where accused already granted bail but further non-bailable offences are added by prosecution. Read decision","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 16, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Sandeep K. Shinde, J., reiterated the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Pradip Ram v. State of Jharkhand, (2019) 17 SCC 326 wherein it was held: \u201cwhere the accused is bailed out under orders of the Court and new offences are added\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":214931,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/22\/gau-hc-s-372-crpc-appeal-against-order-of-assistant-sessions-judge-lies-in-the-court-of-sessions-judge-whether-the-impugned-order-pertains-to-conviction-or-not\/","url_meta":{"origin":220393,"position":5},"title":"Gau HC | S. 372 CrPC: Appeal against order of Assistant Sessions Judge lies in the Court of Sessions Judge, whether the impugned order pertains to conviction or not","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 22, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Gauhati High Court: Rumi Kumari Phukan, J. dismissed an application seeking leave to appeal against an Assistant Sessions Judge\u2019s order of acquittal, holding that the forum for preferring such an appeal would be the Court of Sessions Judge and not the High Court.\u00a0 The petitioner (herein) in the instant case\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220393","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=220393"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220393\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=220393"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=220393"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=220393"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}