{"id":220363,"date":"2019-09-30T16:00:19","date_gmt":"2019-09-30T10:30:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=220363"},"modified":"2019-10-09T16:05:28","modified_gmt":"2019-10-09T10:35:28","slug":"del-hc-tribunals-order-for-industrial-dispute-remanded-back-necessity-for-a-reasoned-order-to-be-produced","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/30\/del-hc-tribunals-order-for-industrial-dispute-remanded-back-necessity-for-a-reasoned-order-to-be-produced\/","title":{"rendered":"Del HC | Tribunal\u2019s order for industrial dispute remanded back; Necessity for a reasoned order to be produced"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Delhi High Court: <\/strong>Rekha Palli, J. while deciding a petition relied on various decisions in order to throw light on the significance and necessity of a reasoned order to be produced by Tribunal while determining an industrial dispute.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the present matter, petitioner\/management assails the award passed by Central Government Industrial Tribunal-II, Karkardooma Court, Delhi whereunder the Tribunal after holding that the services of respondent\/workman had been illegally terminated, directed the petitioner to reinstate him with all consequential benefits.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00a0Counsel for the petitioner submitted that, the petitioner was interested in an amicable settlement with respondent paying him a lump sum of Rs 5, 00,000 along with an experience certificate, which was not acceptable to the respondent.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">According to the facts mentioned in the petition, the respondent had joined as a relationship manager in petitioner\u2019s Lucknow branch office, due to the respondent\u2019s performance being non-satisfactory he was asked to undergo training. Further, the petitioner\u2019s Lucknow branch was closed and the respondent was transferred to Delhi branch. Later after a year or so, the respondent\u2019s services were terminated in due compliance of terms of conditions of his appointment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Respondent on being terminated did not protest and accepted the amount given to him by the respondent in compliance with the terms and conditions of his appointment. After a period of 6 months, the respondent issued a legal notice requesting for withdrawal of his termination order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Respondent thus raised an industrial dispute which was referred by the appropriate government to the learned tribunal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Petitioner filed its written statement opposing the respondent\u2019s claim wherein it was urged that the industrial dispute itself was not maintainable as the respondent, having been appointed as Relationship Manager did not fall within the definition of workman under Section 2(s) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Adding to the above, petitioner claimed that respondent after accepting all his terminal dues without any demur, was stopped from challenging his termination at this belated stage and termination was in accordance with terms and conditions of his employment also the compensation paid to the respondent exceeded from what he should have received under Section 25(F) of I.D. Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The impugned award was passed on 14-06-2017 whereunder the tribunal, after deciding all the issues in favour of respondent, directed the petitioner to reinstate him with full back wages. Thus, aggrieved by the award of tribunal, the petitioner instituted the present petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for the petitioner, Jagriti Ahuja, relied on the decision of this Court in <em>British Airways v. Union of India, <\/em>WP (C) No. 5720 of 2015 and contended that such an award, which is wholly unreasoned, is not sustainable and is liable to be set aside on this ground itself. It was further added that tribunal has simply given its findings without even referring to rival submissions or contentions.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Rajeev Saxena, Counsel for the respondent submitted that tribunal is not expected to give nay detailed findings while dealing with an industrial dispute and once the tribunal reproduced written arguments of the parties, it is evident that their rival contentions had been duly considered while arriving at findings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Court\u2019s observation and Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bench on careful observation of the submissions and the impugned award found that <strong>evidently tribunal has, after reproducing all its previous orders, proceeded to copy-paste the written submission of parties without even making any effort to change their font size as well. <\/strong>It seems that the tribunal gave its findings without even referring to the evidence led by the parties or without giving any reason for the same.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Necessity for the tribunal to set out reasons for its findings while determining an industrial dispute has been repeatedly emphasised by the Supreme Court as well as this Court.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Following are the cases relied on for the above point:<\/strong> <strong><em>British Airways v. Union of India<\/em><\/strong><strong>,\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/5R227L89\">2019 SCC OnLine Del 6800<\/a>; <em>Richa Shailja v. Union of India, <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/82F9K7NN\">2018 SCC OnLine Del 8863<\/a> and <em>Fruit &amp;Merchant Union v. Chief Information Commissioner,<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/H2y30XM5\">2012 SCC OnLine P&amp;H 20803<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Therefore, the Court held that in light of the above stated view, the impugned award which is not only non-speaking and unreasoned but is merely a mechanical reproduction of the written submissions of the parties, Rule 10-B of the I.D. Rules, as also earlier orders passed by the tribunal which cannot be sustained and is accordingly quashed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hence, while quashing the impugned award it is remanded back to the tribunal for fresh consideration. [Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd. v. Chetan Kandpal, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/op5UbrV5\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Del 10311<\/b><\/a>, decided on 25-09-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court: Rekha Palli, J. while deciding a petition relied on various decisions in order to throw light on the significance <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[35558,3278,20511,37782],"class_list":["post-220363","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-impugned-award","tag-industrial_dispute","tag-reasoned-order","tag-rule-10-b-of-the-i-d-rules"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Del HC | Tribunal\u2019s order for industrial dispute remanded back; Necessity for a reasoned order to be produced | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/30\/del-hc-tribunals-order-for-industrial-dispute-remanded-back-necessity-for-a-reasoned-order-to-be-produced\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Del HC | Tribunal\u2019s order for industrial dispute remanded back; Necessity for a reasoned order to be produced\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: Rekha Palli, J. while deciding a petition relied on various decisions in order to throw light on the significance\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/30\/del-hc-tribunals-order-for-industrial-dispute-remanded-back-necessity-for-a-reasoned-order-to-be-produced\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-09-30T10:30:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-10-09T10:35:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/30\/del-hc-tribunals-order-for-industrial-dispute-remanded-back-necessity-for-a-reasoned-order-to-be-produced\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/30\/del-hc-tribunals-order-for-industrial-dispute-remanded-back-necessity-for-a-reasoned-order-to-be-produced\/\",\"name\":\"Del HC | Tribunal\u2019s order for industrial dispute remanded back; Necessity for a reasoned order to be produced | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-09-30T10:30:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-10-09T10:35:28+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/30\/del-hc-tribunals-order-for-industrial-dispute-remanded-back-necessity-for-a-reasoned-order-to-be-produced\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/30\/del-hc-tribunals-order-for-industrial-dispute-remanded-back-necessity-for-a-reasoned-order-to-be-produced\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/30\/del-hc-tribunals-order-for-industrial-dispute-remanded-back-necessity-for-a-reasoned-order-to-be-produced\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Del HC | Tribunal\u2019s order for industrial dispute remanded back; Necessity for a reasoned order to be produced\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Del HC | Tribunal\u2019s order for industrial dispute remanded back; Necessity for a reasoned order to be produced | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/30\/del-hc-tribunals-order-for-industrial-dispute-remanded-back-necessity-for-a-reasoned-order-to-be-produced\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Del HC | Tribunal\u2019s order for industrial dispute remanded back; Necessity for a reasoned order to be produced","og_description":"Delhi High Court: Rekha Palli, J. while deciding a petition relied on various decisions in order to throw light on the significance","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/30\/del-hc-tribunals-order-for-industrial-dispute-remanded-back-necessity-for-a-reasoned-order-to-be-produced\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-09-30T10:30:19+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-10-09T10:35:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/30\/del-hc-tribunals-order-for-industrial-dispute-remanded-back-necessity-for-a-reasoned-order-to-be-produced\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/30\/del-hc-tribunals-order-for-industrial-dispute-remanded-back-necessity-for-a-reasoned-order-to-be-produced\/","name":"Del HC | Tribunal\u2019s order for industrial dispute remanded back; Necessity for a reasoned order to be produced | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-09-30T10:30:19+00:00","dateModified":"2019-10-09T10:35:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/30\/del-hc-tribunals-order-for-industrial-dispute-remanded-back-necessity-for-a-reasoned-order-to-be-produced\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/30\/del-hc-tribunals-order-for-industrial-dispute-remanded-back-necessity-for-a-reasoned-order-to-be-produced\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/30\/del-hc-tribunals-order-for-industrial-dispute-remanded-back-necessity-for-a-reasoned-order-to-be-produced\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Del HC | Tribunal\u2019s order for industrial dispute remanded back; Necessity for a reasoned order to be produced"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":219018,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/02\/jhar-hc-tribunal-is-supposed-to-answer-any-reference-by-considering-evidence-and-pleading-of-parties-not-simply-by-relying-upon-precedent\/","url_meta":{"origin":220363,"position":0},"title":"Jhar HC | Tribunal is supposed to answer any reference by considering evidence and pleading of parties, not simply by relying upon precedent","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 2, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Rajesh Kumar, J., allowed the petition filed by the petitioner stating that the tribunal has failed to pass a reasoned order by considering the evidence and pleading of the parties. In the pertinent case, the petitioner moved to this Court for quashing of the award passed in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":291009,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/01\/section-34-of-arbitration-act-a-well-reasoned-arbitral-award-cannot-be-interfered-with-delhi-high-court-on-limited-scope-of-interference-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":220363,"position":1},"title":"[Section 34 of Arbitration Act] A well-reasoned arbitral award cannot be interfered with: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"May 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Arbitral Tribunal is a creature of Contract, and the Contract is the only basis on which the Learned Tribunal should adjudicate, apart from the general provisions of law and jurisprudence.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":323520,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/04\/central-council-of-homeopathy-is-industry-as-per-industrial-dispute-act-delhi-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":220363,"position":2},"title":"Central Council of Homeopathy is \u2018Industry\u2019 as per Industrial Dispute Act: Delhi HC upholds reinstatement of compulsorily retired workman","author":"Editor","date":"June 4, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court said that Section 33-A is a special provision which aims to adjudicate as to whether conditions of a service, etc. have been changed during the pendency of proceedings before an Industrial Tribunal.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":202208,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/25\/petitioner-though-reinstated-cannot-be-permitted-to-continue-his-services-for-failure-to-show-240-days-of-continuous-service-order-of-tribunal-upheld-punjab-and-haryana-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":220363,"position":3},"title":"Petitioner though reinstated cannot be permitted to continue his services for failure to show 240 days of continuous service; order of Tribunal upheld: Punjab and Haryana HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 25, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Shekher Dhawan, J., dealt with a petition filed under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India in nature of certiorari for modification of award passed by Industrial Tribunal where petitioner was denied continuity of services though reinstated.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":287192,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/18\/delhi-high-court-partly-sets-aside-arbitral-award-passed-by-sole-arbitrator-being-patently-illegal-contrary-to-the-lines-of-contract-legal-news-research-awareness-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":220363,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Interest cannot be withheld in the absence of express provisions permitting the same\u2019; Delhi High Court partially sets aside arbitral award for being patently illegal","author":"Arunima","date":"March 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The impugned arbitral award was passed without considering the clauses of the Concessionaire Agreement while adjudicating on the rate of interest to be granted, thus, suffers from infirmity and patent illegality.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":267699,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/industrial-tribunals-award-to-pay-sweeper-with-arrears-for-extra-hours\/","url_meta":{"origin":220363,"position":5},"title":"Guj HC | Industrial Tribunal&#8217;s award to pay sweeper with arrears for extra hours, preferential regularization upheld; Petition by State dismissed","author":"Editor","date":"June 1, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Gujarat High Court: Biren Vaishnav, J. dismissed a petition which was filed aggrieved by the award dated 14-02-2020 by which petitioner-State of Gujarat has been directed to pay to the respondent-sweeper, salary for undertaking work for four hours a day together with arrears from the date of reinstatement. It was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220363","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=220363"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220363\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=220363"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=220363"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=220363"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}