{"id":220040,"date":"2019-09-26T14:54:58","date_gmt":"2019-09-26T09:24:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=220040"},"modified":"2019-09-26T14:54:58","modified_gmt":"2019-09-26T09:24:58","slug":"delhi-hc-issues-practice-direction-mandating-presence-of-rape-victim-or-person-authorised-on-her-behalf-at-the-time-of-granting-bail-to-the-accused-person","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/26\/delhi-hc-issues-practice-direction-mandating-presence-of-rape-victim-or-person-authorised-on-her-behalf-at-the-time-of-granting-bail-to-the-accused-person\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi HC issues practice direction mandating presence of rape victim or person authorised on her behalf at the time of granting bail to the accused person"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 stood amended by the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2018 (No. 22 of 2018) w.e.f. 21-04-2018 vide which, amongst others, it has been mandated that the presence of the informant or any person authorized by him shall be obligatory at the time of hearing of the application for bail to the person under sub-section (3) of<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #008000;\">Section 376 or Section 376 AB or Section 376 DA or Section 376 DB of the Indian Penal Code and that the High Court or the Court of Session shall, before granting bail, give notice of such application to the Public Prosecutor within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of the notice of such application.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The <strong>relevant provisions of \u201cThe Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2018\u201d<\/strong> in this respect are reproduced herein below:-<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\u201c23. In Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure-<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">(a) In sub-section (1), after the first proviso, the following proviso shall be inserted, namely:-<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\u201cProvided further that the High Court or the Court of Session shall, before granting bail to a person who is accused of an offence triable under sub-Section (3) of Section 376 or Section 376-AB or Section 376-DA or Section 376-DB of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), give notice of the application for bail to the Public Prosecutor within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of the notice of such application.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">(b) After sub-section (1), the following sub-section shall be inserted, namely:-<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\u201c(1-A) The presence of the informant or any person authorized by him shall be obligatory at the time of hearing of the application for bail to the person under sub-section (3) of Section 376 or Section 376-AB or Section 376-DA or Section 376-DB of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">In order to ensure better and effective compliance of the above provisions, Hon\u2019ble the Chief Justice has been pleased to direct as under:-<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(a) Before granting bail to a person who is accused of an offence triable under sub-Section (3) of Section 376 or Section 376-AB or Section 376-DA or Section 376-DB of the Indian Penal Code, the High Court or the Court of Session shall give notice of the application for bail to the Public Prosecutor within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of the notice of such application; and<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(b) The Courts shall ensure that the Investigating Officer has, in writing as per Annexure A, communicated to the informant or any person authorized by her that her presence is obligatory at the time of hearing of the application for bail to the person under sub-section (3) of Section 376 or Section 376-AB or Section 376-DA or Section 376-DB of the Indian Penal Code. Annexure A shall be filed by the I.O. along with the Reply \/ Status Report to such bail application and the Courts shall make all endeavour to ensure the presence of the informant or any person authorized by her.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">These directions shall come into force with immediate effect.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>[Practice Direction issued dt. 24-09-2019]<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\"><strong>Delhi High Court<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 stood amended by the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2018 (No. 22 of 2018) <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,1193],"tags":[2664,37735,37676,27744],"class_list":["post-220040","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-legislationupdates","category-notifications","tag-Bail","tag-practice-direction","tag-section-376-penal-code","tag-section-439-crpc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Delhi HC issues practice direction mandating presence of rape victim or person authorised on her behalf at the time of granting bail to the accused person | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/26\/delhi-hc-issues-practice-direction-mandating-presence-of-rape-victim-or-person-authorised-on-her-behalf-at-the-time-of-granting-bail-to-the-accused-person\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi HC issues practice direction mandating presence of rape victim or person authorised on her behalf at the time of granting bail to the accused person\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 stood amended by the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2018 (No. 22 of 2018)\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/26\/delhi-hc-issues-practice-direction-mandating-presence-of-rape-victim-or-person-authorised-on-her-behalf-at-the-time-of-granting-bail-to-the-accused-person\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-09-26T09:24:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/26\/delhi-hc-issues-practice-direction-mandating-presence-of-rape-victim-or-person-authorised-on-her-behalf-at-the-time-of-granting-bail-to-the-accused-person\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/26\/delhi-hc-issues-practice-direction-mandating-presence-of-rape-victim-or-person-authorised-on-her-behalf-at-the-time-of-granting-bail-to-the-accused-person\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC issues practice direction mandating presence of rape victim or person authorised on her behalf at the time of granting bail to the accused person | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-09-26T09:24:58+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/26\/delhi-hc-issues-practice-direction-mandating-presence-of-rape-victim-or-person-authorised-on-her-behalf-at-the-time-of-granting-bail-to-the-accused-person\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/26\/delhi-hc-issues-practice-direction-mandating-presence-of-rape-victim-or-person-authorised-on-her-behalf-at-the-time-of-granting-bail-to-the-accused-person\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/26\/delhi-hc-issues-practice-direction-mandating-presence-of-rape-victim-or-person-authorised-on-her-behalf-at-the-time-of-granting-bail-to-the-accused-person\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi HC issues practice direction mandating presence of rape victim or person authorised on her behalf at the time of granting bail to the accused person\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC issues practice direction mandating presence of rape victim or person authorised on her behalf at the time of granting bail to the accused person | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/26\/delhi-hc-issues-practice-direction-mandating-presence-of-rape-victim-or-person-authorised-on-her-behalf-at-the-time-of-granting-bail-to-the-accused-person\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi HC issues practice direction mandating presence of rape victim or person authorised on her behalf at the time of granting bail to the accused person","og_description":"Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 stood amended by the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2018 (No. 22 of 2018)","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/26\/delhi-hc-issues-practice-direction-mandating-presence-of-rape-victim-or-person-authorised-on-her-behalf-at-the-time-of-granting-bail-to-the-accused-person\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-09-26T09:24:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/26\/delhi-hc-issues-practice-direction-mandating-presence-of-rape-victim-or-person-authorised-on-her-behalf-at-the-time-of-granting-bail-to-the-accused-person\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/26\/delhi-hc-issues-practice-direction-mandating-presence-of-rape-victim-or-person-authorised-on-her-behalf-at-the-time-of-granting-bail-to-the-accused-person\/","name":"Delhi HC issues practice direction mandating presence of rape victim or person authorised on her behalf at the time of granting bail to the accused person | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-09-26T09:24:58+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/26\/delhi-hc-issues-practice-direction-mandating-presence-of-rape-victim-or-person-authorised-on-her-behalf-at-the-time-of-granting-bail-to-the-accused-person\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/26\/delhi-hc-issues-practice-direction-mandating-presence-of-rape-victim-or-person-authorised-on-her-behalf-at-the-time-of-granting-bail-to-the-accused-person\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/26\/delhi-hc-issues-practice-direction-mandating-presence-of-rape-victim-or-person-authorised-on-her-behalf-at-the-time-of-granting-bail-to-the-accused-person\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi HC issues practice direction mandating presence of rape victim or person authorised on her behalf at the time of granting bail to the accused person"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":238355,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/02\/practice-procedure-del-hc-presence-of-informant-or-person-authorised-obligatory-while-hearing-application-for-bail-to-person-accused-under-pocso-act-court-extends-practice-direction-to-pocso-of\/","url_meta":{"origin":220040,"position":0},"title":"[Practice &#038; Procedure] Del HC | Presence of informant or person authorised obligatory while hearing application for bail to person accused under POCSO Act: Court extends Practice Direction to POCSO offences \u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 2, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench of G.S. Sistani and Anup Jairam Bhambhani, JJ., directed that the provisions of the Practice Direction dated 24-9-2019 shall mutatis mutandis also apply to offences under the Protections of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO). The order now passed is to be read\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":317939,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/20\/practice-directions-criminal-proceedings-pocso-act-notification-gauhati-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":220040,"position":1},"title":"Gauhati High Court adopts Practice Directions for proceedings filed under POCSO Act","author":"Sucheta","date":"March 20, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"On 15-03-2024, the Chief Justice issued a Notification regarding adoption of Practice Directions for Criminal Appeals\/Revisions or Criminal Petitions filed under the POCSO Act in Gauhati High Court and the Outlying Benches.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Gauhati High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Gauhati-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Gauhati-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Gauhati-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Gauhati-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":277792,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/21\/allahabad-high-court-anticipatory-bail-is-a-statutory-right-not-a-constitutional-right-successive-anticipatory-bail-application-not-maintainable-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":220040,"position":2},"title":"Allahabad High Court| Anticipatory bail is a statutory right not a Constitutional right; Successive anticipatory bail application not maintainable","author":"Editor","date":"November 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Allahabad high Court: In a second anticipatory bail application for offences under Sections 363, 366, 376 of the Penal Code, 1860 (\u2018IPC\u2019) and 3 or 4 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (\u2018POCSO Act\u2019), Suresh Kumar Gupta, J. said that Section 439 Code of Criminal\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":230250,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/30\/hp-hc-gravity-of-offence-alone-is-no-parameter-for-rejection-of-bail-under-s-439-crpc-object-and-test-for-grant-of-bail-restated\/","url_meta":{"origin":220040,"position":3},"title":"HP HC | Gravity of offence alone is no parameter for rejection of bail under S. 439 CrPC; Object and test for grant of bail restated","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 30, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court:\u00a0Sandeep Sharma , J., allowed the bail petition stating that object of the bail is to secure the attendance of the accused in the trial and the proper test to be applied in the solution of the question whether bail should be granted or refused is whether\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":305087,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/bail-application-set-aside-denial-informant-victim-right-criminal-proceedings-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":220040,"position":4},"title":"Karnataka HC sets aside bail order on ground of denying informant the right to participate in proceedings","author":"Sucheta","date":"October 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The High Court also issued directions for effective implementation of POCSO Act and amendments introduced in the CrPC in 2018 vis-\u00e0-vis notifying the informants or victims about filing of regular and anticipatory bail applications and other connected issues.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"karnataka high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":204746,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/02\/section-439-crpc-guiding-principle-to-adjudicate-on-bail-application-ordering-forensic-tests-while-considering-same-not-allowed-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":220040,"position":5},"title":"Section 439 CrPC guiding principle to adjudicate on bail application; ordering forensic tests while considering same not allowed: SC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 2, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Bench comprising of N.V. Ramana and M.M. Shantanagoudar, JJ. while allowing an appeal, set aside the impugned order of the Gujarat High Court which clearly violated the settled principles of criminal law jurisprudence and statutory prescriptions. The brief facts of the case were that, an FIR was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220040","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=220040"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220040\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=220040"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=220040"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=220040"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}