{"id":220032,"date":"2019-09-26T16:30:53","date_gmt":"2019-09-26T11:00:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=220032"},"modified":"2019-10-04T12:09:19","modified_gmt":"2019-10-04T06:39:19","slug":"utt-hc-application-for-eviction-not-allowed-to-be-amended-as-adding-up-a-new-ground-will-change-the-nature-of-proceedings-order-set-aside","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/26\/utt-hc-application-for-eviction-not-allowed-to-be-amended-as-adding-up-a-new-ground-will-change-the-nature-of-proceedings-order-set-aside\/","title":{"rendered":"Utt HC | Application for eviction not allowed to be amended, as adding up a new ground will change the nature of proceedings; Order set aside"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Uttaranchal High Court<\/strong>: Manoj K. Tiwari, J. contemplated a tenant\u2019s petition filed against the order passed by the Civil Judge. The particular order was related to a rent control case where the land lady\u2019s application sought amendment in the release application was allowed by the relevant authority.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The factual matrix of the case was that the respondent filed an application under Section 21(1) (a) of Uttar Pradesh Urban Building (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, for release of the premises in question on the <strong>ground of personal and bona fide <\/strong>need. Tenant (<em>petitioner herein<\/em>) filed written a statement against the ground set up in the release application. Thereafter, landlady\u2019s evidence was closed. After four years of filing the release application, landlady moved an application seeking leave to amend her release application. By the said amendment, respondent wanted to introduce a new ground for the release of the premises, namely, <strong>reconstruction of the building after demolition<\/strong>, which is an independent ground for release under Section 21(1)(b) of Act No. 13 of 1972. Respondent relied upon one letter issued by Nagar Palika Parishad, Nainital to her in which it was stated that during the inspection, it was found that cracks have developed in the walls of the building, which may pose threat to the public. Subsequently, the Civil Judge allowed the amendments proposed by the respondent, which was challenged in the instant petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The counsel for the petitioner contended that the building was in a good habitable condition and no repair or reconstruction was needed and the fact was corroborated by the report of the Court. Further, it was submitted that the letter was procured by the respondent from Nagar Palika Parishad, Nanital as it referred to information sent by the respondent to the Nagar Palika Parishad regarding the dilapidated condition of the building. He further submitted that by the impugned order, the nature of the proceeding was changed and a new case had been set up on completely new grounds.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was noted by the Court that under the Scheme of the Act, landlord sought release of building under occupation of tenant only on two grounds, namely, (i) that the building was <em>bona fide <\/em>required in its existing form or after demolition and new construction by the landlord for occupation by himself or any member of his family and (ii) that the building was in a dilapidated condition and was required for purposes of demolition and new construction. The release was originally sought on the first ground, subsequently, the second ground was sought to be added.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">According to the respondent, the building was more than 80 years old and was in a dilapidated condition. She filed the release application in the year 2012 in which she sought eviction of the tenant on the ground that the building was <em>bona fide <\/em>required by her in its existing form for occupation by herself. In her release application, she (<em>landlady<\/em>) did not take the plea that the building was in dilapidated condition. After four years, she sought amendment in the release application to add the ground available under Section 21 (1) (b) of U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972. The question raised after the plea of the respondent was that,\u00a0 if the building was in habitable condition at the time of filing of release application, then how it became dilapidated within four years. It was inconceivable that the landlady was not aware of the condition of the building at the time of filing release application. Thus, the landlady did not act with due diligence.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Court hence set aside the order passed by the Civil Judge and the petition was allowed as it was noted that the amendment sought by the respondent was belated and appeared to be an afterthought. It was stated that the amendment sought by the respondent would change the nature of the proceedings, which the Civil Judge ignored.[Hari Datt Pathak v. Sanjeeda Begum, <b><a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/RGz9DJ15\">2019 SCC OnLine Utt 936<\/a>,<\/b> decided on 19-09-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Uttaranchal High Court: Manoj K. Tiwari, J. contemplated a tenant\u2019s petition filed against the order passed by the Civil Judge. The particular <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-220032","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Utt HC | Application for eviction not allowed to be amended, as adding up a new ground will change the nature of proceedings; Order set aside | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/26\/utt-hc-application-for-eviction-not-allowed-to-be-amended-as-adding-up-a-new-ground-will-change-the-nature-of-proceedings-order-set-aside\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Utt HC | Application for eviction not allowed to be amended, as adding up a new ground will change the nature of proceedings; Order set aside\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Uttaranchal High Court: Manoj K. Tiwari, J. contemplated a tenant\u2019s petition filed against the order passed by the Civil Judge. The particular\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/26\/utt-hc-application-for-eviction-not-allowed-to-be-amended-as-adding-up-a-new-ground-will-change-the-nature-of-proceedings-order-set-aside\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-09-26T11:00:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-10-04T06:39:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/uttrakhandHC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/09\\\/26\\\/utt-hc-application-for-eviction-not-allowed-to-be-amended-as-adding-up-a-new-ground-will-change-the-nature-of-proceedings-order-set-aside\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/09\\\/26\\\/utt-hc-application-for-eviction-not-allowed-to-be-amended-as-adding-up-a-new-ground-will-change-the-nature-of-proceedings-order-set-aside\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"headline\":\"Utt HC | Application for eviction not allowed to be amended, as adding up a new ground will change the nature of proceedings; Order set aside\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-09-26T11:00:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-10-04T06:39:19+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/09\\\/26\\\/utt-hc-application-for-eviction-not-allowed-to-be-amended-as-adding-up-a-new-ground-will-change-the-nature-of-proceedings-order-set-aside\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":681,\"commentCount\":0,\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/09\\\/26\\\/utt-hc-application-for-eviction-not-allowed-to-be-amended-as-adding-up-a-new-ground-will-change-the-nature-of-proceedings-order-set-aside\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/09\\\/26\\\/utt-hc-application-for-eviction-not-allowed-to-be-amended-as-adding-up-a-new-ground-will-change-the-nature-of-proceedings-order-set-aside\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/09\\\/26\\\/utt-hc-application-for-eviction-not-allowed-to-be-amended-as-adding-up-a-new-ground-will-change-the-nature-of-proceedings-order-set-aside\\\/\",\"name\":\"Utt HC | Application for eviction not allowed to be amended, as adding up a new ground will change the nature of proceedings; Order set aside | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-09-26T11:00:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-10-04T06:39:19+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/09\\\/26\\\/utt-hc-application-for-eviction-not-allowed-to-be-amended-as-adding-up-a-new-ground-will-change-the-nature-of-proceedings-order-set-aside\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/09\\\/26\\\/utt-hc-application-for-eviction-not-allowed-to-be-amended-as-adding-up-a-new-ground-will-change-the-nature-of-proceedings-order-set-aside\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/09\\\/26\\\/utt-hc-application-for-eviction-not-allowed-to-be-amended-as-adding-up-a-new-ground-will-change-the-nature-of-proceedings-order-set-aside\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Utt HC | Application for eviction not allowed to be amended, as adding up a new ground will change the nature of proceedings; Order set aside\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Utt HC | Application for eviction not allowed to be amended, as adding up a new ground will change the nature of proceedings; Order set aside | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/26\/utt-hc-application-for-eviction-not-allowed-to-be-amended-as-adding-up-a-new-ground-will-change-the-nature-of-proceedings-order-set-aside\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Utt HC | Application for eviction not allowed to be amended, as adding up a new ground will change the nature of proceedings; Order set aside","og_description":"Uttaranchal High Court: Manoj K. Tiwari, J. contemplated a tenant\u2019s petition filed against the order passed by the Civil Judge. The particular","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/26\/utt-hc-application-for-eviction-not-allowed-to-be-amended-as-adding-up-a-new-ground-will-change-the-nature-of-proceedings-order-set-aside\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-09-26T11:00:53+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-10-04T06:39:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/uttrakhandHC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/26\/utt-hc-application-for-eviction-not-allowed-to-be-amended-as-adding-up-a-new-ground-will-change-the-nature-of-proceedings-order-set-aside\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/26\/utt-hc-application-for-eviction-not-allowed-to-be-amended-as-adding-up-a-new-ground-will-change-the-nature-of-proceedings-order-set-aside\/"},"author":{"name":"Bhumika Indulia","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"headline":"Utt HC | Application for eviction not allowed to be amended, as adding up a new ground will change the nature of proceedings; Order set aside","datePublished":"2019-09-26T11:00:53+00:00","dateModified":"2019-10-04T06:39:19+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/26\/utt-hc-application-for-eviction-not-allowed-to-be-amended-as-adding-up-a-new-ground-will-change-the-nature-of-proceedings-order-set-aside\/"},"wordCount":681,"commentCount":0,"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/26\/utt-hc-application-for-eviction-not-allowed-to-be-amended-as-adding-up-a-new-ground-will-change-the-nature-of-proceedings-order-set-aside\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/26\/utt-hc-application-for-eviction-not-allowed-to-be-amended-as-adding-up-a-new-ground-will-change-the-nature-of-proceedings-order-set-aside\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/26\/utt-hc-application-for-eviction-not-allowed-to-be-amended-as-adding-up-a-new-ground-will-change-the-nature-of-proceedings-order-set-aside\/","name":"Utt HC | Application for eviction not allowed to be amended, as adding up a new ground will change the nature of proceedings; Order set aside | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-09-26T11:00:53+00:00","dateModified":"2019-10-04T06:39:19+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/26\/utt-hc-application-for-eviction-not-allowed-to-be-amended-as-adding-up-a-new-ground-will-change-the-nature-of-proceedings-order-set-aside\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/26\/utt-hc-application-for-eviction-not-allowed-to-be-amended-as-adding-up-a-new-ground-will-change-the-nature-of-proceedings-order-set-aside\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/26\/utt-hc-application-for-eviction-not-allowed-to-be-amended-as-adding-up-a-new-ground-will-change-the-nature-of-proceedings-order-set-aside\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Utt HC | Application for eviction not allowed to be amended, as adding up a new ground will change the nature of proceedings; Order set aside"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":60932,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/10\/no-express-prohibition-under-the-rent-act-debarring-owner-landlord-from-applying-for-release-through-power-of-attorney-holder\/","url_meta":{"origin":220032,"position":0},"title":"No express prohibition under the Rent Act debarring owner-landlord from applying for release through power of attorney holder","author":"Sucheta","date":"August 10, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court:\u00a0\u00a0 Deciding the merits of a release application for eviction of a tenant filed through a power of attorney holder, the Court held that there is no express prohibition under the Rent Act debarring the owner-landlord from applying for release through power of attorney holder and that there\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":207737,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/08\/del-hc-landlord-is-the-best-judge-of-his-own-needs-petition-against-order-of-additional-rent-controller-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":220032,"position":1},"title":"Del HC | &#8220;Landlord is the best judge of his own needs&#8221;: petition against order of Additional Rent Controller dismissed","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 8, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Bench of Anu Malhotra, J. dismissed a revision petition filed against the order Additional Rent Controller whereby the tenant's application for leave to defend the eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 filed by the landlord was dismissed. The landlord had filed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":220359,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/30\/hp-hc-cause-of-action-can-be-inherited-by-successors-of-the-original-landlord-in-cases-of-eviction-suits\/","url_meta":{"origin":220032,"position":2},"title":"HP HC | Cause of action can be inherited by successors of the original landlord in cases of eviction suits","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 30, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Sandeep Sharma, J. upheld the order passed by the Rent Controller whereby an appeal was filed under Section 24(5) of the Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, challenging the order whereby an application filed by respondents under Order 22 Rule 3 read with Section 151 of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":224070,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/09\/raj-hc-time-bound-disposal-of-eviction-application-put-on-hold-since-year-2018-before-rent-tribunal-directed\/","url_meta":{"origin":220032,"position":3},"title":"Raj HC | Time-bound disposal of eviction application put on hold since year 2018 before Rent Tribunal directed \u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 9, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Prakash Gupta, J. allowed this writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.\u00a0 The petitioner here filed an eviction application on 26-04-2018 under Section 9 of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001. The Act provides for disposal of eviction petition within 240 days from\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":235008,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/28\/raj-hc-petitioner-failed-to-point-out-any-averment-or-omission-in-eviction-application-that-might-invite-application-of-or-7-r-11-cpc-court-dismisses-petition\/","url_meta":{"origin":220032,"position":4},"title":"Raj HC | Petitioner failed to point out any averment or omission in eviction application that might invite application of Or. 7 R. 11 CPC: Court dismisses petition","author":"Editor","date":"August 28, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Mahendar Kumar Goyal, J., dismissed a writ petition which was filed aggrieved by the order of the Rent Tribunal which had dismissed an application filed by the petitioner\/non-applicant\/tenant under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. The respondent-applicant had filed an Original Application under Section 18 of the Rajasthan\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":243004,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/29\/ker-hc-eviction-and-rent-control-rent-control-court-has-power-under-s-5-of-limitation-act-to-condone-delay-if-sufficient-cause-is-shown-petition-allowed\/","url_meta":{"origin":220032,"position":5},"title":"Ker HC | [Eviction and Rent Control] Rent Control Court has power under S. 5 of Limitation Act to condone delay, if sufficient cause is shown; Petition allowed","author":"Editor","date":"January 29, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: A. Hariprasad J., while hearing a revision petition, set aside the order passed by the Rent Control Appellate Authority, Kozhikode on the application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act and remitted the matter to be considered on merits as expeditiously as possible. Revision petitioner (tenant)\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220032","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=220032"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220032\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=220032"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=220032"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=220032"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}