{"id":219762,"date":"2019-09-20T14:42:21","date_gmt":"2019-09-20T09:12:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=219762"},"modified":"2019-09-20T14:42:21","modified_gmt":"2019-09-20T09:12:21","slug":"ayodhya-hearing-sc-to-hear-the-matter-for-an-extra-hour-in-order-to-conclude-the-hearing-by-oct-18","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/20\/ayodhya-hearing-sc-to-hear-the-matter-for-an-extra-hour-in-order-to-conclude-the-hearing-by-oct-18\/","title":{"rendered":"Ayodhya hearing| SC to hear the matter for an extra hour in order to conclude the hearing by Oct 18"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court: <\/strong>The 5-judge bench of Ranjan Gogoi, CJ and SA Bobde, Dr. DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and SA Nazeer, JJ has decided to hear the Ayodhya land dispute case for an extra hour from next Monday in order to conclude the hearing before the October 18 deadline fixed by it.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The bench told the counsel for both the Hindu and Muslim parties that it has decided to rise at 5 pm instead of 4 pm, which is the scheduled time to wrap up the day&#8217;s proceedings in the Supreme Court. <em>&#8220;We can sit for extra one hour from Monday (September 23),&#8221;<\/em> it said.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court has set October 18 as deadline for completion of all arguments in the protracted land title dispute, a move that has raised the possibility of a verdict in the politically sensitive case in the middle of November.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A 5-judge bench is conducting a day-to-day hearing in the Ayodhya title dispute case, after it had on\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2019\/08\/02\/ayodhya-dispute-sc-to-hold-day-to-day-hearing-from-aug-6-after-mediation-committee-fails\/\">August 2 observed that since the mediation panel on Ayodhya matter has failed to achieve any final settlement in the matter, it will hold a day-to-day hearing in the case from August 6<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Fourteen appeals are pending before the apex court against the 2010 Allahabad High Court verdict which ordered equal division of the 2.77-acre disputed land in Ayodhya among the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and Ram Lalla.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The 16th-century Babri Masjid was demolished on December 6, 1992.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>(Source: PTI)<\/em><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>More from the day-to-day hearing in Ayodhya Title Dispute:<\/strong><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2019\/09\/18\/ayodhya-hearing-sc-asks-parties-to-come-up-with-tentative-timeline-for-conclusion-of-arguments\/\"><strong>SC asks parties to come up with tentative timeline for conclusion of arguments<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2019\/08\/27\/ayodhya-hearing-sc-slams-nirmohi-akhara-for-opposing-ram-lallas-plea-says-you-stand-or-fall-together\/\"><strong>SC slams Nirmohi Akhara for opposing Ram Lalla\u2019s plea; Says you \u2018stand\u2019 or \u2018fall\u2019 together<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2019\/08\/06\/ayodhya-hearing-day-1-no-muslim-has-entered-the-disputed-land-since-1934-nirmohi-akhara\/\"><strong>No Muslim has entered the disputed land since 1934: Nirmohi Akhara<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2019\/08\/07\/ayodhya-hearing-day-2-sc-seeks-evidence-of-possession-of-ramjanmabhumi-from-nirmohi-akhara\/\"><strong>SC seeks evidence of possession of Ramjanmabhumi from Nirmohi Akhara<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2019\/08\/08\/ayodhya-hearing-day-3both-hindus-muslims-have-always-called-the-disputed-site-a-janmasthana-ram-lallas-counsel\/\"><strong>Both Hindus &amp; Muslims have always called the disputed site a \u2018Janmasthana\u2019: Ram Lalla\u2019s counsel<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/ayodhya-hearing-day-4-sr-adv-rajeev-dhavan-calls-the-decision-to-hear-the-case-5-days-in-a-week-is-inhuman\/\"><strong>SC rejects Sr Adv Rajeev Dhavan\u2019s plea against 5-days a week hearing<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2019\/08\/14\/ayodhya-hearing-day-5-arguments-advanced-on-whether-there-was-an-existing-temple-at-the-disputed-site\/\"><strong>Arguments advanced on whether there was an existing temple at the disputed site<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2019\/08\/14\/ayodhya-hearing-day-6-court-shouldnt-go-beyond-rationality-of-belief-of-ayodhya-being-lord-rams-birthplace-ram-lallas-counsel\/\"><strong>Court shouldn\u2019t go beyond rationality of belief of Ayodhya being Lord Ram\u2019s birthplace: Ram Lalla\u2019s counsel<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2019\/08\/17\/ayodhya-hearing-day-7-excavations-show-that-a-massive-lord-ram-temple-existed-at-the-disputed-site-ram-lallas-counsel\/\"><strong>Excavations show that a massive Lord Ram temple existed at the disputed site: Ram Lalla\u2019s counsel<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2019\/08\/21\/ayodhya-hearing-day-8-babri-masjid-was-built-either-on-the-ruins-of-ram-mandir-or-by-pulling-it-down-ram-lallas-counsel\/\"><strong>Babri Masjid was built either on the ruins of Ram Mandir or by pulling it down: Ram Lalla\u2019s counsel<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2019\/08\/27\/ayodhya-hearing-there-was-a-temple-in-the-inner-courtyard-of-the-disputed-site-nirmohi-akhara\/\"><strong>There was a temple in the inner courtyard of the disputed site: Nirmohi Akhara<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b><strong>Also read:<\/strong><\/b><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2019\/03\/08\/ayodhya-dispute-to-be-settled-by-a-confidential-court-monitored-mediation-proceedings\/\"><b><strong>Ayodhya Dispute to be settled by a \u2018confidential\u2019 Court monitored mediation; No Gag order passed [Full Report]<\/strong><\/b><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2019\/02\/26\/breaking-should-ayodhya-dispute-be-decided-by-mediation-sc-to-decide-on-march\/\"><b><strong>Should Ayodhya dispute be decided by mediation? SC to decide on March 6 [Full Report]<\/strong><\/b><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2018\/09\/27\/ayodhya-matter-not-to-be-referred-to-larger-bench-matter-not-barred-by-res-judicata-in-ismail-faruqui-case-either-sc\/\">Ram Mandir Babri Masjid| Ayodhya matter not to be referred to larger bench; matter not barred by res judicata in Ismail Faruqui case either: SC<\/a><\/strong><\/b><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court: The 5-judge bench of Ranjan Gogoi, CJ and SA Bobde, Dr. DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and SA Nazeer, JJ has <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1188,2],"tags":[16201,3033,31110,3740,34850,20801,31077],"class_list":["post-219762","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hot_off_the_press","category-news","tag-ayodhya","tag-Babri_Masjid","tag-live-streaming","tag-mediation","tag-nirmohi-akhara","tag-ram-janmabhoomi","tag-ram-mandir-babri-masjid"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Ayodhya hearing| SC to hear the matter for an extra hour in order to conclude the hearing by Oct 18 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/20\/ayodhya-hearing-sc-to-hear-the-matter-for-an-extra-hour-in-order-to-conclude-the-hearing-by-oct-18\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ayodhya hearing| SC to hear the matter for an extra hour in order to conclude the hearing by Oct 18\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: The 5-judge bench of Ranjan Gogoi, CJ and SA Bobde, Dr. DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and SA Nazeer, JJ has\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/20\/ayodhya-hearing-sc-to-hear-the-matter-for-an-extra-hour-in-order-to-conclude-the-hearing-by-oct-18\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-09-20T09:12:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/20\/ayodhya-hearing-sc-to-hear-the-matter-for-an-extra-hour-in-order-to-conclude-the-hearing-by-oct-18\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/20\/ayodhya-hearing-sc-to-hear-the-matter-for-an-extra-hour-in-order-to-conclude-the-hearing-by-oct-18\/\",\"name\":\"Ayodhya hearing| SC to hear the matter for an extra hour in order to conclude the hearing by Oct 18 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/20\/ayodhya-hearing-sc-to-hear-the-matter-for-an-extra-hour-in-order-to-conclude-the-hearing-by-oct-18\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/20\/ayodhya-hearing-sc-to-hear-the-matter-for-an-extra-hour-in-order-to-conclude-the-hearing-by-oct-18\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-09-20T09:12:21+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/20\/ayodhya-hearing-sc-to-hear-the-matter-for-an-extra-hour-in-order-to-conclude-the-hearing-by-oct-18\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/20\/ayodhya-hearing-sc-to-hear-the-matter-for-an-extra-hour-in-order-to-conclude-the-hearing-by-oct-18\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/20\/ayodhya-hearing-sc-to-hear-the-matter-for-an-extra-hour-in-order-to-conclude-the-hearing-by-oct-18\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/20\/ayodhya-hearing-sc-to-hear-the-matter-for-an-extra-hour-in-order-to-conclude-the-hearing-by-oct-18\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ayodhya hearing| SC to hear the matter for an extra hour in order to conclude the hearing by Oct 18\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\",\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"caption\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\"},\"description\":\"Senior Associate Editor\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ayodhya hearing| SC to hear the matter for an extra hour in order to conclude the hearing by Oct 18 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/20\/ayodhya-hearing-sc-to-hear-the-matter-for-an-extra-hour-in-order-to-conclude-the-hearing-by-oct-18\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ayodhya hearing| SC to hear the matter for an extra hour in order to conclude the hearing by Oct 18","og_description":"Supreme Court: The 5-judge bench of Ranjan Gogoi, CJ and SA Bobde, Dr. DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and SA Nazeer, JJ has","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/20\/ayodhya-hearing-sc-to-hear-the-matter-for-an-extra-hour-in-order-to-conclude-the-hearing-by-oct-18\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-09-20T09:12:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Prachi Bhardwaj","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/20\/ayodhya-hearing-sc-to-hear-the-matter-for-an-extra-hour-in-order-to-conclude-the-hearing-by-oct-18\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/20\/ayodhya-hearing-sc-to-hear-the-matter-for-an-extra-hour-in-order-to-conclude-the-hearing-by-oct-18\/","name":"Ayodhya hearing| SC to hear the matter for an extra hour in order to conclude the hearing by Oct 18 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/20\/ayodhya-hearing-sc-to-hear-the-matter-for-an-extra-hour-in-order-to-conclude-the-hearing-by-oct-18\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/20\/ayodhya-hearing-sc-to-hear-the-matter-for-an-extra-hour-in-order-to-conclude-the-hearing-by-oct-18\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2019-09-20T09:12:21+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/20\/ayodhya-hearing-sc-to-hear-the-matter-for-an-extra-hour-in-order-to-conclude-the-hearing-by-oct-18\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/20\/ayodhya-hearing-sc-to-hear-the-matter-for-an-extra-hour-in-order-to-conclude-the-hearing-by-oct-18\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/20\/ayodhya-hearing-sc-to-hear-the-matter-for-an-extra-hour-in-order-to-conclude-the-hearing-by-oct-18\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/20\/ayodhya-hearing-sc-to-hear-the-matter-for-an-extra-hour-in-order-to-conclude-the-hearing-by-oct-18\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ayodhya hearing| SC to hear the matter for an extra hour in order to conclude the hearing by Oct 18"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942","name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","caption":"Prachi Bhardwaj"},"description":"Senior Associate Editor","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":220927,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/16\/ayodhya-hearing-40-days-hearing-comes-to-an-end-verdict-reserved\/","url_meta":{"origin":219762,"position":0},"title":"Ayodhya hearing| 40-days hearing comes to an end; Verdict reserved","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 16, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 40-days long Ayodhya title dispute hearing has finally come to an end today. The 5-judge bench of Ranjan Gogoi, CJ and SA Bobde, Dr. DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and SA Nazeer, JJ has reserved it's verdict in one of the most controversial cases this country has seen.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":220035,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/26\/ayodhya-hearing-wont-hear-the-matter-for-even-a-single-extra-day-after-october-18-sc-to-all-counsels\/","url_meta":{"origin":219762,"position":1},"title":"Ayodhya hearing| Won&#8217;t hear the matter for even a single extra day after October 18: SC to all counsels","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"September 26, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Indicating that judgment in Ayodhya dispute case is likely to be delivered before CJI Ranjan Gogoi's retirement in November, the 5-judge bench of Ranjan Gogoi, CJ and SA Bobde, Dr. DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and SA Nazeer, JJ has said that it cannot grant even a single extra\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":220377,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/30\/ayodhya-hearing-we-dont-want-any-mediation-ram-lalla-virajmans-counsel\/","url_meta":{"origin":219762,"position":2},"title":"Ayodhya hearing| We don&#8217;t want any mediation: Ram Lalla Virajman&#8217;s counsel","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"September 30, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Ram Lalla Virajman, one of the parties in the Ayodhya title dispute case, on Monday told the Supreme Court that it does not want any mediation in the case. The 5-judge bench of Ranjan Gogoi, CJ and SA Bobde, Dr. DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and SA Nazeer, JJ\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217876,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/ayodhya-hearing-day-4-sr-adv-rajeev-dhavan-calls-the-decision-to-hear-the-case-5-days-in-a-week-is-inhuman\/","url_meta":{"origin":219762,"position":3},"title":"Ayodhya hearing| SC rejects Sr Adv Rajeev Dhavan&#8217;s plea against 5-days a week hearing","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 9, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court:\u00a0 On the fourth day of hearing in the Ayodhya title dispute case, the counsel appearing for one of the Muslim parties, raised objection over the Supreme Court's decision to hear the appeals on five days in a week rather than three. The Court, however, refused\u00a0 to conduct a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":220900,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/16\/ayodhya-hearing-this-matter-will-be-over-by-5pm-today-enough-is-enough-cji\/","url_meta":{"origin":219762,"position":4},"title":"Ayodhya Hearing| This matter will be over by 5pm today; enough is enough: CJI","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 16, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: On the 40th day of the Ayodhya Title dispute hearing, Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi said that the daily hearing on the Ram Mandir-Babri Masjid land dispute will end by 5 pm today. \"By 5 pm this matter is going to be over. Enough is enough,\" Justice\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":219685,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/18\/ayodhya-hearing-sc-asks-parties-to-come-up-with-tentative-timeline-for-conclusion-of-arguments\/","url_meta":{"origin":219762,"position":5},"title":"Ayodhya hearing| SC asks parties to come up with tentative timeline for conclusion of arguments","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"September 18, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 5-judge bench of Ranjan Gogoi, CJ and SA Bobde, Dr. DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and SA Nazeer, JJ has asked the parties in the Ayodhya land dispute to come up with a tentative time schedule or date when the arguments can be concluded. On the 25th day\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/219762","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=219762"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/219762\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=219762"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=219762"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=219762"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}