{"id":219680,"date":"2019-09-18T10:17:30","date_gmt":"2019-09-18T04:47:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=219680"},"modified":"2019-09-18T10:17:30","modified_gmt":"2019-09-18T04:47:30","slug":"del-hc-objections-under-s-47-cpc-cannot-be-filed-by-signature-of-the-advocate-alone-signature-of-client-necessary","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/18\/del-hc-objections-under-s-47-cpc-cannot-be-filed-by-signature-of-the-advocate-alone-signature-of-client-necessary\/","title":{"rendered":"Del HC | Objections under S. 47 CPC cannot be filed by signature of the Advocate alone, signature of client necessary"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Delhi High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>Pratibha M. Singh, J. dismissed a petition filed against the order whereby the objections filed on behalf of the petitioner under Section 47 CPC (<em>questions to be <\/em><em>determined by the Court executing decree)\u00a0<\/em>were rejected.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The respondent herein filed a suit against the petitioner under Section 13 read with 27 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 seeking a decree of divorce as well as the return of <em>stridhan.\u00a0<\/em>The trial judge granted the decree of divorce and directed the petitioner to return the <em>stridhan <\/em>as claimed by the respondent. The decree came for execution and notice was issued to the petitioner. He filed objections under Section 47 CPC. The said objections were signed by his Advocate. The affidavit supporting the objections was also signed by the Advocate. The trial court rejected the objections on the ground that the petitioner had neither signed the objections nor filed an affidavit in support thereof.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The High Court observed that the\u00a0<strong>objections under Section 47 CPC constitute pleadings.\u00a0<\/strong>Court stated that,\u00a0<strong>&#8220;Under the provisions of CPC and under the Delhi High Court Rules, pleadings ought to be signed by the client and cannot be signed merely by the counsel. Further, the objections ought to be either verified or be accompanied with the affidavit of the client. Even in the rules applicable to the Executing Court and the Family Court, the pleadings have to be signed and verified by the client and not just by the counsel. This is clear from a reading of Order VI Rule 14, Order VI Rule 15, CPC and Rule 4, Part C, Chapter 1, Practice in the Trial of Civil Suits, Instructions to Civil Courts in Delhi (Vol. I of High Court Rules and Orders).<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court stated that,\u00a0<strong>pleadings have to be verified by the parties. Pleaders are entitled to sign the same but not in substitution of the clients. The signatures of the Pleader would be only in addition to that of the client.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court also noted a settled position that advocates, who act on behalf of their clients, cannot verify the pleadings on behalf of their clients. This is clear from a perusal of the Bar Council of India Rules, which prohibit an advocate from accepting a brief in which he has reason to believe that he will be a witness.\u00a0<strong>&#8220;Under certain circumstances, giving of evidence could be directed in proceedings under Section 47 CPC. Accordingly, if an advocate signs the affidavit in support of the objections, then the advocate may be called for cross-examination as a witness, and such a situation would be in clear violation of the Bar Council of India Rules.&#8221;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In such view of the matter, Court did not find any infirmity in the impugned order, and resultantly the appeal was dismissed.[Shyamji Mehrotra v. Shipra Mehrotra, CM(M) 1315 of 2019, decided on 04-09-2019]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court:\u00a0Pratibha M. Singh, J. dismissed a petition filed against the order whereby the objections filed on behalf of the petitioner <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[26624,31837,33086,37623,37624],"class_list":["post-219680","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-bar-council-of-india-rules","tag-objections","tag-pleadings","tag-section-47-cpc","tag-signature-of-client"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Del HC | Objections under S. 47 CPC cannot be filed by signature of the Advocate alone, signature of client necessary | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/18\/del-hc-objections-under-s-47-cpc-cannot-be-filed-by-signature-of-the-advocate-alone-signature-of-client-necessary\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Del HC | Objections under S. 47 CPC cannot be filed by signature of the Advocate alone, signature of client necessary\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Pratibha M. Singh, J. dismissed a petition filed against the order whereby the objections filed on behalf of the petitioner\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/18\/del-hc-objections-under-s-47-cpc-cannot-be-filed-by-signature-of-the-advocate-alone-signature-of-client-necessary\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-09-18T04:47:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/18\/del-hc-objections-under-s-47-cpc-cannot-be-filed-by-signature-of-the-advocate-alone-signature-of-client-necessary\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/18\/del-hc-objections-under-s-47-cpc-cannot-be-filed-by-signature-of-the-advocate-alone-signature-of-client-necessary\/\",\"name\":\"Del HC | Objections under S. 47 CPC cannot be filed by signature of the Advocate alone, signature of client necessary | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-09-18T04:47:30+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/18\/del-hc-objections-under-s-47-cpc-cannot-be-filed-by-signature-of-the-advocate-alone-signature-of-client-necessary\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/18\/del-hc-objections-under-s-47-cpc-cannot-be-filed-by-signature-of-the-advocate-alone-signature-of-client-necessary\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/18\/del-hc-objections-under-s-47-cpc-cannot-be-filed-by-signature-of-the-advocate-alone-signature-of-client-necessary\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Del HC | Objections under S. 47 CPC cannot be filed by signature of the Advocate alone, signature of client necessary\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Del HC | Objections under S. 47 CPC cannot be filed by signature of the Advocate alone, signature of client necessary | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/18\/del-hc-objections-under-s-47-cpc-cannot-be-filed-by-signature-of-the-advocate-alone-signature-of-client-necessary\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Del HC | Objections under S. 47 CPC cannot be filed by signature of the Advocate alone, signature of client necessary","og_description":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Pratibha M. Singh, J. dismissed a petition filed against the order whereby the objections filed on behalf of the petitioner","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/18\/del-hc-objections-under-s-47-cpc-cannot-be-filed-by-signature-of-the-advocate-alone-signature-of-client-necessary\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-09-18T04:47:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/18\/del-hc-objections-under-s-47-cpc-cannot-be-filed-by-signature-of-the-advocate-alone-signature-of-client-necessary\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/18\/del-hc-objections-under-s-47-cpc-cannot-be-filed-by-signature-of-the-advocate-alone-signature-of-client-necessary\/","name":"Del HC | Objections under S. 47 CPC cannot be filed by signature of the Advocate alone, signature of client necessary | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-09-18T04:47:30+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/18\/del-hc-objections-under-s-47-cpc-cannot-be-filed-by-signature-of-the-advocate-alone-signature-of-client-necessary\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/18\/del-hc-objections-under-s-47-cpc-cannot-be-filed-by-signature-of-the-advocate-alone-signature-of-client-necessary\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/18\/del-hc-objections-under-s-47-cpc-cannot-be-filed-by-signature-of-the-advocate-alone-signature-of-client-necessary\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Del HC | Objections under S. 47 CPC cannot be filed by signature of the Advocate alone, signature of client necessary"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":320388,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/19\/objections-under-s-47-cpc-applicable-to-execution-of-decrees-not-maintainable-against-arbitral-awards-allahabad-hc-imposes-5-lakhs-state-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":219680,"position":0},"title":"&#8216;Objections under S. 47 CPC are applicable only to execution of decrees not maintainable against arbitral awards\u2019; Allahabad HC imposes Rs 5 lakhs cost on State","author":"Editor","date":"April 19, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cImposition of costs in cases of frivolous litigation is essential to maintain the integrity, efficiency, and fairness of the judicial system. By deterring abuse of the legal process, promoting judicial efficiency, and upholding the principles of fairness and justice, cost imposition serves to safeguard the rights of individuals, protect the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":207251,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/26\/executing-court-cannot-go-beyond-the-decree-held-objections-rightly-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":219680,"position":1},"title":"Executing Court cannot go beyond the decree; held objections rightly dismissed","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 26, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Petitioner preferred this civil revision before a Single Judge Bench of Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava, J., under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code, against the order passed by 3rd Civil Judge, Class-II, whereby the objection raised by the petitioner under Section 47 read with Section 151 was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":246488,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/05\/section-151-cpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":219680,"position":2},"title":"Chh HC | Application under Or. 9 R. 4 of CPC also attracts provisions under S. 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955","author":"Editor","date":"April 5, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant, J. sets aside the impugned order and allowed the petition. The facts of the case are such that the respondent in a fraudulent manner obtained a decree of divorce which was granted on mutual consent. The petitioner filed First Appeal (Misc.) which was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":263412,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/11\/lower-courts-to-deal-with-entire-process-expeditiously-after-receipt-of-the-application-under-s-151-read-with-or-20-r-6-a-cpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":219680,"position":3},"title":"Megh HC | Lower Courts to deal with entire process expeditiously after receipt of the application under S. 151 read with Or. 20 R. 6-A CPC","author":"Editor","date":"March 11, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Meghalaya High Court: H.S. Thangkhiew, J. while hearing a revision application allowed the same and directed the lower court to deal with the entire process expeditiously immediately on receipt of the application under Section 151 read with Order 20 Rule 6-A CPC. The revision application under Article 227 of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":290178,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/20\/delhi-high-court-states-that-conclusive-foreign-judgment-would-be-enforceable-in-india-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":219680,"position":4},"title":"Conclusive foreign judgment would be enforceable in India: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"April 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court held that the judgement passed by the High Court of England was conclusive and would not fall within the exceptions carved out in Section 13 of CPC and was thus, found to be duly executable in India","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":255568,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/14\/half-a-century-old-litigation-we-wish-it-is-the-knock-out-round-sc-holds-objections-cant-be-raised-in-instalments-res-judicata-applicable-on-execution-proceedings\/","url_meta":{"origin":219680,"position":5},"title":"&#8216;Half a century old litigation, we wish it is the knock out round!&#8217; SC holds objections can\u2019t be raised in instalments; Res judicata applicable on execution proceedings","author":"Editor","date":"October 14, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\"...the case on hand is fit to be included in the syllabus of a law school as a study material for students to get equipped with the various provisions of the Code relating to execution.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/219680","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=219680"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/219680\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=219680"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=219680"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=219680"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}