{"id":219628,"date":"2019-09-17T09:30:03","date_gmt":"2019-09-17T04:00:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=219628"},"modified":"2019-09-20T11:05:48","modified_gmt":"2019-09-20T05:35:48","slug":"del-hc-non-possession-of-valid-driving-license-by-itself-is-no-reason-for-not-granting-compensation-if-accident-proved-to-be-caused-by-rash-and-negligent-driving-of-offender","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/17\/del-hc-non-possession-of-valid-driving-license-by-itself-is-no-reason-for-not-granting-compensation-if-accident-proved-to-be-caused-by-rash-and-negligent-driving-of-offender\/","title":{"rendered":"Del HC | Non-possession of valid driving license by itself is no reason for not granting compensation if accident proved to be caused by rash and negligent driving of offender"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Delhi High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>Najmi Waziri, J. dismissed an appeal filed by the insurer against the award of compensation made by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, and also rejected insurer&#8217;s claim to recover the amount so awarded from the owner of the offending vehicle.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The insurer, represented by Hetu Arora Sethi, Advocate impugned the award of compensation on the ground, inter alia, that the deceased (a minor) was not holding a valid driving license at the time of the accident and was liable for contributory negligence.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Perusing the record and noting the arguments on the issue, dealt with by the Tribunal, the High Court observed:\u00a0<strong>&#8220;Non-possession of the driving license by itself would not be a reason for not granting the award of compensation, if it is proven that the accident was on account of rash and negligent driving of the offending vehicle.&#8221;\u00a0<\/strong>The High Court was of the opinion that the rashness and negligence of the offending vehicle had been duly established in terms of the facts and reasoning of the impugned order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Relying on\u00a0<em>Sudhir Kumar v. Surinder Singh,\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/l5dDyR3Y\">(2008) 12 SCC 436<\/a>, the Court reached the conclusion that the rationale of the impugned order could not be faulted because the negligence of the offending vehicle was evidently much larger than that of the deceased motorcyclist. The offending vehicle was imprudently being driven, i.e. in a rash and negligent manner, as stated by the eyewitness &#8212; the pillion rider. Accordingly, the argument regarding apportionment of liability too was rejected.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The insurer lastly contended that the right of recovery was not granted to them although the driver was not holding a valid driving license for the insured vehicle which was a goods-carrier\/ transport vehicle; the driver possessed a license only for a Light Motor Vehicle and motorcycle. It was noted that this issue has been referred to a 3-Judge Bench by the Supreme Court in\u00a0<em>Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rambha Devi,\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/wLOhnXl7\">2018 SCC OnLine SC 3325<\/a>. However, the High Court held that till the disposal of the said matter, the issue is governed by\u00a0<em>Mukund Dewangan v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.,\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/D0nW3Rgx\">(2017) 14 SCC 663<\/a>, which held that\u00a0<i>&#8220;there is no requirement to\u00a0obtain separate endorsement to drive transport vehicle, and if a driver is holding license to drive light motor vehicle, he can drive transport vehicle of such class without any endorsement to that effect.&#8221;<\/i><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Resultantly, the appeal was dismissed.[National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sushila, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/2ECSOj0p\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Del 10045<\/b><\/a>, decided on 21-08-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court:\u00a0Najmi Waziri, J. dismissed an appeal filed by the insurer against the award of compensation made by the Motor Accident <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2728,37601,37600,37599],"class_list":["post-219628","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-compensation","tag-insurers-claim","tag-non-possession-of-driving-license","tag-owner-of-offending-vehicle"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Del HC | Non-possession of valid driving license by itself is no reason for not granting compensation if accident proved to be caused by rash and negligent driving of offender | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/17\/del-hc-non-possession-of-valid-driving-license-by-itself-is-no-reason-for-not-granting-compensation-if-accident-proved-to-be-caused-by-rash-and-negligent-driving-of-offender\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Del HC | Non-possession of valid driving license by itself is no reason for not granting compensation if accident proved to be caused by rash and negligent driving of offender\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Najmi Waziri, J. dismissed an appeal filed by the insurer against the award of compensation made by the Motor Accident\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/17\/del-hc-non-possession-of-valid-driving-license-by-itself-is-no-reason-for-not-granting-compensation-if-accident-proved-to-be-caused-by-rash-and-negligent-driving-of-offender\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-09-17T04:00:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-09-20T05:35:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/17\/del-hc-non-possession-of-valid-driving-license-by-itself-is-no-reason-for-not-granting-compensation-if-accident-proved-to-be-caused-by-rash-and-negligent-driving-of-offender\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/17\/del-hc-non-possession-of-valid-driving-license-by-itself-is-no-reason-for-not-granting-compensation-if-accident-proved-to-be-caused-by-rash-and-negligent-driving-of-offender\/\",\"name\":\"Del HC | Non-possession of valid driving license by itself is no reason for not granting compensation if accident proved to be caused by rash and negligent driving of offender | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-09-17T04:00:03+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-09-20T05:35:48+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/17\/del-hc-non-possession-of-valid-driving-license-by-itself-is-no-reason-for-not-granting-compensation-if-accident-proved-to-be-caused-by-rash-and-negligent-driving-of-offender\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/17\/del-hc-non-possession-of-valid-driving-license-by-itself-is-no-reason-for-not-granting-compensation-if-accident-proved-to-be-caused-by-rash-and-negligent-driving-of-offender\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/17\/del-hc-non-possession-of-valid-driving-license-by-itself-is-no-reason-for-not-granting-compensation-if-accident-proved-to-be-caused-by-rash-and-negligent-driving-of-offender\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Del HC | Non-possession of valid driving license by itself is no reason for not granting compensation if accident proved to be caused by rash and negligent driving of offender\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Del HC | Non-possession of valid driving license by itself is no reason for not granting compensation if accident proved to be caused by rash and negligent driving of offender | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/17\/del-hc-non-possession-of-valid-driving-license-by-itself-is-no-reason-for-not-granting-compensation-if-accident-proved-to-be-caused-by-rash-and-negligent-driving-of-offender\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Del HC | Non-possession of valid driving license by itself is no reason for not granting compensation if accident proved to be caused by rash and negligent driving of offender","og_description":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Najmi Waziri, J. dismissed an appeal filed by the insurer against the award of compensation made by the Motor Accident","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/17\/del-hc-non-possession-of-valid-driving-license-by-itself-is-no-reason-for-not-granting-compensation-if-accident-proved-to-be-caused-by-rash-and-negligent-driving-of-offender\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-09-17T04:00:03+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-09-20T05:35:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/17\/del-hc-non-possession-of-valid-driving-license-by-itself-is-no-reason-for-not-granting-compensation-if-accident-proved-to-be-caused-by-rash-and-negligent-driving-of-offender\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/17\/del-hc-non-possession-of-valid-driving-license-by-itself-is-no-reason-for-not-granting-compensation-if-accident-proved-to-be-caused-by-rash-and-negligent-driving-of-offender\/","name":"Del HC | Non-possession of valid driving license by itself is no reason for not granting compensation if accident proved to be caused by rash and negligent driving of offender | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-09-17T04:00:03+00:00","dateModified":"2019-09-20T05:35:48+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/17\/del-hc-non-possession-of-valid-driving-license-by-itself-is-no-reason-for-not-granting-compensation-if-accident-proved-to-be-caused-by-rash-and-negligent-driving-of-offender\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/17\/del-hc-non-possession-of-valid-driving-license-by-itself-is-no-reason-for-not-granting-compensation-if-accident-proved-to-be-caused-by-rash-and-negligent-driving-of-offender\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/17\/del-hc-non-possession-of-valid-driving-license-by-itself-is-no-reason-for-not-granting-compensation-if-accident-proved-to-be-caused-by-rash-and-negligent-driving-of-offender\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Del HC | Non-possession of valid driving license by itself is no reason for not granting compensation if accident proved to be caused by rash and negligent driving of offender"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":208065,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/14\/ph-hc-appeal-against-compensation-under-mv-act-dismissed-as-insurer-fails-to-show-drivers-license-was-invalid\/","url_meta":{"origin":219628,"position":0},"title":"P&#038;H HC | Appeal against compensation under MV Act dismissed as insurer fails to show driver&#8217;s license was invalid \u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 14, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: This appeal was filed before a Single Judge Bench of Lisa Gill, J., by the Insurance Company challenging its liability to pay compensation to the claimants which was awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. Facts of the case were that the claim petition was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":200168,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/16\/fake-driving-licence-per-se-does-not-absolve-insurer-of-liability-to-pay-compensation-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":219628,"position":1},"title":"Fake driving licence, per se, does not absolve insurer of liability to pay compensation: SC  \u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 16, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: A.M. Khanwilkar, J. delivered the judgment for CJ Dipak Misra and himself whereby the matter concerning the liability of the insurer to pay compensation in a motor accident claim was remanded back to the Allahabad High Court. Respondents 1-5 filed a claim before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":304972,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/17\/non-possession-of-valid-permit-entitles-insurance-company-to-recover-compensation-paid-from-the-owner-of-vehicle-delhi-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":219628,"position":2},"title":"Non-possession of valid Permit entitles Insurance Company to recover compensation paid, from the owner of vehicle: Delhi High Court","author":"Simranjeet","date":"October 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cRight to recover the compensation will also be available to the Insurance Company where the offending vehicle is being operated at the time of the accident at a place for which it does not have a valid Permit.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":213646,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/18\/bom-hc-insurance-contract-give-rise-to-reciprocal-promises-insurer-entitled-to-recover-the-amount-paid-to-third-party-under-a-cancelled-policy-from-the-insured\/","url_meta":{"origin":219628,"position":3},"title":"Bom HC | Insurance contract give rise to reciprocal promises; Insurer entitled to recover the amount paid to third party under a &#8216;cancelled policy&#8217; from the insured","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 18, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0Sunil K. Kotwal, J., allowed SBI Insurance Co. (insurer) to recover, from the owner of the offending bus (insurer), the amount paid to a third party claimant) under a policy which was cancelled by the insurer on account of non-payment of the premium amount by the insured. An\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":201123,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/01\/lrs-of-deceased-cannot-maintain-claim-under-section-166-mv-act-if-accident-occurred-on-deceaseds-own-fault-or-rash-and-negligent-driving-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":219628,"position":4},"title":"LRs of deceased cannot maintain claim under Section 166 MV Act if accident occurred on deceased\u2019s own fault or rash and negligent driving: SC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 1, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Bench of N.V. Ramana and S. Abdul Nazeer, JJ. allowed an appeal filed by the appellant (insurer) against the judgment and order of Tripura High Court whereby the insurer was directed to pay compensation to the respondents (legal representatives of the deceased) as awarded by the Motor\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":220606,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/09\/pat-hc-insurance-company-granted-the-right-to-recover-half-of-compensation-amount-from-the-owner-insurer-of-the-other-vehicle-involved-in-an-accident-caused-due-to-composite-negligence\/","url_meta":{"origin":219628,"position":5},"title":"Pat HC | Insurance Company granted right to recover half of compensation amount from owner\/ insurer of other vehicle involved in an accident caused due to composite negligence","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 9, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: S. Kumar, J. dismissed the appeal filed by the insurance company on the grounds that the parties were liable severally as well as jointly. Although the company had the right to recover such compensation paid from the other party involved in the accident for which insurance was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/219628","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=219628"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/219628\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=219628"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=219628"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=219628"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}