{"id":219618,"date":"2019-09-16T19:00:12","date_gmt":"2019-09-16T13:30:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=219618"},"modified":"2019-09-27T13:09:02","modified_gmt":"2019-09-27T07:39:02","slug":"cestat-non-consideration-of-the-documents-in-support-of-claims-made-by-the-appellant-amounts-to-passing-a-non-speaking-order","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/16\/cestat-non-consideration-of-the-documents-in-support-of-claims-made-by-the-appellant-amounts-to-passing-a-non-speaking-order\/","title":{"rendered":"CESTAT | Non-consideration of the documents in support of claims made by the appellant amounts to passing a non-speaking order"},"content":{"rendered":"

Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai<\/strong>: Coram of P. Dinesha (Member)\u00a0 and P. Venkata Subba Rao (Member) allowed the application filed by the appellant to praying the Tribunal to recall and rehear the final order passed by the same Bench on 22-02-2018 on the ground that the said order suffered from rectifiable mistakes. The Bench had passed an order whereby they held that the appellant had rendered services other than legal services, and the same was under dispute.<\/p>\n

The main contentions put forth by the appellant was that he had furnished all the documents in support of his legal services rendered to Essel Mining Co. Ltd., Gujarat Sidhee Cement Ltd., and to Express Publication of (Madurai) Ltd., but the same was not considered and hence, non-consideration must render the impugned final order a non-speaking order. With regard to the issue of revenue neutrality, the appellant had relied on a decision of the jurisdictional High Court, which was also not referred to nor considered and such non-consideration must again render the impugned final order a non-speaking order. Therefore, the non-consideration of the above orders, as well as documents, must result in the impugned final order being erroneous and amenable to rectification.<\/p>\n

On the other hand, the respondent opposed the above contentions arguing that the Bench had passed the impugned final order after hearing both sides and after perusing the appeal records. Since there was no error on record, no intervention was required. Also, interfering with the impugned final order would amount to review, which is not permissible under the law.<\/p>\n

The Tribunal pointed out that there was no mention nor discussion as to the applicability of various decisions relied on by the appellant in the impugned final order. There was no dispute that non-consideration of a judgment of the jurisdictional High Court or Supreme Court in itself amounts to a mistake\/error on the face of the very order and the same must be rectified. The same was held in V. Guard Industries Ltd. v. Commercial Tax Officer<\/em>, reported in 2003 (158) E.L.T.806 (Mad.). As there was no discussion on all the various documents relied on by the applicant and furnished in the paper compilation, the Tribunal held that non-consideration of the same amounts to passing a non-speaking order. The impugned final order needed to be recalled and reheard. They directed the Registry to relist the appeal for fresh hearing.[S. Gurumurthy v. Commr. of Central Excise, 2019 SCC OnLine CESTAT 255<\/b><\/a>, decided on 09-09-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai: Coram of P. Dinesha (Member)\u00a0 and P. Venkata Subba Rao (Member) allowed the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":201689,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[37591,29540],"class_list":["post-219618","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-non-consideration-of-documents","tag-non-speaking-order"],"yoast_head":"\nCESTAT | Non-consideration of the documents in support of claims made by the appellant amounts to passing a non-speaking order | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/16\/cestat-non-consideration-of-the-documents-in-support-of-claims-made-by-the-appellant-amounts-to-passing-a-non-speaking-order\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"CESTAT | Non-consideration of the documents in support of claims made by the appellant amounts to passing a non-speaking order\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai: Coram of P. Dinesha (Member)\u00a0 and P. Venkata Subba Rao (Member) allowed the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/16\/cestat-non-consideration-of-the-documents-in-support-of-claims-made-by-the-appellant-amounts-to-passing-a-non-speaking-order\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-09-16T13:30:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-09-27T07:39:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/16\/cestat-non-consideration-of-the-documents-in-support-of-claims-made-by-the-appellant-amounts-to-passing-a-non-speaking-order\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/16\/cestat-non-consideration-of-the-documents-in-support-of-claims-made-by-the-appellant-amounts-to-passing-a-non-speaking-order\/\",\"name\":\"CESTAT | Non-consideration of the documents in support of claims made by the appellant amounts to passing a non-speaking order | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/16\/cestat-non-consideration-of-the-documents-in-support-of-claims-made-by-the-appellant-amounts-to-passing-a-non-speaking-order\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/16\/cestat-non-consideration-of-the-documents-in-support-of-claims-made-by-the-appellant-amounts-to-passing-a-non-speaking-order\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-09-16T13:30:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-09-27T07:39:02+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/16\/cestat-non-consideration-of-the-documents-in-support-of-claims-made-by-the-appellant-amounts-to-passing-a-non-speaking-order\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/16\/cestat-non-consideration-of-the-documents-in-support-of-claims-made-by-the-appellant-amounts-to-passing-a-non-speaking-order\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/16\/cestat-non-consideration-of-the-documents-in-support-of-claims-made-by-the-appellant-amounts-to-passing-a-non-speaking-order\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/16\/cestat-non-consideration-of-the-documents-in-support-of-claims-made-by-the-appellant-amounts-to-passing-a-non-speaking-order\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"CESTAT | Non-consideration of the documents in support of claims made by the appellant amounts to passing a non-speaking order\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"CESTAT | Non-consideration of the documents in support of claims made by the appellant amounts to passing a non-speaking order | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/16\/cestat-non-consideration-of-the-documents-in-support-of-claims-made-by-the-appellant-amounts-to-passing-a-non-speaking-order\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"CESTAT | Non-consideration of the documents in support of claims made by the appellant amounts to passing a non-speaking order","og_description":"Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai: Coram of P. Dinesha (Member)\u00a0 and P. Venkata Subba Rao (Member) allowed the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/16\/cestat-non-consideration-of-the-documents-in-support-of-claims-made-by-the-appellant-amounts-to-passing-a-non-speaking-order\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-09-16T13:30:12+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-09-27T07:39:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/16\/cestat-non-consideration-of-the-documents-in-support-of-claims-made-by-the-appellant-amounts-to-passing-a-non-speaking-order\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/16\/cestat-non-consideration-of-the-documents-in-support-of-claims-made-by-the-appellant-amounts-to-passing-a-non-speaking-order\/","name":"CESTAT | Non-consideration of the documents in support of claims made by the appellant amounts to passing a non-speaking order | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/16\/cestat-non-consideration-of-the-documents-in-support-of-claims-made-by-the-appellant-amounts-to-passing-a-non-speaking-order\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/16\/cestat-non-consideration-of-the-documents-in-support-of-claims-made-by-the-appellant-amounts-to-passing-a-non-speaking-order\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg","datePublished":"2019-09-16T13:30:12+00:00","dateModified":"2019-09-27T07:39:02+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/16\/cestat-non-consideration-of-the-documents-in-support-of-claims-made-by-the-appellant-amounts-to-passing-a-non-speaking-order\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/16\/cestat-non-consideration-of-the-documents-in-support-of-claims-made-by-the-appellant-amounts-to-passing-a-non-speaking-order\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/16\/cestat-non-consideration-of-the-documents-in-support-of-claims-made-by-the-appellant-amounts-to-passing-a-non-speaking-order\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/16\/cestat-non-consideration-of-the-documents-in-support-of-claims-made-by-the-appellant-amounts-to-passing-a-non-speaking-order\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"CESTAT | Non-consideration of the documents in support of claims made by the appellant amounts to passing a non-speaking order"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":281820,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/17\/service-tax-to-be-refunded-for-cancelled-flat-bookings-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":219618,"position":0},"title":"Cancelled Flat Bookings amount to non-performance of service; CESTAT directs Authorities to refund service tax to Builder","author":"Editor","date":"January 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"CESTAT states that cancelled flat bookings amount to non-performance of service,Held that Service tax is not applicable if no service is rendered.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"CESTAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-106.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":233581,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/08\/cestat-company-providing-service-to-member-companies-without-consideration-not-liable-to-service-tax-under-business-auxiliary-service-bas\/","url_meta":{"origin":219618,"position":1},"title":"CESTAT | Company providing service to member companies without consideration not liable to service tax under Business Auxiliary Service (BAS)","author":"Editor","date":"August 8, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Suchita Shukla, Editorial Assistant has put this story together","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":267904,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/can-service-tax-be-levied-on-services-provided-by-club-to-its-members-cestat-law-legal-news-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":219618,"position":2},"title":"Can service tax be levied on services provided by club to its members? CESTAT answers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 3, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (CESTAT): The Coram of Dilip Gupta (President) and P.V. Subba Rao (Technical Member), expressed that, service tax can be levied on services rendered by the club to its members. Factual Matrix Rajasthan Cooperative Dairy Federation Limited \u2013 Appellant was registered under\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-153.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-153.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-153.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-153.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-153.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":331032,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/18\/jharkhand-state-cricket-association-renders-bundled-services-related-to-promoting-cricket-not-liable-to-pay-service-tax-cestat\/","url_meta":{"origin":219618,"position":3},"title":"Jharkhand State Cricket Association renders \u2018bundled services\u2019 related to promoting cricket; not liable to pay service tax for services rendered in connection with sports: CESTAT","author":"Arushi","date":"September 18, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"All the activities rendered by the appellant are undertaken during hosting the cricket matches alone and if there were no cricket matches played, then all these services become irrelevant.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"CESTAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/CESTAT.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/CESTAT.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/CESTAT.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/CESTAT.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":366083,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/08\/no-service-tax-on-use-of-trade-marks-not-registered-in-india-cestat\/","url_meta":{"origin":219618,"position":4},"title":"Service tax not payable on use of trade marks not registered under Indian law: CESTAT","author":"Bharti","date":"November 8, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Intellectual property not registered in India do not constitute \u2018intellectual property rights\u2019 within the meaning of Section 65(55a) of the Finance Act, 1994 and the related services are not 'intellectual property services' within the meaning of Section 65 (55b) of the Finance Act, 1954.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"service tax on use of trade marks","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/service-tax-on-use-of-trade-marks.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/service-tax-on-use-of-trade-marks.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/service-tax-on-use-of-trade-marks.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/service-tax-on-use-of-trade-marks.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":358919,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/04\/sky-lark-education-exempt-from-service-tax-cestat\/","url_meta":{"origin":219618,"position":5},"title":"SKY Lark Education Welfare Society an educational institution; will be exempted from service tax: CESTAT","author":"Bharti","date":"September 4, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cSKY Lark Education Welfare Society is imparting education to students of Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, enrolled under the distant learning programme, as per its curriculum and it is duly recognized under the laws of the Uttar Pradesh Government\/UGC.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"SKY Lark Education exempt from service tax","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/SKY-Lark-Education-exempt-from-service-tax.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/SKY-Lark-Education-exempt-from-service-tax.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/SKY-Lark-Education-exempt-from-service-tax.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/SKY-Lark-Education-exempt-from-service-tax.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/219618","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=219618"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/219618\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/201689"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=219618"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=219618"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=219618"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}