{"id":219415,"date":"2019-09-11T14:30:37","date_gmt":"2019-09-11T09:00:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=219415"},"modified":"2019-09-17T17:56:42","modified_gmt":"2019-09-17T12:26:42","slug":"jhar-hc-writ-petition-under-art-226-dismissed-on-ground-of-availability-of-an-alternative-remedy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/11\/jhar-hc-writ-petition-under-art-226-dismissed-on-ground-of-availability-of-an-alternative-remedy\/","title":{"rendered":"Jhar HC | Writ Petition under Art. 226 dismissed on ground of availability of an alternative remedy"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Jharkhand High Court:<\/strong>\u00a0Sujit Narayan Prasad, J, dismissed the writ petition on the ground of availability of alternative remedy.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the pertinent case, the petitioner moved to the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India being aggrieved with the decision taken by the Ranchi Regional Development Authority (RRDA) of not sanctioning the map of the Building Construction Map vide Building Plan.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The counsel for the respondents raised the preliminary objection on the ground of availability of alternative remedy of appeal before the Tribunal stating that various factual aspect is to be adjudicated in this writ petition and as such, the same is fit to be appreciated by the Tribunal since the statute has created the remedy to file an appeal against the decision taken by the RRDA.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court held that it is evident that the petitioner is questioning the building map plan, on various ground and Court is of the considered view that although there is no absolute bar in entertaining the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India but where question of determination of the issues on factual aspect is involved, the writ Court should refrain from adjudicating the issues, if alternate remedy is available for adjudication of the issues after appreciating the factual aspect. Hence, the writ petition cannot be entertained on the ground of availability of the alternative remedy of appeal before the Tribunal of the RRDA is available.[Prakash Munjal v. State of Jharkhand, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/d6iIiTF5\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Jhar 1153<\/b><\/a>, decided on 06-09-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jharkhand High Court:\u00a0Sujit Narayan Prasad, J, dismissed the writ petition on the ground of availability of alternative remedy. In the pertinent case, <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31975,31370,37519],"class_list":["post-219415","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-alternative-remedy","tag-article-226-of-constitution-of-india","tag-ranchi-regional-development-authority"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Jhar HC | Writ Petition under Art. 226 dismissed on ground of availability of an alternative remedy | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/11\/jhar-hc-writ-petition-under-art-226-dismissed-on-ground-of-availability-of-an-alternative-remedy\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jhar HC | Writ Petition under Art. 226 dismissed on ground of availability of an alternative remedy\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jharkhand High Court:\u00a0Sujit Narayan Prasad, J, dismissed the writ petition on the ground of availability of alternative remedy. In the pertinent case,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/11\/jhar-hc-writ-petition-under-art-226-dismissed-on-ground-of-availability-of-an-alternative-remedy\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-09-11T09:00:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-09-17T12:26:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/11\/jhar-hc-writ-petition-under-art-226-dismissed-on-ground-of-availability-of-an-alternative-remedy\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/11\/jhar-hc-writ-petition-under-art-226-dismissed-on-ground-of-availability-of-an-alternative-remedy\/\",\"name\":\"Jhar HC | Writ Petition under Art. 226 dismissed on ground of availability of an alternative remedy | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-09-11T09:00:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-09-17T12:26:42+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/11\/jhar-hc-writ-petition-under-art-226-dismissed-on-ground-of-availability-of-an-alternative-remedy\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/11\/jhar-hc-writ-petition-under-art-226-dismissed-on-ground-of-availability-of-an-alternative-remedy\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/11\/jhar-hc-writ-petition-under-art-226-dismissed-on-ground-of-availability-of-an-alternative-remedy\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jhar HC | Writ Petition under Art. 226 dismissed on ground of availability of an alternative remedy\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jhar HC | Writ Petition under Art. 226 dismissed on ground of availability of an alternative remedy | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/11\/jhar-hc-writ-petition-under-art-226-dismissed-on-ground-of-availability-of-an-alternative-remedy\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jhar HC | Writ Petition under Art. 226 dismissed on ground of availability of an alternative remedy","og_description":"Jharkhand High Court:\u00a0Sujit Narayan Prasad, J, dismissed the writ petition on the ground of availability of alternative remedy. In the pertinent case,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/11\/jhar-hc-writ-petition-under-art-226-dismissed-on-ground-of-availability-of-an-alternative-remedy\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-09-11T09:00:37+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-09-17T12:26:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/11\/jhar-hc-writ-petition-under-art-226-dismissed-on-ground-of-availability-of-an-alternative-remedy\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/11\/jhar-hc-writ-petition-under-art-226-dismissed-on-ground-of-availability-of-an-alternative-remedy\/","name":"Jhar HC | Writ Petition under Art. 226 dismissed on ground of availability of an alternative remedy | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-09-11T09:00:37+00:00","dateModified":"2019-09-17T12:26:42+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/11\/jhar-hc-writ-petition-under-art-226-dismissed-on-ground-of-availability-of-an-alternative-remedy\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/11\/jhar-hc-writ-petition-under-art-226-dismissed-on-ground-of-availability-of-an-alternative-remedy\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/11\/jhar-hc-writ-petition-under-art-226-dismissed-on-ground-of-availability-of-an-alternative-remedy\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jhar HC | Writ Petition under Art. 226 dismissed on ground of availability of an alternative remedy"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":337096,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/11\/mere-existence-of-alternative-remedy-not-ground-for-dismissal-writ-petition-kerala-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":219415,"position":0},"title":"Writ petition against administrative authority cannot be dismissed as &#8216;non-maintainable&#8217; merely on ground of existence of alternative remedy: Kerala HC","author":"Editor","date":"December 11, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"There is a difference between entertainability and maintainability of a writ petition. Powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India can be exercised in restricted circumstances and within well-defined parameters, even if there exists an alternate remedy.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":247415,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/20\/explained-rule-of-alternate-remedy-and-maintainability-of-writ-petitions-under-article-226-of-the-constitution\/","url_meta":{"origin":219415,"position":1},"title":"Explained: Rule of alternate remedy and maintainability of writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"April 20, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\"An alternate remedy by itself does not divest the High Court of its powers under Article 226 of the Constitution in an appropriate case though ordinarily, a writ petition should not be entertained when an efficacious alternate remedy is provided by law;.\"","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":33861,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/27\/writ-petition-filed-by-star-india-dismissed-for-want-of-maintainability\/","url_meta":{"origin":219415,"position":2},"title":"Writ Petition filed by Star India dismissed for want of maintainability","author":"Sucheta","date":"January 27, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court- Dismissing the writ petition filed by the petitioner challenging the orders of Telecom Disputes Settlement & Appellate Tribunal\u2019s (TDSAT) on the ground that the procedure adopted by the TDSAT in making the orders and the jurisdiction exercised in issuing the directions contained therein is beyond the powers\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":248188,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/14\/when-can-high-court-entertain-a-writ-petition-notwithstanding-the-availability-of-an-alternative-remedy-supreme-court-explains\/","url_meta":{"origin":219415,"position":3},"title":"When can High Court entertain a writ petition, notwithstanding the availability of an alternative remedy? Supreme Court explains","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"May 14, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\"The availability of an alternative remedy does not prohibit the High Court from entertaining a writ petition in an appropriate case.\"","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283171,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/04\/supreme-court-mere-availability-of-an-alternative-remedy-of-appeal-or-revision-would-not-oust-the-jurisdiction-of-the-high-court-and-render-a-writ-petition-not-maintainable\/","url_meta":{"origin":219415,"position":4},"title":"Mere availability of an alternative remedy of appeal or revision would not oust High Court&#8217;s jurisdiction and render a writ petition \u201cnot maintainable\u201d: Supreme Court","author":"Editor","date":"February 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court observed that availability of an alternative remedy does not operate as an absolute bar to the \u201cmaintainability\u201d of a writ petition and that the rule, which requires a party to pursue the alternative remedy provided by a statute, is a rule of policy, convenience and discretion rather\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-277.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":267159,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/20\/writ-petition-not-maintainable-due-to-having-an-alternative-and-efficacious-remedy-under-s-17-of-the-sarfaesi-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":219415,"position":5},"title":"Raj HC | Writ Petition not maintainable due to having an alternative and efficacious remedy under S. 17 of the SARFAESI Act","author":"Editor","date":"May 20, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Mahendar Kumar Goyal, J. dismissed the writ petition in view of availability of alternative remedy to the petitioners under the provisions of the SARFAESI Act.\u00a0 The instant writ petition was filed by the borrowers for quashing the order dated 15-03-2022 passed by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Jaipur\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/219415","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=219415"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/219415\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=219415"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=219415"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=219415"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}