{"id":219390,"date":"2019-09-11T13:30:21","date_gmt":"2019-09-11T08:00:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=219390"},"modified":"2019-09-17T17:59:59","modified_gmt":"2019-09-17T12:29:59","slug":"pat-hc-order-passed-without-including-the-contentions-of-the-party-marking-non-appearance-of-the-counsel-when-same-was-untrue-to-be-set-aside","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/11\/pat-hc-order-passed-without-including-the-contentions-of-the-party-marking-non-appearance-of-the-counsel-when-same-was-untrue-to-be-set-aside\/","title":{"rendered":"Pat HC | Order passed without including the contentions of the party marking non-appearance of the counsel when same was untrue, to be set aside"},"content":{"rendered":"

Patna<\/strong> High Court: <\/strong>Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J. allowed the revision petition filed by the opposite party on grounds that fresh order be passed by including the unheard parties.<\/p>\n

The petitioner filed a Criminal Revision against the order dated 17-01-2015 whereby and whereunder the learned Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Darbhanga, summoned\u00a0 the petitioners\/opposite party nos. 2 to 9, finding prima facie case against them for the offence under Sections 323, 448 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code, on inquiry under Section 204 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.<\/p>\n

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that while he was present on the date of the argument and had argued the case and, thereafter, the impugned order was passed, the learned Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Darbhanga, did not include his argument in the impugned order and also included \u00a0in the impugned order about his non-appearance.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong>The cause title of the impugned order reflected the non-appearance of the learned counsel for complainant\/petitioner, while the record of the trial court was showing that the complainant\/ petitioner was present on the date of the argument of the case and he was also heard and, thereafter, the impugned order was passed. The impugned order also goes to show that the argument, as advanced on behalf of the complainant\/petitioner, is not included therein and thus, without going into the merit of the case, the Court held that the impugned order dated 17-01-2015 passed by the learned Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Darbhanga, in Criminal Revision No. 273 of 2014 was liable to be set aside and the matter was remitted back to the court concerned for passing afresh\/appropriate order, after hearing the parties, in accordance with law.<\/p>\n

In view of the above-noted facts, the instant revision petition was allowed accordingly.[Ram Sewak Yadav v. State of Bihar, 2019 SCC OnLine Pat 1564<\/b><\/a>, decided on 06-09-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Patna High Court: Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J. allowed the revision petition filed by the opposite party on grounds that fresh order be <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-219390","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"\nPat HC | Order passed without including the contentions of the party marking non-appearance of the counsel when same was untrue, to be set aside | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/11\/pat-hc-order-passed-without-including-the-contentions-of-the-party-marking-non-appearance-of-the-counsel-when-same-was-untrue-to-be-set-aside\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pat HC | Order passed without including the contentions of the party marking non-appearance of the counsel when same was untrue, to be set aside\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Patna High Court: Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J. allowed the revision petition filed by the opposite party on grounds that fresh order be\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/11\/pat-hc-order-passed-without-including-the-contentions-of-the-party-marking-non-appearance-of-the-counsel-when-same-was-untrue-to-be-set-aside\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-09-11T08:00:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-09-17T12:29:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/11\/pat-hc-order-passed-without-including-the-contentions-of-the-party-marking-non-appearance-of-the-counsel-when-same-was-untrue-to-be-set-aside\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/11\/pat-hc-order-passed-without-including-the-contentions-of-the-party-marking-non-appearance-of-the-counsel-when-same-was-untrue-to-be-set-aside\/\",\"name\":\"Pat HC | Order passed without including the contentions of the party marking non-appearance of the counsel when same was untrue, to be set aside | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-09-11T08:00:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-09-17T12:29:59+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/11\/pat-hc-order-passed-without-including-the-contentions-of-the-party-marking-non-appearance-of-the-counsel-when-same-was-untrue-to-be-set-aside\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/11\/pat-hc-order-passed-without-including-the-contentions-of-the-party-marking-non-appearance-of-the-counsel-when-same-was-untrue-to-be-set-aside\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/11\/pat-hc-order-passed-without-including-the-contentions-of-the-party-marking-non-appearance-of-the-counsel-when-same-was-untrue-to-be-set-aside\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pat HC | Order passed without including the contentions of the party marking non-appearance of the counsel when same was untrue, to be set aside\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pat HC | Order passed without including the contentions of the party marking non-appearance of the counsel when same was untrue, to be set aside | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/11\/pat-hc-order-passed-without-including-the-contentions-of-the-party-marking-non-appearance-of-the-counsel-when-same-was-untrue-to-be-set-aside\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pat HC | Order passed without including the contentions of the party marking non-appearance of the counsel when same was untrue, to be set aside","og_description":"Patna High Court: Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J. allowed the revision petition filed by the opposite party on grounds that fresh order be","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/11\/pat-hc-order-passed-without-including-the-contentions-of-the-party-marking-non-appearance-of-the-counsel-when-same-was-untrue-to-be-set-aside\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-09-11T08:00:21+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-09-17T12:29:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/11\/pat-hc-order-passed-without-including-the-contentions-of-the-party-marking-non-appearance-of-the-counsel-when-same-was-untrue-to-be-set-aside\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/11\/pat-hc-order-passed-without-including-the-contentions-of-the-party-marking-non-appearance-of-the-counsel-when-same-was-untrue-to-be-set-aside\/","name":"Pat HC | Order passed without including the contentions of the party marking non-appearance of the counsel when same was untrue, to be set aside | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-09-11T08:00:21+00:00","dateModified":"2019-09-17T12:29:59+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/11\/pat-hc-order-passed-without-including-the-contentions-of-the-party-marking-non-appearance-of-the-counsel-when-same-was-untrue-to-be-set-aside\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/11\/pat-hc-order-passed-without-including-the-contentions-of-the-party-marking-non-appearance-of-the-counsel-when-same-was-untrue-to-be-set-aside\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/11\/pat-hc-order-passed-without-including-the-contentions-of-the-party-marking-non-appearance-of-the-counsel-when-same-was-untrue-to-be-set-aside\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pat HC | Order passed without including the contentions of the party marking non-appearance of the counsel when same was untrue, to be set aside"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":219159,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/05\/pat-hc-maintenance-denied-to-wife-when-divorce-granted-on-grounds-of-adultery-pendency-of-appeal-to-set-aside-such-divorce-decree-cannot-be-a-reason-to-uphold-order-of-maintenance\/","url_meta":{"origin":219390,"position":0},"title":"Pat HC | Maintenance denied to wife when divorce granted on grounds of adultery, pendency of appeal to set aside such divorce decree cannot be a reason to uphold order of maintenance","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 5, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. allowed the application of the petitioner to set aside the order granting maintenance to his wife when the divorce was granted on account of adultery on the wife\u2019s part. The petitioner filed an application under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, against\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":299162,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/12\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-revision-seeking-cancellation-of-bail-in-assault-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":219390,"position":1},"title":"Calcutta High Court dismisses revision seeking cancellation of bail in assault case","author":"Ritu","date":"August 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Calcutta High Court criticized the trial court for solely relying on party's submissions and not calling for injury report.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":216558,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/06\/pat-hc-application-for-quashing-cognizance-order-passed-in-a-dowry-harassment-case-dismissed-on-ground-of-gross-delay-of-10-years-in-filing-the-said-application\/","url_meta":{"origin":219390,"position":2},"title":"Pat HC | Application for quashing cognizance order passed in a dowry harassment case \u2013 dismissed on ground of gross delay of 10 years in filing the said application","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 6, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. dismissed an application filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 praying for quashing of cognizance taken against petitioner, in a case pertaining to demand of dowry and torture therefor. Petitioner, along with eight others, was charged with offence of torture,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":283636,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/10\/calcutta-high-court-revision-transactions-recovery-clock-criminal-proceeding\/","url_meta":{"origin":219390,"position":3},"title":"Breach of Contract does not give rise to cause of action for Criminal Breach of Trust: Calcutta High Court reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"February 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court | While deciding a revision petition, Tirthankar Ghosh*, J. held that no offence under Ss. 417 and 426 of the Penal Code, 1860 can be made out from the alleged transactions and a case for recovery can be made out from nature of such transactions, cloaking any\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image95.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":316025,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/04\/cal-hc-affirms-rejection-of-section-125-crpc-application-in-absence-of-prima-facie-proof-of-marriage-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":219390,"position":4},"title":"Calcutta High Court affirms rejection of Section 125 CrPC maintenance claim in absence of prima facie proof of marriage","author":"Ritu","date":"March 4, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Calcutta High Court stated that the documents presented by the petitioner which mention her as wife are mere declarations, subject to proof, if challenged.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":309057,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/12\/cal-hc-dismisses-revision-considering-time-lapse-and-availability-of-legal-recourse-under-section-1445-crpc-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":219390,"position":5},"title":"Calcutta High Court dismisses revision considering time lapse and availability of legal recourse under Section 144(5) CrPC","author":"Ritu","date":"December 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Section 144(5) of the CrPC empowers any Magistrate can rescind or alter an order made under this section.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/219390","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=219390"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/219390\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=219390"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=219390"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=219390"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}