{"id":219145,"date":"2019-09-04T18:30:37","date_gmt":"2019-09-04T13:00:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=219145"},"modified":"2019-09-07T15:55:23","modified_gmt":"2019-09-07T10:25:23","slug":"pat-hc-continuation-of-employment-would-not-create-a-vested-right-to-claim-renewal-of-such-contract-of-employment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/pat-hc-continuation-of-employment-would-not-create-a-vested-right-to-claim-renewal-of-such-contract-of-employment\/","title":{"rendered":"Pat HC | Continuation of employment would not create a vested right to claim renewal of such contract of employment"},"content":{"rendered":"

Patna<\/strong> High Court: <\/strong>Madhuresh Prasad, J. disposed of the writ petition on the grounds that the extending of the petitioner\u2019s engagement would not create a precedent for the respondents.<\/p>\n

The petitioner was engaged on contract basis for a period of one year as a Peon in the District Child Protection Unit at Gaya, pursuant to an Advertisement in the year 2011. It has been argued by the counsel for the petitioner that after the lapse of one year\u2019s contract period, the respondents, having appreciated the petitioner\u2019s work, renewed his contractual employment by extending the engagement till January, 2018. After the end of such extension, the petitioner\u2019s claim for continuation on contract basis has been rejected under the order dated 03-05-2018.<\/p>\n

The petitioner also submitted that according to the Office Order dated 03-05-2018, the petitioner would stand deprived of consideration of his claim for contractual engagement in future on account of the authorities having recorded that the petitioner\u2019s work was unsatisfactory. The counsel argued that this was contrary to the positive review that led to his continuance till January, 2018.<\/p>\n

The Court after careful consideration and after going through the Advertisement of 2011 held that the advertisement contemplated contractual engagement for a period of one year only. The fact that the respondents have allowed the petitioner to continue till January, 2018 would not create a vested right in the petitioner to claim renewal of the contract in the times to come.<\/p>\n

In view of the above noted facts, the instant petition was disposed of accordingly with the observation that in future when the respondent authorities would be exercising the option of contractual appointment, the petitioner will have the right to apply and his case would have to be considered as per the terms of the advertisement and the requirements therein.[Pappu Kumar v. State of Bihar, 2019 SCC OnLine Pat 1509<\/b><\/a>, decided on 29-08-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Patna High Court: Madhuresh Prasad, J. disposed of the writ petition on the grounds that the extending of the petitioner\u2019s engagement would <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[37418,37417,32846],"class_list":["post-219145","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-continuation-of-employment","tag-contract-of-employment","tag-renewal"],"yoast_head":"\nPat HC | Continuation of employment would not create a vested right to claim renewal of such contract of employment | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/pat-hc-continuation-of-employment-would-not-create-a-vested-right-to-claim-renewal-of-such-contract-of-employment\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pat HC | Continuation of employment would not create a vested right to claim renewal of such contract of employment\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Patna High Court: Madhuresh Prasad, J. disposed of the writ petition on the grounds that the extending of the petitioner\u2019s engagement would\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/pat-hc-continuation-of-employment-would-not-create-a-vested-right-to-claim-renewal-of-such-contract-of-employment\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-09-04T13:00:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-09-07T10:25:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/pat-hc-continuation-of-employment-would-not-create-a-vested-right-to-claim-renewal-of-such-contract-of-employment\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/pat-hc-continuation-of-employment-would-not-create-a-vested-right-to-claim-renewal-of-such-contract-of-employment\/\",\"name\":\"Pat HC | Continuation of employment would not create a vested right to claim renewal of such contract of employment | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-09-04T13:00:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-09-07T10:25:23+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/pat-hc-continuation-of-employment-would-not-create-a-vested-right-to-claim-renewal-of-such-contract-of-employment\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/pat-hc-continuation-of-employment-would-not-create-a-vested-right-to-claim-renewal-of-such-contract-of-employment\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/pat-hc-continuation-of-employment-would-not-create-a-vested-right-to-claim-renewal-of-such-contract-of-employment\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pat HC | Continuation of employment would not create a vested right to claim renewal of such contract of employment\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pat HC | Continuation of employment would not create a vested right to claim renewal of such contract of employment | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/pat-hc-continuation-of-employment-would-not-create-a-vested-right-to-claim-renewal-of-such-contract-of-employment\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pat HC | Continuation of employment would not create a vested right to claim renewal of such contract of employment","og_description":"Patna High Court: Madhuresh Prasad, J. disposed of the writ petition on the grounds that the extending of the petitioner\u2019s engagement would","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/pat-hc-continuation-of-employment-would-not-create-a-vested-right-to-claim-renewal-of-such-contract-of-employment\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-09-04T13:00:37+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-09-07T10:25:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/pat-hc-continuation-of-employment-would-not-create-a-vested-right-to-claim-renewal-of-such-contract-of-employment\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/pat-hc-continuation-of-employment-would-not-create-a-vested-right-to-claim-renewal-of-such-contract-of-employment\/","name":"Pat HC | Continuation of employment would not create a vested right to claim renewal of such contract of employment | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-09-04T13:00:37+00:00","dateModified":"2019-09-07T10:25:23+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/pat-hc-continuation-of-employment-would-not-create-a-vested-right-to-claim-renewal-of-such-contract-of-employment\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/pat-hc-continuation-of-employment-would-not-create-a-vested-right-to-claim-renewal-of-such-contract-of-employment\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/pat-hc-continuation-of-employment-would-not-create-a-vested-right-to-claim-renewal-of-such-contract-of-employment\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pat HC | Continuation of employment would not create a vested right to claim renewal of such contract of employment"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":295859,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/03\/mp-hc-no-regularization-service-past-performance-long-service-temporary-appointees\/","url_meta":{"origin":219145,"position":0},"title":"Temporary Appointees cannot claim regularization based on past performance or long service: Madhya Pradesh High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"July 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court held that \u201cin the terms and conditions of the appointment it is clearly mentioned that the employee would not be having any right to claim regularization\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":212533,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/28\/pat-hc-no-infirmity-in-order-rejecting-renewal-of-service-where-complaint-of-rape-is-pending-against-contractual-employee\/","url_meta":{"origin":219145,"position":1},"title":"Pat HC | No infirmity in order rejecting renewal of service, where complaint of rape is pending against contractual employee","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 28, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: The Bench of Ashutosh Kumar, J. dismissed a petition filed by a contractual employee holding that there was no infirmity in an order rejecting renewal of his service, as there was a complaint pending against him. Petitioner herein had applied for the post of Junior Engineer on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":270344,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/19\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-substitution-of-an-appointment-on-compassionate-grounds-through-contractual-appointment-held-illegal-directions-issued\/","url_meta":{"origin":219145,"position":2},"title":"Madhya Pradesh High Court | Substitution of an appointment on compassionate grounds through contractual appointment held illegal; directions issued","author":"Editor","date":"July 19, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Madhya Pradesh High Court: The Division Bench of Ravi Malimath, CJ. and Vishal Mishra, J. allowed a writ petition directing the respondents to pay costs for the delay in compassionate employment. The case of the writ petitioner is that his father, who was working as an Assistant Veterinary\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":301968,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/20\/contractual-employment-not-enforceable-when-contract-is-purely-contractual-mp-hc-legal-news-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":219145,"position":3},"title":"Contractual employment not enforceable when contract lacks statutory governance: Madhya Pradesh High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"September 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court noted that the petitioner had been absent for an extended period, both before and after the court's interim orders.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":213741,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/19\/pak-hc-a-contract-employee-is-debarred-from-approaching-high-court-under-constitutional-jurisdiction-only-remedy-available-is-to-file-suit-for-damages\/","url_meta":{"origin":219145,"position":4},"title":"Pak SC | A contract employee is debarred from approaching High Court under constitutional jurisdiction","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 19, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Pakistan Supreme Court: The Bench of Gulzar Ahmed, \u00a0Faisal Arab and Ijaz UL Ahsan, JJ., dismissed the petition filed against a Judgment of the Lahore High Court through which the appeal filed by the petitioner regarding the termination of his services was dismissed. The facts of the case were that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":240381,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/09\/raj-hc-appointment-on-contractual-basis-is-subject-to-conditions-of-service-of-contract-court-dismisses-appeal-holding-the-termination-valid\/","url_meta":{"origin":219145,"position":5},"title":"Raj HC | Appointment on contractual basis is subject to conditions of service of contract; Court dismisses appeal holding the termination valid","author":"Editor","date":"December 9, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J., dismissed a petition which was filed assailing the action of respondents who had terminated his services on the ground that the Administration was not satisfied with his work and the competent authority had approved the termination order. The counsel for the petitioner, R.K.Mathur\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/219145","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=219145"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/219145\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=219145"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=219145"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=219145"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}