{"id":219128,"date":"2019-09-04T14:30:56","date_gmt":"2019-09-04T09:00:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=219128"},"modified":"2019-09-07T15:54:09","modified_gmt":"2019-09-07T10:24:09","slug":"jhar-hc-a-writ-petition-after-issuance-of-notice-under-s-134-of-sarfaesi-is-not-to-be-entertained-petitioner-to-approach-debt-recovery-tribunal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/jhar-hc-a-writ-petition-after-issuance-of-notice-under-s-134-of-sarfaesi-is-not-to-be-entertained-petitioner-to-approach-debt-recovery-tribunal\/","title":{"rendered":"Jhar HC | A writ petition after issuance of notice under S. 13(4) of SARFAESI is not to be entertained; petitioner to approach Debt Recovery Tribunal"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Jharkhand High Court:<\/strong> Sujit Narayan Prasad, J., dismissed the writ petition as a writ petition after issuance of notice under Section 13 (4) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 is not to be entertained.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The brief facts of the case of the petitioner is that the petitioner has extended with the credit facilities of an amount of Rs 80 Lakhs, a cash credit of Rs 70 Lakhs and a bank guarantee facility of Rs 10 Lakhs. The said account having been declared to be a non-performing asset, therefore, a proceeding has been initiated by issuing a notice under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, subsequent thereto, a notice under Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act, has also been issued. In course of that stage, the respondent-Bank has entered into a settlement under One Time Settlement Scheme by settling the account. The petitioner after entering into the settlement had started making a payment but the terms and conditions of the One Time Settlement were not been complied with, therefore, the One Time Settlement Scheme was cancelled by the impugned order, against which, the present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Counsel for the petitioner relied upon the judgement of<em> A-One Mega Mart (P) Ltd. v. HDFC Bank, <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/0HHAIC5O\">2012 SCC OnLine P&amp;H 17328<\/a>, and submitted that the writ petition may be entertained and appropriate direction by quashing the One Time Settlement may be issued.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Counsel for the respondent submitted that the proceeding has been initiated under the Debt Recovery Act, 1993 and subsequently the notice under Section 13(2) has also been issued now it is at the stage of the proceeding under Section 13(4) of the Act, 2002.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court held that the there is no absolute bar in entertaining the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India but simultaneously in numerous judgements of the Supreme Court it has been laid down that a writ petition after issuance of notice under Section 13(4) of the Act, 2002 is not to be entertained. In this regard, reliance was placed upon the judgement of<em> State Bank of Travancore v. Mathew K.C., <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/41oe54TD\">(2018) 3 SCC 85<\/a>. On the basis of views expressed by the Supreme Court, this Court is of the view that this writ petition is not fit to be entertained, accordingly, dismissed.[Ace Sales &amp; Logistics v. H.D.F.C. Bank Ltd.,\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/EkJ228nq\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Jhar 1136<\/b><\/a>, decided on 20-08-2019]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jharkhand High Court: Sujit Narayan Prasad, J., dismissed the writ petition as a writ petition after issuance of notice under Section 13 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31370,37411,17061,37410],"class_list":["post-219128","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-article-226-of-constitution-of-india","tag-credit-facilities","tag-issuance-of-notice","tag-section-134-of-the-sarfaesi-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Jhar HC | A writ petition after issuance of notice under S. 13(4) of SARFAESI is not to be entertained; petitioner to approach Debt Recovery Tribunal | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/jhar-hc-a-writ-petition-after-issuance-of-notice-under-s-134-of-sarfaesi-is-not-to-be-entertained-petitioner-to-approach-debt-recovery-tribunal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jhar HC | A writ petition after issuance of notice under S. 13(4) of SARFAESI is not to be entertained; petitioner to approach Debt Recovery Tribunal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jharkhand High Court: Sujit Narayan Prasad, J., dismissed the writ petition as a writ petition after issuance of notice under Section 13\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/jhar-hc-a-writ-petition-after-issuance-of-notice-under-s-134-of-sarfaesi-is-not-to-be-entertained-petitioner-to-approach-debt-recovery-tribunal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-09-04T09:00:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-09-07T10:24:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/jhar-hc-a-writ-petition-after-issuance-of-notice-under-s-134-of-sarfaesi-is-not-to-be-entertained-petitioner-to-approach-debt-recovery-tribunal\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/jhar-hc-a-writ-petition-after-issuance-of-notice-under-s-134-of-sarfaesi-is-not-to-be-entertained-petitioner-to-approach-debt-recovery-tribunal\/\",\"name\":\"Jhar HC | A writ petition after issuance of notice under S. 13(4) of SARFAESI is not to be entertained; petitioner to approach Debt Recovery Tribunal | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-09-04T09:00:56+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-09-07T10:24:09+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/jhar-hc-a-writ-petition-after-issuance-of-notice-under-s-134-of-sarfaesi-is-not-to-be-entertained-petitioner-to-approach-debt-recovery-tribunal\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/jhar-hc-a-writ-petition-after-issuance-of-notice-under-s-134-of-sarfaesi-is-not-to-be-entertained-petitioner-to-approach-debt-recovery-tribunal\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/jhar-hc-a-writ-petition-after-issuance-of-notice-under-s-134-of-sarfaesi-is-not-to-be-entertained-petitioner-to-approach-debt-recovery-tribunal\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jhar HC | A writ petition after issuance of notice under S. 13(4) of SARFAESI is not to be entertained; petitioner to approach Debt Recovery Tribunal\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jhar HC | A writ petition after issuance of notice under S. 13(4) of SARFAESI is not to be entertained; petitioner to approach Debt Recovery Tribunal | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/jhar-hc-a-writ-petition-after-issuance-of-notice-under-s-134-of-sarfaesi-is-not-to-be-entertained-petitioner-to-approach-debt-recovery-tribunal\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jhar HC | A writ petition after issuance of notice under S. 13(4) of SARFAESI is not to be entertained; petitioner to approach Debt Recovery Tribunal","og_description":"Jharkhand High Court: Sujit Narayan Prasad, J., dismissed the writ petition as a writ petition after issuance of notice under Section 13","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/jhar-hc-a-writ-petition-after-issuance-of-notice-under-s-134-of-sarfaesi-is-not-to-be-entertained-petitioner-to-approach-debt-recovery-tribunal\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-09-04T09:00:56+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-09-07T10:24:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/jhar-hc-a-writ-petition-after-issuance-of-notice-under-s-134-of-sarfaesi-is-not-to-be-entertained-petitioner-to-approach-debt-recovery-tribunal\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/jhar-hc-a-writ-petition-after-issuance-of-notice-under-s-134-of-sarfaesi-is-not-to-be-entertained-petitioner-to-approach-debt-recovery-tribunal\/","name":"Jhar HC | A writ petition after issuance of notice under S. 13(4) of SARFAESI is not to be entertained; petitioner to approach Debt Recovery Tribunal | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-09-04T09:00:56+00:00","dateModified":"2019-09-07T10:24:09+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/jhar-hc-a-writ-petition-after-issuance-of-notice-under-s-134-of-sarfaesi-is-not-to-be-entertained-petitioner-to-approach-debt-recovery-tribunal\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/jhar-hc-a-writ-petition-after-issuance-of-notice-under-s-134-of-sarfaesi-is-not-to-be-entertained-petitioner-to-approach-debt-recovery-tribunal\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/jhar-hc-a-writ-petition-after-issuance-of-notice-under-s-134-of-sarfaesi-is-not-to-be-entertained-petitioner-to-approach-debt-recovery-tribunal\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jhar HC | A writ petition after issuance of notice under S. 13(4) of SARFAESI is not to be entertained; petitioner to approach Debt Recovery Tribunal"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":322898,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/24\/whether-housing-finance-company-recover-loan-amount-less-than-%e2%82%b920-lakh-under-sarfaesi-act-mp-high-court-answers-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":219128,"position":0},"title":"Whether Housing Finance Company can recover loan amount of less than \u20b920 lakh under SARFAESI Act? MP High Court answers","author":"Ritu","date":"May 24, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"MP High Court held that the writ petition is maintainable due to the pure legal questions involved regarding the applicability of SARFAESI Act provisions to HFCs for amounts below the Rs. 20 Lakhs threshold.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":196227,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/22\/withdrawal-of-notice-under-s-13-4-of-sarfaesi-act-does-not-discharge-the-debt\/","url_meta":{"origin":219128,"position":1},"title":"Withdrawal of notice under Section 13 (4) of SARFAESI Act does not discharge the debt","author":"Saba","date":"May 22, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: A petition filed against the possession notice issued under Rule 8 of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules 2002 was dismissed by a Division Bench comprising of Hemant Gupta, CJ and Vijay Kumar Shukla, J. Argument of the petitioner was that earlier, the concerned Bank initiated proceedings\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":236755,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/05\/jhar-hc%e2%94%82-loan-by-financial-institutions-is-in-the-nature-of-public-money-writ-petition-not-maintainable-as-alternative-remedy-available-under-s-17-of-sarfaesi-act-if-aggrie\/","url_meta":{"origin":219128,"position":2},"title":"Jhar HC | Loan by financial institutions is in the nature of \u2018public money\u2019; Writ Petition not maintainable as alternative remedy available under S. 17 of SARFAESI Act if aggrieved due to action taken by \u2018State\u2019 under S. 13\/14 of the Act","author":"Editor","date":"October 5, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Rajesh Shankar, J. dismissed the petition on grounds of non-maintainability. The facts of the case are such that the petitioner took a loan to the tune of Rs 4, 25,000 from the respondent bank namely Allahabad Bank. Due to default in payment of money, a notice was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":178884,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/28\/no-proceedings-including-art-226-entertained-action-taken-sarfaesi-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":219128,"position":3},"title":"No proceedings including that under Art 226 should be entertained against action taken under SARFAESI Act","author":"Saba","date":"December 28, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Himachal Pradesh: A Division Bench comprising of Dharam Chand Chaudhary and Vivek Singh Thakur, JJ., dismissed a civil writ petition observing that no proceedings should be entertained against action taken under SARFAESI Act, 2002. The petitioner Society filed the petition praying that Respondent 3 Bank be restrained\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":223865,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/06\/ker-hc-art-226-petition-against-sarfaesi-recovery-proceedings-entertained-court-gives-peremptory-orders-cannot-be-challenged-in-any-court-or-forum\/","url_meta":{"origin":219128,"position":4},"title":"Ker HC | Art. 226 petition against SARFAESI recovery proceedings entertained; Court gives peremptory orders, cannot be challenged in any Court or Forum","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 6, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: C.S. Dias, J. disposed of a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner is the wife of one Senthil Kumar, accused under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. The husband of the petitioner\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":371436,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/02\/sarfaesi-act-transfer-of-ownership-of-secured-asset-bombay-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":219128,"position":5},"title":"Ownership of secured asset in a statutory sale under SARFAESI is transferred upon issuance of sale certificate: Bombay HC","author":"Sunaina","date":"January 2, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cOn losing merely the right of redemption, a borrower does not automatically lose ownership rights over the secured asset and that the ownership right is ultimately lost only upon issuance of sale certificate in accordance with Rule 9(6) of the SARFAESI Rules.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Ownership of secured asset","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Ownership-of-secured-asset.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Ownership-of-secured-asset.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Ownership-of-secured-asset.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Ownership-of-secured-asset.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/219128","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=219128"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/219128\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=219128"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=219128"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=219128"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}