{"id":219126,"date":"2019-09-04T14:30:14","date_gmt":"2019-09-04T09:00:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=219126"},"modified":"2019-09-07T16:19:51","modified_gmt":"2019-09-07T10:49:51","slug":"raj-hc-delay-in-filing-of-restoration-application-condoned-due-to-missing-of-file-to-be-attached-by-appellants-within-stipulated-time","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/raj-hc-delay-in-filing-of-restoration-application-condoned-due-to-missing-of-file-to-be-attached-by-appellants-within-stipulated-time\/","title":{"rendered":"Raj HC | Delay in filing of restoration application condoned due to missing of file to be attached by appellants within stipulated time"},"content":{"rendered":"

Rajasthan High Court: <\/strong>A Division Bench of Sangeet Lodha and P.K. Lohra, JJ. allowed an application for restoration and condoned the delay in filing of the application.<\/p>\n

In the present case, in a peremptory order dated 26-04-2011 the Rajasthan High Court had dismissed an application of Special Appeal in D.B. Special Appeal (W) 1133 of 2011. The petitioner has therefore filed a restoration application for restoration of the dismissed application. The present Bench decided on considering the matter on its merits despite the restoration application being barred by limitation.<\/p>\n

The Counsel representing the appellants, R.S. Saluja submitted that according to the peremptory order the appellants were required to file notices within a stipulated time period, which were complied by the appellants as well. The Counsel submitted that the case file of the special appeal was missing and thus, the same could not be attached to the notices. The Counsel also brought to the notice of the present bench an office report which revealed that the missing was found after a period of seven years thus there was no delay on the part of the appellants in the filing.<\/p>\n

The Court upon perusal of the office report and various other documents stated that the notices were filed by the appellants within the stipulated time period and the Court erred while dismissing the same in terms of peremptory order. Thus, the Court allowed the restoration application to its original number and condoned the delay.[Shaitana Ram v. State of Rajasthan, 2019 SCC OnLine Raj 2498<\/a>,<\/b> decided on 29-08-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Sangeet Lodha and P.K. Lohra, JJ. allowed an application for restoration and condoned the delay <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[37408,24144,37409,35624,37407],"class_list":["post-219126","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-condone","tag-limitation-act","tag-no-delay","tag-peremptory-order","tag-restoration-application"],"yoast_head":"\nRaj HC | Delay in filing of restoration application condoned due to missing of file to be attached by appellants within stipulated time | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/raj-hc-delay-in-filing-of-restoration-application-condoned-due-to-missing-of-file-to-be-attached-by-appellants-within-stipulated-time\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Raj HC | Delay in filing of restoration application condoned due to missing of file to be attached by appellants within stipulated time\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Sangeet Lodha and P.K. Lohra, JJ. allowed an application for restoration and condoned the delay\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/raj-hc-delay-in-filing-of-restoration-application-condoned-due-to-missing-of-file-to-be-attached-by-appellants-within-stipulated-time\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-09-04T09:00:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-09-07T10:49:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/raj-hc-delay-in-filing-of-restoration-application-condoned-due-to-missing-of-file-to-be-attached-by-appellants-within-stipulated-time\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/raj-hc-delay-in-filing-of-restoration-application-condoned-due-to-missing-of-file-to-be-attached-by-appellants-within-stipulated-time\/\",\"name\":\"Raj HC | Delay in filing of restoration application condoned due to missing of file to be attached by appellants within stipulated time | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-09-04T09:00:14+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-09-07T10:49:51+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/raj-hc-delay-in-filing-of-restoration-application-condoned-due-to-missing-of-file-to-be-attached-by-appellants-within-stipulated-time\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/raj-hc-delay-in-filing-of-restoration-application-condoned-due-to-missing-of-file-to-be-attached-by-appellants-within-stipulated-time\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/raj-hc-delay-in-filing-of-restoration-application-condoned-due-to-missing-of-file-to-be-attached-by-appellants-within-stipulated-time\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Raj HC | Delay in filing of restoration application condoned due to missing of file to be attached by appellants within stipulated time\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Raj HC | Delay in filing of restoration application condoned due to missing of file to be attached by appellants within stipulated time | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/raj-hc-delay-in-filing-of-restoration-application-condoned-due-to-missing-of-file-to-be-attached-by-appellants-within-stipulated-time\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Raj HC | Delay in filing of restoration application condoned due to missing of file to be attached by appellants within stipulated time","og_description":"Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Sangeet Lodha and P.K. Lohra, JJ. allowed an application for restoration and condoned the delay","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/raj-hc-delay-in-filing-of-restoration-application-condoned-due-to-missing-of-file-to-be-attached-by-appellants-within-stipulated-time\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-09-04T09:00:14+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-09-07T10:49:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/raj-hc-delay-in-filing-of-restoration-application-condoned-due-to-missing-of-file-to-be-attached-by-appellants-within-stipulated-time\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/raj-hc-delay-in-filing-of-restoration-application-condoned-due-to-missing-of-file-to-be-attached-by-appellants-within-stipulated-time\/","name":"Raj HC | Delay in filing of restoration application condoned due to missing of file to be attached by appellants within stipulated time | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-09-04T09:00:14+00:00","dateModified":"2019-09-07T10:49:51+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/raj-hc-delay-in-filing-of-restoration-application-condoned-due-to-missing-of-file-to-be-attached-by-appellants-within-stipulated-time\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/raj-hc-delay-in-filing-of-restoration-application-condoned-due-to-missing-of-file-to-be-attached-by-appellants-within-stipulated-time\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/raj-hc-delay-in-filing-of-restoration-application-condoned-due-to-missing-of-file-to-be-attached-by-appellants-within-stipulated-time\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Raj HC | Delay in filing of restoration application condoned due to missing of file to be attached by appellants within stipulated time"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":319759,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/09\/mockery-justice-delay-12-years-condoned-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":219126,"position":0},"title":"SC dismisses Centre\u2019s plea to condone delay of 12 years and 158 days for filing restoration of suit; calls it a \u2018mockery of justice\u2019","author":"Editor","date":"April 9, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe length of the delay is a relevant matter which the court must take into consideration while considering whether the delay should be condoned or not.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"condonation of delay of 12 years","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/condonation-of-delay-of-12-years.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/condonation-of-delay-of-12-years.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/condonation-of-delay-of-12-years.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/condonation-of-delay-of-12-years.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":180294,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/09\/equity-aids-vigilant-delhi-hc-applications-seeking-condonation-delay-devoid-sufficient-reasons-grounds\/","url_meta":{"origin":219126,"position":1},"title":"Equity aids the vigilant: Delhi HC on applications seeking condonation of delay devoid of sufficient reasons or grounds","author":"Saba","date":"January 9, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Bench of the Delhi High Court dismissed a Letters Patent Appeal which was preferred to assail the dismissal of applications filed for restoration of a writ petition (\u2018subject petition\u2019). The subject petition itself had been dismissed in default. The subject petition was listed for hearing before\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":197646,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/period-of-delay-is-not-the-criteria-while-considering-application-under-section-5-of-limitation-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":219126,"position":2},"title":"Period of delay is not the criteria while considering application under Section 5 of Limitation Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 28, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of G.S. Sistani and Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, JJ., refused to condone a delay of 65 days in filing the appeal under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 which was consequently dismissed. The appellant filed the said appeal against the order of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":282956,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/02\/under-the-payment-of-gratuity-act-a-delay-cannot-be-condoned-by-taking-the-aid-of-the-provisions-of-the-limitation-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":219126,"position":3},"title":"Delay cannot be condoned under Payment of Gratuity Act by taking the aid of the provisions of Limitation Act: Kerala High Court","author":"Editor","date":"February 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court perused Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963 and Section 7(7) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 and held that the authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act cannot condone the delay in filing an appeal by entertaining an application under Limitation Act.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-310.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":291058,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/condonation-of-delay-litigation-should-not-be-terminated-by-default-andhra-pradesh-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":219126,"position":4},"title":"Litigation should not be terminated by default of either of the parties; Andhra Pradesh High Court condones a delay of 339 days","author":"Editor","date":"May 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Ordinarily the litigation should not be terminated by default either of the plaintiff or the defendant. The cause of justice does require that the adjudication be done on merits.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"andhra pradesh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":259304,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/30\/delay-of-1011-days-condoned-by-andhra-pradesh-hc-what-a-grave-error-holds-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":219126,"position":5},"title":"Delay of 1011 days condoned by Andhra Pradesh HC! What a grave error, holds Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 30, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a case where the Andhra Pradesh High Court had condoned a delay of 1011 days even though no sufficient cause was shown explaining the delay, the bench of MR Shah* and BV Nagarathna, JJ has held that the High Court has not exercised the discretion judiciously. Factual\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/219126","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=219126"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/219126\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=219126"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=219126"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=219126"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}