{"id":219114,"date":"2019-09-04T11:00:53","date_gmt":"2019-09-04T05:30:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=219114"},"modified":"2019-09-13T09:55:09","modified_gmt":"2019-09-13T04:25:09","slug":"sat-representation-for-refund-made-by-the-appellants-rightly-rejected-by-sebi-as-it-did-not-indicate-the-manner-and-the-mode-of-repayment-to-the-investors","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/sat-representation-for-refund-made-by-the-appellants-rightly-rejected-by-sebi-as-it-did-not-indicate-the-manner-and-the-mode-of-repayment-to-the-investors\/","title":{"rendered":"SAT | Representation for refund made by appellants rejected by SEBI as it did not indicate the manner and mode of repayment to investors"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT):<\/strong> A Division Bench of Justice Tarun Agarwala, (Presiding Officer) and Dr C. K. G. Nair (Member), upheld the order passed by Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) for rejecting the representation filed by the appellants.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SEBI passed an order in 2015 holding that &#8220;Kalpbut Real Estate Limited&#8221; was engaged in operating Collective Investment Scheme (CIS) by mobilizing funds from the public in contravention of Section 12(1B) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 and consequently, in order to protect the interest of the investors in the securities market, SEBI directed the company and its directors to wind up the collective investment schemes and refund the money collected within the period of three months.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">This order was challenged before the Tribunal which was disposed of on the strength of the submission made by the appellants that irrespective of the fact as to whether their scheme was CIS or not, the appellants were willing to refund the amount to the investors. On the basis of this statement, in 2017 the Tribunal permitted the appellants to make the representation setting out in details the names of the investors and quantum of the amount already refunded and the mode and the manner in which the balance amount would be refunded.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">This list of payments made did not indicate the manner and the mode of repayment and consequently, SEBI directed the appellants to provide details of the manner in which the payments were to be made. Since no details were supplied, the representation of the appellants was rejected in 2019. The appellants filed an appeal to challenge this.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tribunal was of the opinion that the list which was perused by SEBI only had the date and the amount mentioned in it. There were no details as to how that amount was to be paid, viz, by way of cash or by cheque or by RTGS, etc., was not indicated. Specific details were asked by SEBI, but the same was not done. Thus, the list came into scrutiny. Further, nothing was indicated with regard to the mode and the manner in which the balance amount would be refunded.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Therefore, the Tribunal held that the representation filed by the appellants was rightly rejected and that there was no error of law made by SEBI in rejecting the same.[Kalpbut Real Estate Ltd. v. Securities and Exchange Board of India, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Qj8GiKFL\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine SAT 164<\/b><\/a>, decided on 22-08-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT): A Division Bench of Justice Tarun Agarwala, (Presiding Officer) and Dr C. K. G. Nair (Member), upheld the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":209781,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[33584,37395,25544,32553,37394],"class_list":["post-219114","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-collective-investment-scheme","tag-mobilisation-of-funds","tag-mode-of-payment","tag-refund-of-money","tag-section-121b-of-sebi-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>SAT | Representation for refund made by appellants rejected by SEBI as it did not indicate the manner and mode of repayment to investors | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/sat-representation-for-refund-made-by-the-appellants-rightly-rejected-by-sebi-as-it-did-not-indicate-the-manner-and-the-mode-of-repayment-to-the-investors\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SAT | Representation for refund made by appellants rejected by SEBI as it did not indicate the manner and mode of repayment to investors\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT): A Division Bench of Justice Tarun Agarwala, (Presiding Officer) and Dr C. K. G. Nair (Member), upheld the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/sat-representation-for-refund-made-by-the-appellants-rightly-rejected-by-sebi-as-it-did-not-indicate-the-manner-and-the-mode-of-repayment-to-the-investors\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-09-04T05:30:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-09-13T04:25:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/sat-representation-for-refund-made-by-the-appellants-rightly-rejected-by-sebi-as-it-did-not-indicate-the-manner-and-the-mode-of-repayment-to-the-investors\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/sat-representation-for-refund-made-by-the-appellants-rightly-rejected-by-sebi-as-it-did-not-indicate-the-manner-and-the-mode-of-repayment-to-the-investors\/\",\"name\":\"SAT | Representation for refund made by appellants rejected by SEBI as it did not indicate the manner and mode of repayment to investors | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/sat-representation-for-refund-made-by-the-appellants-rightly-rejected-by-sebi-as-it-did-not-indicate-the-manner-and-the-mode-of-repayment-to-the-investors\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/sat-representation-for-refund-made-by-the-appellants-rightly-rejected-by-sebi-as-it-did-not-indicate-the-manner-and-the-mode-of-repayment-to-the-investors\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-09-04T05:30:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-09-13T04:25:09+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/sat-representation-for-refund-made-by-the-appellants-rightly-rejected-by-sebi-as-it-did-not-indicate-the-manner-and-the-mode-of-repayment-to-the-investors\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/sat-representation-for-refund-made-by-the-appellants-rightly-rejected-by-sebi-as-it-did-not-indicate-the-manner-and-the-mode-of-repayment-to-the-investors\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/sat-representation-for-refund-made-by-the-appellants-rightly-rejected-by-sebi-as-it-did-not-indicate-the-manner-and-the-mode-of-repayment-to-the-investors\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/sat-representation-for-refund-made-by-the-appellants-rightly-rejected-by-sebi-as-it-did-not-indicate-the-manner-and-the-mode-of-repayment-to-the-investors\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SAT | Representation for refund made by appellants rejected by SEBI as it did not indicate the manner and mode of repayment to investors\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SAT | Representation for refund made by appellants rejected by SEBI as it did not indicate the manner and mode of repayment to investors | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/sat-representation-for-refund-made-by-the-appellants-rightly-rejected-by-sebi-as-it-did-not-indicate-the-manner-and-the-mode-of-repayment-to-the-investors\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"SAT | Representation for refund made by appellants rejected by SEBI as it did not indicate the manner and mode of repayment to investors","og_description":"Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT): A Division Bench of Justice Tarun Agarwala, (Presiding Officer) and Dr C. K. G. Nair (Member), upheld the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/sat-representation-for-refund-made-by-the-appellants-rightly-rejected-by-sebi-as-it-did-not-indicate-the-manner-and-the-mode-of-repayment-to-the-investors\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-09-04T05:30:53+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-09-13T04:25:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/sat-representation-for-refund-made-by-the-appellants-rightly-rejected-by-sebi-as-it-did-not-indicate-the-manner-and-the-mode-of-repayment-to-the-investors\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/sat-representation-for-refund-made-by-the-appellants-rightly-rejected-by-sebi-as-it-did-not-indicate-the-manner-and-the-mode-of-repayment-to-the-investors\/","name":"SAT | Representation for refund made by appellants rejected by SEBI as it did not indicate the manner and mode of repayment to investors | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/sat-representation-for-refund-made-by-the-appellants-rightly-rejected-by-sebi-as-it-did-not-indicate-the-manner-and-the-mode-of-repayment-to-the-investors\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/sat-representation-for-refund-made-by-the-appellants-rightly-rejected-by-sebi-as-it-did-not-indicate-the-manner-and-the-mode-of-repayment-to-the-investors\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg","datePublished":"2019-09-04T05:30:53+00:00","dateModified":"2019-09-13T04:25:09+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/sat-representation-for-refund-made-by-the-appellants-rightly-rejected-by-sebi-as-it-did-not-indicate-the-manner-and-the-mode-of-repayment-to-the-investors\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/sat-representation-for-refund-made-by-the-appellants-rightly-rejected-by-sebi-as-it-did-not-indicate-the-manner-and-the-mode-of-repayment-to-the-investors\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/sat-representation-for-refund-made-by-the-appellants-rightly-rejected-by-sebi-as-it-did-not-indicate-the-manner-and-the-mode-of-repayment-to-the-investors\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/sat-representation-for-refund-made-by-the-appellants-rightly-rejected-by-sebi-as-it-did-not-indicate-the-manner-and-the-mode-of-repayment-to-the-investors\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SAT | Representation for refund made by appellants rejected by SEBI as it did not indicate the manner and mode of repayment to investors"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":197375,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/22\/winding-up-of-collective-investment-scheme-ordered-for-contravention-of-section-121b-sebi-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":219114,"position":0},"title":"Winding up of \u2018Collective Investment Scheme\u2019 ordered for contravention of Section 12(1b) SEBI Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 22, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI): The whole time member of SEBI,\u00a0 G.Mahalingam in accordance to the interim order given earlier issued directions under Section 19 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 and Sections 11(1), 11(B) and 11(4) thereof and regulation 65 of the SEBI\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":217689,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/05\/sat-companies-cannot-run-cis-scheme-without-registering-it-with-sebi\/","url_meta":{"origin":219114,"position":1},"title":"SAT | Companies cannot run CIS Scheme without registering it with SEBI","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 5, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT):\u00a0Justice Tarun Agarwala (Presiding Officer) and Dr C.K.G. Nair (Member) justified the penalty imposed by SEBI on the appellants under Section 15-J of SEBI Act. The appellants challenged the order of the Adjudicating Officer (AO) of SEBI. The order directed them to pay a penalty of Rs\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":224431,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/22\/sat-company-floating-cis-without-registering-with-sebi-held-liable-under-s-15-ha-of-sebi-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":219114,"position":2},"title":"SAT | Company floating CIS without registering with SEBI held liable under S. 15-HA of SEBI Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 22, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT): A Two-Member Bench of Justice Tarun Agarwala (Presiding Officer) and Justice M.T. Joshi (Judicial Member) was hearing two appeals pertaining to the orders passed by Adjudicating Officer (AO) of Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) imposing penalty over appellants. The appeals were filed by Subrata\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":220140,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/27\/sebi-directors-liable-along-with-company-to-refund-the-money-of-investors-collected-under-collective-investment-scheme-without-obtaining-a-certificate-of-registration\/","url_meta":{"origin":219114,"position":3},"title":"SEBI | Directors liable along with Company to refund the money of investors collected under &#8216;Collective Investment Scheme&#8217; without obtaining a certificate of registration","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI): Ananta Barua, Whole Time Member, issued directions holding the Directors of Zeestar liable for accepting money under the Collective Investment Scheme when they weren\u2019t possessing the registrations for the same. It was brought to the attention of SEBI that Zeestar Limousines Ltd. was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":18421,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/10\/08\/mobilizing-funds-for-purchase-of-future-land-and-pre-booking-of-plots-constitutes-collective-investment-scheme\/","url_meta":{"origin":219114,"position":4},"title":"Mobilizing funds for purchase of future land and pre-booking of plots constitutes Collective Investment Scheme","author":"Sucheta","date":"October 8, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Security and Exchange Board of India (SEBI): In a setback to Adel Landmarks Limited, a real estate enterprise, the SEBI directed the company and its directors to refund the money collected from the public under its \u2018pre-booking of plots\u2019 scheme. Adel, without registration and approval under SEBI\u2019s Collective Investment Schemes\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":174664,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/10\/sebi-directs-earliest-repayment-dues-owed-investors\/","url_meta":{"origin":219114,"position":5},"title":"SEBI directs earliest repayment of dues owed to investors","author":"Saba","date":"December 10, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities and Exchange Board of India: In the order passed by G. Mahaloingam (Whole Time Member) in continuation of the order dated 29-5-2016, it has been directed that Anmol India Agro-Herbal Farming and Dairies Care Company Ltd. and its directors shall repay the due amounts within a maximum period of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/219114","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=219114"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/219114\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/209781"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=219114"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=219114"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=219114"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}