{"id":218737,"date":"2019-08-29T09:53:57","date_gmt":"2019-08-29T04:23:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=218737"},"modified":"2019-09-03T17:33:46","modified_gmt":"2019-09-03T12:03:46","slug":"bom-hc-prayer-for-withdrawal-and-liberty-to-file-fresh-suit-cannot-be-split-into-two-plaintiff-entitled-to-file-fresh-suit-even-if-no-express-liberty-given","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/29\/bom-hc-prayer-for-withdrawal-and-liberty-to-file-fresh-suit-cannot-be-split-into-two-plaintiff-entitled-to-file-fresh-suit-even-if-no-express-liberty-given\/","title":{"rendered":"Bom HC | Prayer for withdrawal and liberty to file fresh suit cannot be split into two: plaintiff entitled to file fresh suit even if no express liberty given"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Bombay High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>Sandeep K. Shinde, J. dismissed an application filed under Section 115 CPC taking exception to the order of the Civil Judge whereby he rejected applicants application seeking rejection of plaint by the respondent-plaintiff.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The applicant-defendant filed an application under Order 7 Rule 11 (d) read with Order 23 Rule 3 and 4(b) CPC, urging for rejection of plaint filed by the respondent. It was his case that the respondent had earlier instituted a Summary Suit before the trial court but withdrew it. However, soon thereafter, the respondent instituted another Special Civil Suit on the same cause of action.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The applicant represented by S.M. Oak instructed by Sagar Anant Joshi, Advocates, contended that the previous suit was withdrawn by the respondent unconditionally without liberty to institute a fresh suit in terms of Rule 3 read with Rule 4 and Order 23 CPC. The applicant, therefore, contended that in the absence of expressed liberty to institute a fresh suit, the present subject suit field subsequently was not maintainable. However, the applicant&#8217;s application was rejected by the Civil Judge.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Perusing the application for withdrawal of the previous suit filed by the respondent, the High Court noted that respondent sought leave to withdraw the previous suit with liberty to file a fresh suit. From the impugned order, it was more than clear that the trial court had recorded its satisfaction as required under Order 13 Rule 3(a) CPC, having found substance in the application, and granted permission to withdraw the suit.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was observed:\u00a0<strong>&#8220;Contention of the Applicant that though Plaintiff was permitted to withdraw the suit but in absence of express liberty to institute fresh suit, second suit was not maintainable, cannot be accepted. In as much as prayer for withdrawal and liberty to file fresh suit cannot be split up in two parts viz. withdrawal and liberty to file fresh suit. It has to be allowed as whole or rejected as whole. It is well settled that if an application is made for withdrawal of the suit with liberty to file suit, it is not open for the Court to grant only permission for withdrawal, without liberty to institute the proceedings, though it is open for the Court to reject such application.&#8221;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In such view of the matter, it was held that the present application was devoid of merits and was therefore dismissed. [Chandrakant Pandurang Shingade v. Sau. Manjusha Chandrakant Shingade, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/EgX7L94v\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Bom 1669<\/b><\/a>, decided on 06-08-2019]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bombay High Court:\u00a0Sandeep K. Shinde, J. dismissed an application filed under Section 115 CPC taking exception to the order of the Civil <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":74381,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[37301,31620],"class_list":["post-218737","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-liberty-to-file-fresh-suit","tag-section-115-cpc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Bom HC | Prayer for withdrawal and liberty to file fresh suit cannot be split into two: plaintiff entitled to file fresh suit even if no express liberty given | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/29\/bom-hc-prayer-for-withdrawal-and-liberty-to-file-fresh-suit-cannot-be-split-into-two-plaintiff-entitled-to-file-fresh-suit-even-if-no-express-liberty-given\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bom HC | Prayer for withdrawal and liberty to file fresh suit cannot be split into two: plaintiff entitled to file fresh suit even if no express liberty given\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court:\u00a0Sandeep K. Shinde, J. dismissed an application filed under Section 115 CPC taking exception to the order of the Civil\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/29\/bom-hc-prayer-for-withdrawal-and-liberty-to-file-fresh-suit-cannot-be-split-into-two-plaintiff-entitled-to-file-fresh-suit-even-if-no-express-liberty-given\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-08-29T04:23:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-09-03T12:03:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/29\/bom-hc-prayer-for-withdrawal-and-liberty-to-file-fresh-suit-cannot-be-split-into-two-plaintiff-entitled-to-file-fresh-suit-even-if-no-express-liberty-given\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/29\/bom-hc-prayer-for-withdrawal-and-liberty-to-file-fresh-suit-cannot-be-split-into-two-plaintiff-entitled-to-file-fresh-suit-even-if-no-express-liberty-given\/\",\"name\":\"Bom HC | Prayer for withdrawal and liberty to file fresh suit cannot be split into two: plaintiff entitled to file fresh suit even if no express liberty given | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/29\/bom-hc-prayer-for-withdrawal-and-liberty-to-file-fresh-suit-cannot-be-split-into-two-plaintiff-entitled-to-file-fresh-suit-even-if-no-express-liberty-given\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/29\/bom-hc-prayer-for-withdrawal-and-liberty-to-file-fresh-suit-cannot-be-split-into-two-plaintiff-entitled-to-file-fresh-suit-even-if-no-express-liberty-given\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-08-29T04:23:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-09-03T12:03:46+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/29\/bom-hc-prayer-for-withdrawal-and-liberty-to-file-fresh-suit-cannot-be-split-into-two-plaintiff-entitled-to-file-fresh-suit-even-if-no-express-liberty-given\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/29\/bom-hc-prayer-for-withdrawal-and-liberty-to-file-fresh-suit-cannot-be-split-into-two-plaintiff-entitled-to-file-fresh-suit-even-if-no-express-liberty-given\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/29\/bom-hc-prayer-for-withdrawal-and-liberty-to-file-fresh-suit-cannot-be-split-into-two-plaintiff-entitled-to-file-fresh-suit-even-if-no-express-liberty-given\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/29\/bom-hc-prayer-for-withdrawal-and-liberty-to-file-fresh-suit-cannot-be-split-into-two-plaintiff-entitled-to-file-fresh-suit-even-if-no-express-liberty-given\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bom HC | Prayer for withdrawal and liberty to file fresh suit cannot be split into two: plaintiff entitled to file fresh suit even if no express liberty given\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bom HC | Prayer for withdrawal and liberty to file fresh suit cannot be split into two: plaintiff entitled to file fresh suit even if no express liberty given | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/29\/bom-hc-prayer-for-withdrawal-and-liberty-to-file-fresh-suit-cannot-be-split-into-two-plaintiff-entitled-to-file-fresh-suit-even-if-no-express-liberty-given\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bom HC | Prayer for withdrawal and liberty to file fresh suit cannot be split into two: plaintiff entitled to file fresh suit even if no express liberty given","og_description":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0Sandeep K. Shinde, J. dismissed an application filed under Section 115 CPC taking exception to the order of the Civil","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/29\/bom-hc-prayer-for-withdrawal-and-liberty-to-file-fresh-suit-cannot-be-split-into-two-plaintiff-entitled-to-file-fresh-suit-even-if-no-express-liberty-given\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-08-29T04:23:57+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-09-03T12:03:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/29\/bom-hc-prayer-for-withdrawal-and-liberty-to-file-fresh-suit-cannot-be-split-into-two-plaintiff-entitled-to-file-fresh-suit-even-if-no-express-liberty-given\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/29\/bom-hc-prayer-for-withdrawal-and-liberty-to-file-fresh-suit-cannot-be-split-into-two-plaintiff-entitled-to-file-fresh-suit-even-if-no-express-liberty-given\/","name":"Bom HC | Prayer for withdrawal and liberty to file fresh suit cannot be split into two: plaintiff entitled to file fresh suit even if no express liberty given | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/29\/bom-hc-prayer-for-withdrawal-and-liberty-to-file-fresh-suit-cannot-be-split-into-two-plaintiff-entitled-to-file-fresh-suit-even-if-no-express-liberty-given\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/29\/bom-hc-prayer-for-withdrawal-and-liberty-to-file-fresh-suit-cannot-be-split-into-two-plaintiff-entitled-to-file-fresh-suit-even-if-no-express-liberty-given\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","datePublished":"2019-08-29T04:23:57+00:00","dateModified":"2019-09-03T12:03:46+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/29\/bom-hc-prayer-for-withdrawal-and-liberty-to-file-fresh-suit-cannot-be-split-into-two-plaintiff-entitled-to-file-fresh-suit-even-if-no-express-liberty-given\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/29\/bom-hc-prayer-for-withdrawal-and-liberty-to-file-fresh-suit-cannot-be-split-into-two-plaintiff-entitled-to-file-fresh-suit-even-if-no-express-liberty-given\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/29\/bom-hc-prayer-for-withdrawal-and-liberty-to-file-fresh-suit-cannot-be-split-into-two-plaintiff-entitled-to-file-fresh-suit-even-if-no-express-liberty-given\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","width":1331,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/29\/bom-hc-prayer-for-withdrawal-and-liberty-to-file-fresh-suit-cannot-be-split-into-two-plaintiff-entitled-to-file-fresh-suit-even-if-no-express-liberty-given\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bom HC | Prayer for withdrawal and liberty to file fresh suit cannot be split into two: plaintiff entitled to file fresh suit even if no express liberty given"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":212117,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/16\/del-hc-plea-taken-by-defendant-in-written-statement-is-wholly-irrelevant-the-stage-of-deciding-or-7-r-11-cpc-application\/","url_meta":{"origin":218737,"position":0},"title":"Del HC | Plea taken by defendant in written statement is wholly irrelevant at the stage of deciding Or. 7 R. 11 CPC application","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 16, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Vinod Goel, J. dismissed a petition impugning the order passed by\u00a0Civil Judge whereby defendant's application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. The plaintiff filed a recovery suit against the defendant (petitioner) on account of selling them wooden furniture. The suit was instituted in Delhi as the plaintiff was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":202952,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/01\/withdrawal-of-a-suit-can-be-allowed-under-order-xxiii-rule-3-of-cpc-if-the-defect-is-formal-in-nature-and-such-that-has-no-effect-on-merits-of-the-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":218737,"position":1},"title":"Withdrawal of a suit can be allowed under Order XXIII Rule 3 of CPC if the defect is formal in nature and such that has no effect on merits of the case","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 1, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge bench comprising of Rashid Ali Dar, J. while dealing with a civil revision petition filed against the order of trial court allowing withdrawal of suit, upheld the trial court order on the finding that there were sufficient grounds for granting leave for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":267027,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/18\/application-under-s-151-of-cpc-maintainable-despite-the-fact-that-order-allowing-the-application-under-or-7-r-11-of-cpc-is-appealable\/","url_meta":{"origin":218737,"position":2},"title":"MP HC | Application under S. 151 of CPC maintainable despite the fact that order allowing the application under Or. 7 R. 11 of CPC is appealable; Trial Court directed to restore civil suit","author":"Editor","date":"May 18, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Dwarka Dhish Bansal, J. allowed a civil revision under Section 115 of CPC against the order rejecting application filed under Section 151 of CPC holding that the same was not maintainable. Order sheet of the trial Court showed that respondent 2 was not present when the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":275119,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/06\/delhi-high-court-negligence-of-counsel-not-a-reasonable-ground-within-order-xi-rule-15-cpc-facts-of-the-case-must-disclose-urgency-to-avail-benefit-under-or-xi-r-14-cpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":218737,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court| Negligence of counsel not a reasonable ground within Order XI Rule 1(5) CPC; Facts of the case must disclose \u2018urgency\u2019 to avail benefit under Or. XI R. 1(4) CPC","author":"Editor","date":"October 6, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a case filed by the petitioner challenging dismissal order in relation to an application filed seeking to place on record, certain additional documents which, according to the application, were a necessary and essential part of the suit, but could not be filed with the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":237351,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/13\/defamation-madras-hc-presence-or-absence-of-evidence-not-a-matter-to-be-decided-in-or-7-r-11-cpc-application-challenge-to-isha-foundations-defamation-suit-against-media-entity-rejected\/","url_meta":{"origin":218737,"position":4},"title":"[Defamation] Madras HC | &#8220;Presence or absence of evidence not a matter to be decided in Or. 7 R. 11 CPC application&#8221;: Challenge to Isha Foundation&#8217;s defamation suit against media entity rejected","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 13, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: R. Subramanian, J., refused to allow the application filed by Sathiyam Media praying for rejection of plaint filed by the Isha Foundation claiming damages for defamation from the applicant. Cause of Action The present application was filed to seek rejection of the plaint due to non-disclosure of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":218666,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/27\/mp-hc-plaint-filed-under-or-7-r-11-cpc-can-be-rejected-based-on-grounds-mentioned-in-rule-11-or-if-the-cause-of-action-has-not-been-disclosed\/","url_meta":{"origin":218737,"position":5},"title":"MP HC | Plaint filed under Or. 7 R. 11 CPC can be rejected based on grounds mentioned in Rule 11 or if the cause of action has not been disclosed","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Prakash Shrivastava, J., dismissed the revision petition filed by the respondents under Section 115 CPC where they challenged the order of the Trial Court, whereby their application for rejection of plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC was rejected. The respondents had filed the suit for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/218737","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=218737"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/218737\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/74381"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=218737"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=218737"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=218737"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}