{"id":218731,"date":"2019-08-28T18:15:00","date_gmt":"2019-08-28T12:45:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=218731"},"modified":"2019-09-03T16:59:25","modified_gmt":"2019-09-03T11:29:25","slug":"raj-hc-decree-of-divorce-granted-in-light-of-compromise-arrived-between-the-parties","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/28\/raj-hc-decree-of-divorce-granted-in-light-of-compromise-arrived-between-the-parties\/","title":{"rendered":"Raj HC | Decree of Divorce granted in light of compromise arrived between the parties"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Rajasthan High Court: <\/strong>The Division Bench comprising of Narendra Singh Dhaddha and Mohammad Rafiq, JJ. allowed a decree of divorce which was filed through a joint application under Section 13 B(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the present case, a joint application was filed by the husband and wife under Section 13B (1) of HMA, for dissolution of their marriage. Along with this, they also filed an application under Section 13B (2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for waiver of the cooling-off period.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Further, the above was filed in the family court and dismissed thereafter. Hence the present appeal has been filed challenging the said order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Parties stated that the marriage could not be consummated fro inability of the husband and there is absolutely no possibility of the parties living together. In such circumstances, they both started living separately and decided to obtain a decree of divorce.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel on behalf of the parties submitted that the application filed under Section 13 B (1) of the stated Act clearly mentions that the parties have been living separately from last more than 1 year. Further, it has been stated in the application that, wife received all her \u2018stridhan\u2019 and dowry articles along with a sum of Rs 15, 00,000 as permanent alimony.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In order to support the above submission, counsel relied on the Judgments of the Supreme Court in <em>Veena v. State (Govt. of NCT, Delhi)<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/95Mo3Kk9\">(2011) 14 SCC 614<\/a>; <em>Devinder Singh Narula v. Meenakshi Nangia<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/BUyyforH\">(2012) 8 SCC 580<\/a> and <em>Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/auol3vp4\">(2017) 8 SCC 746<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The High Court, on noting the submissions of the parties along with keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, stated that, the compromise arrived between the parties persuaded the court to allow the said appeal and therefore the marriage is to be dissolved with immediate effect.[Sachin Gupta v. Ram Kumari Gupta, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/GkRL80rq\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Raj 2402<\/b><\/a>, decided on 22-08-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Rajasthan High Court: The Division Bench comprising of Narendra Singh Dhaddha and Mohammad Rafiq, JJ. allowed a decree of divorce which was <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2711,31588,37300],"class_list":["post-218731","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-compromise","tag-decree-of-divorce","tag-section-13-b1-of-the-hindu-marriage-act-1955"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Raj HC | Decree of Divorce granted in light of compromise arrived between the parties | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/28\/raj-hc-decree-of-divorce-granted-in-light-of-compromise-arrived-between-the-parties\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Raj HC | Decree of Divorce granted in light of compromise arrived between the parties\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court: The Division Bench comprising of Narendra Singh Dhaddha and Mohammad Rafiq, JJ. allowed a decree of divorce which was\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/28\/raj-hc-decree-of-divorce-granted-in-light-of-compromise-arrived-between-the-parties\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-08-28T12:45:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-09-03T11:29:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/28\/raj-hc-decree-of-divorce-granted-in-light-of-compromise-arrived-between-the-parties\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/28\/raj-hc-decree-of-divorce-granted-in-light-of-compromise-arrived-between-the-parties\/\",\"name\":\"Raj HC | Decree of Divorce granted in light of compromise arrived between the parties | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-08-28T12:45:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-09-03T11:29:25+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/28\/raj-hc-decree-of-divorce-granted-in-light-of-compromise-arrived-between-the-parties\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/28\/raj-hc-decree-of-divorce-granted-in-light-of-compromise-arrived-between-the-parties\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/28\/raj-hc-decree-of-divorce-granted-in-light-of-compromise-arrived-between-the-parties\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Raj HC | Decree of Divorce granted in light of compromise arrived between the parties\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Raj HC | Decree of Divorce granted in light of compromise arrived between the parties | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/28\/raj-hc-decree-of-divorce-granted-in-light-of-compromise-arrived-between-the-parties\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Raj HC | Decree of Divorce granted in light of compromise arrived between the parties","og_description":"Rajasthan High Court: The Division Bench comprising of Narendra Singh Dhaddha and Mohammad Rafiq, JJ. allowed a decree of divorce which was","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/28\/raj-hc-decree-of-divorce-granted-in-light-of-compromise-arrived-between-the-parties\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-08-28T12:45:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-09-03T11:29:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/28\/raj-hc-decree-of-divorce-granted-in-light-of-compromise-arrived-between-the-parties\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/28\/raj-hc-decree-of-divorce-granted-in-light-of-compromise-arrived-between-the-parties\/","name":"Raj HC | Decree of Divorce granted in light of compromise arrived between the parties | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-08-28T12:45:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-09-03T11:29:25+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/28\/raj-hc-decree-of-divorce-granted-in-light-of-compromise-arrived-between-the-parties\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/28\/raj-hc-decree-of-divorce-granted-in-light-of-compromise-arrived-between-the-parties\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/28\/raj-hc-decree-of-divorce-granted-in-light-of-compromise-arrived-between-the-parties\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Raj HC | Decree of Divorce granted in light of compromise arrived between the parties"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":63501,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/24\/family-courts-are-not-allowed-to-enlarge-the-scope-of-enquiry-under-s-13b-2-of-the-hindu-marriage-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":218731,"position":0},"title":"Family Courts are not allowed to enlarge the scope of enquiry under S. 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act","author":"Sucheta","date":"August 24, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: While deciding upon an appeal against the order and decree passed by the Family Court, Tirunelveli, the Division Bench of K.K. Sasidharan and B. Gokuldas, JJ., set aside the decision of the Family Court dismissing the joint petition for dissolution of marriage of the appellants for want\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":245705,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/17\/cooling-period\/","url_meta":{"origin":218731,"position":1},"title":"Chh HC | Guidelines regarding the waiver of cooling period as provided under S. 13B (2) of Hindu Marriage Act reiterated; Petition allowed","author":"Editor","date":"March 17, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant J., allowed the petition and quashed the impugned order. The facts of the case are such that the marriage of petitioner 1 with petitioner 2 was solemnized on 17-02-2016. Because of differences between them, they started living separately on 10-01-2018. It was almost\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":238365,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/02\/bom-hc-can-cooling-off-period-under-s-13-b2-of-hindu-marriage-act-be-waived-legal-position-discussed-in-a-case-of-pregnant-woman\/","url_meta":{"origin":218731,"position":2},"title":"Bom HC | Can &#8220;cooling-off period&#8221; under S. 13-B(2) of Hindu Marriage Act be waived? Legal position discussed in a case of pregnant woman","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 2, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0Nitin W. Sambre, J., allowed an application seeking waiver of the cooling-off period on an urgent basis in light of woman carrying pregnancy from another person. Parties to the instant matter tendered the joint petition for divorce by mutual consent pursuant to the provisions of Section 13B of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":156074,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/12\/video-conferencing-can-be-used-for-conducting-proceedings-in-second-motion-of-mutual-consent-divorce\/","url_meta":{"origin":218731,"position":3},"title":"Video conferencing can be used for conducting proceedings in second motion of mutual consent divorce","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"September 12, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Holding that the minimum period of six months stipulated under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for a motion for passing decree of divorce on the basis of mutual consent is not mandatory but directory, the bench of AK Goel and UU Lalit, JJ said that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":264939,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/02\/alimony-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":218731,"position":4},"title":"Whether husband is entitled to claim alimony under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955? Bom HC decides","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 2, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Bharati Dangre, J., held that provision of maintenance\/permanent alimony being a beneficial provision for the indigent spouse, Section 25 can be invoked by either of the spouse, where a decree of any kind governed by Sections 9 to 13 has been passed and marriage tie is broken,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":254822,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/28\/where-minor-wife-fails-to-obtain-decree-of-nullity-before-attaining-age-of-majority-the-marriage-becomes-a-valid-one\/","url_meta":{"origin":218731,"position":5},"title":"[Child Marriage] P&#038;H HC | Where minor wife fails to obtain decree of nullity before attaining age of majority, the marriage becomes a valid one; HC interprets","author":"Editor","date":"September 28, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: The Division Bench of Ritu Bahri and Arun Monga, JJ., held that in case of child marriage, the marriage is voidable not void and a petition for nullity under Section 13(2)(iv) could only be filed if she-wife had got married at the age of 15\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/218731","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=218731"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/218731\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=218731"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=218731"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=218731"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}