{"id":218722,"date":"2019-08-28T17:30:05","date_gmt":"2019-08-28T12:00:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=218722"},"modified":"2019-08-28T14:56:24","modified_gmt":"2019-08-28T09:26:24","slug":"cbdt-clarifies-differential-regime-between-domestic-investors-and-fpis-existed-even-prior-to-general-budget-2019-and-was-not-creation-of-finance-no-2-act-2019","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/28\/cbdt-clarifies-differential-regime-between-domestic-investors-and-fpis-existed-even-prior-to-general-budget-2019-and-was-not-creation-of-finance-no-2-act-2019\/","title":{"rendered":"CBDT clarifies differential regime between domestic investors and FPIs existed even prior to General Budget 2019 and was not creation of Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019"},"content":{"rendered":"

Dispelling this false impression being created in certain sections of media including social media, CBDT said that differential regime between domestic investors (including AIF Category III) and FPIs existed even prior to the General Budget 2019 and was therefore not the creation of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019 or the announcement made by the Finance Ministry on 23rd<\/sup>\u00a0August 2019.<\/p>\n

In this regard, CBDT has further stated that in case of Foreign Institutional Investors (FPIs), Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) contains special provisions [Section 115AD read with Section 2(14) of the Act] for taxation of income from derivatives. Under this regime, the income of FPIs arising from derivatives was treated as capital gains and liable for a special rate of tax as per Section 115AD of the Act. However, income arising from derivatives for the domestic investors including Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) Category-III as well as for foreign investors who are not FPIs, has always been treated as business income and not as capital gains, and taxed at applicable normal income tax rates. The differential regime therefore already existed for FPIs through Section 115 AD. Therefore, to say that General Budget 2019 or FM\u2019s announcement on 23rd<\/sup>\u00a0August 2019 created a differential regime between FPI and domestic investor is incorrect.<\/p>\n

\n

[Press Release dt. 28-08-2019]<\/strong><\/p>\n

Ministry of Finance<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Dispelling this false impression being created in certain sections of media including social media, CBDT said that differential regime between domestic investors <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1188,2],"tags":[37295,37296,37297,37298],"class_list":["post-218722","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-hot_off_the_press","category-news","tag-differential-regime","tag-domestic-investor","tag-foreign-institutional-investors","tag-general-budget-2019"],"yoast_head":"\nCBDT clarifies differential regime between domestic investors and FPIs existed even prior to General Budget 2019 and was not creation of Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/28\/cbdt-clarifies-differential-regime-between-domestic-investors-and-fpis-existed-even-prior-to-general-budget-2019-and-was-not-creation-of-finance-no-2-act-2019\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"CBDT clarifies differential regime between domestic investors and FPIs existed even prior to General Budget 2019 and was not creation of Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Dispelling this false impression being created in certain sections of media including social media, CBDT said that differential regime between domestic investors\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/28\/cbdt-clarifies-differential-regime-between-domestic-investors-and-fpis-existed-even-prior-to-general-budget-2019-and-was-not-creation-of-finance-no-2-act-2019\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-08-28T12:00:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/mof-647_022117042319.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/28\/cbdt-clarifies-differential-regime-between-domestic-investors-and-fpis-existed-even-prior-to-general-budget-2019-and-was-not-creation-of-finance-no-2-act-2019\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/28\/cbdt-clarifies-differential-regime-between-domestic-investors-and-fpis-existed-even-prior-to-general-budget-2019-and-was-not-creation-of-finance-no-2-act-2019\/\",\"name\":\"CBDT clarifies differential regime between domestic investors and FPIs existed even prior to General Budget 2019 and was not creation of Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-08-28T12:00:05+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/28\/cbdt-clarifies-differential-regime-between-domestic-investors-and-fpis-existed-even-prior-to-general-budget-2019-and-was-not-creation-of-finance-no-2-act-2019\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/28\/cbdt-clarifies-differential-regime-between-domestic-investors-and-fpis-existed-even-prior-to-general-budget-2019-and-was-not-creation-of-finance-no-2-act-2019\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/28\/cbdt-clarifies-differential-regime-between-domestic-investors-and-fpis-existed-even-prior-to-general-budget-2019-and-was-not-creation-of-finance-no-2-act-2019\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"CBDT clarifies differential regime between domestic investors and FPIs existed even prior to General Budget 2019 and was not creation of Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"CBDT clarifies differential regime between domestic investors and FPIs existed even prior to General Budget 2019 and was not creation of Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/28\/cbdt-clarifies-differential-regime-between-domestic-investors-and-fpis-existed-even-prior-to-general-budget-2019-and-was-not-creation-of-finance-no-2-act-2019\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"CBDT clarifies differential regime between domestic investors and FPIs existed even prior to General Budget 2019 and was not creation of Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019","og_description":"Dispelling this false impression being created in certain sections of media including social media, CBDT said that differential regime between domestic investors","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/28\/cbdt-clarifies-differential-regime-between-domestic-investors-and-fpis-existed-even-prior-to-general-budget-2019-and-was-not-creation-of-finance-no-2-act-2019\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-08-28T12:00:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/mof-647_022117042319.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/28\/cbdt-clarifies-differential-regime-between-domestic-investors-and-fpis-existed-even-prior-to-general-budget-2019-and-was-not-creation-of-finance-no-2-act-2019\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/28\/cbdt-clarifies-differential-regime-between-domestic-investors-and-fpis-existed-even-prior-to-general-budget-2019-and-was-not-creation-of-finance-no-2-act-2019\/","name":"CBDT clarifies differential regime between domestic investors and FPIs existed even prior to General Budget 2019 and was not creation of Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-08-28T12:00:05+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/28\/cbdt-clarifies-differential-regime-between-domestic-investors-and-fpis-existed-even-prior-to-general-budget-2019-and-was-not-creation-of-finance-no-2-act-2019\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/28\/cbdt-clarifies-differential-regime-between-domestic-investors-and-fpis-existed-even-prior-to-general-budget-2019-and-was-not-creation-of-finance-no-2-act-2019\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/28\/cbdt-clarifies-differential-regime-between-domestic-investors-and-fpis-existed-even-prior-to-general-budget-2019-and-was-not-creation-of-finance-no-2-act-2019\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"CBDT clarifies differential regime between domestic investors and FPIs existed even prior to General Budget 2019 and was not creation of Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":7285,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/09\/02\/government-accepted-shah-committee-s-recommendation-to-make-clarificatory-amendment-on-non-applicability-of-mat-on-fii-fpis\/","url_meta":{"origin":218722,"position":0},"title":"Government Accepted Shah Committee\u2019s Recommendation to Make Clarificatory Amendment on Non-Applicability of MAT on FII\/FPIs","author":"Sucheta","date":"September 2, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"In the light of controversy generated on the applicability of the Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) on FIIs\/FPIs due to inconsistent rulings of the Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR) on the issue, the applicability of MAT on FIIs was excluded vide the Finance Act, 2015 amending the Income Tax Act, 1961\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Hot Off The Press"","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":332790,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/10\/p-notes-and-sebi-regulations-addressing-regulatory-arbitrage-whilst-managing-foreign-investments\/","url_meta":{"origin":218722,"position":1},"title":"P-Notes and SEBI Regulations: Addressing Regulatory Arbitrage Whilst Managing Foreign Investments","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 10, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"by Aditya Kumar* and Samridhi Singh**","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Managing Foreign Investments","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Managing-Foreign-Investments.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Managing-Foreign-Investments.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Managing-Foreign-Investments.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Managing-Foreign-Investments.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":219758,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/20\/corporate-tax-rates-slashed-to-22-for-domestic-companies-and-15-for-new-domestic-manufacturing-companies-and-other-fiscal-reliefs\/","url_meta":{"origin":218722,"position":2},"title":"Corporate tax rates slashed to 22% for domestic companies and 15% for new domestic manufacturing companies and other fiscal reliefs","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 20, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"The Government has brought in the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Ordinance 2019 to make certain amendments in the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the Finance (No. 2) Act 2019. This was announced by the Union Minister for Finance & Corporate Affairs Smt Nirmala Sitaraman during the Press Conference in Goa today. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":222768,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/03\/taxation-amendment-bill-2019-passed-by-lok-sabha-reduction-in-corporate-tax-rates\/","url_meta":{"origin":218722,"position":3},"title":"Lok Sabha clears passage for — Taxation Amendment Bill, 2019 ; Reduction in Corporate tax rates","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 3, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Lok Sabha passed the Taxation Amendment Bill, 2019 on Lok Sabha on 02-12-2019. Corporate Tax Rates slashed to be slashed to 22% for domestic companies and 15% for new domestic manufacturing companies, according to the said bill. List of amendments: Section 92 BA Section 115 BA Insertion of Sections 115\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/PARLIAMENT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/PARLIAMENT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/PARLIAMENT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/PARLIAMENT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/PARLIAMENT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":357835,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/26\/sebi-advisory-fraudulent-fpi-trading-schemes-india-2025\/","url_meta":{"origin":218722,"position":4},"title":"SEBI Issues Advisory Against Fraudulent FPI-Based Trading Schemes Targeting Indian Investors","author":"Shubhi","date":"August 26, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"SEBI advisory warns investors about rising fraudulent FPI trading schemes urging caution and use of only verified SEBI registered platforms for safe investments.","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"SEBI advisory on fraudulent FPI Trading Schemes","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/SEBI-advisory-on-fraudulent-FPI-Trading-Schemes.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/SEBI-advisory-on-fraudulent-FPI-Trading-Schemes.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/SEBI-advisory-on-fraudulent-FPI-Trading-Schemes.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/SEBI-advisory-on-fraudulent-FPI-Trading-Schemes.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":222905,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/06\/cbdt-issues-draft-notification-seeking-inputs-for-framing-of-rules-with-respect-to-fund-manager-regime-under-s-9a-of-i-t-act-1961\/","url_meta":{"origin":218722,"position":5},"title":"CBDT issues draft notification seeking inputs for framing of rules with respect to Fund Manager Regime under S. 9A of I.T. Act, 1961","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 6, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Section 9A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) provides for a special taxation regime in respect of certain offshore funds in the context of their fund managers being located in India. It is provided that in case of an eligible investment fund, the fund management activity carried out through\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/218722","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=218722"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/218722\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=218722"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=218722"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=218722"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}