{"id":218657,"date":"2019-08-27T12:00:53","date_gmt":"2019-08-27T06:30:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=218657"},"modified":"2019-08-29T12:48:37","modified_gmt":"2019-08-29T07:18:37","slug":"utt-hc-non-filing-of-affidavit-along-with-the-application-under-s-1563-of-crpc-held-to-be-a-curable-defect","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/27\/utt-hc-non-filing-of-affidavit-along-with-the-application-under-s-1563-of-crpc-held-to-be-a-curable-defect\/","title":{"rendered":"Utt HC | Non-filing of affidavit along with the application under S. 156(3) of CrPC held to be a curable defect"},"content":{"rendered":"

Uttaranchal High Court<\/strong>: Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. contemplated a criminal revision petition, where the main question which had to be decided was related to the revisional power exercised by the Sessions Judge, where an order was rejected by him under Section 156(3) of CrPC and same was held by the Revisional Court, where it set aside the order of the Sessions Judge and remitted the matter back to the Trial Court to consider the application.<\/p>\n

The applicant had challenged the order passed by the Revisional Court on the grounds that rejection was rightly made by the Trial Court as no affidavit was accompanied despite being a mandatory requirement. The applicant relied on the judgment in Priyanka Srivastava v. State of UP<\/em>., (2015) 6 SCC 287<\/a>, where the Supreme Court held that affidavit was mandatory in order to attach propriety and genuineness to the application preferred under Section 156 (3) of CrPC, it was ought to be supported with an affidavit so as to justify the set of allegations<\/em>. Another ground for challenge was that when the Revision Court was dealing with the rejection order passed by the Trial Court, then at that point if the Revisional Court allowed the revision, it could have been\u00a0 a simplicitor setting aside of an order, but once the Revisional Court ordered it contained a direction of remand for reconsideration of \u00a0application under Section 156(3), then the Revisional Court could not had issued any specific positive direction as to the manner in which it \u00a0was required to be complied with by \u00a0the Trial Court on revival of the \u00a0proceedings in pursuance to the order of remand by the Revisional Courts order. Hence, the main contention was that it was a futile exercise by the Court to order reconsideration of application, as it was like sitting with preconceived mind and the Trial Court will be more dominated and influenced by the directions.<\/p>\n

The Court in the instant application found it necessary to address all the contentions submitted by the applicant, mainly with respect to the case adjudicated by the Supreme Court. The Court observed that in Priyanka Srivastava\u2019s<\/em> case it was discussed that it should create an impediment and check-in filing of frivolous application and the same being invariably entertained by the Magistrate without even testing the genuineness of the allegations<\/em>. Hence the main purpose for making the affidavit mandatory along with the application under Section 156(3) was to maintain check and balances over frivolous and vexatious applications. It was further observed that the spirit and the purpose with which the said judgment was rendered it never intended or aimed at any point of time that it \u00a0should create an\u00a0 impediment in entertainment of an application under Section 156(3),\u00a0 which had been otherwise genuinely filed by the complainant by invoking the provisions contained under Section 156(3).<\/p>\n

The Court further on perusal of the directions given by the Revisional Court in the operative portion of the order observed that it simply directed to consider it afresh and under such circumstances the effect of the Revisional Court\u2019s order impugned in the present revision would be that the Trial Court will have to consider the application under Section 156(3) of CrPC, de novo<\/em> as if it has been filed as afresh.<\/p>\n

Court while addressing the main controversy raised that \u2018whether it was mandatory to file an affidavit along the application<\/em>\u2019 as held in the abovementioned case, the Court observed that the Supreme Court\u2019s judgment was for laudable purpose and object to be achieved that the invocation of Section 156(3), should not be made by the applicant to adopt it as a\u00a0 matter of drawing a farce proceeding against the accused person or for vengeance of personal grievances. Hence, it was directed that the Magistrate when takes cognizance of the matter after the revival would ensure that the defect of not filing of the affidavit by the applicant was rectified and was permitted to file the same.[Commercial Toyota v. State of Uttarakhand, 2019 SCC OnLine Utt 749<\/b><\/a>, decided on 31-07-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Uttaranchal High Court: Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. contemplated a criminal revision petition, where the main question which had to be decided was <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[37270,36002,37269],"class_list":["post-218657","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-mandatory-to-file-affidavit","tag-revisional-court","tag-section-1563-of-crpc"],"yoast_head":"\nUtt HC | Non-filing of affidavit along with the application under S. 156(3) of CrPC held to be a curable defect | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/27\/utt-hc-non-filing-of-affidavit-along-with-the-application-under-s-1563-of-crpc-held-to-be-a-curable-defect\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Utt HC | Non-filing of affidavit along with the application under S. 156(3) of CrPC held to be a curable defect\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Uttaranchal High Court: Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. contemplated a criminal revision petition, where the main question which had to be decided was\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/27\/utt-hc-non-filing-of-affidavit-along-with-the-application-under-s-1563-of-crpc-held-to-be-a-curable-defect\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-08-27T06:30:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-08-29T07:18:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/uttrakhandHC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/27\/utt-hc-non-filing-of-affidavit-along-with-the-application-under-s-1563-of-crpc-held-to-be-a-curable-defect\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/27\/utt-hc-non-filing-of-affidavit-along-with-the-application-under-s-1563-of-crpc-held-to-be-a-curable-defect\/\",\"name\":\"Utt HC | Non-filing of affidavit along with the application under S. 156(3) of CrPC held to be a curable defect | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-08-27T06:30:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-08-29T07:18:37+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/27\/utt-hc-non-filing-of-affidavit-along-with-the-application-under-s-1563-of-crpc-held-to-be-a-curable-defect\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/27\/utt-hc-non-filing-of-affidavit-along-with-the-application-under-s-1563-of-crpc-held-to-be-a-curable-defect\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/27\/utt-hc-non-filing-of-affidavit-along-with-the-application-under-s-1563-of-crpc-held-to-be-a-curable-defect\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Utt HC | Non-filing of affidavit along with the application under S. 156(3) of CrPC held to be a curable defect\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Utt HC | Non-filing of affidavit along with the application under S. 156(3) of CrPC held to be a curable defect | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/27\/utt-hc-non-filing-of-affidavit-along-with-the-application-under-s-1563-of-crpc-held-to-be-a-curable-defect\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Utt HC | Non-filing of affidavit along with the application under S. 156(3) of CrPC held to be a curable defect","og_description":"Uttaranchal High Court: Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. contemplated a criminal revision petition, where the main question which had to be decided was","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/27\/utt-hc-non-filing-of-affidavit-along-with-the-application-under-s-1563-of-crpc-held-to-be-a-curable-defect\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-08-27T06:30:53+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-08-29T07:18:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/uttrakhandHC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/27\/utt-hc-non-filing-of-affidavit-along-with-the-application-under-s-1563-of-crpc-held-to-be-a-curable-defect\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/27\/utt-hc-non-filing-of-affidavit-along-with-the-application-under-s-1563-of-crpc-held-to-be-a-curable-defect\/","name":"Utt HC | Non-filing of affidavit along with the application under S. 156(3) of CrPC held to be a curable defect | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-08-27T06:30:53+00:00","dateModified":"2019-08-29T07:18:37+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/27\/utt-hc-non-filing-of-affidavit-along-with-the-application-under-s-1563-of-crpc-held-to-be-a-curable-defect\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/27\/utt-hc-non-filing-of-affidavit-along-with-the-application-under-s-1563-of-crpc-held-to-be-a-curable-defect\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/27\/utt-hc-non-filing-of-affidavit-along-with-the-application-under-s-1563-of-crpc-held-to-be-a-curable-defect\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Utt HC | Non-filing of affidavit along with the application under S. 156(3) of CrPC held to be a curable defect"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":149624,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/14\/applications-under-s-1563-crpc-are-to-be-supported-by-an-affidavit-duly-sworn-to-by-applicant-invoking-jurisdiction-of-the-magistrate\/","url_meta":{"origin":218657,"position":0},"title":"Applications under S. 156(3) CrPC are to be supported by an affidavit duly sworn to by applicant invoking jurisdiction of the Magistrate","author":"Saba","date":"August 14, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: While passing the order in a criminal petition filed under Section 482 CrPC praying to quash the proceedings in the investigation in a criminal case, a Single Judge Bench of K.N. Phaneendra,J. held that direction of investigation under Section 156(3) warrants application of judicial mind. Litigant cannot\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":181944,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/17\/applications-s-1563-crpc-supported-affidavit-duly-sworn-applicant\/","url_meta":{"origin":218657,"position":1},"title":"Applications under S. 156(3) CrPC are to be supported by an affidavit duly sworn in by applicant","author":"Saba","date":"January 17, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of K.N. Phaneendra, J., decided a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of CrPC, wherein it quashed the order passed by the learned Magistrate under Section 156(3) of CrPC directing investigation in a criminal case. The respondent-applicant had filed a private complaint\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":308475,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/05\/directions-for-investigation-u-s-1563-crpc-cannot-be-given-mechanically-by-magistrate-application-of-mind-must-dhc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":218657,"position":2},"title":"Directions for investigation u\/s 156(3) CrPC cannot be given mechanically by Magistrate; application of mind necessary: Delhi High Court","author":"Simranjeet","date":"December 5, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cMagistrate is not bound to direct investigation by police even if all allegations made in complaint disclose ingredients of cognizable offence. Each case must be viewed depending upon facts and circumstances involved therein.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":239638,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/25\/kar-hc-is-it-mandatory-to-file-an-affidavit-for-invocation-of-jurisdiction-of-magistrate-under-s-1563-crpc-petition-allowed-partly\/","url_meta":{"origin":218657,"position":3},"title":"Kar HC | Is it mandatory to file an affidavit for invocation of jurisdiction of Magistrate under S. 156(3) CrPC? Petition allowed partly","author":"Editor","date":"November 25, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: John Michael Cunha J., allowed the petition partly stating that Section 156(3) CrPC applications are to be supported by an affidavit duly sworn by the applicant who seeks the invocation of the jurisdiction of the Magistrate. The facts of the case are such that Respondent 2 presented\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":343423,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/order-passed-by-hc-revisional-jurisdiction-would-relate-back-to-trial-court-sc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":218657,"position":4},"title":"Order passed by High Court in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction would relate back to the order of the Trial Court: SC","author":"Sucheta","date":"March 10, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cAlthough the law allows for travelling back of the revisional order of the High Court, yet it is far from ideal to do so after the passage of a substantial period of time. The correct approach to be adopted in cases like this is that the High Court should direct\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"hc revisional jurisdiction order relate back","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/hc-revisional-jurisdiction-order-relate-back.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/hc-revisional-jurisdiction-order-relate-back.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/hc-revisional-jurisdiction-order-relate-back.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/hc-revisional-jurisdiction-order-relate-back.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":329589,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/29\/section-311-crpc-based-on-affidavit-filed-after-her-initial-testimony-mp-hc-answers-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":218657,"position":5},"title":"Section 311 CrPC| Can Prosecutrix be recalled for further Cross-Examination based on affidavit filed after her initial testimony? MP High Court answers","author":"Ritu","date":"August 29, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Section 311 CrPC allows the court to recall a witness if it is essential for a just decision of the case, but such power must be exercised judiciously and with caution.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/218657","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=218657"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/218657\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=218657"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=218657"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=218657"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}