{"id":218529,"date":"2019-08-23T10:06:53","date_gmt":"2019-08-23T04:36:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=218529"},"modified":"2019-08-27T10:25:13","modified_gmt":"2019-08-27T04:55:13","slug":"del-hc-complaint-under-s-138-ni-act-dismissed-for-non-prosecution-restored-considering-that-clerk-of-complainants-counsel-noted-wrong-date","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/23\/del-hc-complaint-under-s-138-ni-act-dismissed-for-non-prosecution-restored-considering-that-clerk-of-complainants-counsel-noted-wrong-date\/","title":{"rendered":"Del HC | Complaint under S. 138 NI Act dismissed for non-prosecution restored considering that clerk of complainant’s counsel noted wrong date"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>Mukta Gupta, J. allowed a petition filed against the order of the trial Judge whereby the petitioner’s complaint filed for the commission of offence under Section 138\u00a0(dishonour of cheque)\u00a0<\/em>of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, was dismissed for non-prosecution.<\/p>\n

The petitioner had advanced a loan to the respondent who defaulted in repaying the same. The cheque given by the respondent for the discharge of the said liability was also dishonoured. After fulfilling the codal formalities, the petitioner filed a complaint under Section 138.<\/p>\n

The petitioner along with his counsel was present when the Metropolitan Magistrate issued summons against the respondent. Thereafter, on the next date, counsel for the petitioner was present but Metropolitan Magistrate was not available on account of training, Thereafter, counsel for the petitioner was present and bailable warrants were issued against the respondent. When notice was required to be framed, the case was transferred to another Metropolitan Magistrate. On the subsequent date, none appeared before the Metropolitan Magistrate as the advocates were on strike. On the date of the impugned order, the complaint was dismissed on account of non-appearance on behalf of the petitioner.<\/p>\n

The High Court was of the view that the petition ought to be allowed. It was considered that neither the complainant nor his counsel could appear due to strike as mentioned above and that the clerk of the counsel wrongly noted the next date, and therefore the complainant or his counsel could not again appear on the date of the impugned order. In such circumstances of the case, the Court thought it fit to restore petitioner’s complaint on the file of the Metropolitan Magistrate. The petition was accordingly allowed. [Rajeev Kumar v. Gagan Makhija, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 9708<\/b><\/a>, decided on 07-08-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:\u00a0Mukta Gupta, J. allowed a petition filed against the order of the trial Judge whereby the petitioner’s complaint filed for <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[28514,2862,3301,30292,31300,23584],"class_list":["post-218529","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-cheque","tag-dishonour_of_cheque","tag-liability","tag-loan","tag-non-prosecution","tag-section-138-ni-act"],"yoast_head":"\nDel HC | Complaint under S. 138 NI Act dismissed for non-prosecution restored considering that clerk of complainant's counsel noted wrong date | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/23\/del-hc-complaint-under-s-138-ni-act-dismissed-for-non-prosecution-restored-considering-that-clerk-of-complainants-counsel-noted-wrong-date\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Del HC | Complaint under S. 138 NI Act dismissed for non-prosecution restored considering that clerk of complainant's counsel noted wrong date\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Mukta Gupta, J. allowed a petition filed against the order of the trial Judge whereby the petitioner’s complaint filed for\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/23\/del-hc-complaint-under-s-138-ni-act-dismissed-for-non-prosecution-restored-considering-that-clerk-of-complainants-counsel-noted-wrong-date\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-08-23T04:36:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-08-27T04:55:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/08\\\/23\\\/del-hc-complaint-under-s-138-ni-act-dismissed-for-non-prosecution-restored-considering-that-clerk-of-complainants-counsel-noted-wrong-date\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/08\\\/23\\\/del-hc-complaint-under-s-138-ni-act-dismissed-for-non-prosecution-restored-considering-that-clerk-of-complainants-counsel-noted-wrong-date\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"headline\":\"Del HC | Complaint under S. 138 NI Act dismissed for non-prosecution restored considering that clerk of complainant’s counsel noted wrong date\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-08-23T04:36:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-08-27T04:55:13+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/08\\\/23\\\/del-hc-complaint-under-s-138-ni-act-dismissed-for-non-prosecution-restored-considering-that-clerk-of-complainants-counsel-noted-wrong-date\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":312,\"commentCount\":0,\"keywords\":[\"cheque\",\"dishonour of cheque\",\"liability\",\"loan\",\"Non-Prosecution\",\"Section 138 NI Act\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/08\\\/23\\\/del-hc-complaint-under-s-138-ni-act-dismissed-for-non-prosecution-restored-considering-that-clerk-of-complainants-counsel-noted-wrong-date\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/08\\\/23\\\/del-hc-complaint-under-s-138-ni-act-dismissed-for-non-prosecution-restored-considering-that-clerk-of-complainants-counsel-noted-wrong-date\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/08\\\/23\\\/del-hc-complaint-under-s-138-ni-act-dismissed-for-non-prosecution-restored-considering-that-clerk-of-complainants-counsel-noted-wrong-date\\\/\",\"name\":\"Del HC | Complaint under S. 138 NI Act dismissed for non-prosecution restored considering that clerk of complainant's counsel noted wrong date | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-08-23T04:36:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-08-27T04:55:13+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/08\\\/23\\\/del-hc-complaint-under-s-138-ni-act-dismissed-for-non-prosecution-restored-considering-that-clerk-of-complainants-counsel-noted-wrong-date\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/08\\\/23\\\/del-hc-complaint-under-s-138-ni-act-dismissed-for-non-prosecution-restored-considering-that-clerk-of-complainants-counsel-noted-wrong-date\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/08\\\/23\\\/del-hc-complaint-under-s-138-ni-act-dismissed-for-non-prosecution-restored-considering-that-clerk-of-complainants-counsel-noted-wrong-date\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Del HC | Complaint under S. 138 NI Act dismissed for non-prosecution restored considering that clerk of complainant’s counsel noted wrong date\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Del HC | Complaint under S. 138 NI Act dismissed for non-prosecution restored considering that clerk of complainant's counsel noted wrong date | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/23\/del-hc-complaint-under-s-138-ni-act-dismissed-for-non-prosecution-restored-considering-that-clerk-of-complainants-counsel-noted-wrong-date\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Del HC | Complaint under S. 138 NI Act dismissed for non-prosecution restored considering that clerk of complainant's counsel noted wrong date","og_description":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Mukta Gupta, J. allowed a petition filed against the order of the trial Judge whereby the petitioner’s complaint filed for","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/23\/del-hc-complaint-under-s-138-ni-act-dismissed-for-non-prosecution-restored-considering-that-clerk-of-complainants-counsel-noted-wrong-date\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-08-23T04:36:53+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-08-27T04:55:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/23\/del-hc-complaint-under-s-138-ni-act-dismissed-for-non-prosecution-restored-considering-that-clerk-of-complainants-counsel-noted-wrong-date\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/23\/del-hc-complaint-under-s-138-ni-act-dismissed-for-non-prosecution-restored-considering-that-clerk-of-complainants-counsel-noted-wrong-date\/"},"author":{"name":"Bhumika Indulia","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"headline":"Del HC | Complaint under S. 138 NI Act dismissed for non-prosecution restored considering that clerk of complainant’s counsel noted wrong date","datePublished":"2019-08-23T04:36:53+00:00","dateModified":"2019-08-27T04:55:13+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/23\/del-hc-complaint-under-s-138-ni-act-dismissed-for-non-prosecution-restored-considering-that-clerk-of-complainants-counsel-noted-wrong-date\/"},"wordCount":312,"commentCount":0,"keywords":["cheque","dishonour of cheque","liability","loan","Non-Prosecution","Section 138 NI Act"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/23\/del-hc-complaint-under-s-138-ni-act-dismissed-for-non-prosecution-restored-considering-that-clerk-of-complainants-counsel-noted-wrong-date\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/23\/del-hc-complaint-under-s-138-ni-act-dismissed-for-non-prosecution-restored-considering-that-clerk-of-complainants-counsel-noted-wrong-date\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/23\/del-hc-complaint-under-s-138-ni-act-dismissed-for-non-prosecution-restored-considering-that-clerk-of-complainants-counsel-noted-wrong-date\/","name":"Del HC | Complaint under S. 138 NI Act dismissed for non-prosecution restored considering that clerk of complainant's counsel noted wrong date | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-08-23T04:36:53+00:00","dateModified":"2019-08-27T04:55:13+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/23\/del-hc-complaint-under-s-138-ni-act-dismissed-for-non-prosecution-restored-considering-that-clerk-of-complainants-counsel-noted-wrong-date\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/23\/del-hc-complaint-under-s-138-ni-act-dismissed-for-non-prosecution-restored-considering-that-clerk-of-complainants-counsel-noted-wrong-date\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/23\/del-hc-complaint-under-s-138-ni-act-dismissed-for-non-prosecution-restored-considering-that-clerk-of-complainants-counsel-noted-wrong-date\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Del HC | Complaint under S. 138 NI Act dismissed for non-prosecution restored considering that clerk of complainant’s counsel noted wrong date"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/218529","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=218529"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/218529\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=218529"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=218529"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=218529"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}