{"id":218450,"date":"2019-08-21T15:00:30","date_gmt":"2019-08-21T09:30:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=218450"},"modified":"2019-08-29T16:25:16","modified_gmt":"2019-08-29T10:55:16","slug":"ker-hc-entry-restrictions-in-lakshadweep-found-to-be-just-and-reasonable-mainlanders-right-under-article-14-and-19-not-violated","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/21\/ker-hc-entry-restrictions-in-lakshadweep-found-to-be-just-and-reasonable-mainlanders-right-under-article-14-and-19-not-violated\/","title":{"rendered":"Ker HC | Entry restrictions in Lakshadweep found to be just and reasonable; Mainlander\u2019s right under Article 14 and 19 not violated"},"content":{"rendered":"

Kerala High Court<\/strong>: Shaji P. Chaly, J. entertained a writ petition filed by a mother of the minor aged 2 years, who was a native of Union Territory of Lakshadweep. She sought to quash orders issued by the Lakshadweep Administration emphasizing certain regulatory measures to enter the Island, among others, to the family members also who were residents of the mainland, and for other related relief.<\/p>\n

Factual matrix of the case is that the petitioner\u2019s mother was a member of the Scheduled Tribe community and was native of one of the islands known as Kiltan Island. The petitioner contended that the orders passed by the authority were illegal and arbitrary which prescribed procedures to issue, reject, renew, endorse and cancel the Entry Permit to various categories to the Union Territory. It was further contended that the order contravened and replaced certain provisions of the Islands (Restrictions on Entry and Residence) Rules, 1967. It was pointed that the rules were made by the Administrator in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 9 of the Regulations, 1965, with the previous sanction of the Central Government.<\/p>\n

The Rules which were in vogue for around 50 years enabled the family of a native of the Islands who hailed from the mainland; to visit any of the Islands of Union Territory without a permit. It was submitted that the orders passed by the Administrator without any legislative competence, since Section 9 of the Regulations, 1965, only enabled the Administrator of the Islands to make rules with the sanction of the Central Government for the interests of the general public or for the protection of the interests of any Scheduled Tribe by imposing reasonable restrictions on the right of any person who was not a native of the Islands to visit or reside in the islands. However, the orders had been issued by a delegate to the Administrator. The main contention of the petitioner were that the new classification made under trusted upon the petitioner\u2019s requirement of securing entry permit was violative of Article 14 of the Constitution, as the restrictions contained thereunder interfered with the fundamental rights guaranteed to the citizens under Articles 14 and 19(1)(d), (e) and (g) of the Constitution of India.<\/p>\n

On the contrary, the respondents stated that there was a long pending demand from all stakeholders including political parties, elected members, the general public, etc. to simplify the procedure for issue of entry permit to various categories of persons\/visitors. Accordingly, the Administrator, Lakshadweep, constituted a committee under the Chairmanship of Collector and Development Commissioner, Lakshadweep and guidelines were issued as per the recommendations of the said committee. The Rule stipulated was \u2018no persons who are not a native of the island shall enter or reside in or attempt to enter or reside in the islands except under and in accordance with a permit issued by the competent authority<\/em>.\u2019<\/p>\n

The Court observed that special status was given to Union Territory of Lakshadweep in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution and the orders issued thereunder, with the intention of protecting the ethnic culture, heritage and to maintain the serene and calm atmosphere in the said Islands, and not to interfere with their culture and habits unnecessarily by the mainlanders. But the father of the petitioner who was not a native of the Island had to seek the permit every time when he has to visit his family. Keeping in mind the Court passed an order in favor of the petitioner that whenever an application is made it must be processed at the earliest possible time. Still, the Court found no arbitrariness or unconstitutionality in the orders as contended by the petitioner.<\/p>\n

The Court opined that, \u201cprovisions of the Scheduled Areas (Part A States) Order, 1950, Order 1951 specified above, and other provisions of law discussed above, it can be seen that the restrictions imposed in Exts.P1 and P2 are only procedural in nature, which are not creating any complete or absolute embargo against the family members who are mainlanders to visit the Islands, and it is also not creating any prohibition in contravention of the Rules, 1967<\/em>.\u201d[Master Ryan Adam Ajit v. Union of India, 2019 SCC OnLine Ker 2669<\/b><\/a>, decided on 12-04-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Kerala High Court: Shaji P. Chaly, J. entertained a writ petition filed by a mother of the minor aged 2 years, who <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[37186,37185],"class_list":["post-218450","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-article-14-and-19-of-constitution-of-india","tag-entry-restrictions-in-lakshadweep"],"yoast_head":"\nKer HC | Entry restrictions in Lakshadweep found to be just and reasonable; Mainlander\u2019s right under Article 14 and 19 not violated | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/21\/ker-hc-entry-restrictions-in-lakshadweep-found-to-be-just-and-reasonable-mainlanders-right-under-article-14-and-19-not-violated\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ker HC | Entry restrictions in Lakshadweep found to be just and reasonable; Mainlander\u2019s right under Article 14 and 19 not violated\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court: Shaji P. Chaly, J. entertained a writ petition filed by a mother of the minor aged 2 years, who\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/21\/ker-hc-entry-restrictions-in-lakshadweep-found-to-be-just-and-reasonable-mainlanders-right-under-article-14-and-19-not-violated\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-08-21T09:30:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-08-29T10:55:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/21\/ker-hc-entry-restrictions-in-lakshadweep-found-to-be-just-and-reasonable-mainlanders-right-under-article-14-and-19-not-violated\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/21\/ker-hc-entry-restrictions-in-lakshadweep-found-to-be-just-and-reasonable-mainlanders-right-under-article-14-and-19-not-violated\/\",\"name\":\"Ker HC | Entry restrictions in Lakshadweep found to be just and reasonable; Mainlander\u2019s right under Article 14 and 19 not violated | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-08-21T09:30:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-08-29T10:55:16+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/21\/ker-hc-entry-restrictions-in-lakshadweep-found-to-be-just-and-reasonable-mainlanders-right-under-article-14-and-19-not-violated\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/21\/ker-hc-entry-restrictions-in-lakshadweep-found-to-be-just-and-reasonable-mainlanders-right-under-article-14-and-19-not-violated\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/21\/ker-hc-entry-restrictions-in-lakshadweep-found-to-be-just-and-reasonable-mainlanders-right-under-article-14-and-19-not-violated\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ker HC | Entry restrictions in Lakshadweep found to be just and reasonable; Mainlander\u2019s right under Article 14 and 19 not violated\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ker HC | Entry restrictions in Lakshadweep found to be just and reasonable; Mainlander\u2019s right under Article 14 and 19 not violated | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/21\/ker-hc-entry-restrictions-in-lakshadweep-found-to-be-just-and-reasonable-mainlanders-right-under-article-14-and-19-not-violated\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ker HC | Entry restrictions in Lakshadweep found to be just and reasonable; Mainlander\u2019s right under Article 14 and 19 not violated","og_description":"Kerala High Court: Shaji P. Chaly, J. entertained a writ petition filed by a mother of the minor aged 2 years, who","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/21\/ker-hc-entry-restrictions-in-lakshadweep-found-to-be-just-and-reasonable-mainlanders-right-under-article-14-and-19-not-violated\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-08-21T09:30:30+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-08-29T10:55:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/21\/ker-hc-entry-restrictions-in-lakshadweep-found-to-be-just-and-reasonable-mainlanders-right-under-article-14-and-19-not-violated\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/21\/ker-hc-entry-restrictions-in-lakshadweep-found-to-be-just-and-reasonable-mainlanders-right-under-article-14-and-19-not-violated\/","name":"Ker HC | Entry restrictions in Lakshadweep found to be just and reasonable; Mainlander\u2019s right under Article 14 and 19 not violated | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-08-21T09:30:30+00:00","dateModified":"2019-08-29T10:55:16+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/21\/ker-hc-entry-restrictions-in-lakshadweep-found-to-be-just-and-reasonable-mainlanders-right-under-article-14-and-19-not-violated\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/21\/ker-hc-entry-restrictions-in-lakshadweep-found-to-be-just-and-reasonable-mainlanders-right-under-article-14-and-19-not-violated\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/21\/ker-hc-entry-restrictions-in-lakshadweep-found-to-be-just-and-reasonable-mainlanders-right-under-article-14-and-19-not-violated\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ker HC | Entry restrictions in Lakshadweep found to be just and reasonable; Mainlander\u2019s right under Article 14 and 19 not violated"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":249330,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/05\/lakshadweep-regulations\/","url_meta":{"origin":218450,"position":0},"title":"[Lakshadweep Regulations] Ker HC | Government should be eager to consider public suggestion; HC grants liberty to raise objections\/suggestions even after expiry of outer time limit","author":"Editor","date":"June 5, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: The Division Bench comprising of A. Muhamed Mustaque and Kauser Edappagath, JJ., addressed the issue relating to controversial regulations of the U.T. of Lakshadweep. The Bench granted the petitioner liberty to raise suggestions, objections etc. even after expiry of outer time limit of 21 days stipulated for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":233567,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/07\/ngt-stay-on-cutting-of-coconut-trees-in-agabatti-island-lakshadweep-joint-committee-to-assess-damage-likely-to-be-caused\/","url_meta":{"origin":218450,"position":1},"title":"NGT | Stay on cutting of coconut trees in Agabatti Island Lakshadweep; Joint Committee to assess damage likely to be caused","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 7, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"National Green Tribunal (NGT):\u00a0A Division Bench of K. Ramakrishnan (Judicial Member) and Saibal Dasgupta (Expert Member), directed to stop the cutting of coconut trees in Agabatti Island Lakshadweep and ordered to maintain status quo. Main Grievance Indiscriminate cutting of coconut trees in Agatti Island, Lakshadweep for the purpose of formation\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NGT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/NGT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/NGT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/NGT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/NGT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/NGT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":350282,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/10\/kerala-hc-stays-lakshadweep-order-removing-arabic-mahal-curriculum\/","url_meta":{"origin":218450,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Local study and application of mind essential for implementing education policy\u2019; Kerala HC stays order to remove Arabic, Mahal from Lakshadweep school curriculum","author":"Apoorva","date":"June 10, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court viewed that a prima facie case was made out by the Petitioner that the impugned office order was issued without conducting any study or consultation with stakeholders","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":332764,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/supreme-court-overturns-kerala-hc-order-for-disciplinary-proceedings-against-lakshadweep-judicial-officer\/","url_meta":{"origin":218450,"position":3},"title":"Supreme Court overturns Kerala HC\u2019s order for disciplinary proceedings against Lakshadweep Judicial Officer, citing lack of consideration for key records in the case","author":"Apoorva","date":"October 9, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court said that the disciplinary proceedings against the Judicial Magistrate, have been initiated on the basis of a legally invalid order.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Disciplinary proceedings against Lakshadweep Judge","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Disciplinary-proceedings-against-Lakshadweep-Judge.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Disciplinary-proceedings-against-Lakshadweep-Judge.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Disciplinary-proceedings-against-Lakshadweep-Judge.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Disciplinary-proceedings-against-Lakshadweep-Judge.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":250627,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/02\/demolition-of-traditional-coastal-communities-dwellings\/","url_meta":{"origin":218450,"position":4},"title":"[Lakshadweep] Ker HC | Demolition of Traditional Coastal Communities\u2019 dwellings; HC stays impugned notice of Lakshadweep Administration","author":"Editor","date":"July 2, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: Raja Vihayaraghavan V., J., stayed the Lakshadweep Administration\u2019s notice with regard to demolition of dwellings of Traditional Coastal Communities. The instant case dealt with the provisions of the Laccadive Minicoy and Amini Islands Land Revenue and Tenancy Regulation, 1965 (Regulation, 1965). Evidently, the petitioners had been asked\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":250022,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/19\/lakshadweep-regulations-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":218450,"position":5},"title":"[Lakshadweep Regulations] Ker HC | Draft stipulations are premature, cannot be assailed through PIL","author":"Editor","date":"June 19, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: T.R. Ravi, J., held that draft stipulation could not be accepted for the challenge as the same is premature to be assailed by the Public Interest Litigation. The instant PIL was filed to assail a few regulatory measures initiated by the State of Kerala concerning Lakshadweep Islands.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/218450","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=218450"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/218450\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=218450"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=218450"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=218450"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}