{"id":218135,"date":"2019-08-16T15:30:48","date_gmt":"2019-08-16T10:00:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=218135"},"modified":"2019-08-23T11:53:11","modified_gmt":"2019-08-23T06:23:11","slug":"mp-hc-non-filing-of-certificate-under-s-65-b-of-evidence-act-on-an-earlier-occasion-can-be-excused-if-it-is-filed-at-a-later-stage-during-trial","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/16\/mp-hc-non-filing-of-certificate-under-s-65-b-of-evidence-act-on-an-earlier-occasion-can-be-excused-if-it-is-filed-at-a-later-stage-during-trial\/","title":{"rendered":"MP HC | Non-filing of certificate under S. 65-B of Evidence Act on an earlier occasion can be excused if it is filed at a later stage during trial"},"content":{"rendered":"

Madhya Pradesh High Court:<\/b> Rajeev Kumar Dubey, J., upheld the decision of the Trial Court and rejected a petition filed under Section 482 of CrPC.<\/p>\n

A petition was filed for quashing the order passed by First Additional Session Judge to the Court of Additional Judge, whereby the trial Court allowed the prosecution’s application filed under Section 91 of CrPC. and took a certificate under Section 65-B of the Evidence Act on record produced by the prosecution.<\/p>\n

The applicant was facing a trial which was pending before the First Additional Session Judge to the Court of Additional Judge. He was tried for offences punishable under Sections 302 and 34 IPC. During the trial, the prosecution filed an application for taking certificate issued under Section 65-B of the Evidence Act on record and the Court allowed that application. The applicant was aggrieved from that order and filed a petition.<\/p>\n

The applicant submitted that the prosecution did not file the certificate under Section 65 B of Indian Evidence Act at the time of filing of charge-sheet while said certificate ought to have been filed along with the charge-sheet. The prosecution was not entitled to file the certificate at the time of trial. And therefore, the Trial Court committed a mistake in taking that certificate on record.<\/p>\n

The State opposed this stating that the certificate under Section 65-B of the Evidence Act can be filed during the trial of the case.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The Court relied on Supreme Court\u2019s decision in Sonu v. State of Haryana<\/i>, (2017) 8 SCC 570<\/a> where it held that although electronic records are not inherently admissible as evidence, the objection is that, objection relating to the mode or method of proof has to be raised at the time of marking of the document as an exhibit and not later.<\/p>\n

Similarly, the Supreme Court in Union of India v. Ravindra V. Desai<\/i>, (2018) 16 SCC 273<\/a> held “Non-production of the certificate under Section 65-B of the Evidence Act, 1872 on an earlier occasion was a curable defect which stood cured<\/i>.”<\/p>\n

Based on this, the Court held that the non-filing of the certificate of 65-B of the Evidence Act on an earlier occasion is a curable defect which can be cured by filing the certificate of 65-B at a later stage during trial. The trial court did not commit any mistake in taking that certificate of Section 65-B on record.[Antar Singh v. State of M.P., 2019 SCC OnLine MP 1981<\/b><\/a>, decided on 13-08-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Madhya Pradesh High Court: Rajeev Kumar Dubey, J., upheld the decision of the Trial Court and rejected a petition filed under Section <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[37088,37087,37086,37089,35960],"class_list":["post-218135","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-non-production-of-certificate","tag-section-482-of-crpc","tag-section-65-b-of-evidence-act","tag-section-91-of-crpc","tag-sections-302-and-34-ipc"],"yoast_head":"\nMP HC | Non-filing of certificate under S. 65-B of Evidence Act on an earlier occasion can be excused if it is filed at a later stage during trial | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/16\/mp-hc-non-filing-of-certificate-under-s-65-b-of-evidence-act-on-an-earlier-occasion-can-be-excused-if-it-is-filed-at-a-later-stage-during-trial\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"MP HC | Non-filing of certificate under S. 65-B of Evidence Act on an earlier occasion can be excused if it is filed at a later stage during trial\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Rajeev Kumar Dubey, J., upheld the decision of the Trial Court and rejected a petition filed under Section\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/16\/mp-hc-non-filing-of-certificate-under-s-65-b-of-evidence-act-on-an-earlier-occasion-can-be-excused-if-it-is-filed-at-a-later-stage-during-trial\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-08-16T10:00:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-08-23T06:23:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/16\/mp-hc-non-filing-of-certificate-under-s-65-b-of-evidence-act-on-an-earlier-occasion-can-be-excused-if-it-is-filed-at-a-later-stage-during-trial\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/16\/mp-hc-non-filing-of-certificate-under-s-65-b-of-evidence-act-on-an-earlier-occasion-can-be-excused-if-it-is-filed-at-a-later-stage-during-trial\/\",\"name\":\"MP HC | Non-filing of certificate under S. 65-B of Evidence Act on an earlier occasion can be excused if it is filed at a later stage during trial | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-08-16T10:00:48+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-08-23T06:23:11+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/16\/mp-hc-non-filing-of-certificate-under-s-65-b-of-evidence-act-on-an-earlier-occasion-can-be-excused-if-it-is-filed-at-a-later-stage-during-trial\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/16\/mp-hc-non-filing-of-certificate-under-s-65-b-of-evidence-act-on-an-earlier-occasion-can-be-excused-if-it-is-filed-at-a-later-stage-during-trial\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/16\/mp-hc-non-filing-of-certificate-under-s-65-b-of-evidence-act-on-an-earlier-occasion-can-be-excused-if-it-is-filed-at-a-later-stage-during-trial\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"MP HC | Non-filing of certificate under S. 65-B of Evidence Act on an earlier occasion can be excused if it is filed at a later stage during trial\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MP HC | Non-filing of certificate under S. 65-B of Evidence Act on an earlier occasion can be excused if it is filed at a later stage during trial | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/16\/mp-hc-non-filing-of-certificate-under-s-65-b-of-evidence-act-on-an-earlier-occasion-can-be-excused-if-it-is-filed-at-a-later-stage-during-trial\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"MP HC | Non-filing of certificate under S. 65-B of Evidence Act on an earlier occasion can be excused if it is filed at a later stage during trial","og_description":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Rajeev Kumar Dubey, J., upheld the decision of the Trial Court and rejected a petition filed under Section","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/16\/mp-hc-non-filing-of-certificate-under-s-65-b-of-evidence-act-on-an-earlier-occasion-can-be-excused-if-it-is-filed-at-a-later-stage-during-trial\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-08-16T10:00:48+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-08-23T06:23:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/16\/mp-hc-non-filing-of-certificate-under-s-65-b-of-evidence-act-on-an-earlier-occasion-can-be-excused-if-it-is-filed-at-a-later-stage-during-trial\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/16\/mp-hc-non-filing-of-certificate-under-s-65-b-of-evidence-act-on-an-earlier-occasion-can-be-excused-if-it-is-filed-at-a-later-stage-during-trial\/","name":"MP HC | Non-filing of certificate under S. 65-B of Evidence Act on an earlier occasion can be excused if it is filed at a later stage during trial | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-08-16T10:00:48+00:00","dateModified":"2019-08-23T06:23:11+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/16\/mp-hc-non-filing-of-certificate-under-s-65-b-of-evidence-act-on-an-earlier-occasion-can-be-excused-if-it-is-filed-at-a-later-stage-during-trial\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/16\/mp-hc-non-filing-of-certificate-under-s-65-b-of-evidence-act-on-an-earlier-occasion-can-be-excused-if-it-is-filed-at-a-later-stage-during-trial\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/16\/mp-hc-non-filing-of-certificate-under-s-65-b-of-evidence-act-on-an-earlier-occasion-can-be-excused-if-it-is-filed-at-a-later-stage-during-trial\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"MP HC | Non-filing of certificate under S. 65-B of Evidence Act on an earlier occasion can be excused if it is filed at a later stage during trial"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":198358,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/10\/a-private-person-has-no-locus-to-pursue-an-application-under-section-311-crpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":218135,"position":0},"title":"A private person has no locus to pursue an application under Section 311 CrPC \u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 10, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Ashwini Kumar Singh, J. dismissed an application filed under Section 482 CrPC against the order of Additional Sessions Judge whereby prosecution\u2019s application under Section 311 CrPC was dismissed. The applicant was the informant in a case registered under Section 302 IPC.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":224799,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/31\/del-hc-ss-143-147-ni-act-lay-down-special-code-for-trial-recourse-to-s-482-crpc-as-a-substitute-for-initiating-second-revision-petition-denied\/","url_meta":{"origin":218135,"position":1},"title":"Del HC | Ss. 143-147 NI Act lay down Special Code for trial, recourse to S. 482 CrPC as a substitute for initiating second revision petition denied","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 31, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Rajnish Bhatnagar, J., dismissed a petition filed against the order of the Sessions Court whereby it had dismissed the review petition filed by the petitioners against the order of the Metropolitan Magistrate taking cognizance of offences under Section 138 and Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":321928,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/12\/delhi-hc-remands-matter-back-to-trial-court-in-2005-ghoos-mehal-sting-by-aaj-tak-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":218135,"position":2},"title":"[Aaj Tak Sting Operation] Certificate under Section 65B can be filed subsequently to ensure fair trial: Delhi HC remands matter back to Trial Court","author":"Editor","date":"May 12, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIn criminal trials certificate in terms of Section 65-B of the Act is to filed before commencement of the trial. However, the Trial Court, in its discretion, after examining any application by the prosecution under Sections 91 or 311 CrPC or Section 165 of the Evidence, may permit production of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":259938,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/13\/kar-hc-while-deciding-the-petition-under-s-482-of-crpc-evidence-cannot-be-appreciated-as-it-lies-within-the-domain-of-trial-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":218135,"position":3},"title":"Kar HC |\u00a0 While deciding the petition under S. 482 of CrPC evidence cannot be appreciated as it lies within the domain of Trial Court","author":"Editor","date":"January 13, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: Sreenivas Harish Kumar J. dismissed the petition being devoid of merits. The facts of the case are such that the 1st petitioner is the husband of 2nd respondent. On certain allegations that the petitioners subjected the 2nd respondent to harassment in connection with demand for dowry, FIR\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":176154,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/15\/prior-notice-necessity-impleading-person-additional-accused-s-319-crpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":218135,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Prior notice\u2019 is a necessity before impleading a person as an additional accused under S. 319 CrPC","author":"Saba","date":"December 15, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: While deciding a criminal petition filed under Section 482 CrPC, a Single Judge Bench comprising of K.N. Phaneendra, J. held that the order passed by the trial court whereby it allowed the petitioners to be impleaded as additional accused, was not sustainable. The petitioners challenged the above\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":217513,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/31\/all-hc-special-judge-sc-st-act-held-to-have-committed-no-illegality-in-passing-summoning-order-under-s-204-of-the-crpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":218135,"position":5},"title":"All HC | Special Judge, SC\/ST Act, held to have committed no illegality in passing summoning order under S. 204 of CrPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 31, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: Rekha Dikshit, J. while disposing of this petition directed the lower court to consider the bail application (if moved by the petitioners) in the light of the judgment passed by the seven Judges' Bench of this Court in Amarawati v. State of U.P., 2004 SCC OnLine All\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/218135","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=218135"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/218135\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=218135"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=218135"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=218135"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}