{"id":218037,"date":"2019-08-13T13:00:25","date_gmt":"2019-08-13T07:30:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=218037"},"modified":"2019-08-16T11:09:45","modified_gmt":"2019-08-16T05:39:45","slug":"utt-hc-precondition-of-appeal-under-cgst-act-must-be-payment-of-the-demanded-tax-and-10-of-the-disputed-amount","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/13\/utt-hc-precondition-of-appeal-under-cgst-act-must-be-payment-of-the-demanded-tax-and-10-of-the-disputed-amount\/","title":{"rendered":"Utt HC | Precondition of appeal under CGST Act must be payment of the demanded tax and 10% of the disputed amount"},"content":{"rendered":"

Uttaranchal High Court<\/strong>: A Division Bench of Ramesh Ranganathan, CJ and Alok Kumar Verma, J. entertained a special appeal filed against the order of Single Judge in a writ petition where the petition was dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy.<\/p>\n

Factual matrix of the case was that the appellant purchased timber from Uttarakhand Forest Development Corporation, under Section 3 of the U.P. Forest Development Corporation Act, 1974. It was contended by the appellant that the Corporation issued an invoice where both CGST and SGST were charged on the sale price of goods. It was further contended that the appellant paid the amount to the Corporation even before the goods were transported.<\/p>\n

It was the appellant\u2019s case that the Corporation should have raised two separate e-way bills for two separate consignments but had raised one e-way bill for the total amount on both the consignments. Further, the goods of the appellant were in transit, they were seized and, on the ground that only one e-way bill was issued instead of two, a penalty of Rs 1,70,688 was sought to be levied on the appellant-writ petitioner. Hence, it was contended that the penalty, if at all, should have been paid by the Corporation since the error in issuing one e-way bill instead of two was on their part and not on the part of the appellant. The Single Judge, however, dismissed the writ petition at the stage of admission relegating the appellant-writ petitioner to the remedy under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Hence the appellant found the special appeal appropriate for proper adjudication of the case.<\/p>\n

The counsel for the appellant Piyush Garg, submitted that the proceedings under challenge was an order of detention of goods under Section 129 of the CGST Act; it was against the demand raised on detention of the goods, for payment of tax and penalty, that the writ jurisdiction of Court was invoked; tax had already been paid to the Corporation before the goods were even transported by the appellant; the remedy, under Section 107 of the CGST Act, was not efficacious since sub-section (6) of Section 107, which required 10% of the disputed amount to be paid, only provided for stay of payment of the remaining amount, and nothing more; the appellant was not able to take delivery of the seized goods from the second respondent since Section 107 of the CGST Act does not provide for such an eventuality; and the appellant had perforce to avail the remedy of invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.<\/p>\n

The Law point discussed by the Court was that, Section 107 of the CGST Act related to Appeals to the Appellate Authority and, under sub-section (1) thereof, any person, aggrieved by any decision or order passed, under the CGST Act or the State Goods and Services Tax Act, by an adjudicating authority may appeal to such Appellate Authority. While an appeal, under Section 107 of the CGST Act, would lie to the Appellate Authority against any decision or order passed by an adjudicating authority, Section 2(4) of the CGST Act defines \u201cadjudicating authority\u201d in very broad terms. Under Section 2(4) of the CGST Act, an \u201cadjudicating authority\u201d has been defined to mean any authority, appointed or authorised to pass any order or decision under the Act, but not to include the authorities specified therein. Admittedly the Appellate Authority, under Section 107(1) of the CGST Act, was not one such. Since an appeal would lie against any order passed or decision taken by any authority appointed or authorized to pass any order or decision under the Act, it does appear that an order of detention can also be appealed against under Section 7(1) of the CGST Act.<\/p>\n

Hence, the Court observed that there was no dispute regarding tax and it was the appellant\u2019s case that the tax in its entirety had been paid to the Corporation which, in turn, was obligated to remit the said amount to the State Tax Department. Since the appellant-writ petitioner disputed levy of penalty in its entirety, they would, in terms of Section 107(6) of the CGST Act, were only required to deposit 10% of such penalty. That did not, however, solved the problem which the appellant faced i.e. for release of the goods detained by the respondent-authorities. If, on the other hand, he were to comply with the demand notice issued under Section 129(1) of the CGST Act then, in terms of Section 129(5) of the CGST Act, on payment of the amount referred to in sub-section (1), all proceedings in respect of the notice specified in sub-section (3) shall be deemed to be concluded, in which event the goods were to be released. Hence, the Court ordered the amount to be refunded to the appellant.[Agarwal Timber Suppliers v. State of Uttarakhand, 2019 SCC OnLine Utt 730<\/a>,<\/b> decided on 06-08-2109]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench of Ramesh Ranganathan, CJ and Alok Kumar Verma, J. entertained a special appeal filed against the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31975,30102,37053,37052,37054],"class_list":["post-218037","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-alternative-remedy","tag-cgst-act","tag-precondition-of-appeal","tag-section-107-of-cgst-act","tag-timber"],"yoast_head":"\nUtt HC | Precondition of appeal under CGST Act must be payment of the demanded tax and 10% of the disputed amount | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/13\/utt-hc-precondition-of-appeal-under-cgst-act-must-be-payment-of-the-demanded-tax-and-10-of-the-disputed-amount\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Utt HC | Precondition of appeal under CGST Act must be payment of the demanded tax and 10% of the disputed amount\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench of Ramesh Ranganathan, CJ and Alok Kumar Verma, J. entertained a special appeal filed against the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/13\/utt-hc-precondition-of-appeal-under-cgst-act-must-be-payment-of-the-demanded-tax-and-10-of-the-disputed-amount\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-08-13T07:30:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-08-16T05:39:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/uttrakhandHC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/13\/utt-hc-precondition-of-appeal-under-cgst-act-must-be-payment-of-the-demanded-tax-and-10-of-the-disputed-amount\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/13\/utt-hc-precondition-of-appeal-under-cgst-act-must-be-payment-of-the-demanded-tax-and-10-of-the-disputed-amount\/\",\"name\":\"Utt HC | Precondition of appeal under CGST Act must be payment of the demanded tax and 10% of the disputed amount | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-08-13T07:30:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-08-16T05:39:45+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/13\/utt-hc-precondition-of-appeal-under-cgst-act-must-be-payment-of-the-demanded-tax-and-10-of-the-disputed-amount\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/13\/utt-hc-precondition-of-appeal-under-cgst-act-must-be-payment-of-the-demanded-tax-and-10-of-the-disputed-amount\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/13\/utt-hc-precondition-of-appeal-under-cgst-act-must-be-payment-of-the-demanded-tax-and-10-of-the-disputed-amount\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Utt HC | Precondition of appeal under CGST Act must be payment of the demanded tax and 10% of the disputed amount\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Utt HC | Precondition of appeal under CGST Act must be payment of the demanded tax and 10% of the disputed amount | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/13\/utt-hc-precondition-of-appeal-under-cgst-act-must-be-payment-of-the-demanded-tax-and-10-of-the-disputed-amount\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Utt HC | Precondition of appeal under CGST Act must be payment of the demanded tax and 10% of the disputed amount","og_description":"Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench of Ramesh Ranganathan, CJ and Alok Kumar Verma, J. entertained a special appeal filed against the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/13\/utt-hc-precondition-of-appeal-under-cgst-act-must-be-payment-of-the-demanded-tax-and-10-of-the-disputed-amount\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-08-13T07:30:25+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-08-16T05:39:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/uttrakhandHC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/13\/utt-hc-precondition-of-appeal-under-cgst-act-must-be-payment-of-the-demanded-tax-and-10-of-the-disputed-amount\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/13\/utt-hc-precondition-of-appeal-under-cgst-act-must-be-payment-of-the-demanded-tax-and-10-of-the-disputed-amount\/","name":"Utt HC | Precondition of appeal under CGST Act must be payment of the demanded tax and 10% of the disputed amount | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-08-13T07:30:25+00:00","dateModified":"2019-08-16T05:39:45+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/13\/utt-hc-precondition-of-appeal-under-cgst-act-must-be-payment-of-the-demanded-tax-and-10-of-the-disputed-amount\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/13\/utt-hc-precondition-of-appeal-under-cgst-act-must-be-payment-of-the-demanded-tax-and-10-of-the-disputed-amount\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/13\/utt-hc-precondition-of-appeal-under-cgst-act-must-be-payment-of-the-demanded-tax-and-10-of-the-disputed-amount\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Utt HC | Precondition of appeal under CGST Act must be payment of the demanded tax and 10% of the disputed amount"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":240743,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/16\/cestat-amount-already-reversed-before-introduction-of-cgst-act-2017-entitled-to-be-re-credited-tribunal-allows-appeal\/","url_meta":{"origin":218037,"position":0},"title":"CESTAT | Amount already reversed before introduction of CGST Act 2017 entitled to be re-credited; Tribunal allows appeal","author":"Editor","date":"December 16, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): Ashok Jindal (Judicial Member) allowed an appeal filed against the impugned order wherein the refund claim had been rejected in terms of the provisions effective from 01-03-2015 in case of deemed export. The counsel for the appellant, Mr Naveen Bindal submitted that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":275502,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/13\/maharashtra-appellate-authority-for-advance-ruling-consideration-supply-subsidy-cgst-mgst-gst-appeal-one-stop-crises-centre-scheme-charitable-activities-destitute-women-domestic-violence-legal-r\/","url_meta":{"origin":218037,"position":1},"title":"Maharashtra Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling | “One Stop Crises Centre” Scheme can be construed as subsidy, not subject to GST; Set aside MAAR ruling","author":"Editor","date":"October 13, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (Maharashtra): In an appeal filed under Section 100 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (\u2018CGST\u2019) and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (\u2018MGST\u2019) being aggrieved by the advance ruling passed by the Maharashtra Authority of Advance Ruling (MAAR),\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Advance Rulings"","block_context":{"text":"Advance Rulings","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/aar\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-65-2-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-65-2-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-65-2-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-65-2-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-65-2-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":270266,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/18\/aaar-free-ipl-tickets-supply-of-complimentary-tickets-is-promotion-of-business-attracts-gst\/","url_meta":{"origin":218037,"position":2},"title":"AAAR| Free IPL tickets: Supply of Complimentary tickets is promotion of business; attracts GST","author":"Editor","date":"July 18, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Punjab: Arun Narayan Gupta Chief Commissioner, CGST Commissionerate, and Kamal Kishor Yadav, Commissioner of State Tax held that the distribution of match tickets to related persons for the promotion of business attracts GST. The factual background of the case The appellant entered into\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"AAR GST","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/gst-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/gst-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/gst-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/gst-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/gst-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":364899,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/28\/gujarat-appellate-aar-on-itc-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses\/","url_meta":{"origin":218037,"position":3},"title":"Inside Gujarat Appellate AAR order refusing Input Tax Credit claim on buyback expenditure of Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers & Chemical’s shares","author":"Adyasha Mohanty","date":"October 28, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Reaffirming the principle that transactions in securities fall outside the ambit of GST, the Gujarat Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling held that ITC on share buyback expenses is inadmissible and must be reversed under Section 17(3) of the CGST Act, 2017.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"ITC claim on share buyback expenses","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/ITC-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/ITC-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/ITC-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/ITC-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297798,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/27\/delhi-hc-sets-aside-order-for-violating-the-principles-of-natural-justice-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":218037,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Telephonic conversations for brief period cannot be construed as hearing\u2019; Delhi High Court sets aside order passed in violation of S. 75 of CGST Act","author":"Editor","date":"July 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe opportunity of hearing, which the Officer is statutorily required to give to the person against whom an adverse decision is contemplated, is not an empty formality, and is a well-recognised principle of audi alteram partem, which has rightly been incorporated in Section 75(3) and 75(4) of the CGST Act.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":335349,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/16\/allahabad-hc-penalty-goods-in-transit-gst-registration-suspension\/","url_meta":{"origin":218037,"position":5},"title":"Penalty can’t be imposed on goods in transit with valid tax invoice and e-way bill, even after suspension of GST registration: Allahabad High Court","author":"Editor","date":"November 16, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court directed the authorities to carry out the exercise in terms of Section 129 (1)(a) of the CGST Act within a period of two weeks from the date of this order.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/218037","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=218037"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/218037\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=218037"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=218037"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=218037"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}