{"id":217998,"date":"2019-08-13T09:00:52","date_gmt":"2019-08-13T03:30:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=217998"},"modified":"2019-08-13T11:46:43","modified_gmt":"2019-08-13T06:16:43","slug":"jhar-hc-recasting-of-issue-after-conclusion-of-trial-denied-held-it-is-being-done-to-delay-proceedings","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/13\/jhar-hc-recasting-of-issue-after-conclusion-of-trial-denied-held-it-is-being-done-to-delay-proceedings\/","title":{"rendered":"Jhar HC | Recasting of issue after conclusion of trial denied, held it is being done to delay proceedings"},"content":{"rendered":"

Jharkhand High Court:<\/strong> Sujit Narayan Prasad, J., dismissed the present petition filed by the petitioner and denied the recasting of issues at the stage of conclusion of the trial.<\/p>\n

In the present case, the order in Title Eviction Suit is under challenge by the petitioner. In the said suit, the petitioner had admitted that the property in question has been sub-letted in his favour described as Schedule \u201cB\u201d of the plaint. However, the petitioner had filed a petition under Order 14 Rule 5 CPC to frame an additional issue to the effect that the Schedule \u201cB\u201d premises is not the tenanted premises, therefore, the said issue pertaining to the premises needed to be adjudicated by framing a separate issue but it was rejected by the Court. Hence, the instant writ petition was filed by the petitioner.<\/p>\n

In the Eviction Suit, the trial court has found that the suit has been filed for eviction of the defendant from alleged suit \u201cB\u201d land and trial was concluded and the case was fixed for argument and at that stage, the petition was filed under Order 14 Rule 5 CPC for recasting of the issues. Therefore the trial court declined to pass positive order in favour of the petitioner.<\/p>\n

In view of the above, this Court has found that the petitioner had raised the issue of having no relation of landlord and tenant after putting his appearance in the eviction suit in question, therefore, a particular issue to that effect has been framed. The court is of the view that now the petitioner is trying to recast the issue by taking plea that he is not in the premises said to have been tenanted in his favour as under Schedule \u201cB\u201d and to that effect the issues have already been framed, therefore, after conclusion of the trial and when the case has been posted for final arguments, the recasting of issue is nothing but to delay the proceeding, therefore, this Court has held that the trial Court has committed any illegality in not passing a positive order. [Md. Allauddin v. Laxmi Devi, 2019 SCC OnLine Jhar 1003<\/b><\/a>, decided on 06-08-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jharkhand High Court: Sujit Narayan Prasad, J., dismissed the present petition filed by the petitioner and denied the recasting of issues at <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[37045,37042,33111,37044,37043],"class_list":["post-217998","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-additional-issue","tag-conclusion-of-trial","tag-eviction-suit","tag-order-14-rule-5-cpc","tag-recasting-of-issue"],"yoast_head":"\nJhar HC | Recasting of issue after conclusion of trial denied, held it is being done to delay proceedings | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/13\/jhar-hc-recasting-of-issue-after-conclusion-of-trial-denied-held-it-is-being-done-to-delay-proceedings\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jhar HC | Recasting of issue after conclusion of trial denied, held it is being done to delay proceedings\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jharkhand High Court: Sujit Narayan Prasad, J., dismissed the present petition filed by the petitioner and denied the recasting of issues at\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/13\/jhar-hc-recasting-of-issue-after-conclusion-of-trial-denied-held-it-is-being-done-to-delay-proceedings\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-08-13T03:30:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-08-13T06:16:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/13\/jhar-hc-recasting-of-issue-after-conclusion-of-trial-denied-held-it-is-being-done-to-delay-proceedings\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/13\/jhar-hc-recasting-of-issue-after-conclusion-of-trial-denied-held-it-is-being-done-to-delay-proceedings\/\",\"name\":\"Jhar HC | Recasting of issue after conclusion of trial denied, held it is being done to delay proceedings | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-08-13T03:30:52+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-08-13T06:16:43+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/13\/jhar-hc-recasting-of-issue-after-conclusion-of-trial-denied-held-it-is-being-done-to-delay-proceedings\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/13\/jhar-hc-recasting-of-issue-after-conclusion-of-trial-denied-held-it-is-being-done-to-delay-proceedings\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/13\/jhar-hc-recasting-of-issue-after-conclusion-of-trial-denied-held-it-is-being-done-to-delay-proceedings\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jhar HC | Recasting of issue after conclusion of trial denied, held it is being done to delay proceedings\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jhar HC | Recasting of issue after conclusion of trial denied, held it is being done to delay proceedings | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/13\/jhar-hc-recasting-of-issue-after-conclusion-of-trial-denied-held-it-is-being-done-to-delay-proceedings\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jhar HC | Recasting of issue after conclusion of trial denied, held it is being done to delay proceedings","og_description":"Jharkhand High Court: Sujit Narayan Prasad, J., dismissed the present petition filed by the petitioner and denied the recasting of issues at","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/13\/jhar-hc-recasting-of-issue-after-conclusion-of-trial-denied-held-it-is-being-done-to-delay-proceedings\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-08-13T03:30:52+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-08-13T06:16:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/13\/jhar-hc-recasting-of-issue-after-conclusion-of-trial-denied-held-it-is-being-done-to-delay-proceedings\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/13\/jhar-hc-recasting-of-issue-after-conclusion-of-trial-denied-held-it-is-being-done-to-delay-proceedings\/","name":"Jhar HC | Recasting of issue after conclusion of trial denied, held it is being done to delay proceedings | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-08-13T03:30:52+00:00","dateModified":"2019-08-13T06:16:43+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/13\/jhar-hc-recasting-of-issue-after-conclusion-of-trial-denied-held-it-is-being-done-to-delay-proceedings\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/13\/jhar-hc-recasting-of-issue-after-conclusion-of-trial-denied-held-it-is-being-done-to-delay-proceedings\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/13\/jhar-hc-recasting-of-issue-after-conclusion-of-trial-denied-held-it-is-being-done-to-delay-proceedings\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jhar HC | Recasting of issue after conclusion of trial denied, held it is being done to delay proceedings"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":356606,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/14\/delhi-hc-decrees-eviction-based-on-admissions\/","url_meta":{"origin":217998,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Admissions can be inferred from vague\/evasive denials\u2019; Delhi HC decrees eviction based on admissions despite denial of landlord-tenant relationship","author":"Editor","date":"August 14, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The issues that have been set up in defence by the respondent are such that it will not be possible for him to succeed even if these are entertained, so far as concerns the recovery of possession of the subject premises. No useful purpose will thus be served if the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"eviction based on admissions","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/eviction-based-on-admissions.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/eviction-based-on-admissions.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/eviction-based-on-admissions.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/eviction-based-on-admissions.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":218167,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/17\/del-hc-discrepancy-of-not-filing-leave-to-defend-under-or-37-r-35-in-response-to-summary-suit-could-be-ignored-in-interest-of-justice\/","url_meta":{"origin":217998,"position":1},"title":"Del HC | Discrepancy of not filing “leave to defend” under Or. 37 R. 3(5) in response to summary suit could be ignored in interest of justice","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 17, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High court:\u00a0Vibhu Bhkaru, J. dismissed a revision petition filed under Section 115 CPC impugning an order passed by the Additional District Judge in the subject summary suit whereby the respondents were granted unconditional Leave to Defend. The respondents had defaulted in repaying the loan extended to them by the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":358545,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/01\/owner-entitled-to-return-of-original-documents-under-order-13-rule-9-cpc-telangana-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":217998,"position":2},"title":"Who is entitled to return of Original Documents, party who produced it or the owner? Telangana HC clarifies Order 13 Rule 9 CPC","author":"Editor","date":"September 1, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The petitioner had averred that the intent of Order 13 Rule 9 of the CPC is to ensure that documents, once they have served their purpose in litigation and are no longer required by the Court, should be returned to their rightful owners.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"return of original documents","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/return-of-original-documents.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/return-of-original-documents.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/return-of-original-documents.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/return-of-original-documents.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":300885,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/06\/andhra-pradesh-hc-upholds-the-order-dismissing-application-under-order-viii-rule-2-of-cpc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":217998,"position":3},"title":"Relevance of the documents sought under Order VII Rule 2 of CPC should be stated in the affidavit: Andhra Pradesh High Court upholds Order dismissing application","author":"Editor","date":"September 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is not stated in the affidavit as to how the documents are relevant to the suit except stating that, the documents are important and crucial documents to prove that the promissory note suit is a rank forged and materially altered.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"andhra pradesh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":335664,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/22\/del-hc-dismisses-revision-petition-to-challenge-order-performance-oral-agreement-to-sell-maintainable\/","url_meta":{"origin":217998,"position":4},"title":"Delhi HC dismisses Revision Petition to challenge Order by ADJ holding suit for specific performance of oral agreement to sell maintainable","author":"Editor","date":"November 22, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u2018It is no longer res integra that to determine an application under Order VII Rule 11 of Civil Procedure Code, it is only averments made in the plaint that can be considered.\u2019","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":323645,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/05\/will-personal-right-of-action-survive-transfer-legal-heir-upon-original-plaintiffs-death-dhc-answers-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":217998,"position":5},"title":"Will personal right of action survive by transfer to legal heir upon original plaintiff\u2019s death? Delhi HC answers","author":"Editor","date":"June 5, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe nature of infringement of his legal rights, if any, which were claimed by the deceased\/plaintiff, were personal to him and certainly not heritable\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217998","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=217998"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217998\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=217998"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=217998"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=217998"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}