{"id":217895,"date":"2019-08-09T19:30:13","date_gmt":"2019-08-09T14:00:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=217895"},"modified":"2019-08-29T16:45:00","modified_gmt":"2019-08-29T11:15:00","slug":"sat-additional-affidavit-filed-after-disposal-of-appeal-cannot-form-part-of-the-memo-of-appeal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/sat-additional-affidavit-filed-after-disposal-of-appeal-cannot-form-part-of-the-memo-of-appeal\/","title":{"rendered":"SAT | Additional affidavit filed after disposal of appeal cannot form part of the memo of appeal"},"content":{"rendered":"

Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT):<\/strong> Justice Tarun Agarwala (Presiding Officer) and Dr C.K.G. Nair (Member) dismissed an appeal by the appellant as it was devoid of any merit<\/p>\n

The appellant, a private company, was a minority shareholder in New Delhi Television Ltd. (NDTV). With regard to non-disclosure of a tax demand under Clause 36 of the Equity Listing Agreement prescribed by the Stock Exchange (Listing Agreement) by the Company, the appellant made a complaint to the stock exchange as well as to SEBI based on which adjudication proceedings were initiated by the Adjudicating Officer under Sections 23-A and 23-E of the SEBI Act, 1992 read with 23-I of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 (SCRA). The Adjudicating Officer imposed a penalty of Rs 2 crores on NDTV. The appellant filed an appeal against the order contending that the penalty should have been imposed on the Key Managerial Personnel of the Company who took a conscious decision of not disclosing the event under Clause 36 of the Listing Agreement, and not the whole company. The Tribunal directed the appellant to make a fresh representation to SEBI.<\/p>\n

Based on this, a representation was filed which was rejected by the Whole Time Member (WTM), as they found that out of the nine violations only two violations formed the cause of grievance which was mentioned in the appeal filed before the Tribunal. The remaining seven violations alleged were beyond the scope of the directions of the Tribunal. On the two violations which were part of the appeal, the WTM held that the complaint of the appellant was considered and appropriate orders of the penalty were passed against the Company.<\/p>\n

The Tribunal was of the opinion that the contentions by the appellants were misconceived. They held there were parallel proceedings for the same offence culminating into an order passed by the Adjudicating Officer under Section 15-A(b) of the SEBI Act as well as under Sections 23-A(a) and 23-E of the SCRA. Thus, their grievance was set at rest. Another contention of the appellant that the remaining seven alleged violations should also be considered as they were part of the appeal that was filed before the Tribunal was also misconceived.<\/p>\n

The earlier order of the Tribunal clearly rejected the contention of the appellant for making the representation on issues other than the issue mentioned. The Tribunal rejected the modification application holding that permitting the appellant to make a representation on issues which are not the subject matter of appeal would amount to enlarging the scope of the representation beyond the grievances set out in the memo of appeal. Also, the additional affidavit on which reliance was placed was filed much after the disposal of the appellant\u2019s appeal. Any additional affidavit filed after the disposal of the appeal cannot form part of the memo of appeal.[Quantum Securities (P) Ltd. v. Securities & Exchange Board of India, 2019 SCC OnLine SAT 142<\/b><\/a>, decided on 07-08-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT): Justice Tarun Agarwala (Presiding Officer) and Dr C.K.G. Nair (Member) dismissed an appeal by the appellant as it <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":209781,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[37011,8991,37012,21454,37013,37014],"class_list":["post-217895","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-additional-affidavit","tag-appeal","tag-memo-of-appeal","tag-ndtv","tag-securities-contracts-regulation-act-1956","tag-tax-demand"],"yoast_head":"\nSAT | Additional affidavit filed after disposal of appeal cannot form part of the memo of appeal | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/sat-additional-affidavit-filed-after-disposal-of-appeal-cannot-form-part-of-the-memo-of-appeal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SAT | Additional affidavit filed after disposal of appeal cannot form part of the memo of appeal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT): Justice Tarun Agarwala (Presiding Officer) and Dr C.K.G. Nair (Member) dismissed an appeal by the appellant as it\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/sat-additional-affidavit-filed-after-disposal-of-appeal-cannot-form-part-of-the-memo-of-appeal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-08-09T14:00:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-08-29T11:15:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/sat-additional-affidavit-filed-after-disposal-of-appeal-cannot-form-part-of-the-memo-of-appeal\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/sat-additional-affidavit-filed-after-disposal-of-appeal-cannot-form-part-of-the-memo-of-appeal\/\",\"name\":\"SAT | Additional affidavit filed after disposal of appeal cannot form part of the memo of appeal | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/sat-additional-affidavit-filed-after-disposal-of-appeal-cannot-form-part-of-the-memo-of-appeal\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/sat-additional-affidavit-filed-after-disposal-of-appeal-cannot-form-part-of-the-memo-of-appeal\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-08-09T14:00:13+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-08-29T11:15:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/sat-additional-affidavit-filed-after-disposal-of-appeal-cannot-form-part-of-the-memo-of-appeal\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/sat-additional-affidavit-filed-after-disposal-of-appeal-cannot-form-part-of-the-memo-of-appeal\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/sat-additional-affidavit-filed-after-disposal-of-appeal-cannot-form-part-of-the-memo-of-appeal\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/sat-additional-affidavit-filed-after-disposal-of-appeal-cannot-form-part-of-the-memo-of-appeal\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SAT | Additional affidavit filed after disposal of appeal cannot form part of the memo of appeal\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SAT | Additional affidavit filed after disposal of appeal cannot form part of the memo of appeal | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/sat-additional-affidavit-filed-after-disposal-of-appeal-cannot-form-part-of-the-memo-of-appeal\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"SAT | Additional affidavit filed after disposal of appeal cannot form part of the memo of appeal","og_description":"Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT): Justice Tarun Agarwala (Presiding Officer) and Dr C.K.G. Nair (Member) dismissed an appeal by the appellant as it","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/sat-additional-affidavit-filed-after-disposal-of-appeal-cannot-form-part-of-the-memo-of-appeal\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-08-09T14:00:13+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-08-29T11:15:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/sat-additional-affidavit-filed-after-disposal-of-appeal-cannot-form-part-of-the-memo-of-appeal\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/sat-additional-affidavit-filed-after-disposal-of-appeal-cannot-form-part-of-the-memo-of-appeal\/","name":"SAT | Additional affidavit filed after disposal of appeal cannot form part of the memo of appeal | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/sat-additional-affidavit-filed-after-disposal-of-appeal-cannot-form-part-of-the-memo-of-appeal\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/sat-additional-affidavit-filed-after-disposal-of-appeal-cannot-form-part-of-the-memo-of-appeal\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg","datePublished":"2019-08-09T14:00:13+00:00","dateModified":"2019-08-29T11:15:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/sat-additional-affidavit-filed-after-disposal-of-appeal-cannot-form-part-of-the-memo-of-appeal\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/sat-additional-affidavit-filed-after-disposal-of-appeal-cannot-form-part-of-the-memo-of-appeal\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/sat-additional-affidavit-filed-after-disposal-of-appeal-cannot-form-part-of-the-memo-of-appeal\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/sat-additional-affidavit-filed-after-disposal-of-appeal-cannot-form-part-of-the-memo-of-appeal\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SAT | Additional affidavit filed after disposal of appeal cannot form part of the memo of appeal"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":296584,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/12\/sat-dismiss-appeal-not-maintainable-shareholder-right-to-continue-litigation-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":217895,"position":0},"title":"SAT Mumbai dismisses appeal under S. 15T SEBI Act for not having filed by an ‘aggrieved person’","author":"Arunima","date":"July 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"SAT Mumbai observed that it is not open to a shareholder to complain about the scheme of arrangement before the SEBI or to the Stock Exchange nor is it open to the shareholder to make a representation and \/or file an appeal before this Tribunal under Section 15T of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"securities appellate tribunal, mumbai","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/securities-appellate-tribunal-mumbai.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/securities-appellate-tribunal-mumbai.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/securities-appellate-tribunal-mumbai.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/securities-appellate-tribunal-mumbai.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":215172,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/30\/sat-objective-of-sebi-act-is-to-regulate-healthy-growth-of-securities-market-no-action-to-be-taken-without-following-the-principles-of-natural-justice\/","url_meta":{"origin":217895,"position":1},"title":"SAT | Objective of SEBI Act is to regulate healthy growth of securities market: No action to be taken without following principles of natural justice","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 30, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT): The Coram of Tarun Agarwala, J. (Presiding Officer), Dr C.K.G Nair (Member) and M.T. Joshi, J. (Judicial Member) allowed an appeal against the order of delisting the company as a shell company by Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) and Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI). An\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217292,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/25\/sat-in-case-of-violation-of-market-norms-withholding-of-dividends-it-is-sebis-duty-to-inquire-and-take-action-under-s-124-of-the-companies-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":217895,"position":2},"title":"SAT | In case of violation of market norms (withholding of dividends), it is SEBI\u2019s duty to inquire and take action under S. 124 of Companies Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 25, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT), Mumbai: Coram of Justice Tarun Agarwala (Presiding Officer), Dr C.K.G. Nair (Member), and Justice M.T. Joshi (Judicial Member) directed SEBI to look into violation of market norms by Cairn India with respect to withholding of dividends along with interest payable to Cairn UK Holdings, the Appellant.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":219170,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/05\/bom-hc-sebi-committed-serious-error-in-rejecting-ndtvs-applications-for-condonation-of-delay\/","url_meta":{"origin":217895,"position":3},"title":"Bom HC | SEBI committed serious error in rejecting NDTV’s applications for condonation of delay","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 5, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Division Bench of Akil Kureshi and S.J. Kathawalla, JJ. addressed the petition filed by NDTV challenging orders passed by Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI). Orders passed by SEBI pertained to the rejection of applications filed by NDTV for condonation of delay in filing settlement applications.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":196000,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/14\/suspension-of-trading-delisting-of-company-only-mitigating-factors-not-grounds-to-escape-liability-for-flouting-sebi-circulars\/","url_meta":{"origin":217895,"position":4},"title":"Suspension of trading, delisting of company only mitigating factors, not grounds to escape liability for flouting SEBI circulars","author":"Saba","date":"May 14, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai: The\u00a0SAT, Mumbai has held that delisting of a company is not a tenable ground to be held unaccountable for non-compliance with SEBI circulars. In\u00a0Pashupati\u00a0Cables Ltd. v. SEBI, the Tribunal heard an appeal against a penalty of Rs. 6 lakhs imposed by SEBI on the appellant company\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/appoointment.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/appoointment.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/appoointment.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/appoointment.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/appoointment.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":245918,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/22\/stock-exchange\/","url_meta":{"origin":217895,"position":5},"title":"SAT | Separate penalties by the stock exchanges can be imposed | While positing, rejects appeal","author":"Editor","date":"March 22, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT): A Coram of Tarun Agarwala, J., (Presiding Officer) and M.T. Joshi, J., (Judicial Member) while dismissing an appeal held that separate penalties by the stock exchanges could be imposed. In the present matter, BSE and NSE separately imposed a penalty of Rs 12 lakh for violation\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217895","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=217895"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217895\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/209781"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=217895"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=217895"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=217895"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}