{"id":217891,"date":"2019-08-09T18:30:34","date_gmt":"2019-08-09T13:00:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=217891"},"modified":"2019-08-13T11:20:27","modified_gmt":"2019-08-13T05:50:27","slug":"guj-hc-unabsorbed-depreciation-could-be-carried-forward-up-to-maximum-period-of-8-years-from-the-year-in-which-it-was-first-computed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/guj-hc-unabsorbed-depreciation-could-be-carried-forward-up-to-maximum-period-of-8-years-from-the-year-in-which-it-was-first-computed\/","title":{"rendered":"Guj HC | Unabsorbed depreciation could be carried forward up to maximum period of 8 years from the year in which it was first computed"},"content":{"rendered":"

Gujarat High Court:<\/strong> A Division Bench of J.B. Pardiwala and A.C. Rao, JJ. dismissed a tax appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (ITA) against an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal on 25-05-2018 for the Assessment Year 2007-08.<\/p>\n

The appellant asked the High Court to address the following substantial question of law:<\/p>\n

(a) Whether ITAT has erred in law in allowing carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation for the AYs 1996-97, 1997-98 and 1998-99 beyond the period of eight AYs in contravention of applicable provisions being section 32(2)(iii)(b) of the ITA as amended by Finance (No.2) Act, 1996?<\/p>\n

(b) Whether ITAT should not have directed the Assessing Officer to allow carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation after verification of carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation for the AYs as mentioned above by holding that carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation prior to assessment can be set off in subsequent years without setting time limit?<\/p>\n

The questions of law as proposed by the appellant were not res integra for the High Court as they had discussed these issues in General Motors (India) (P) Ltd. v. CIT, <\/em>2012 SCC OnLine Guj 6101<\/a>, wherein, the Court held that Section 32(2) of ITA was amended by the Finance (No.2) Act of 1996, with effect from the AY 1997-98 and the unabsorbed depreciation for the AY 1997-98 could be carried forward up to the maximum period of eight years from the year in which it was first computed. When eight years expired in the AY 2005-06, the assessee would be eligible to claim unabsorbed depreciation of the AY 1997-98 for being carried forward and set off against the income for the AY 2005-06. But the assessee was not entitled to unabsorbed depreciation for the AY 1997-98, which was not eligible for being carried forward and set off against the income for the AY 2006-07.<\/p>\n

Based on this judgment, the Court dismissed the Tax Appeal.[Principal Commissioner of Income Tax v. SNS Textiles Ltd., 2019 SCC OnLine Guj 1478<\/b><\/a>, decided on 05-08-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Gujarat High Court: A Division Bench of J.B. Pardiwala and A.C. Rao, JJ. dismissed a tax appeal filed under Section 260-A of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":206146,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[37009,9013,34162,37010],"class_list":["post-217891","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-assessment-year-2007-08","tag-income-tax-appellate-tribunal","tag-section-260-a-of-income-tax-act","tag-unabsorbed-depreciation"],"yoast_head":"\nGuj HC | Unabsorbed depreciation could be carried forward up to maximum period of 8 years from the year in which it was first computed | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/guj-hc-unabsorbed-depreciation-could-be-carried-forward-up-to-maximum-period-of-8-years-from-the-year-in-which-it-was-first-computed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Guj HC | Unabsorbed depreciation could be carried forward up to maximum period of 8 years from the year in which it was first computed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Gujarat High Court: A Division Bench of J.B. Pardiwala and A.C. Rao, JJ. dismissed a tax appeal filed under Section 260-A of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/guj-hc-unabsorbed-depreciation-could-be-carried-forward-up-to-maximum-period-of-8-years-from-the-year-in-which-it-was-first-computed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-08-09T13:00:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-08-13T05:50:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/guj-hc-unabsorbed-depreciation-could-be-carried-forward-up-to-maximum-period-of-8-years-from-the-year-in-which-it-was-first-computed\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/guj-hc-unabsorbed-depreciation-could-be-carried-forward-up-to-maximum-period-of-8-years-from-the-year-in-which-it-was-first-computed\/\",\"name\":\"Guj HC | Unabsorbed depreciation could be carried forward up to maximum period of 8 years from the year in which it was first computed | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/guj-hc-unabsorbed-depreciation-could-be-carried-forward-up-to-maximum-period-of-8-years-from-the-year-in-which-it-was-first-computed\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/guj-hc-unabsorbed-depreciation-could-be-carried-forward-up-to-maximum-period-of-8-years-from-the-year-in-which-it-was-first-computed\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-08-09T13:00:34+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-08-13T05:50:27+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/guj-hc-unabsorbed-depreciation-could-be-carried-forward-up-to-maximum-period-of-8-years-from-the-year-in-which-it-was-first-computed\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/guj-hc-unabsorbed-depreciation-could-be-carried-forward-up-to-maximum-period-of-8-years-from-the-year-in-which-it-was-first-computed\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/guj-hc-unabsorbed-depreciation-could-be-carried-forward-up-to-maximum-period-of-8-years-from-the-year-in-which-it-was-first-computed\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/guj-hc-unabsorbed-depreciation-could-be-carried-forward-up-to-maximum-period-of-8-years-from-the-year-in-which-it-was-first-computed\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Guj HC | Unabsorbed depreciation could be carried forward up to maximum period of 8 years from the year in which it was first computed\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Guj HC | Unabsorbed depreciation could be carried forward up to maximum period of 8 years from the year in which it was first computed | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/guj-hc-unabsorbed-depreciation-could-be-carried-forward-up-to-maximum-period-of-8-years-from-the-year-in-which-it-was-first-computed\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Guj HC | Unabsorbed depreciation could be carried forward up to maximum period of 8 years from the year in which it was first computed","og_description":"Gujarat High Court: A Division Bench of J.B. Pardiwala and A.C. Rao, JJ. dismissed a tax appeal filed under Section 260-A of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/guj-hc-unabsorbed-depreciation-could-be-carried-forward-up-to-maximum-period-of-8-years-from-the-year-in-which-it-was-first-computed\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-08-09T13:00:34+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-08-13T05:50:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/guj-hc-unabsorbed-depreciation-could-be-carried-forward-up-to-maximum-period-of-8-years-from-the-year-in-which-it-was-first-computed\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/guj-hc-unabsorbed-depreciation-could-be-carried-forward-up-to-maximum-period-of-8-years-from-the-year-in-which-it-was-first-computed\/","name":"Guj HC | Unabsorbed depreciation could be carried forward up to maximum period of 8 years from the year in which it was first computed | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/guj-hc-unabsorbed-depreciation-could-be-carried-forward-up-to-maximum-period-of-8-years-from-the-year-in-which-it-was-first-computed\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/guj-hc-unabsorbed-depreciation-could-be-carried-forward-up-to-maximum-period-of-8-years-from-the-year-in-which-it-was-first-computed\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg","datePublished":"2019-08-09T13:00:34+00:00","dateModified":"2019-08-13T05:50:27+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/guj-hc-unabsorbed-depreciation-could-be-carried-forward-up-to-maximum-period-of-8-years-from-the-year-in-which-it-was-first-computed\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/guj-hc-unabsorbed-depreciation-could-be-carried-forward-up-to-maximum-period-of-8-years-from-the-year-in-which-it-was-first-computed\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/guj-hc-unabsorbed-depreciation-could-be-carried-forward-up-to-maximum-period-of-8-years-from-the-year-in-which-it-was-first-computed\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/guj-hc-unabsorbed-depreciation-could-be-carried-forward-up-to-maximum-period-of-8-years-from-the-year-in-which-it-was-first-computed\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Guj HC | Unabsorbed depreciation could be carried forward up to maximum period of 8 years from the year in which it was first computed"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":234553,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/22\/kar-hc-deductions-falling-under-s-10-b-of-income-tax-act-cannot-be-computed-without-setting-off-brought-forward-business-losses-and-unabsorbed-depreciation\/","url_meta":{"origin":217891,"position":0},"title":"Kar HC | Deductions falling under S. 10-B of Income Tax Act cannot be computed without setting off brought forward business losses and unabsorbed depreciation","author":"Editor","date":"August 22, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Division Bench of Alok Aradhe and H.T. Narendra Prasad, JJ. set aside the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in favour of the assessee. The present appeal was filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (IT Act) wherein an order passed by\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":180344,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/08\/relaxation-provisions-relating-levy-mat-case-companies-application-corporate-insolvency-resolution-process-admitted-insolvency-bankruptcy-code-20\/","url_meta":{"origin":217891,"position":1},"title":"Relaxation in provisions relating to levy of MAT in case of companies against whom an application for corporate insolvency resolution process has been admitted under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016","author":"Saba","date":"January 8, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"The existing provisions of Section 115JB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (\u2018the Act\u2019), inter alia, provide, that, for the purposes of levy of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) in case of a company, the amount of loss brought forward or unabsorbed depreciation, whichever is less as per books of account shall\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":169834,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/20\/comments-sought-draft-notification-respect-conversion-indian-branch-foreign-bank-indian-subsidiary-company\/","url_meta":{"origin":217891,"position":2},"title":"Comments sought on Draft Notification in respect of conversion of Indian Branch of foreign bank into Indian subsidiary company","author":"Saba","date":"November 20, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Finance Act, 2012 inserted a new Chapter XII-BB consisting of Section 115JG in the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) which contains \u201cSpecial provisions relating to conversion of Indian Branch of a foreign bank into a subsidiary company\u201d. Section 115JG of the Act inter alia provides that in case the conversion\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":316072,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/04\/itat-allows-vodafone-claim-depreciation-goodwill-acquired-pursuant-slump-sale-acquisition-call-centre-business-from-vegl\/","url_meta":{"origin":217891,"position":3},"title":"ITAT allows Vodafone’s claim of depreciation on goodwill acquired pursuant to slump sale acquisition of Call Centre Business from VEGL","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 4, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"ITAT noted that Parliament had taken due note that the Supreme Court had held that the goodwill arising on business reorganization i.e. amalgamation, slump sales, demerger etc. is a depreciable intangible asset under Section 32 of the Act.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":256839,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/08\/will-hostel-facility-which-is-incidental-to-providing-education-as-per-object-of-assessee-be-a-charitable-purpose-exempted\/","url_meta":{"origin":217891,"position":4},"title":"Will hostel facility which is incidental to providing education as per object of assessee be a charitable purpose exempted under S. 11 of Income Tax Act? ITAT answers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 8, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT): Coram of Anil Chaturvedi (Accountant Member) and Suchitra Kamble (Judicial Member) allowed the appeal filed by the assessee challenging the assessment order made by the Income Tax authorities. The assessee society was duly registered, and the renewal was granted for the period of 5 years.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":218610,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/26\/del-hc-reopening-of-assessment-based-on-a-change-of-opinion-by-assessing-officer-held-vitiated-in-law-as-it-does-not-satisfy-legal-requirement-of-s-147-ita\/","url_meta":{"origin":217891,"position":5},"title":"Del HC | Reopening of assessment based on a change of opinion by Assessing Officer held vitiated in law as it does not satisfy legal requirement of S. 147 ITA","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 26, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of S. Muralidhar and Talwant Singh, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed by the Revenue against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) opining that no substantial question of law arises. The issue sought to be urged by the Revenue was whether the ITAT\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217891","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=217891"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217891\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/206146"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=217891"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=217891"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=217891"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}