{"id":217753,"date":"2019-08-06T17:30:38","date_gmt":"2019-08-06T12:00:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=217753"},"modified":"2019-09-13T10:58:13","modified_gmt":"2019-09-13T05:28:13","slug":"sat-disgorgement-without-restitution-doesnt-serve-any-purpose-appellants-compensated-as-an-investor-protection-measure","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/06\/sat-disgorgement-without-restitution-doesnt-serve-any-purpose-appellants-compensated-as-an-investor-protection-measure\/","title":{"rendered":"SAT | &#8220;Disgorgement without restitution doesn&#8217;t serve any purpose&#8221;, appellants compensated as an investor protection measure"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT):<\/b>\u00a0Justice Tarun Agarwala (Presiding Officer), Dr C.K.G. Nair (Member), and Justice M.T. Joshi (Judicial Member) allowed an appeal challenging an order by SEBI.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The appellants, who are husband and wife, challenged the order of the Whole Time Member (\u2018WTM\u2019) of SEBI. They invested Rs 18,25,041 in buying the shares of VCL in 2002. They argued that the said order violates the directions given by this Tribunal by order as well as the mandate given to SEBI by the SEBI Act, 1992 in protecting the investors. Vital Communications Limited (\u2018VCL\u2019) and other companies were directed to disgorge the unlawful gain of Rs 4,55,91,232 with interest for violation of various provisions of the SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices Relating to Securities Markets) Regulations, 1995 (\u2018PFUTP Regulations, 1995\u2019) and SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices Relating to Securities Markets) Regulations, 2003 (\u2018PFUTP Regulations, 2003\u2019).<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The tribunal by an earlier order had directed SEBI to look into the complaint of the appellants for alleged misleading and fraudulent advertisements issued by VCL, along with an investigation. In case SEBI finds VCL guilty of playing fraud on the investors, it may consider directing the concerned entity or VCL to refund the actual amount spent by the Appellants on purchasing the shares in question and with appropriate interest and as per law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The appellants contended the following:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li>The WTM of SEBI passed a disgorgement order against the Company and the connected entities, when they were directed to refund the amount spent by the appellants on purchasing the shares of VCL with appropriate interest as per law.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li>SEBI is in breach of not following the directions of the Tribunal, apart from not fulfilling its mandate of protecting the investors as they have been pursuing this matter since 2002 at a very high personal cost.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li>Based on these reasons, they must be compensated accordingly.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The respondent submitted the following:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li>Tribunal\u2019s order dated was modified by another order. While the first order stated that SEBI may consider compensating the appellants, the second-order of this Tribunal modified it by stating that such considerations must be in accordance with the law.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li>It is virtually impossible for SEBI to provide for restitution to a large number of investors who have invested in the secondary market and incurred losses and giving compensation on a selective basis would be discriminatory as there may be a large number of affected investors and restitution to investors as a class is a complex task beyond the capacity of SEBI.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Tribunal held that the appellants highlighted the violations made by VCL and other entities owing to their efforts since 2002 and that SEBI is not a helpless entity as it claims to be in its order. The Tribunal also made clear that direction contained in the amended order was that if violation by the VCL was proved, the appellants\u2019 claim may be considered as per law. They directed VCL and other entities to pay a sum of Rs 4.5 crore (approximately) along with interest holding that the basic idea behind disgorgement is restitution.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span>[Ram Kishori Gupta v. Securities &amp; Exchange Board of India, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/1lMwQ425\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine SAT 149<\/b><\/a>, decided on 02-08-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT):\u00a0Justice Tarun Agarwala (Presiding Officer), Dr C.K.G. Nair (Member), and Justice M.T. Joshi (Judicial Member) allowed an appeal challenging <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":209781,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[2728,36953,36954,34244],"class_list":["post-217753","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-compensation","tag-disgorgement","tag-investor-protection-measure","tag-restitution"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>SAT | &quot;Disgorgement without restitution doesn&#039;t serve any purpose&quot;, appellants compensated as an investor protection measure | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/06\/sat-disgorgement-without-restitution-doesnt-serve-any-purpose-appellants-compensated-as-an-investor-protection-measure\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SAT | &quot;Disgorgement without restitution doesn&#039;t serve any purpose&quot;, appellants compensated as an investor protection measure\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT):\u00a0Justice Tarun Agarwala (Presiding Officer), Dr C.K.G. Nair (Member), and Justice M.T. Joshi (Judicial Member) allowed an appeal challenging\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/06\/sat-disgorgement-without-restitution-doesnt-serve-any-purpose-appellants-compensated-as-an-investor-protection-measure\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-08-06T12:00:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-09-13T05:28:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/06\/sat-disgorgement-without-restitution-doesnt-serve-any-purpose-appellants-compensated-as-an-investor-protection-measure\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/06\/sat-disgorgement-without-restitution-doesnt-serve-any-purpose-appellants-compensated-as-an-investor-protection-measure\/\",\"name\":\"SAT | \\\"Disgorgement without restitution doesn't serve any purpose\\\", appellants compensated as an investor protection measure | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/06\/sat-disgorgement-without-restitution-doesnt-serve-any-purpose-appellants-compensated-as-an-investor-protection-measure\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/06\/sat-disgorgement-without-restitution-doesnt-serve-any-purpose-appellants-compensated-as-an-investor-protection-measure\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-08-06T12:00:38+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-09-13T05:28:13+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/06\/sat-disgorgement-without-restitution-doesnt-serve-any-purpose-appellants-compensated-as-an-investor-protection-measure\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/06\/sat-disgorgement-without-restitution-doesnt-serve-any-purpose-appellants-compensated-as-an-investor-protection-measure\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/06\/sat-disgorgement-without-restitution-doesnt-serve-any-purpose-appellants-compensated-as-an-investor-protection-measure\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/06\/sat-disgorgement-without-restitution-doesnt-serve-any-purpose-appellants-compensated-as-an-investor-protection-measure\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SAT | &#8220;Disgorgement without restitution doesn&#8217;t serve any purpose&#8221;, appellants compensated as an investor protection measure\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SAT | \"Disgorgement without restitution doesn't serve any purpose\", appellants compensated as an investor protection measure | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/06\/sat-disgorgement-without-restitution-doesnt-serve-any-purpose-appellants-compensated-as-an-investor-protection-measure\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"SAT | \"Disgorgement without restitution doesn't serve any purpose\", appellants compensated as an investor protection measure","og_description":"Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT):\u00a0Justice Tarun Agarwala (Presiding Officer), Dr C.K.G. Nair (Member), and Justice M.T. Joshi (Judicial Member) allowed an appeal challenging","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/06\/sat-disgorgement-without-restitution-doesnt-serve-any-purpose-appellants-compensated-as-an-investor-protection-measure\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-08-06T12:00:38+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-09-13T05:28:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/06\/sat-disgorgement-without-restitution-doesnt-serve-any-purpose-appellants-compensated-as-an-investor-protection-measure\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/06\/sat-disgorgement-without-restitution-doesnt-serve-any-purpose-appellants-compensated-as-an-investor-protection-measure\/","name":"SAT | \"Disgorgement without restitution doesn't serve any purpose\", appellants compensated as an investor protection measure | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/06\/sat-disgorgement-without-restitution-doesnt-serve-any-purpose-appellants-compensated-as-an-investor-protection-measure\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/06\/sat-disgorgement-without-restitution-doesnt-serve-any-purpose-appellants-compensated-as-an-investor-protection-measure\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg","datePublished":"2019-08-06T12:00:38+00:00","dateModified":"2019-09-13T05:28:13+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/06\/sat-disgorgement-without-restitution-doesnt-serve-any-purpose-appellants-compensated-as-an-investor-protection-measure\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/06\/sat-disgorgement-without-restitution-doesnt-serve-any-purpose-appellants-compensated-as-an-investor-protection-measure\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/06\/sat-disgorgement-without-restitution-doesnt-serve-any-purpose-appellants-compensated-as-an-investor-protection-measure\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/06\/sat-disgorgement-without-restitution-doesnt-serve-any-purpose-appellants-compensated-as-an-investor-protection-measure\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SAT | &#8220;Disgorgement without restitution doesn&#8217;t serve any purpose&#8221;, appellants compensated as an investor protection measure"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":348503,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/22\/supreme-court-res-judicata-applicability-sebi\/","url_meta":{"origin":217753,"position":0},"title":"Flummoxed by Finality: Supreme Court Reaffirms Applicability of Res Judicata to SEBI","author":"Editor","date":"May 22, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"by Namita Shetty* and Bharat Harne**","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/law-firm\/cam\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"res judicata applicability to SEBI","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/res-judicata-applicability-to-SEBI.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/res-judicata-applicability-to-SEBI.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/res-judicata-applicability-to-SEBI.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/res-judicata-applicability-to-SEBI.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/res-judicata-applicability-to-SEBI.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/res-judicata-applicability-to-SEBI.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":224431,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/22\/sat-company-floating-cis-without-registering-with-sebi-held-liable-under-s-15-ha-of-sebi-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":217753,"position":1},"title":"SAT | Company floating CIS without registering with SEBI held liable under S. 15-HA of SEBI Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 22, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT): A Two-Member Bench of Justice Tarun Agarwala (Presiding Officer) and Justice M.T. Joshi (Judicial Member) was hearing two appeals pertaining to the orders passed by Adjudicating Officer (AO) of Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) imposing penalty over appellants. The appeals were filed by Subrata\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":203972,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/20\/role-of-all-accused-in-the-matter-of-satyam-computer-services-ltd-found-to-be-different%e2%94%80-no-uniform-order-of-restrain-from-access-to-securities-market-can-be-given\/","url_meta":{"origin":217753,"position":2},"title":"Satyam Case |SEBI reduces period of restraint order from accessing in securities market","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 20, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities Exchange Board of India, Mumbai: The present case was remanded to SEBI from the order of Securities Appellant Tribunal before G. Mahalingam (Whole Time Member). The question before SEBI was how to compute disgorgement amount based on inputs provided by the noticees and the period for which the noticees\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":241109,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/23\/sat-the-strategy-of-momentum-trading-is-about-creating-its-own-momentum-inimical-to-the-interest-of-the-securities-market-and-is-violative-of-pfutp-regulations\/","url_meta":{"origin":217753,"position":3},"title":"SAT | The strategy of \u2018momentum trading\u2019 is about creating its own momentum inimical to the interest of the securities market and is violative of PFUTP regulations","author":"Editor","date":"December 23, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT):The Bench of Justice Tarun Agarwala (Presiding Officer), Justice M. T. Joshi and Dr C. K. G. Nair Member dismissed the appeal on the ground that the trading strategy used by the appellants was violative of SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices relating to the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":325002,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/24\/delineating-the-scope-and-nature-of-disgorgement-under-securities-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":217753,"position":4},"title":"Delineating the Scope and Nature of Disgorgement Under Securities Law","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 24, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"by Shuchi Agrawal\u2020 and Snigdha Kajaria\u2020\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delineating the Scope and Nature of Disgorgement","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Delineating-the-Scope-and-Nature-of-Disgorgement.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Delineating-the-Scope-and-Nature-of-Disgorgement.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Delineating-the-Scope-and-Nature-of-Disgorgement.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Delineating-the-Scope-and-Nature-of-Disgorgement.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217689,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/05\/sat-companies-cannot-run-cis-scheme-without-registering-it-with-sebi\/","url_meta":{"origin":217753,"position":5},"title":"SAT | Companies cannot run CIS Scheme without registering it with SEBI","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 5, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT):\u00a0Justice Tarun Agarwala (Presiding Officer) and Dr C.K.G. Nair (Member) justified the penalty imposed by SEBI on the appellants under Section 15-J of SEBI Act. The appellants challenged the order of the Adjudicating Officer (AO) of SEBI. The order directed them to pay a penalty of Rs\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217753","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=217753"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217753\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/209781"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=217753"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=217753"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=217753"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}