{"id":217709,"date":"2019-08-05T16:00:39","date_gmt":"2019-08-05T10:30:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=217709"},"modified":"2019-08-07T16:33:27","modified_gmt":"2019-08-07T11:03:27","slug":"patna-hc-referring-authority-for-industrial-dispute-cannot-assume-role-of-quasi-judicial-body-while-conducting-conciliation-proceeding","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/05\/patna-hc-referring-authority-for-industrial-dispute-cannot-assume-role-of-quasi-judicial-body-while-conducting-conciliation-proceeding\/","title":{"rendered":"Patna HC | Referring authority for industrial dispute cannot assume role of quasi-judicial body while conducting conciliation proceeding"},"content":{"rendered":"

Patna High Court: <\/strong>Shivaji Pandey, J. allowed the writ application to the extent that the impugned order was remanded back to the competent authority to consider the claim of the petitioner afresh and take a decision in accordance with law.<\/p>\n

The petitioner challenged the order, whereby the competent authority had refused to refer to the industrial dispute raised by the petitioner for adjudication on the ground that the disputant was engaged in the capacity of Sales Manager, and as such he would not qualify to be a workman within the definition given in Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The petitioner was appointed as Trainee Sales Team Manager, but he claimed to be a workman. A conciliation proceeding was held, but it failed to materialize and ultimately the dispute was denied from being referred to an Industrial Tribunal.<\/p>\n

The Court held that the authority while exercising the power of conciliation and consideration to referring the dispute raised exercises a power which is administrative in nature and thus, it cannot exercise the power of adjudication and as such, cannot adjudicate the status of an employee whether he is a workman or not. It was emphasized by the Court that the appropriate authority while refusing to refer the dispute to the Tribunal cannot embark upon adjudicatory mechanism.<\/p>\n

The Court was of the view that that authority had usurped the power of a quasi-judicial body and hence, the impugned order stood quashed. The matter was remanded back to the competent authority to consider the claim of the petitioner afresh and take a decision in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt\/production of a copy of this order.<\/p>\n

In view of the above-noted facts, the instant petition was allowed accordingly.[Rahul Muzaffarpuri v. Union of India, 2019 SCC OnLine Pat 1264<\/b><\/a>, decided on 05-07-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Patna High Court: Shivaji Pandey, J. allowed the writ application to the extent that the impugned order was remanded back to the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31647,36934,3278,36935,3279],"class_list":["post-217709","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-adjudication","tag-conciliation-proceeding","tag-industrial_dispute","tag-section-2s-of-the-industrial-disputes-act","tag-workman"],"yoast_head":"\nPatna HC | Referring authority for industrial dispute cannot assume role of quasi-judicial body while conducting conciliation proceeding | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/05\/patna-hc-referring-authority-for-industrial-dispute-cannot-assume-role-of-quasi-judicial-body-while-conducting-conciliation-proceeding\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Patna HC | Referring authority for industrial dispute cannot assume role of quasi-judicial body while conducting conciliation proceeding\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Patna High Court: Shivaji Pandey, J. allowed the writ application to the extent that the impugned order was remanded back to the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/05\/patna-hc-referring-authority-for-industrial-dispute-cannot-assume-role-of-quasi-judicial-body-while-conducting-conciliation-proceeding\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-08-05T10:30:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-08-07T11:03:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/05\/patna-hc-referring-authority-for-industrial-dispute-cannot-assume-role-of-quasi-judicial-body-while-conducting-conciliation-proceeding\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/05\/patna-hc-referring-authority-for-industrial-dispute-cannot-assume-role-of-quasi-judicial-body-while-conducting-conciliation-proceeding\/\",\"name\":\"Patna HC | Referring authority for industrial dispute cannot assume role of quasi-judicial body while conducting conciliation proceeding | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-08-05T10:30:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-08-07T11:03:27+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/05\/patna-hc-referring-authority-for-industrial-dispute-cannot-assume-role-of-quasi-judicial-body-while-conducting-conciliation-proceeding\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/05\/patna-hc-referring-authority-for-industrial-dispute-cannot-assume-role-of-quasi-judicial-body-while-conducting-conciliation-proceeding\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/05\/patna-hc-referring-authority-for-industrial-dispute-cannot-assume-role-of-quasi-judicial-body-while-conducting-conciliation-proceeding\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Patna HC | Referring authority for industrial dispute cannot assume role of quasi-judicial body while conducting conciliation proceeding\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Patna HC | Referring authority for industrial dispute cannot assume role of quasi-judicial body while conducting conciliation proceeding | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/05\/patna-hc-referring-authority-for-industrial-dispute-cannot-assume-role-of-quasi-judicial-body-while-conducting-conciliation-proceeding\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Patna HC | Referring authority for industrial dispute cannot assume role of quasi-judicial body while conducting conciliation proceeding","og_description":"Patna High Court: Shivaji Pandey, J. allowed the writ application to the extent that the impugned order was remanded back to the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/05\/patna-hc-referring-authority-for-industrial-dispute-cannot-assume-role-of-quasi-judicial-body-while-conducting-conciliation-proceeding\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-08-05T10:30:39+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-08-07T11:03:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/05\/patna-hc-referring-authority-for-industrial-dispute-cannot-assume-role-of-quasi-judicial-body-while-conducting-conciliation-proceeding\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/05\/patna-hc-referring-authority-for-industrial-dispute-cannot-assume-role-of-quasi-judicial-body-while-conducting-conciliation-proceeding\/","name":"Patna HC | Referring authority for industrial dispute cannot assume role of quasi-judicial body while conducting conciliation proceeding | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-08-05T10:30:39+00:00","dateModified":"2019-08-07T11:03:27+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/05\/patna-hc-referring-authority-for-industrial-dispute-cannot-assume-role-of-quasi-judicial-body-while-conducting-conciliation-proceeding\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/05\/patna-hc-referring-authority-for-industrial-dispute-cannot-assume-role-of-quasi-judicial-body-while-conducting-conciliation-proceeding\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/05\/patna-hc-referring-authority-for-industrial-dispute-cannot-assume-role-of-quasi-judicial-body-while-conducting-conciliation-proceeding\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Patna HC | Referring authority for industrial dispute cannot assume role of quasi-judicial body while conducting conciliation proceeding"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":275122,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/06\/kerala-high-court-section-332b-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947-labour-court-discharge-dismissal-unfair-practice-misconduct-natural-justice-legal-research-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":217709,"position":0},"title":"Kerala High Court| Object of an enquiry under S. 33 (2) (b) of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 is to lift the veil to find out any hidden motive in punishing the workman","author":"Editor","date":"October 6, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Kerala High Court: In a petition challenging the order dismissing the application filed under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (\u2018the Act\u2019), Mohammed Nias C.P., J. has observed that the respondent has not properly considered the application under Section 33(2)(b) and it is necessary to question\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":313885,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/13\/arbitration-as-a-method-of-adjudication-of-industrial-disputes-an-analysis\/","url_meta":{"origin":217709,"position":1},"title":"Arbitration as a Method of Adjudication of Industrial Disputes: An Analysis","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 13, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"by Amrut Anil Joshi\u2020 and Anand Ratnakar Pai\u2020\u2020","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Adjudication of Industrial Disputes","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Adjudication-of-Industrial-Disputes.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Adjudication-of-Industrial-Disputes.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Adjudication-of-Industrial-Disputes.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Adjudication-of-Industrial-Disputes.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":315022,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/del-hc-upholds-labor-court-award-hospital-is-an-industry-under-industrial-disputes-act-directs-continous-service-of-workman-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":217709,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Hospital deemed an \u2018Industry\u2019 under Industrial Disputes Act\u2019; Delhi High Court affirms Rights of a \u2018Workman\u2019 in Hospital Dispute","author":"Arunima","date":"February 22, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court upholds Labour Court's finding, affirming Hospital as an Industry under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 validating State Government's referral authority, and confirming the continuous service of the workman.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217393,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/27\/utt-hc-dm-held-competent-authority-for-taking-cognizance-of-offence-under-s-14-a-of-u-p-industrial-dispute-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":217709,"position":3},"title":"Utt HC | DM held competent authority for taking cognizance of \u2018offence\u2019 under S. 14-A of U.P. Industrial Dispute Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. entertained a writ petition where the petitioner, a workman was aggrieved by the order of the Deputy Labor Commissioner as his application under Section 14-A of U.P. Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 was rejected for punishing the respondent. The petitioner contended that he was a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":319114,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/02\/nature-of-duties-and-functions-is-the-determining-factor-in-ascertaining-workman-under-the-industrial-disputes-act-bombay-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":217709,"position":4},"title":"Nature of duties and functions is the determining factor in ascertaining \u2018workman\u2019 under the Industrial Disputes Act; Bombay HC reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"April 2, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The High Court stated that dominant purpose of the employee should be considered, instead of any additional duties performed.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217512,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/31\/utt-hc-labour-court-is-not-free-to-widen-scope-of-reference-made-to-it-reinstated-workman-given-the-status-of-trainee-and-not-regular-employee\/","url_meta":{"origin":217709,"position":5},"title":"Utt HC | Labour Court is not free to widen scope of reference made to it; Reinstated workman given the status of trainee and not regular employee","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 31, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. contemplated the writ petition where the petitioner raised questions related to the order of the Labor Court passed in 2014. The brief facts as involved in the instant writ petition were that the petitioner in the capacity of being an employer as a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217709","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=217709"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217709\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=217709"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=217709"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=217709"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}