{"id":217393,"date":"2019-07-27T10:30:26","date_gmt":"2019-07-27T05:00:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=217393"},"modified":"2019-08-01T13:09:29","modified_gmt":"2019-08-01T07:39:29","slug":"utt-hc-dm-held-competent-authority-for-taking-cognizance-of-offence-under-s-14-a-of-u-p-industrial-dispute-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/27\/utt-hc-dm-held-competent-authority-for-taking-cognizance-of-offence-under-s-14-a-of-u-p-industrial-dispute-act\/","title":{"rendered":"Utt HC | DM held competent authority for taking cognizance of \u2018offence\u2019 under S. 14-A of U.P. Industrial Dispute Act"},"content":{"rendered":"

Uttaranchal High Court<\/strong>: Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. entertained a writ petition where the petitioner, a workman was aggrieved by the order of the Deputy Labor Commissioner as his application under Section 14-A of U.P. Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 was rejected for punishing the respondent.<\/p>\n

The petitioner contended that he was a workman in a private company since 2003. He was working as a Technician in the Noida factory but was subsequently transferred to Ranchi. Thereafter he contended that a settlement was reached between the Union and the Management wherein one of the stipulated conditions was that \u201cthe place of transfer of transferred employees would be changed as per the convenience of the employees concerned\u201d. After the settlement, the said petitioner was transferred to Dehradun but due to his alleged involvement in the trade union activities, he was again transferred to Gauhati, thus, the petitioner alleged that such transfer was in clear violation to the settlement already made. Further, he made a request before the Labour Commissioner to cancel his transfer on the ground that such was violative to the settlement. It was submitted by counsel for the petitioner Singdha Tiwari that under Section 14-A of U.P. Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 i.e., Penalty for breach of a term of the award, there had been a breach of settlement committed by the respondent and he was liable for punishment.<\/p>\n

The said application under Section 14-A was rejected by the Commissioner on the ground that what the petitioner was actually relying upon was the settlement which was executed between the Management and Union at Noida and therefore only the Labour Commissioner, Noida had jurisdiction to entertain this application.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that Section 14-A of the Act, 1947 which the petitioner had invoked for redressal of his grievance had a long and chequered history. Initially, there was no such provision under the Act, 1947 or even in the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. In the Act, 1947, Section 14-A was inserted by U.P. Act No. 34 of 1978. It made a breach of a binding settlement (or award) by any person a punishable offence<\/strong>. This provision was inserted as a deterrent to such employers who were earlier able to evade the implementation of an award or settlement. The Court noticed and stated that the provision gave more teeth to the Industrial Disputes Act. However, it was held that since Section 14-A of the Act, 1947 was related to an \u201coffence\u201d, the application would not lie either before the Labor Commissioner, of any place but it was only cognizable by the Magistrate, 1st <\/sup>Class<\/strong>, as such was the stipulation of the law.<\/p>\n

The Court cited the relevant provisions which were Sections 15 and 16 of the said Act, and where it was mentioned \u2018Offence to be deemed cognizable\u2019 and \u2018Cognizance of offence\u2019, the Court further stated that the bare reading of the provisions showed that Magistrate was the only competent authority to adjudicate the matter. It was stated that the first authority which must take cognizance of the mater was the concerned District Magistrate or the public servant by the previous sanction of the DM. Hence, the Court found that the matter was decided by the Labor Commissioner on the point of jurisdiction, without properly adjudicating the real issue. It was held that though the provisions of CrPC were not strictly applicable but Sections 178 and 179 were to be applied and cognizance would have been taken up by the Magistrate rather than Commissioner. The Court allowed the writ petition only on the ground that Deputy Labor Commissioner was wrong in dismissing the application of the petitioner on ground of jurisdiction, <\/strong>before adjudicating with the matter, the Deputy Labor Commissioner must have proceeded in accordance with the law and after appreciating the facts of the case.[Rajesh Kashyap v. Rakesh Pandey, 2019 SCC OnLine Utt 630<\/b><\/a>, decided on 04-07-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Uttaranchal High Court: Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. entertained a writ petition where the petitioner, a workman was aggrieved by the order of the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3050,36819,16121,2554,36818],"class_list":["post-217393","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Cognizable","tag-deputy-labor-commissioner","tag-district-magistrate","tag-Jurisdiction","tag-section-14-a-of-u-p-industrial-dispute-act"],"yoast_head":"\nUtt HC | DM held competent authority for taking cognizance of \u2018offence\u2019 under S. 14-A of U.P. Industrial Dispute Act | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/27\/utt-hc-dm-held-competent-authority-for-taking-cognizance-of-offence-under-s-14-a-of-u-p-industrial-dispute-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Utt HC | DM held competent authority for taking cognizance of \u2018offence\u2019 under S. 14-A of U.P. Industrial Dispute Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Uttaranchal High Court: Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. entertained a writ petition where the petitioner, a workman was aggrieved by the order of the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/27\/utt-hc-dm-held-competent-authority-for-taking-cognizance-of-offence-under-s-14-a-of-u-p-industrial-dispute-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-07-27T05:00:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-08-01T07:39:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/uttrakhandHC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/27\/utt-hc-dm-held-competent-authority-for-taking-cognizance-of-offence-under-s-14-a-of-u-p-industrial-dispute-act\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/27\/utt-hc-dm-held-competent-authority-for-taking-cognizance-of-offence-under-s-14-a-of-u-p-industrial-dispute-act\/\",\"name\":\"Utt HC | DM held competent authority for taking cognizance of \u2018offence\u2019 under S. 14-A of U.P. Industrial Dispute Act | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-07-27T05:00:26+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-08-01T07:39:29+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/27\/utt-hc-dm-held-competent-authority-for-taking-cognizance-of-offence-under-s-14-a-of-u-p-industrial-dispute-act\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/27\/utt-hc-dm-held-competent-authority-for-taking-cognizance-of-offence-under-s-14-a-of-u-p-industrial-dispute-act\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/27\/utt-hc-dm-held-competent-authority-for-taking-cognizance-of-offence-under-s-14-a-of-u-p-industrial-dispute-act\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Utt HC | DM held competent authority for taking cognizance of \u2018offence\u2019 under S. 14-A of U.P. Industrial Dispute Act\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Utt HC | DM held competent authority for taking cognizance of \u2018offence\u2019 under S. 14-A of U.P. Industrial Dispute Act | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/27\/utt-hc-dm-held-competent-authority-for-taking-cognizance-of-offence-under-s-14-a-of-u-p-industrial-dispute-act\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Utt HC | DM held competent authority for taking cognizance of \u2018offence\u2019 under S. 14-A of U.P. Industrial Dispute Act","og_description":"Uttaranchal High Court: Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. entertained a writ petition where the petitioner, a workman was aggrieved by the order of the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/27\/utt-hc-dm-held-competent-authority-for-taking-cognizance-of-offence-under-s-14-a-of-u-p-industrial-dispute-act\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-07-27T05:00:26+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-08-01T07:39:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/uttrakhandHC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/27\/utt-hc-dm-held-competent-authority-for-taking-cognizance-of-offence-under-s-14-a-of-u-p-industrial-dispute-act\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/27\/utt-hc-dm-held-competent-authority-for-taking-cognizance-of-offence-under-s-14-a-of-u-p-industrial-dispute-act\/","name":"Utt HC | DM held competent authority for taking cognizance of \u2018offence\u2019 under S. 14-A of U.P. Industrial Dispute Act | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-07-27T05:00:26+00:00","dateModified":"2019-08-01T07:39:29+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/27\/utt-hc-dm-held-competent-authority-for-taking-cognizance-of-offence-under-s-14-a-of-u-p-industrial-dispute-act\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/27\/utt-hc-dm-held-competent-authority-for-taking-cognizance-of-offence-under-s-14-a-of-u-p-industrial-dispute-act\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/27\/utt-hc-dm-held-competent-authority-for-taking-cognizance-of-offence-under-s-14-a-of-u-p-industrial-dispute-act\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Utt HC | DM held competent authority for taking cognizance of \u2018offence\u2019 under S. 14-A of U.P. Industrial Dispute Act"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":315022,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/del-hc-upholds-labor-court-award-hospital-is-an-industry-under-industrial-disputes-act-directs-continous-service-of-workman-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":217393,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Hospital deemed an \u2018Industry\u2019 under Industrial Disputes Act\u2019; Delhi High Court affirms Rights of a \u2018Workman\u2019 in Hospital Dispute","author":"Arunima","date":"February 22, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court upholds Labour Court's finding, affirming Hospital as an Industry under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 validating State Government's referral authority, and confirming the continuous service of the workman.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297556,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/24\/temporary-seasonal-short-term-employment-not-amount-to-unfair-labour-practice-allahabad-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":217393,"position":1},"title":"Temporary, seasonal or short-term employment does not amount to unfair labour practice; Allahabad High Court denies relief to workman","author":"Apoorva","date":"July 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court said that it is not possible to hold that temporary employment for every seasonal increase in industrial activities as an unfair labour practice.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":321102,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/30\/bombay-high-court-upholds-cadbury-termination-decision-for-being-employee-under-mrtu-pulp-act-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":217393,"position":2},"title":"Bombay High Court upholds Cadbury’s termination decision for not being \u2018employee\u2019 under MRTU and PULP Act","author":"Editor","date":"April 30, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Both Labour as well as Industrial Court have concurrently held that apart from performing supervisory nature of duties, the petitioner did not himself perform any manual, skilled, unskilled or clerical work.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":275122,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/06\/kerala-high-court-section-332b-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947-labour-court-discharge-dismissal-unfair-practice-misconduct-natural-justice-legal-research-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":217393,"position":3},"title":"Kerala High Court| Object of an enquiry under S. 33 (2) (b) of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 is to lift the veil to find out any hidden motive in punishing the workman","author":"Editor","date":"October 6, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Kerala High Court: In a petition challenging the order dismissing the application filed under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (\u2018the Act\u2019), Mohammed Nias C.P., J. has observed that the respondent has not properly considered the application under Section 33(2)(b) and it is necessary to question\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":308371,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/04\/cal-hc-affirms-directors-liability-under-section-32-of-industrial-disputes-act-1947-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":217393,"position":4},"title":"Calcutta High Court affirms Director\u2019s liability under Section 32 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; directs compliance of compensation order","author":"Ritu","date":"December 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 \u201cis a beneficial legislation, for the benefit of the workmen and not paying the compensation since 2007 is clearly an abuse of the process of law.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":220363,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/30\/del-hc-tribunals-order-for-industrial-dispute-remanded-back-necessity-for-a-reasoned-order-to-be-produced\/","url_meta":{"origin":217393,"position":5},"title":"Del HC | Tribunal\u2019s order for industrial dispute remanded back; Necessity for a reasoned order to be produced","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 30, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Rekha Palli, J. while deciding a petition relied on various decisions in order to throw light on the significance and necessity of a reasoned order to be produced by Tribunal while determining an industrial dispute. In the present matter, petitioner\/management assails the award passed by Central Government\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217393","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=217393"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217393\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=217393"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=217393"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=217393"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}