{"id":217277,"date":"2019-07-25T09:58:17","date_gmt":"2019-07-25T04:28:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=217277"},"modified":"2019-07-25T10:10:40","modified_gmt":"2019-07-25T04:40:40","slug":"sl-sc-there-is-a-duty-both-to-the-bank-to-preserve-its-fair-name-and-to-the-customer-whose-money-lies-in-deposits-termination-upheld-on-the-grounds-of-misconduct","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/25\/sl-sc-there-is-a-duty-both-to-the-bank-to-preserve-its-fair-name-and-to-the-customer-whose-money-lies-in-deposits-termination-upheld-on-the-grounds-of-misconduct\/","title":{"rendered":"SL SC | \u2018There is a duty, both to the bank to preserve its fair name and customer whose money lies in deposits\u2019; Termination upheld on grounds of misconduct"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka: <\/strong>A Full Bench of Sisira De Abrew, Prasanna Jayawardena and S. Thurairaja, JJ. entertained the instant appeal filed against the order of\u00a0 Provincial High Court, where the judgment passed by the Labor Tribunal was reversed.<\/p>\n

The factual matrix of the case was that one workman-respondent was employed with People\u2019s Bank-appellant, where he was a member of the Trade Union. Several allegations of misconduct were filed against the respondent and he was terminated from his services from the said ground. The Labor Tribunal held that the termination was just and equitable and also found that during the course of his employment at the appellant\u2019s establishment, the respondent had misconducted himself on several occasions, some of which included disobeying the orders of his superiors, misbehaving in the presence of customers and abusing his superiors using foul and obscene language.<\/p>\n

Hence, the respondent against the order of the Tribunal filed an appeal in the High Court, where it was held that, \u2018Respondent was \u201cmentally retarded\u201d and that owing to his mental retardation, he could not be held responsible for the alleged misconduct.\u2019 Accordingly, the order of the Tribunal was set aside and the appeal was allowed, payment of compensation was ordered, equivalent to the salary of five years.<\/p>\n

Thus, the Appellant-Bank filed the instant appeal aggrieved by the order of the High Court for payment of compensation and not holding respondent liable for the alleged misconduct. The Court observed that the theory advanced by the High Court was applicable when determining the criminal responsibility of a person in a criminal case<\/strong>. However, in cases involving an employer-employee relationship, such standards set out in criminal law cannot be applied since; such a relationship was founded on the principles of trust and discipline. It was further noted that, as a result, any breach of these principles affected, not only the relationship between the employer and the employee but also the quality of the services provided by the employer along with the reputation of his establishment.<\/p>\n

It was further observed by the Court that, the respondent had, not only refused to obey the legitimate instructions of his superiors at several instances but had also insulted and humiliated a superior officer in the presence of customers and it is a general rule that refusal to obey reasonable orders justifies the dismissal from service. Hence, the order of the Tribunal was upheld and the judgment of the High Court was set aside on the ground that, higher standards which were applicable in criminal cases cannot be applied to cases before the Labor Tribunal. Thus, the termination order was maintainable.[People\u2019s Bank v. Lanka Banku Sevaka Sangamaya, SC. Appeal No. 107 of 2010, decided on 09-07-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka: A Full Bench of Sisira De Abrew, Prasanna Jayawardena and S. Thurairaja, <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":147611,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,12],"tags":[5051,2645],"class_list":["post-217277","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-foreigncourts","tag-misconduct","tag-termination"],"yoast_head":"\nSL SC | \u2018There is a duty, both to the bank to preserve its fair name and customer whose money lies in deposits\u2019; Termination upheld on grounds of misconduct | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/25\/sl-sc-there-is-a-duty-both-to-the-bank-to-preserve-its-fair-name-and-to-the-customer-whose-money-lies-in-deposits-termination-upheld-on-the-grounds-of-misconduct\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SL SC | \u2018There is a duty, both to the bank to preserve its fair name and customer whose money lies in deposits\u2019; Termination upheld on grounds of misconduct\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka: A Full Bench of Sisira De Abrew, Prasanna Jayawardena and S. Thurairaja,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/25\/sl-sc-there-is-a-duty-both-to-the-bank-to-preserve-its-fair-name-and-to-the-customer-whose-money-lies-in-deposits-termination-upheld-on-the-grounds-of-misconduct\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-07-25T04:28:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-07-25T04:40:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/25\/sl-sc-there-is-a-duty-both-to-the-bank-to-preserve-its-fair-name-and-to-the-customer-whose-money-lies-in-deposits-termination-upheld-on-the-grounds-of-misconduct\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/25\/sl-sc-there-is-a-duty-both-to-the-bank-to-preserve-its-fair-name-and-to-the-customer-whose-money-lies-in-deposits-termination-upheld-on-the-grounds-of-misconduct\/\",\"name\":\"SL SC | \u2018There is a duty, both to the bank to preserve its fair name and customer whose money lies in deposits\u2019; Termination upheld on grounds of misconduct | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/25\/sl-sc-there-is-a-duty-both-to-the-bank-to-preserve-its-fair-name-and-to-the-customer-whose-money-lies-in-deposits-termination-upheld-on-the-grounds-of-misconduct\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/25\/sl-sc-there-is-a-duty-both-to-the-bank-to-preserve-its-fair-name-and-to-the-customer-whose-money-lies-in-deposits-termination-upheld-on-the-grounds-of-misconduct\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-07-25T04:28:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-07-25T04:40:40+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/25\/sl-sc-there-is-a-duty-both-to-the-bank-to-preserve-its-fair-name-and-to-the-customer-whose-money-lies-in-deposits-termination-upheld-on-the-grounds-of-misconduct\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/25\/sl-sc-there-is-a-duty-both-to-the-bank-to-preserve-its-fair-name-and-to-the-customer-whose-money-lies-in-deposits-termination-upheld-on-the-grounds-of-misconduct\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/25\/sl-sc-there-is-a-duty-both-to-the-bank-to-preserve-its-fair-name-and-to-the-customer-whose-money-lies-in-deposits-termination-upheld-on-the-grounds-of-misconduct\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/25\/sl-sc-there-is-a-duty-both-to-the-bank-to-preserve-its-fair-name-and-to-the-customer-whose-money-lies-in-deposits-termination-upheld-on-the-grounds-of-misconduct\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SL SC | \u2018There is a duty, both to the bank to preserve its fair name and customer whose money lies in deposits\u2019; Termination upheld on grounds of misconduct\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SL SC | \u2018There is a duty, both to the bank to preserve its fair name and customer whose money lies in deposits\u2019; Termination upheld on grounds of misconduct | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/25\/sl-sc-there-is-a-duty-both-to-the-bank-to-preserve-its-fair-name-and-to-the-customer-whose-money-lies-in-deposits-termination-upheld-on-the-grounds-of-misconduct\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"SL SC | \u2018There is a duty, both to the bank to preserve its fair name and customer whose money lies in deposits\u2019; Termination upheld on grounds of misconduct","og_description":"Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka: A Full Bench of Sisira De Abrew, Prasanna Jayawardena and S. Thurairaja,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/25\/sl-sc-there-is-a-duty-both-to-the-bank-to-preserve-its-fair-name-and-to-the-customer-whose-money-lies-in-deposits-termination-upheld-on-the-grounds-of-misconduct\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-07-25T04:28:17+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-07-25T04:40:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/25\/sl-sc-there-is-a-duty-both-to-the-bank-to-preserve-its-fair-name-and-to-the-customer-whose-money-lies-in-deposits-termination-upheld-on-the-grounds-of-misconduct\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/25\/sl-sc-there-is-a-duty-both-to-the-bank-to-preserve-its-fair-name-and-to-the-customer-whose-money-lies-in-deposits-termination-upheld-on-the-grounds-of-misconduct\/","name":"SL SC | \u2018There is a duty, both to the bank to preserve its fair name and customer whose money lies in deposits\u2019; Termination upheld on grounds of misconduct | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/25\/sl-sc-there-is-a-duty-both-to-the-bank-to-preserve-its-fair-name-and-to-the-customer-whose-money-lies-in-deposits-termination-upheld-on-the-grounds-of-misconduct\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/25\/sl-sc-there-is-a-duty-both-to-the-bank-to-preserve-its-fair-name-and-to-the-customer-whose-money-lies-in-deposits-termination-upheld-on-the-grounds-of-misconduct\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","datePublished":"2019-07-25T04:28:17+00:00","dateModified":"2019-07-25T04:40:40+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/25\/sl-sc-there-is-a-duty-both-to-the-bank-to-preserve-its-fair-name-and-to-the-customer-whose-money-lies-in-deposits-termination-upheld-on-the-grounds-of-misconduct\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/25\/sl-sc-there-is-a-duty-both-to-the-bank-to-preserve-its-fair-name-and-to-the-customer-whose-money-lies-in-deposits-termination-upheld-on-the-grounds-of-misconduct\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/25\/sl-sc-there-is-a-duty-both-to-the-bank-to-preserve-its-fair-name-and-to-the-customer-whose-money-lies-in-deposits-termination-upheld-on-the-grounds-of-misconduct\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/25\/sl-sc-there-is-a-duty-both-to-the-bank-to-preserve-its-fair-name-and-to-the-customer-whose-money-lies-in-deposits-termination-upheld-on-the-grounds-of-misconduct\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SL SC | \u2018There is a duty, both to the bank to preserve its fair name and customer whose money lies in deposits\u2019; Termination upheld on grounds of misconduct"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":328918,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/17\/reinstatement-after-alleged-misconduct-removed-cannot-be-treated-as-re-employment-chhattisgarh-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":217277,"position":0},"title":"Reinstatement in service after alleged misconduct is removed cannot be treated as re-employment: Chhattisgarh HC grants consequential benefits deprived to employee","author":"Arushi","date":"August 17, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"If the Government servant has been terminated without adhering to Article 311 of the Constitution, then in such a case the provisions cannot be interpreted in favour of the State to deprive the employee of his legitimate claim.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Chhattisgarh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":309594,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/18\/termination-without-opportunity-of-being-heard-violates-article-3112-mandate-calcutta-high-court-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":217277,"position":1},"title":"Termination without opportunity of being heard violates Article 311(2) mandate: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"December 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Calcutta High Court determined that the termination, despite being framed as simpliciter, was based on respondent\u2019s alleged misconduct.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":223616,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/hp-hc-%e2%94%82passing-an-order-without-giving-the-opportunity-of-hearing-is-a-violation-of-natural-justice-court-dismisses-appeal\/","url_meta":{"origin":217277,"position":2},"title":"HP HC | Passing an order without giving the opportunity of hearing is a violation of natural justice; Court dismisses appeal","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 26, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Division Bench of L. Narayana Swamy, CJ and Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J., dismissed an application which was filed by the petitioners challenging an order dated 10-05-2016 given by the H.P. Administrative Tribunal, Shimla (Tribunal) whereby the T.A. was allowed and the termination against the respondent\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":322824,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/23\/bombay-hc-upholds-mat-judgment-reinstating-employee-terminated-for-misconduct-by-state\/","url_meta":{"origin":217277,"position":3},"title":"Bombay High Court reinstates government employee terminated by State issuing a stigmatic order without conducting enquiry","author":"Editor","date":"May 23, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court referred to MAT\u2019s finding that the petitioners were empowered to terminate the services of a probationer in case of misconduct, provided that such misconduct is proved after an opportunity of being heard is availed to the respondent. However, the same was not followed by the petitioners.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":36701,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/23\/high-court-upholds-bonafide-termination-of-employment-by-a-superior-officer\/","url_meta":{"origin":217277,"position":4},"title":"High Court upholds \u201cbonafide\u201d termination of employment by a Superior Officer","author":"Sucheta","date":"February 23, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Observing the allegations of unreasonable termination and colourable exercise of power against the respondent employer, a Division Bench comprising Bhat J. and Sharma JJ. dismissed the appeal concluding that the actions of the respondent were bonafide, objective and supported by reason. The appellant is a woman appointed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":316536,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/08\/termination-of-services-of-probationer-is-neither-per-se-dismissal-nor-removal-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":217277,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Probationer\u2019s termination is neither per se dismissal nor removal\u2019; Calcutta High Court upholds termination order","author":"Ritu","date":"March 8, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Whether the termination, in present case, be termed an innocuous termination simpliciter or an order of punishment based on the alleged misconduct of the petitioner?","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217277","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=217277"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217277\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/147611"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=217277"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=217277"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=217277"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}