{"id":217252,"date":"2019-07-24T15:00:25","date_gmt":"2019-07-24T09:30:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=217252"},"modified":"2019-07-25T15:08:57","modified_gmt":"2019-07-25T09:38:57","slug":"ph-hc-money-decree-set-aside-in-absence-of-evidence-to-be-established-actual-loss-occurred-to-the-plaintiff","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/24\/ph-hc-money-decree-set-aside-in-absence-of-evidence-to-be-established-actual-loss-occurred-to-the-plaintiff\/","title":{"rendered":"P&#038;H HC | Money decree set aside in absence of evidence to be established actual loss occurred to the plaintiff"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Punjab and Haryana High Court:<\/strong>\u00a0 Augustine George Masih, J. upheld the decision of the lower court as there was no evidence on record to prove the contentions made by the appellant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">An appeal was made against the judgment and decree passed by the Additional District Judge whereby the suit filed by the appellant-plaintiff for recovery of the amount from the respondent-defendant had been set aside by allowing the appeal and dismissing the suit of the appellant-plaintiff.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">S.S. Bedi, Counsel for the appellant argued that the judgment and decree passed by the trial court was based upon proper appreciation of the evidence and the document on record. He contended that the respondent had acted upon the certificate of the Assistant who had been placed under the suspension and thus did not have authority to issue the certificate. He contended that the suit for recovery preferred by the appellant-plaintiff was based upon a departmental inquiry which was held against the respondent-defendant. Thus it was argued that the judgment passed by the Lower Appellate Court is based upon erroneous assumptions overlooking the facts on record and the evidence which has been produced by the parties. He, thus, contends that the appeal deserves to be allowed by setting aside the judgment and decree passed by the Lower Appellate Court and restoring that of the trial Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court opined that contention of the appellant that the report of the departmental inquiry was enough to establish the shortage cannot be accepted as no stock shortage had been proved on record and assertion that the respondent-defendant was required to himself verify the stock will not suffice as the same was not made in any rules or regulations as such. It was further held that <em>unauthorized person having issued the certificate could not have been acted upon as it did not have any legal sanctity; moreover, no record was produced to show that any payment in the presence of the commission agent was made at the time of purchase of the stock. Merely relying upon the inquiry report would not be enough in a suit for recovery. Actual loss having occurred by the Corporation has to be established which is absent here as no evidence has been produced on record to substantiate such an assertion and, therefore, the contention of learned counsel for the appellant that the respondent-defendant had acted upon a certificate issued by an unauthorized person, cannot be accepted.<\/em> Thus the Judgment of the lower court was upheld.[Punjab State Warehousing Corpn. Ltd. v. Paramjit Singh, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/T5nGdTEc\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine P&amp;H 1229<\/b><\/a>, decided on 15-07-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab and Haryana High Court:\u00a0 Augustine George Masih, J. upheld the decision of the lower court as there was no evidence on <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[19391,14131,36766,32239],"class_list":["post-217252","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-absence-of-evidence","tag-departmental-enquiry","tag-lower-appellate-court","tag-money-decree"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>P&amp;H HC | Money decree set aside in absence of evidence to be established actual loss occurred to the plaintiff | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/24\/ph-hc-money-decree-set-aside-in-absence-of-evidence-to-be-established-actual-loss-occurred-to-the-plaintiff\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"P&amp;H HC | Money decree set aside in absence of evidence to be established actual loss occurred to the plaintiff\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Punjab and Haryana High Court:\u00a0 Augustine George Masih, J. upheld the decision of the lower court as there was no evidence on\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/24\/ph-hc-money-decree-set-aside-in-absence-of-evidence-to-be-established-actual-loss-occurred-to-the-plaintiff\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-07-24T09:30:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-07-25T09:38:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/24\/ph-hc-money-decree-set-aside-in-absence-of-evidence-to-be-established-actual-loss-occurred-to-the-plaintiff\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/24\/ph-hc-money-decree-set-aside-in-absence-of-evidence-to-be-established-actual-loss-occurred-to-the-plaintiff\/\",\"name\":\"P&H HC | Money decree set aside in absence of evidence to be established actual loss occurred to the plaintiff | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-07-24T09:30:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-07-25T09:38:57+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/24\/ph-hc-money-decree-set-aside-in-absence-of-evidence-to-be-established-actual-loss-occurred-to-the-plaintiff\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/24\/ph-hc-money-decree-set-aside-in-absence-of-evidence-to-be-established-actual-loss-occurred-to-the-plaintiff\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/24\/ph-hc-money-decree-set-aside-in-absence-of-evidence-to-be-established-actual-loss-occurred-to-the-plaintiff\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"P&#038;H HC | Money decree set aside in absence of evidence to be established actual loss occurred to the plaintiff\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"P&H HC | Money decree set aside in absence of evidence to be established actual loss occurred to the plaintiff | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/24\/ph-hc-money-decree-set-aside-in-absence-of-evidence-to-be-established-actual-loss-occurred-to-the-plaintiff\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"P&H HC | Money decree set aside in absence of evidence to be established actual loss occurred to the plaintiff","og_description":"Punjab and Haryana High Court:\u00a0 Augustine George Masih, J. upheld the decision of the lower court as there was no evidence on","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/24\/ph-hc-money-decree-set-aside-in-absence-of-evidence-to-be-established-actual-loss-occurred-to-the-plaintiff\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-07-24T09:30:25+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-07-25T09:38:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/24\/ph-hc-money-decree-set-aside-in-absence-of-evidence-to-be-established-actual-loss-occurred-to-the-plaintiff\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/24\/ph-hc-money-decree-set-aside-in-absence-of-evidence-to-be-established-actual-loss-occurred-to-the-plaintiff\/","name":"P&H HC | Money decree set aside in absence of evidence to be established actual loss occurred to the plaintiff | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-07-24T09:30:25+00:00","dateModified":"2019-07-25T09:38:57+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/24\/ph-hc-money-decree-set-aside-in-absence-of-evidence-to-be-established-actual-loss-occurred-to-the-plaintiff\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/24\/ph-hc-money-decree-set-aside-in-absence-of-evidence-to-be-established-actual-loss-occurred-to-the-plaintiff\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/24\/ph-hc-money-decree-set-aside-in-absence-of-evidence-to-be-established-actual-loss-occurred-to-the-plaintiff\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"P&#038;H HC | Money decree set aside in absence of evidence to be established actual loss occurred to the plaintiff"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":301796,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/18\/chhattisgarh-hc-facts-deposed-by-power-of-attorney-holder-cannot-be-relied-if-party-to-the-suit-is-not-examined-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":217252,"position":0},"title":"In absence of examination of the party to a suit, facts deposed by the power of attorney holder cannot be relied upon: Chhattisgarh High Court","author":"Editor","date":"September 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe pleading made by respondent-plaintiff through the power of attorney holder in the plaint is to be examined as against the statement made by the power of the attorney holder as a witness.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"chhattisgarh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/chhattisgarh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/chhattisgarh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/chhattisgarh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/chhattisgarh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":304689,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/13\/procedural-technicalities-should-not-override-substantive-provisions-of-law-calcutta-high-court-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":217252,"position":1},"title":"\u201cProcedural technicalities should not override substantive provisions of law\u201d, Calcutta High Court affirms ex-parte eviction decree","author":"Ritu","date":"October 13, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The first appellate court's decision to set aside the ex-parte decree and remand the case was seen as unnecessary and not in line with the purpose of Order 18 Rule 4 of CPC.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":304701,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/14\/lack-of-property-title-renders-suit-for-specific-performance-unenforceable-calcutta-high-court-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":217252,"position":2},"title":"Lack of property title renders Suit for specific performance unenforceable: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"October 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court determined that the compromise decree indicated that the vendors-defendants (respondent 2 and 3) do not have title to the property.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":314975,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/cal-hc-dismisses-claim-for-permanent-injunction-due-to-lack-of-legal-right-and-lawful-possession-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":217252,"position":3},"title":"Calcutta High Court upholds public use presumption for pot dumping land; dismisses Permanent Injunction claim","author":"Ritu","date":"February 22, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhen damages have been paid for unlawful use of land then plaintiff, being a wrong doer, cannot claim equitable relief for wrongful use of such land, in respect of which he has no right, title, interest.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":157474,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/19\/a-will-shrouded-by-suspicious-circumstances-cannot-be-held-to-be-a-valid-document\/","url_meta":{"origin":217252,"position":4},"title":"A will shrouded by suspicious circumstances cannot be held to be a valid document","author":"Saba","date":"September 19, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Himachal Pradesh: While deciding a Regular First Appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC against the judgment passed by the Presiding Officer, Mandi whereby the suit for declaration having been filed by the appellant-plaintiff was dismissed, a Single Judge Bench of Sandeep Sharma, J. held that there\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":213843,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/22\/mp-hc-appeal-in-tenancy-matter-dismissed-in-absence-of-substantial-question-of-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":217252,"position":5},"title":"MP HC | Appeal in tenancy matter dismissed in absence\u00a0 of substantial question of law","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 22, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: This second appeal was filed before the Bench of Vivek Rusia, J., by appellant against the judgment and decree passed by 11th Additional District Judge, Indore whereby appeal was partly allowed while affirming the judgment and decree passed under Section 12 (1)(a) of M.P. Accommodation Control\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217252","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=217252"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217252\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=217252"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=217252"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=217252"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}