{"id":217220,"date":"2019-07-23T18:00:43","date_gmt":"2019-07-23T12:30:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=217220"},"modified":"2019-07-25T15:01:37","modified_gmt":"2019-07-25T09:31:37","slug":"utt-hc-error-of-law-can-be-corrected-by-a-writ-but-not-an-error-of-fact-held-the-jurisdiction-to-issue-a-writ-of-certiorari-is-supervisory-and-not-appellate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/23\/utt-hc-error-of-law-can-be-corrected-by-a-writ-but-not-an-error-of-fact-held-the-jurisdiction-to-issue-a-writ-of-certiorari-is-supervisory-and-not-appellate\/","title":{"rendered":"Utt HC | Error of law can be corrected by a writ but not an error of fact; held, the jurisdiction to issue a writ of certiorari is supervisory and not appellate"},"content":{"rendered":"

Uttaranchal High Court<\/strong>: A Division Bench of Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J. and Alok Kumar Verma, J. entertained a writ petition which was initially filed in the Allahabad High Court in 1994.<\/p>\n

Factual matrix of the case was that the petitioner was appointed as a Panchayat Mantri and thereafter the Panchayat Mantries were declared to be public servants. Petitioner sought leave for 15 days during his course of employment. Respondent demanded a health certificate by the petitioner, however, he failed. The services of the petitioner were terminated on various grounds; he questioned his termination on the principle of natural justice.<\/p>\n

State Public Services Tribunal on the sole ground that the impugned order of termination dated had been passed with retrospective effect and the State Public Services Tribunal quashed the said order of termination and held that the order of termination cannot be passed with retrospective effect.<\/p>\n

While the Tribunal held that the petitioner had been absent from duty throughout, and had filed the Claim Petition after a period of more than 12 years, the State Public Services Tribunal observed that, since the order of termination was void, the law of limitation had no application on void orders; but no order related to the payment of salary for intervening period was passed as the petitioner was at fault.<\/p>\n

The Court in the instant writ held that while it was debatable whether the Tribunal was entitled to grant the relief sought for in the Claim Petition, despite the employee had invoked its jurisdiction 12 years\u2019 after the order of termination was passed. The Court felt that it was inappropriate to examine that aspect since the Government had filed a Writ Petition before the Allahabad High Court questioning the very same order passed by the Tribunal, albeit to the extent the order of termination was quashed and the petitioner was reinstated into service. Hence the examination in the Writ Petition was limited to the action of the Tribunal in denying the petitioner salary for the period between the dates of his termination till the date on which the petitioner was required to join duty.<\/p>\n

The writ was filed challenging the order passed by the State Public Services Tribunal, Lucknow where it quashed the termination order of the petitioner and had held it illegal and void. It further directed respondents to reinstate the petitioner and pay him salary and dues. The Tribunal, however, observed that no orders were passed for payment of salary to the petitioner, for the intervening period, on account of his continued absence from duty.<\/p>\n

The Court held that, \u201cunlike an appellate authority which can reappreciate the evidence on record, the High Court, in the exercise of its certiorari jurisdiction, would not substitute its views for that of the Tribunal, nor would it reappreciate the evidence on record to arrive at a conclusion different from that of the Tribunal whose order is impugned before it.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

The Court found no error in the order of the Tribunal as to pass certiorari, hence saw no reason to interfere with the order of the Tribunal in denying the salary from the date of the termination till reinstatement. The Court observed that \u201cHaving approached the State Public Services Tribunal after a period of 12 years, the petitioner cannot be heard to contend that he should also be paid his salary for the intervening period from the year 1980 to 1992 when he approached the Tribunal, even though it was he who had slept over his rights for around 12 years.\u201d<\/em>[Naresh Kumar Jain v. State Public Services Tribunal, 2019 SCC OnLine Utt 613<\/b><\/a>, decided on 16-07-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench of Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J. and Alok Kumar Verma, J. entertained a writ petition which was initially <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[36751,32628,2554,35403],"class_list":["post-217220","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-error-of-fact","tag-error-of-law","tag-Jurisdiction","tag-writ-of-certiorari"],"yoast_head":"\nUtt HC | Error of law can be corrected by a writ but not an error of fact; held, the jurisdiction to issue a writ of certiorari is supervisory and not appellate | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/23\/utt-hc-error-of-law-can-be-corrected-by-a-writ-but-not-an-error-of-fact-held-the-jurisdiction-to-issue-a-writ-of-certiorari-is-supervisory-and-not-appellate\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Utt HC | Error of law can be corrected by a writ but not an error of fact; held, the jurisdiction to issue a writ of certiorari is supervisory and not appellate\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench of Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J. and Alok Kumar Verma, J. entertained a writ petition which was initially\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/23\/utt-hc-error-of-law-can-be-corrected-by-a-writ-but-not-an-error-of-fact-held-the-jurisdiction-to-issue-a-writ-of-certiorari-is-supervisory-and-not-appellate\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-07-23T12:30:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-07-25T09:31:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/uttrakhandHC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/23\/utt-hc-error-of-law-can-be-corrected-by-a-writ-but-not-an-error-of-fact-held-the-jurisdiction-to-issue-a-writ-of-certiorari-is-supervisory-and-not-appellate\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/23\/utt-hc-error-of-law-can-be-corrected-by-a-writ-but-not-an-error-of-fact-held-the-jurisdiction-to-issue-a-writ-of-certiorari-is-supervisory-and-not-appellate\/\",\"name\":\"Utt HC | Error of law can be corrected by a writ but not an error of fact; held, the jurisdiction to issue a writ of certiorari is supervisory and not appellate | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-07-23T12:30:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-07-25T09:31:37+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/23\/utt-hc-error-of-law-can-be-corrected-by-a-writ-but-not-an-error-of-fact-held-the-jurisdiction-to-issue-a-writ-of-certiorari-is-supervisory-and-not-appellate\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/23\/utt-hc-error-of-law-can-be-corrected-by-a-writ-but-not-an-error-of-fact-held-the-jurisdiction-to-issue-a-writ-of-certiorari-is-supervisory-and-not-appellate\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/23\/utt-hc-error-of-law-can-be-corrected-by-a-writ-but-not-an-error-of-fact-held-the-jurisdiction-to-issue-a-writ-of-certiorari-is-supervisory-and-not-appellate\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Utt HC | Error of law can be corrected by a writ but not an error of fact; held, the jurisdiction to issue a writ of certiorari is supervisory and not appellate\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Utt HC | Error of law can be corrected by a writ but not an error of fact; held, the jurisdiction to issue a writ of certiorari is supervisory and not appellate | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/23\/utt-hc-error-of-law-can-be-corrected-by-a-writ-but-not-an-error-of-fact-held-the-jurisdiction-to-issue-a-writ-of-certiorari-is-supervisory-and-not-appellate\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Utt HC | Error of law can be corrected by a writ but not an error of fact; held, the jurisdiction to issue a writ of certiorari is supervisory and not appellate","og_description":"Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench of Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J. and Alok Kumar Verma, J. entertained a writ petition which was initially","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/23\/utt-hc-error-of-law-can-be-corrected-by-a-writ-but-not-an-error-of-fact-held-the-jurisdiction-to-issue-a-writ-of-certiorari-is-supervisory-and-not-appellate\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-07-23T12:30:43+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-07-25T09:31:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/uttrakhandHC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/23\/utt-hc-error-of-law-can-be-corrected-by-a-writ-but-not-an-error-of-fact-held-the-jurisdiction-to-issue-a-writ-of-certiorari-is-supervisory-and-not-appellate\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/23\/utt-hc-error-of-law-can-be-corrected-by-a-writ-but-not-an-error-of-fact-held-the-jurisdiction-to-issue-a-writ-of-certiorari-is-supervisory-and-not-appellate\/","name":"Utt HC | Error of law can be corrected by a writ but not an error of fact; held, the jurisdiction to issue a writ of certiorari is supervisory and not appellate | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-07-23T12:30:43+00:00","dateModified":"2019-07-25T09:31:37+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/23\/utt-hc-error-of-law-can-be-corrected-by-a-writ-but-not-an-error-of-fact-held-the-jurisdiction-to-issue-a-writ-of-certiorari-is-supervisory-and-not-appellate\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/23\/utt-hc-error-of-law-can-be-corrected-by-a-writ-but-not-an-error-of-fact-held-the-jurisdiction-to-issue-a-writ-of-certiorari-is-supervisory-and-not-appellate\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/23\/utt-hc-error-of-law-can-be-corrected-by-a-writ-but-not-an-error-of-fact-held-the-jurisdiction-to-issue-a-writ-of-certiorari-is-supervisory-and-not-appellate\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Utt HC | Error of law can be corrected by a writ but not an error of fact; held, the jurisdiction to issue a writ of certiorari is supervisory and not appellate"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":299952,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/24\/supreme-court-discusses-principles-governing-issuance-of-writ-of-certiorari-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":217220,"position":0},"title":"Supreme Court Ruling on the Principles governing issuance of Writ of Certiorari: All you need to know","author":"Editor","date":"August 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe purpose of certiorari is only to confine the inferior tribunals within their jurisdiction, so as to avoid the irregular exercise, or the non-exercise or the illegal assumption of it and not to correct errors of finding of fact or interpretation of law committed by them in the exercise of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"writ of certiorari","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/writ-of-certiorari.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/writ-of-certiorari.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/writ-of-certiorari.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/writ-of-certiorari.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":241779,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/05\/jhar-hc-interference-under-arti-226-a-writ-of-certiorari-can-be-issued-only-in-exercise-of-supervisory-jurisdiction-which-is-different-from-appellate-jurisdiction-hc-reiterates\/","url_meta":{"origin":217220,"position":1},"title":"Jhar HC | [Interference under Art. 226] A writ of certiorari can be issued only in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction which is different from appellate jurisdiction; HC reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"January 5, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: A Division Bench of Dr Ravi Ranjan, CJ. and Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. while dismissing the present appeal, relied on settled precedents upon power of judicial review against an Award passed by Tribunal or Lower Court. \u00a0Background Respondent had raised a demand for regularization in service but\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":220947,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/17\/pat-hc-principles-of-natural-justice-could-not-be-put-in-a-straight-jacket-formula-so-as-to-defeat-the-larger-public-interest\/","url_meta":{"origin":217220,"position":2},"title":"Pat HC | Principles of natural justice could not be put in a straight jacket formula so as to defeat the larger public interest","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 17, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J. dismissed the writ application on the grounds that the settled proposition of law was that the writ of certiorari should not be issued only for making out a legal point. The petitioner, aggrieved by the order dated passed by the Additional Chief Secretary,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":215658,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/13\/utt-hc-barring-an-election-petition-for-non-issue-of-notice-to-opposite-party-beyond-jurisdiction-when-prescribed-authority-did-not-frame-an-issue-regarding-s-80-cpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":217220,"position":3},"title":"Utt HC | Barring an election petition for non-issue of notice to opposite party \u2013 beyond jurisdiction when prescribed authority did not frame an issue regarding S. 80 CPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 13, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: Lok Pal Singh, J. dismissed a writ petition filed by a village pradhan challenging the order of District Court (revisional court) whereby matter pertaining to the validity of his election as pradhan was directed to be considered afresh by the Prescribed Authority. Petitioner was elected as the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":259557,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/05\/high-court-cannot-treat-itself-a-court-of-appeal-while-entertaining-writ-of-certiorari\/","url_meta":{"origin":217220,"position":4},"title":"Utt HC | High Court cannot treat itself a court of appeal while entertaining writ of certiorari","author":"Editor","date":"January 5, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: The Division Bench of S.K, Mishra ACJ. & N.S. Dhanik J., dismissed a petition filed against Claim Petition No. 05\/NB\/DB\/2014. The petitioners prayed for quashing of the judgment and order dated 20-06-2018 passed by the Uttarakhand Public Services Tribunal and to issue a writ in the nature\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":215755,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/14\/utt-hc-judgment-of-a-competent-court-is-binding-inter-parties-and-cannot-be-re-agitated-in-collateral-proceedings-even-if-erroneous\/","url_meta":{"origin":217220,"position":5},"title":"Utt HC | Judgment of a Competent Court is binding inter-parties and cannot be re-agitated in collateral proceedings even if erroneous","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 14, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench of Ramesh Ranganathan and R.C. Khulbe, JJ. contemplated a writ petition, where the petitioner who was an Assistant Professor, sought certiorari to quash the order of recovery of money along with interest. The petitioner further sought mandamus to direct the respondent-State University to re-examine\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217220","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=217220"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217220\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=217220"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=217220"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=217220"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}