{"id":217142,"date":"2019-07-22T13:00:37","date_gmt":"2019-07-22T07:30:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=217142"},"modified":"2019-07-25T15:26:14","modified_gmt":"2019-07-25T09:56:14","slug":"ph-hc-no-substantive-issue-raised-when-parties-at-consensus-to-resolve-the-matter-with-the-competent-authority","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/22\/ph-hc-no-substantive-issue-raised-when-parties-at-consensus-to-resolve-the-matter-with-the-competent-authority\/","title":{"rendered":"P&H HC | No substantive issue raised when parties at consensus to resolve the matter with the competent authority"},"content":{"rendered":"

Punjab and Haryana High Court<\/strong>: A Division Bench of Krishna Murari, C.J and Arun Palli, J. disposed of the writ petition after the consensus was drawn between the parties to present the case in front of the competent authorities.<\/p>\n

A writ in the nature of mandamus was sought for commanding the respondent to restraint from awarding the tender\/contract whose bid had been accepted.<\/p>\n

Brief facts of the case were that FCI invited E-tenders for Handling and Transport Contractor for a period of 2 Years. The grievance was that the respondent submitted his bid as a small enterprise so as to avail the benefit admissible to Micro & Small Enterprises but it does not fulfill the requisite terms prescribed to be eligible in the said category. Thus, the FCI was restrained from awarding the work order to the respondent and resorted to an ad hoc arrangement of the movement of the food grains.<\/p>\n

D.S. Patwalia and Kannan Malik, Counsels for the petitioner submitted that parties shall report to the competent authority and abide by the date and time indicated by the counsel.<\/p>\n

J.S. Puri, Counsel for the respondent submitted that as time was the essence of the situation the parties should be directed to approach the Food Corporation of India.<\/p>\n

The Court opined that as a consensus had emerged between the parties as only a period of 6 months remains out of initial period of 2 years for which contract to be awarded and it would rather be expedient if the FCI re-initiates the process, confining to the petitioner and respondent, with downward bidding from the lowest bid submitted by respondent. It was further submitted that it shall be open to the FCI to award the contract for a period of 6 months or for a longer period, as it may choose and decide.<\/p>\n

The Court thus held that as the parties have drawn the consensus and nothing substantive remains, the petition was disposed of with the said terms to the parties. It was further added that the Court has not opined with the eligibility of the respondent to bid and thus the same was open to being adjudicated in appropriate proceedings if any.[Ambay Transport Co. v. FCI, 2019 SCC OnLine P&H 1267<\/b><\/a>, decided on 17-07-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Punjab and Haryana High Court: A Division Bench of Krishna Murari, C.J and Arun Palli, J. disposed of the writ petition after <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[10081,3174,36719,29556,36720],"class_list":["post-217142","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-competent-authority","tag-contract","tag-e-tenders","tag-fci","tag-substantive-issue"],"yoast_head":"\nP&H HC | No substantive issue raised when parties at consensus to resolve the matter with the competent authority | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/22\/ph-hc-no-substantive-issue-raised-when-parties-at-consensus-to-resolve-the-matter-with-the-competent-authority\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"P&H HC | No substantive issue raised when parties at consensus to resolve the matter with the competent authority\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Punjab and Haryana High Court: A Division Bench of Krishna Murari, C.J and Arun Palli, J. disposed of the writ petition after\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/22\/ph-hc-no-substantive-issue-raised-when-parties-at-consensus-to-resolve-the-matter-with-the-competent-authority\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-07-22T07:30:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-07-25T09:56:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/22\/ph-hc-no-substantive-issue-raised-when-parties-at-consensus-to-resolve-the-matter-with-the-competent-authority\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/22\/ph-hc-no-substantive-issue-raised-when-parties-at-consensus-to-resolve-the-matter-with-the-competent-authority\/\",\"name\":\"P&H HC | No substantive issue raised when parties at consensus to resolve the matter with the competent authority | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-07-22T07:30:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-07-25T09:56:14+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/22\/ph-hc-no-substantive-issue-raised-when-parties-at-consensus-to-resolve-the-matter-with-the-competent-authority\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/22\/ph-hc-no-substantive-issue-raised-when-parties-at-consensus-to-resolve-the-matter-with-the-competent-authority\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/22\/ph-hc-no-substantive-issue-raised-when-parties-at-consensus-to-resolve-the-matter-with-the-competent-authority\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"P&H HC | No substantive issue raised when parties at consensus to resolve the matter with the competent authority\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"P&H HC | No substantive issue raised when parties at consensus to resolve the matter with the competent authority | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/22\/ph-hc-no-substantive-issue-raised-when-parties-at-consensus-to-resolve-the-matter-with-the-competent-authority\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"P&H HC | No substantive issue raised when parties at consensus to resolve the matter with the competent authority","og_description":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: A Division Bench of Krishna Murari, C.J and Arun Palli, J. disposed of the writ petition after","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/22\/ph-hc-no-substantive-issue-raised-when-parties-at-consensus-to-resolve-the-matter-with-the-competent-authority\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-07-22T07:30:37+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-07-25T09:56:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/22\/ph-hc-no-substantive-issue-raised-when-parties-at-consensus-to-resolve-the-matter-with-the-competent-authority\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/22\/ph-hc-no-substantive-issue-raised-when-parties-at-consensus-to-resolve-the-matter-with-the-competent-authority\/","name":"P&H HC | No substantive issue raised when parties at consensus to resolve the matter with the competent authority | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-07-22T07:30:37+00:00","dateModified":"2019-07-25T09:56:14+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/22\/ph-hc-no-substantive-issue-raised-when-parties-at-consensus-to-resolve-the-matter-with-the-competent-authority\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/22\/ph-hc-no-substantive-issue-raised-when-parties-at-consensus-to-resolve-the-matter-with-the-competent-authority\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/22\/ph-hc-no-substantive-issue-raised-when-parties-at-consensus-to-resolve-the-matter-with-the-competent-authority\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"P&H HC | No substantive issue raised when parties at consensus to resolve the matter with the competent authority"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":265136,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/07\/interference-with-government-tenders-makes-the-state-and-its-citizens-suffer-twice-courts-should-refrain-from-staying-government-tenders-even-in-case-of-total-arbitrariness-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":217142,"position":0},"title":"Interference with Government Tenders makes the State and its citizens suffer twice. Courts should refrain from staying Government tenders even in case of total arbitrariness: SC\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"April 7, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Explaining the scope of interference in matters relating to Government contracts and tenders, the bench of Hemant Gupta* and V. Ramasubramanian, JJ has held that even if the Court finds that there is total arbitrariness or that the tender has been granted in a malafide manner, still the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-121.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-121.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-121.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-121.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-121.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":247681,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/27\/judicial-review-or-judicial-restraint-supreme-court-explains-where-the-virtue-itself-turns-into-vice\/","url_meta":{"origin":217142,"position":1},"title":"Judicial review or judicial restraint? Supreme Court explains where the virtue itself turns into vice","author":"Editor","date":"April 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Division Bench comprising of Rohinton Fali Nariman* and B.R. Gavai, JJ., addressed the issue of overstepping of review jurisdiction by the High Courts in policy matters. The Bench expressed, \u201cJudicial review in these matters is equivalent to judicial restraint in these matters\u2026the writ court does not have\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":289880,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/17\/writ-jurisdiction-cannot-be-invoked-to-avoid-contractual-obligations-or-to-modify-the-contract-delhi-high-court-upholds-single-judge-decision-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":217142,"position":2},"title":"Writ jurisdiction cannot be invoked to avoid contractual obligations or to modify the contract: Delhi High Court upholds Single Judge’s decision","author":"Simranjeet","date":"April 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The writ court should not exercise its powers under Article 226 of the Constitution which will obstruct contractual rights between the parties.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":327003,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/20\/delhi-hc-stays-debarment-order-by-food-corporation-india-being-violative-of-principles-of-natural-justice-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":217142,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court stays debarment order by Food Corporation of India for being violative of principles of natural justice","author":"Editor","date":"July 20, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Food Corporation of India issued the undated communication after various defects were noticed in the Demolition and Reconstruction of 20 Residential Flats in Sector 27, Noida.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":63681,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/25\/section-45-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-does-not-include-the-enquiry-as-to-the-legality-and-validity-of-the-substantive-contract\/","url_meta":{"origin":217142,"position":4},"title":"Section 45 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 does not include the enquiry as to the legality and validity of the substantive contract","author":"Sucheta","date":"August 25, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: A pivotal question that came before the Court for consideration was that whether two Indian companies, Sasan Power Ltd. and NACC India Ltd., each of whom have been incorporated and registered in India could in law be said to have \u201cmade an agreement referred to in Section 44\u201d\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Alternate Dispute Resolution"","block_context":{"text":"Alternate Dispute Resolution","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/alternate_dispute_resolution\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":266229,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/30\/principles-of-natural-justice\/","url_meta":{"origin":217142,"position":5},"title":"Jhar HC | Principles of natural justice required to be followed and cannot be waived out depending upon quantum of punishment; Reiterated mandate of natural justice in blacklisting cases","author":"Editor","date":"April 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: A Division Bench of Ravi Ranjan, CJ and Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. allowed the appeal and quashed the impugned order as it suffers from material irregularities. The facts of the case are such that the a notice inviting tender was issued by the respondent-BCCL on inviting applications\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217142","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=217142"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217142\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=217142"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=217142"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=217142"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}