{"id":217026,"date":"2019-07-18T18:00:51","date_gmt":"2019-07-18T12:30:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=217026"},"modified":"2019-07-25T16:01:19","modified_gmt":"2019-07-25T10:31:19","slug":"jk-hc-writ-under-art-226-admissible-only-if-there-is-allegation-of-violation-of-a-statutory-duty-on-the-part-of-statutory-authority","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/jk-hc-writ-under-art-226-admissible-only-if-there-is-allegation-of-violation-of-a-statutory-duty-on-the-part-of-statutory-authority\/","title":{"rendered":"J&K HC | Writ under Art. 226 admissible only if there is allegation of violation of a statutory duty on the part of statutory authority"},"content":{"rendered":"

Jammu & Kashmir High Court: <\/strong>Sanjay Kumar Gupta, J. dismissed a writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus against official respondents for restraining private persons from encroaching of the suit property of the petitioner.<\/p>\n

The petitioner herein had filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Article 103 of Constitution of Jammu & Kashmir, seeking mandamus commanding the official respondents to restrain certain private persons from interfering in the peaceful possession of petitioner\u2019s suit property.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that the petitioner was claiming relief for restraining the encroachment of his land by private persons. It was opined that this was not the function of official respondents, because they are executive functionaries of State. Since, the dispute involved the civil rights of the petitioner, it would be proper for him to seek a remedy before a civil court by filing a suit for injunction.<\/p>\n

While determining the petition before it, the Court relied heavily on Roshina T v. Abdul Azeez<\/em>, (2019) 2 SCC 329<\/a> where it was held that \u201ca regular suit is an appropriate remedy for settlement of the disputes relating to property rights between the private persons. The remedy under Article 226 of the Constitution shall not be available except where violation of some statutory duty on the part of statutory authority is alleged.\u201d<\/em><\/strong> In that case, the Supreme Court had held that a High Court cannot use its constitutional jurisdiction for deciding disputes, for which remedies under the general law, civil or criminal are available. The jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution being special and extraordinary, it should not be exercised casually or lightly on mere asking by the litigant.<\/p>\n

In view of the above, the petition was dismissed but liberty was granted to the petitioner to approach the civil court.[Paras Ram v. State of J&K, 2019 SCC OnLine J&K 479<\/b><\/a>, decided on 24-05-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jammu & Kashmir High Court: Sanjay Kumar Gupta, J. dismissed a writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus against official respondents for <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31370,3457,35688,34652,32664],"class_list":["post-217026","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-article-226-of-constitution-of-india","tag-encroachment","tag-statutory-duty","tag-suit-property","tag-writ"],"yoast_head":"\nJ&K HC | Writ under Art. 226 admissible only if there is allegation of violation of a statutory duty on the part of statutory authority | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/jk-hc-writ-under-art-226-admissible-only-if-there-is-allegation-of-violation-of-a-statutory-duty-on-the-part-of-statutory-authority\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"J&K HC | Writ under Art. 226 admissible only if there is allegation of violation of a statutory duty on the part of statutory authority\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: Sanjay Kumar Gupta, J. dismissed a writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus against official respondents for\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/jk-hc-writ-under-art-226-admissible-only-if-there-is-allegation-of-violation-of-a-statutory-duty-on-the-part-of-statutory-authority\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-07-18T12:30:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-07-25T10:31:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/jk-hc-writ-under-art-226-admissible-only-if-there-is-allegation-of-violation-of-a-statutory-duty-on-the-part-of-statutory-authority\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/jk-hc-writ-under-art-226-admissible-only-if-there-is-allegation-of-violation-of-a-statutory-duty-on-the-part-of-statutory-authority\/\",\"name\":\"J&K HC | Writ under Art. 226 admissible only if there is allegation of violation of a statutory duty on the part of statutory authority | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-07-18T12:30:51+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-07-25T10:31:19+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/jk-hc-writ-under-art-226-admissible-only-if-there-is-allegation-of-violation-of-a-statutory-duty-on-the-part-of-statutory-authority\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/jk-hc-writ-under-art-226-admissible-only-if-there-is-allegation-of-violation-of-a-statutory-duty-on-the-part-of-statutory-authority\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/jk-hc-writ-under-art-226-admissible-only-if-there-is-allegation-of-violation-of-a-statutory-duty-on-the-part-of-statutory-authority\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"J&K HC | Writ under Art. 226 admissible only if there is allegation of violation of a statutory duty on the part of statutory authority\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"J&K HC | Writ under Art. 226 admissible only if there is allegation of violation of a statutory duty on the part of statutory authority | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/jk-hc-writ-under-art-226-admissible-only-if-there-is-allegation-of-violation-of-a-statutory-duty-on-the-part-of-statutory-authority\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"J&K HC | Writ under Art. 226 admissible only if there is allegation of violation of a statutory duty on the part of statutory authority","og_description":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: Sanjay Kumar Gupta, J. dismissed a writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus against official respondents for","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/jk-hc-writ-under-art-226-admissible-only-if-there-is-allegation-of-violation-of-a-statutory-duty-on-the-part-of-statutory-authority\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-07-18T12:30:51+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-07-25T10:31:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/jk-hc-writ-under-art-226-admissible-only-if-there-is-allegation-of-violation-of-a-statutory-duty-on-the-part-of-statutory-authority\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/jk-hc-writ-under-art-226-admissible-only-if-there-is-allegation-of-violation-of-a-statutory-duty-on-the-part-of-statutory-authority\/","name":"J&K HC | Writ under Art. 226 admissible only if there is allegation of violation of a statutory duty on the part of statutory authority | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-07-18T12:30:51+00:00","dateModified":"2019-07-25T10:31:19+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/jk-hc-writ-under-art-226-admissible-only-if-there-is-allegation-of-violation-of-a-statutory-duty-on-the-part-of-statutory-authority\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/jk-hc-writ-under-art-226-admissible-only-if-there-is-allegation-of-violation-of-a-statutory-duty-on-the-part-of-statutory-authority\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/jk-hc-writ-under-art-226-admissible-only-if-there-is-allegation-of-violation-of-a-statutory-duty-on-the-part-of-statutory-authority\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"J&K HC | Writ under Art. 226 admissible only if there is allegation of violation of a statutory duty on the part of statutory authority"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":204918,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/07\/property-disputes-between-private-parties-not-a-fit-case-for-high-courts-to-interfere-under-article-226-of-the-constitution\/","url_meta":{"origin":217026,"position":0},"title":"Property disputes between private parties: Not a fit case for High Courts to interfere under Article 226 of the Constitution","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 7, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Dhiraj Singh Thakur, J., dismissed a writ petition filed against the actions of private respondents 6 to 13, whereby respondents were interfering with the property owned by the petitioner. The main issue that arose before the Court was whether the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":276150,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/26\/jammu-kashmir-hc-reservation-pahari-speaking-people-petition-challenging-dismissed-writs-legal-news-and-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":217026,"position":1},"title":"J&K and Ladakh HC | Petition challenging 4% reservation for Pahari Speaking People in State\/UT Services dismissed as petitioners failed to qualify as \u2018aggrieved persons\u2019 for the purposes of Art 226","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court: While deliberating over the instant writ petition concerning reservation provided to Pahari Speaking People, the Sanjay Dhar, J., had to look into the question as to who can invoke the jurisdiction of the High Court under Art. 226 of the Constitution seeking a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":374846,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/06\/writ-maintainability-private-unaided-school-teacher-selection-jk-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":217026,"position":2},"title":"Teacher’s selection in private unaided school purely contractual matter; Not amenable to writ jurisdiction: J&K and Ladakh HC","author":"Sunaina","date":"February 6, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe rights arising in favour of candidates participating in the selection process are private rights, which cannot be enforced against an institution that is neither a State nor an instrumentality of the State by way of a writ petition.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"writ maintainability against private unaided school","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/writ-maintainability-against-private-unaided-school.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/writ-maintainability-against-private-unaided-school.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/writ-maintainability-against-private-unaided-school.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/writ-maintainability-against-private-unaided-school.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":378711,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/18\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-state-article-12-jk-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":217026,"position":3},"title":"Vaishno Devi Shrine Board not \u201cState\u201d under Art. 12 Despite Statutory Status; Lacks Governmental Control: J&K and Ladakh HC","author":"Sunaina","date":"March 18, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe guiding factor is the nature of duty imposed upon the person or body against whom a writ is being sought. If the nature of duty imposed on a body is public in nature, it is amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution but if the rights\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"vaishno devi shrine board not State","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-State.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-State.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-State.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-State.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":219336,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/10\/mp-hc-writ-of-mandamus-under-art-226-cannot-be-issued-for-compelling-police-to-perform-a-statutory-duty-under-s-154-crpc-without-availing-all-the-other-alternative-remedies-as-prescribed-in-crimin\/","url_meta":{"origin":217026,"position":4},"title":"MP HC | Writ of mandamus cannot be issued for compelling police to perform a statutory duty under S. 154 CrPC without availing all other alternative remedies prescribed in CrPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 10, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: G.S. Ahluwalia, J., dismissed a petition filed under Article 226 Constitution of India to direct the respondents to register an FIR on the basis of the complaint made by her. The main question before the High Court to decide was \u2018whether a writ petition under Article\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":214905,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/cal-hc-grievances-ought-to-be-first-filed-in-the-competent-civil-forum-before-preferring-a-writ-petition-in-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":217026,"position":5},"title":"Cal HC | Grievances ought to be first filed in the competent civil forum, before preferring a writ petition in High Court\u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 21, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: Tapabrata Chakraborty, J. dismissed a writ petition filed by the petitioner, Dr Kashninath Ghosh Hazra, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner claimed to be the owner of an un-partitioned land at plot nos. 4933, 4934, 4935 and 4936 of Mouza Sadpur, Block- Kandi,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217026","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=217026"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217026\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=217026"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=217026"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=217026"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}