{"id":217015,"date":"2019-07-18T10:28:23","date_gmt":"2019-07-18T04:58:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=217015"},"modified":"2019-07-25T17:40:56","modified_gmt":"2019-07-25T12:10:56","slug":"hp-hc-manufacturing-of-corrugated-boxes-in-itself-neither-horticulture-product-nor-produce-held-petitioners-case-not-covered-under-national-horticulture-broad-guidelines","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/hp-hc-manufacturing-of-corrugated-boxes-in-itself-neither-horticulture-product-nor-produce-held-petitioners-case-not-covered-under-national-horticulture-broad-guidelines\/","title":{"rendered":"HP HC | Manufacturing of corrugated boxes in itself neither horticulture product nor produce; Held, petitioner\u2019s case not covered under National Horticulture Broad Guidelines"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Himachal Pradesh High Court<\/strong>: Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J. dismissed a writ petition where the main issue was \u2018<em>whether the manufacturing of corrugated boxes of apple was covered for grant of subsidy as per the scheme appended with the petition<\/em>.\u2019<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The factual matrix was that the petitioner prior to setting up a manufacturing unit of corrugated apple boxes requested the respondent for grant of subsidy by the requisite application. Pursuant to such application respondent carried out an inspection of the premises and after carrying out the same, the application so submitted was rejected with the remarks \u2018<strong><em>not covered in<\/em> <em>National Horticulture Broad Guidelines<\/em>\u2019<\/strong>. Aggrieved by which the petitioner applied to the Court by the way of writ.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court observed that Clause II of the said Scheme defined \u2018primary processing\u2019 related components, which were eligible for assistance under the scheme. It was further observed that the Coordinate Bench had already concluded that the corrugated boxes which were manufactured by the petitioner was covered under a particular clause i.e. \u201c<strong>Horticulture ancillary industry for promoting, indigenous manufacturing of horticulture-related form tools and machineries, equipments, plastics containers, packaging, etc.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The respondent in compliance to the order passed by the earlier Bench stated that, National Horticulture Board was set up by the Government of India as an autonomous body with a mandate to promote the integrated development of Horticulture with special emphasis on post-harvest management and cold chain to reduce post-harvest loses. The respondent further submitted that for the accomplishment of the said objectives, the respondents provided assistance by way of subsidy under various schemes prescribed for the purpose to facilitate the completion\/initiation of such projects. It was further averred that petitioner\u2019s project file was presented before the Appraisal Committee but was found ineligible since manufacturing of corrugated boxes for apple was not covered under that scheme guidelines and as such the application was rejected. It was contended that the interpretation given by the petitioner to the term \u2018Packaging\u2019 was incorrect, because as per scheme assistance in case of CFB Cartons, Aseptic Packaging, Polybags, etc. was available on merit for launching a new horticulture product during its first year and for introduction of horticulture products in a market as on-time assistance, as was evident from Clause (iv) of the policy.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court held that, it was not in dispute that the petitioner neither launched new horticulture product nor introduced any horticulture product in the market for the assistance of which the petitioner promised the use of the product, therefore, his case was not covered by any of the clauses of the scheme, as the scheme was only attracted in case of CFB Cartons, etc. that were available on merit that too for launch of a new horticulture products during its first year and for the introduction of horticulture produces in the market as a one time assistance. Manufacturing of corrugated boxes in itself was neither a horticulture product nor horticulture produce.[Rajesh Sharma v. Union of India, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/a9D93sOU\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine HP 999<\/b><\/a>, decided on 12-07-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Himachal Pradesh High Court: Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J. dismissed a writ petition where the main issue was \u2018whether the manufacturing of corrugated <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":222107,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[36668,36670,36669,29991],"class_list":["post-217015","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-horticulture-product","tag-indigenous-manufacturing","tag-national-horticulture-broad-guidelines","tag-subsidy"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>HP HC | Manufacturing of corrugated boxes in itself neither horticulture product nor produce; Held, petitioner\u2019s case not covered under National Horticulture Broad Guidelines | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/hp-hc-manufacturing-of-corrugated-boxes-in-itself-neither-horticulture-product-nor-produce-held-petitioners-case-not-covered-under-national-horticulture-broad-guidelines\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"HP HC | Manufacturing of corrugated boxes in itself neither horticulture product nor produce; Held, petitioner\u2019s case not covered under National Horticulture Broad Guidelines\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J. dismissed a writ petition where the main issue was \u2018whether the manufacturing of corrugated\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/hp-hc-manufacturing-of-corrugated-boxes-in-itself-neither-horticulture-product-nor-produce-held-petitioners-case-not-covered-under-national-horticulture-broad-guidelines\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-07-18T04:58:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-07-25T12:10:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/hp-hc-manufacturing-of-corrugated-boxes-in-itself-neither-horticulture-product-nor-produce-held-petitioners-case-not-covered-under-national-horticulture-broad-guidelines\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/hp-hc-manufacturing-of-corrugated-boxes-in-itself-neither-horticulture-product-nor-produce-held-petitioners-case-not-covered-under-national-horticulture-broad-guidelines\/\",\"name\":\"HP HC | Manufacturing of corrugated boxes in itself neither horticulture product nor produce; Held, petitioner\u2019s case not covered under National Horticulture Broad Guidelines | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/hp-hc-manufacturing-of-corrugated-boxes-in-itself-neither-horticulture-product-nor-produce-held-petitioners-case-not-covered-under-national-horticulture-broad-guidelines\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/hp-hc-manufacturing-of-corrugated-boxes-in-itself-neither-horticulture-product-nor-produce-held-petitioners-case-not-covered-under-national-horticulture-broad-guidelines\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-07-18T04:58:23+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-07-25T12:10:56+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/hp-hc-manufacturing-of-corrugated-boxes-in-itself-neither-horticulture-product-nor-produce-held-petitioners-case-not-covered-under-national-horticulture-broad-guidelines\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/hp-hc-manufacturing-of-corrugated-boxes-in-itself-neither-horticulture-product-nor-produce-held-petitioners-case-not-covered-under-national-horticulture-broad-guidelines\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/hp-hc-manufacturing-of-corrugated-boxes-in-itself-neither-horticulture-product-nor-produce-held-petitioners-case-not-covered-under-national-horticulture-broad-guidelines\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/hp-hc-manufacturing-of-corrugated-boxes-in-itself-neither-horticulture-product-nor-produce-held-petitioners-case-not-covered-under-national-horticulture-broad-guidelines\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"HP HC | Manufacturing of corrugated boxes in itself neither horticulture product nor produce; Held, petitioner\u2019s case not covered under National Horticulture Broad Guidelines\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"HP HC | Manufacturing of corrugated boxes in itself neither horticulture product nor produce; Held, petitioner\u2019s case not covered under National Horticulture Broad Guidelines | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/hp-hc-manufacturing-of-corrugated-boxes-in-itself-neither-horticulture-product-nor-produce-held-petitioners-case-not-covered-under-national-horticulture-broad-guidelines\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"HP HC | Manufacturing of corrugated boxes in itself neither horticulture product nor produce; Held, petitioner\u2019s case not covered under National Horticulture Broad Guidelines","og_description":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J. dismissed a writ petition where the main issue was \u2018whether the manufacturing of corrugated","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/hp-hc-manufacturing-of-corrugated-boxes-in-itself-neither-horticulture-product-nor-produce-held-petitioners-case-not-covered-under-national-horticulture-broad-guidelines\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-07-18T04:58:23+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-07-25T12:10:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/hp-hc-manufacturing-of-corrugated-boxes-in-itself-neither-horticulture-product-nor-produce-held-petitioners-case-not-covered-under-national-horticulture-broad-guidelines\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/hp-hc-manufacturing-of-corrugated-boxes-in-itself-neither-horticulture-product-nor-produce-held-petitioners-case-not-covered-under-national-horticulture-broad-guidelines\/","name":"HP HC | Manufacturing of corrugated boxes in itself neither horticulture product nor produce; Held, petitioner\u2019s case not covered under National Horticulture Broad Guidelines | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/hp-hc-manufacturing-of-corrugated-boxes-in-itself-neither-horticulture-product-nor-produce-held-petitioners-case-not-covered-under-national-horticulture-broad-guidelines\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/hp-hc-manufacturing-of-corrugated-boxes-in-itself-neither-horticulture-product-nor-produce-held-petitioners-case-not-covered-under-national-horticulture-broad-guidelines\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","datePublished":"2019-07-18T04:58:23+00:00","dateModified":"2019-07-25T12:10:56+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/hp-hc-manufacturing-of-corrugated-boxes-in-itself-neither-horticulture-product-nor-produce-held-petitioners-case-not-covered-under-national-horticulture-broad-guidelines\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/hp-hc-manufacturing-of-corrugated-boxes-in-itself-neither-horticulture-product-nor-produce-held-petitioners-case-not-covered-under-national-horticulture-broad-guidelines\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/hp-hc-manufacturing-of-corrugated-boxes-in-itself-neither-horticulture-product-nor-produce-held-petitioners-case-not-covered-under-national-horticulture-broad-guidelines\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/hp-hc-manufacturing-of-corrugated-boxes-in-itself-neither-horticulture-product-nor-produce-held-petitioners-case-not-covered-under-national-horticulture-broad-guidelines\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"HP HC | Manufacturing of corrugated boxes in itself neither horticulture product nor produce; Held, petitioner\u2019s case not covered under National Horticulture Broad Guidelines"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":242382,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/18\/tri-hc-default-on-the-part-of-a-government-department-cannot-be-a-reason-to-prevent-an-entity-from-seeking-its-entitlement-petition-allowed\/","url_meta":{"origin":217015,"position":0},"title":"Tri HC | Default on the part of a Government department cannot be a reason to prevent an entity from seeking its entitlement; Petition allowed","author":"Editor","date":"January 18, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Tripura High Court: A Division Bench of Akil Kureshi, CJ and S.G. Chattopadhyay J., while allowing the present petition, held, \u201cOne department of the Government cannot cite the reason of another department not acting promptly enough to deny the benefit declared by the Government under any scheme.\u201d The petitioner herein\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":203215,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/06\/manufacturers-and-not-farmers-have-the-onus-to-prove-the-quality-of-seeds-under-consumer-protection-act-1986\/","url_meta":{"origin":217015,"position":1},"title":"Manufacturers, and not farmers, have the onus to prove the quality of seeds under Consumer Protection Act, 1986","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 6, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): A Division Bench comprising of R.K. Agrawal, J. and M. Shreesha, Member dismissed the revision petition filed against the order of Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission confirming payment of compensation to the respondent\/complainant \u2013 farmers for supply of inferior quality of seeds by\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":196271,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/23\/purpose-of-grant-is-to-be-seen-to-ascertain-it-as-a-capital-or-revenue-receipt\/","url_meta":{"origin":217015,"position":2},"title":"Purpose of grant is to be seen to ascertain it as a capital or revenue receipt","author":"Saba","date":"May 23, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Sanjib Banerjee and Abhijit Gangopadhyay, JJ. held that the subsidy allowed by the State Government on account of power consumption to new or expanding industrial units was a capital receipt. The subsidy as referred to above was granted to business units and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":219923,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/24\/sl-coa-if-the-words-are-unambiguous-court-shall-give-effect-to-the-plain-words-of-the-statute-sinhala-text-prevailed-over-english-text-in-a-case-of-inconsistency\/","url_meta":{"origin":217015,"position":3},"title":"SL CoA | If words are unambiguous, Court shall give effect to plain words of the Statute; Sinhala text prevailed over English text in a case of inconsistency","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 24, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Court of Appeal of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka: Mahinda Samayawardhena, J. entertained a writ petition where the application sought certiorari for quashing the seizure and detention of the goods from his possession and to prohibit the respondents from seizing, detaining, and thereafter instituting and or continuing with\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":248090,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/11\/covid-19-vaccination-bom-hc-biovet-pvt-ltd-allowed-to-use-idle-vaccine-manufacturing-unit-for-covaxin-production-directs-maharashtra-to-cooperate\/","url_meta":{"origin":217015,"position":4},"title":"[COVID-19 Vaccination] Bom HC| Biovet Pvt. Ltd. allowed to use idle vaccine manufacturing unit for Covaxin production; directs Maharashtra to cooperate","author":"Editor","date":"May 11, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: The Division Bench of N.R.Borkar and K.K.Tated, JJ., directed State government to hand over the peaceful possession of the ready to use BSL-3 vaccine manufacturing unit, Pune from M\/s. Intervet India Pvt. Ltd. to Biovet Pvt. Ltd. along with the requisite rights, responsibilities and obligations to deal\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282122,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/21\/if-a-party-has-taken-steps-considering-the-factor-of-subsidy-the-government-cannot-withdraw-subsidy-retrospectively\/","url_meta":{"origin":217015,"position":5},"title":"Kerala High Court | If a party has taken steps considering the factor of subsidy, the Government cannot withdraw it retrospectively","author":"Editor","date":"January 21, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court observed that concession or benefit of subsidy can be withdrawn prospectively and not retrospectively, by the Government.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-310.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217015","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=217015"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217015\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/222107"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=217015"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=217015"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=217015"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}