{"id":216899,"date":"2019-07-16T15:35:56","date_gmt":"2019-07-16T10:05:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=216899"},"modified":"2019-07-17T14:20:45","modified_gmt":"2019-07-17T08:50:45","slug":"all-hc-court-not-to-interfere-in-matters-where-petitioner-fails-to-furnish-any-explanation-to-challenge-inquiry-report","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/16\/all-hc-court-not-to-interfere-in-matters-where-petitioner-fails-to-furnish-any-explanation-to-challenge-inquiry-report\/","title":{"rendered":"All HC | Court not to interfere in matters where petitioner fails to furnish any explanation to challenge inquiry report"},"content":{"rendered":"

Allahabad High Court<\/strong>: Sunita Agarwal, J. disposed of the writ petition after giving various directions to the Board of Management to expeditiously look into the matter if in any case any representation is filed by the petitioner.<\/p>\n

A petition was directed against the inquiry report where the petitioner who was retired from the post of Secretary, Co-operatives Society Limited Gathwaha, was found guilty of misappropriation of Government money. The inquiry report indicated that cash of seven receipts was not deposited by the petitioner in the bank prior to his retirement. The petitioner disputed that there was no proper opportunity to submit his explanation before the inquiry committee. An FIR was also lodged in the police station against the petitioner.<\/p>\n

R.K. Singh Rajput, counsel for the petitioner submitted that amount due against the petitioner was to be adjusted with the view of the decision of the Board of Management of the Co-operative Society and it was also placed before the court that salary due to the petitioner would be adjusted in the recovery if any. It was submitted that in such case the adjustment of Rs 437 was to be made. Lastly, it was contended that in view of the decision taken by the Board of Management of the Co-operative Society, Nawabganj, Farrukahabad, no coercive action can be taken against the petitioner.<\/p>\n

The Court opined that as there was no order of recovery on the date of the decision of the Board of Management of the society. There<\/em> could not be any decision of adjustment of dues of the petitioner against the society in contemplation of recovery of public money.\u00a0 As the learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to furnish any explanation of the petitioner to challenge the findings of the inquiry report this Court does not find any justification to interfere. <\/em>The petitioner was therefore directed to deposit the entire dues as sought to be recovered pursuant to the inquiry within a period of two months. It was further directed that it would be open for the petitioner to lay his claim for payment of salary, allegedly due from March 2017 to July 2018. It was instructed to the Board of Management of the Co-operative Society to take the decision expeditiously if in any case any representation is filed by the petitioner.[Suresh Singh v. State of U.P., 2019 SCC OnLine All 2560<\/b><\/a>, decided on 11-07-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Allahabad High Court: Sunita Agarwal, J. disposed of the writ petition after giving various directions to the Board of Management to expeditiously <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[36632,36634,36635,36633],"class_list":["post-216899","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-inquiry-report","tag-misappropriation-of-government-money","tag-payment-of-salary","tag-recovery-of-public-money"],"yoast_head":"\nAll HC | Court not to interfere in matters where petitioner fails to furnish any explanation to challenge inquiry report | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/16\/all-hc-court-not-to-interfere-in-matters-where-petitioner-fails-to-furnish-any-explanation-to-challenge-inquiry-report\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"All HC | Court not to interfere in matters where petitioner fails to furnish any explanation to challenge inquiry report\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad High Court: Sunita Agarwal, J. disposed of the writ petition after giving various directions to the Board of Management to expeditiously\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/16\/all-hc-court-not-to-interfere-in-matters-where-petitioner-fails-to-furnish-any-explanation-to-challenge-inquiry-report\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-07-16T10:05:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-07-17T08:50:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/16\/all-hc-court-not-to-interfere-in-matters-where-petitioner-fails-to-furnish-any-explanation-to-challenge-inquiry-report\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/16\/all-hc-court-not-to-interfere-in-matters-where-petitioner-fails-to-furnish-any-explanation-to-challenge-inquiry-report\/\",\"name\":\"All HC | Court not to interfere in matters where petitioner fails to furnish any explanation to challenge inquiry report | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-07-16T10:05:56+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-07-17T08:50:45+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/16\/all-hc-court-not-to-interfere-in-matters-where-petitioner-fails-to-furnish-any-explanation-to-challenge-inquiry-report\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/16\/all-hc-court-not-to-interfere-in-matters-where-petitioner-fails-to-furnish-any-explanation-to-challenge-inquiry-report\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/16\/all-hc-court-not-to-interfere-in-matters-where-petitioner-fails-to-furnish-any-explanation-to-challenge-inquiry-report\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"All HC | Court not to interfere in matters where petitioner fails to furnish any explanation to challenge inquiry report\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"All HC | Court not to interfere in matters where petitioner fails to furnish any explanation to challenge inquiry report | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/16\/all-hc-court-not-to-interfere-in-matters-where-petitioner-fails-to-furnish-any-explanation-to-challenge-inquiry-report\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"All HC | Court not to interfere in matters where petitioner fails to furnish any explanation to challenge inquiry report","og_description":"Allahabad High Court: Sunita Agarwal, J. disposed of the writ petition after giving various directions to the Board of Management to expeditiously","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/16\/all-hc-court-not-to-interfere-in-matters-where-petitioner-fails-to-furnish-any-explanation-to-challenge-inquiry-report\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-07-16T10:05:56+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-07-17T08:50:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/16\/all-hc-court-not-to-interfere-in-matters-where-petitioner-fails-to-furnish-any-explanation-to-challenge-inquiry-report\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/16\/all-hc-court-not-to-interfere-in-matters-where-petitioner-fails-to-furnish-any-explanation-to-challenge-inquiry-report\/","name":"All HC | Court not to interfere in matters where petitioner fails to furnish any explanation to challenge inquiry report | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-07-16T10:05:56+00:00","dateModified":"2019-07-17T08:50:45+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/16\/all-hc-court-not-to-interfere-in-matters-where-petitioner-fails-to-furnish-any-explanation-to-challenge-inquiry-report\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/16\/all-hc-court-not-to-interfere-in-matters-where-petitioner-fails-to-furnish-any-explanation-to-challenge-inquiry-report\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/16\/all-hc-court-not-to-interfere-in-matters-where-petitioner-fails-to-furnish-any-explanation-to-challenge-inquiry-report\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"All HC | Court not to interfere in matters where petitioner fails to furnish any explanation to challenge inquiry report"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":253239,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/26\/disciplinary-authority\/","url_meta":{"origin":216899,"position":0},"title":"Tri HC | Mere honesty and admission of charge are not the grounds for tempering with the order passed by disciplinary authority; Court dismisses appeal","author":"Editor","date":"August 26, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Tripura High Court: Akil Kureshi, CJ., dismissed a petition which was filed challenging an order passed by the Director of Elementary Education imposing punishment of compulsory retirement on the petitioner as also an order passed by the Secretary, Education (School) Department, Government of Tripura dismissing the appeal against the order\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":244206,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/22\/corruption\/","url_meta":{"origin":216899,"position":1},"title":"Tri HC | Once material has come to Government notice prima facie indicating that there was some corrupt practice, Government is duty-bound to act on the same; Court maintains departmental inquiry","author":"Editor","date":"February 22, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Tripura High Court: Akil Kureshi, CJ., disposed of a writ petition which was filed challenging a departmental inquiry and suspension pending such departmental inquiry against the petitioner. Petitioner was a Junior Engineer in the Government of Tripura. A complaint was made against him holding assets disproportionate to his known source\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":297103,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/18\/strict-rules-not-apply-evidence-in-disciplinary-hearings-bombay-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":216899,"position":2},"title":"\u201cStrict rules of evidence do not apply in a disciplinary proceeding\u201d: Bombay High Court while refusing interim relief for Bus Conductor against dismissal from service","author":"Ridhi","date":"July 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court found the Labour Court and Industrial Court justified in refusing to exercise jurisdiction in the petitioner's favour.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"bombay high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":207812,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/09\/delhi-hc-scope-of-inquiry-by-mm-under-section-7-of-extradition-act-is-limited-to-satisfaction-of-prima-facie-case-against-fugitive-criminal\/","url_meta":{"origin":216899,"position":3},"title":"Del HC| Scope of inquiry by MM under Section 7 of Extradition Act is limited to satisfaction of prima facie case against fugitive criminal","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 9, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0The Bench of Mukta Gupta, J. dismissed a writ petition filed against the order-cum-inquiry report of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate whereby he recommended extradition of the petitioner to the Kingdom of Thailand. The petitioner was alleged to have murdered an American national in Bangkok, Thailand in 2012. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":254871,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/29\/jhar-hc-conclusion-of-departmental-proceeding-on-the-ground-of-conviction-by-trial-court-will-subsequent-acquittal-by-high-court-affect-the-outcome-of-departmental-proceeding\/","url_meta":{"origin":216899,"position":4},"title":"Jhar HC | Conclusion of Departmental proceeding on the ground of conviction by Trial Court; will subsequent acquittal by High Court affect the outcome of departmental proceeding?","author":"Editor","date":"September 29, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J. while holding the reason assigned by the Director-General of Police (DGP) while rejecting the claim of the petitioner to review the order of his suspension bad in law, directed the DGP to reconsider the matter. The petitioner had preferred this writ petition for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":216249,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/29\/jhar-hc-non-furnishing-of-enquiry-report-not-detrimental-to-departmental-proceeding-if-no-prejudice-caused-to-employee\/","url_meta":{"origin":216899,"position":5},"title":"Jhar HC | Non-furnishing of enquiry report not detrimental to departmental proceeding, if no prejudice caused to employee","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 29, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J. heard a writ petition that sought to quash the order passed by the respondent whereby the petitioner had been inflicted with the punishment of stoppage of annual increment for six months in Departmental Proceeding. The petitioner was a constable and was accused of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216899","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=216899"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216899\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=216899"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=216899"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=216899"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}