{"id":216896,"date":"2019-07-16T14:35:48","date_gmt":"2019-07-16T09:05:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=216896"},"modified":"2019-07-17T14:19:35","modified_gmt":"2019-07-17T08:49:35","slug":"ori-hc-lower-court-orders-quashed-due-to-production-of-forged-evidence-and-fraudulent-practices","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/16\/ori-hc-lower-court-orders-quashed-due-to-production-of-forged-evidence-and-fraudulent-practices\/","title":{"rendered":"Ori HC | Lower Court orders quashed due to production of forged evidence and fraudulent practices"},"content":{"rendered":"

Orissa High Court:<\/strong> Dr A.K. Rath J., quashed the order passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division) and order by Tahsildar due to fraudulent practices of the parties in a consolidation matter.<\/p>\n

In the present case, a plot of land came into the purview of consolidation operation, wherein the Opposite Party 1 filed a consolidation revision before the Commissioner. The Commissioner had remanded the matter to the Consolidation Officer for effecting a compromise. The Opposite Party 2 had filed a compromise petition along with a trace map for partition and the Consolidation Officer had allotted 1\/3rd<\/sup> of land to each in accordance with the trace map. The Opposite Party 2 had filed another application before the Tahsildar for the conversion of the agricultural land into a homestead.<\/p>\n

Senior Advocate, Rajat Kumar Rath and Advocate, Sandipani Nayak representing the petitioners, submitted before the High Court that the trace map which was submitted by the Opposite Party 1 was a fraudulent copy. He put forth that the copy was forged and was an imaginary vertical sketch map; therefore the orders passed by the respective authorities were based on fabricated factual scenarios. The Senior Advocate also placed reliance on two apex court decisions which were discussed by the High Court in its order.<\/p>\n

The Advocate representing the Opposite Party 1, Bikram Rath submitted that they were constrained in filing for a permanent injunction due to the disturbed possession in the land by the Opposite Party 2.<\/p>\n

The High Court, before delving into the matter, discussed the two apex court decision in order to distinguish between when proceedings shall be considered \u201ccollusive and fraudulent\u201d. It stated that in Nagubai Ammal v. B. Shama Rao<\/em>, AIR 1956 SC 593<\/a>, the apex court had come to a decision that in \u201ccollusive proceedings the combat is a mere sham, in a fraudulent suit it is real and earnest.\u201d <\/em>Thus stating that in collusive proceedings the claim is fictitious in nature whereas, in a fraudulent suit, the claim is untrue. Placing reliance to another two Supreme Court decisions it stated that both in S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu v. Jagannath<\/em>, (1994) 1 SCC 1<\/a> and Badami v. Bhali<\/em>, (2012) 11 SCC 574<\/a>, the Apex Court had stated that a judgment obtained by fraudulent means should be treated with nullity notwithstanding the hierarchy of court, whether superior or inferior court passing the order\/decree. It quoted Chief Justice Edward Coke of England, \u201cFraud avoids all judicial acts, ecclesiastical or temporal.\u201d<\/em>\u00a0 The Court upon perusal of documents produced stated that it was evident that the diagram produced in the compromise petition was diametrically opposite to the consolidation case. Therefore, the court quashed both the orders passed by the Civil Judge and Tahsildar, stating that the Opposite party 1 had fraudulently induced the authorities for a favourable order and also provided an option for the Opposite Party 1 to make a fresh application for conversion of land.[Prafulla Kumar Nayak v. Khetramohan Nayak, 2019 SCC OnLine Ori 238<\/b><\/a>, decided on 10-07-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Orissa High Court: Dr A.K. Rath J., quashed the order passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division) and order by Tahsildar due to <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[36631,10141,14201],"class_list":["post-216896","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-forged-evidence","tag-fraud","tag-permanent-injunction"],"yoast_head":"\nOri HC | Lower Court orders quashed due to production of forged evidence and fraudulent practices | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/16\/ori-hc-lower-court-orders-quashed-due-to-production-of-forged-evidence-and-fraudulent-practices\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ori HC | Lower Court orders quashed due to production of forged evidence and fraudulent practices\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Orissa High Court: Dr A.K. Rath J., quashed the order passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division) and order by Tahsildar due to\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/16\/ori-hc-lower-court-orders-quashed-due-to-production-of-forged-evidence-and-fraudulent-practices\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-07-16T09:05:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-07-17T08:49:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/orissa-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/16\/ori-hc-lower-court-orders-quashed-due-to-production-of-forged-evidence-and-fraudulent-practices\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/16\/ori-hc-lower-court-orders-quashed-due-to-production-of-forged-evidence-and-fraudulent-practices\/\",\"name\":\"Ori HC | Lower Court orders quashed due to production of forged evidence and fraudulent practices | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-07-16T09:05:48+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-07-17T08:49:35+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/16\/ori-hc-lower-court-orders-quashed-due-to-production-of-forged-evidence-and-fraudulent-practices\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/16\/ori-hc-lower-court-orders-quashed-due-to-production-of-forged-evidence-and-fraudulent-practices\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/16\/ori-hc-lower-court-orders-quashed-due-to-production-of-forged-evidence-and-fraudulent-practices\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ori HC | Lower Court orders quashed due to production of forged evidence and fraudulent practices\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ori HC | Lower Court orders quashed due to production of forged evidence and fraudulent practices | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/16\/ori-hc-lower-court-orders-quashed-due-to-production-of-forged-evidence-and-fraudulent-practices\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ori HC | Lower Court orders quashed due to production of forged evidence and fraudulent practices","og_description":"Orissa High Court: Dr A.K. Rath J., quashed the order passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division) and order by Tahsildar due to","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/16\/ori-hc-lower-court-orders-quashed-due-to-production-of-forged-evidence-and-fraudulent-practices\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-07-16T09:05:48+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-07-17T08:49:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/orissa-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/16\/ori-hc-lower-court-orders-quashed-due-to-production-of-forged-evidence-and-fraudulent-practices\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/16\/ori-hc-lower-court-orders-quashed-due-to-production-of-forged-evidence-and-fraudulent-practices\/","name":"Ori HC | Lower Court orders quashed due to production of forged evidence and fraudulent practices | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-07-16T09:05:48+00:00","dateModified":"2019-07-17T08:49:35+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/16\/ori-hc-lower-court-orders-quashed-due-to-production-of-forged-evidence-and-fraudulent-practices\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/16\/ori-hc-lower-court-orders-quashed-due-to-production-of-forged-evidence-and-fraudulent-practices\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/16\/ori-hc-lower-court-orders-quashed-due-to-production-of-forged-evidence-and-fraudulent-practices\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ori HC | Lower Court orders quashed due to production of forged evidence and fraudulent practices"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":365880,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/06\/application-for-consolidation-of-suits-under-section-10-cpc-not-maintainable\/","url_meta":{"origin":216896,"position":0},"title":"Application for consolidation of multiple suits is not maintainable under S. 10 CPC: Himachal Pradesh HC","author":"Editor","date":"November 6, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cSection 10 CPC relates to the principle of res subjudice wherein, a subsequent suit filed between the same parties on the same cause must be stayed in the light of the pendency of the earlier suit. It is not concerned with the issue of clubbing or consolidating the cases.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"consolidation of suits under Section 10","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/consolidation-of-suits-under-Section-10.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/consolidation-of-suits-under-Section-10.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/consolidation-of-suits-under-Section-10.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/consolidation-of-suits-under-Section-10.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":255905,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/21\/whether-the-commissioner-director-consolidation-can-entertain-the-petition-at-any-point-of-time\/","url_meta":{"origin":216896,"position":1},"title":"Ori HC | Whether the Commissioner\/Director, Consolidation can entertain the petition at any point of time, where no period of limitation has been prescribed for invoking jurisdiction under S. 37 of the OCH & PFL Act?","author":"Editor","date":"October 21, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court:\u00a0 A Division Bench of S K Mishra and Savitri Ratho, JJ., answered both the questions posed before it elaborately. The present petition was filed to resolve the conflict between the reported cases of Abhaya Charan Mohanty v. State of Orissa; 2003 (Supp.) OLR-882 and Bhagaban Jena and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":317809,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/sc-dismisses-plea-against-allahabad-hc-order-on-consolidation-of-15-suits-regarding-krishna-janmabhoomi-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":216896,"position":2},"title":"Krishna Janmabhoomi | SC dismisses Masjid Committee\u2019s plea against Allahabad HC order on consolidation of 15 suits","author":"Editor","date":"March 19, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Allahabad High Court on 11-01-2024, consolidated fifteen suits regarding the Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah Dispute in the interest of Justice.","rel":"","context":"In "Hot Off The Press"","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Krishna Janmabhoomi","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Krishna-Janmabhoomi.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Krishna-Janmabhoomi.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Krishna-Janmabhoomi.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Krishna-Janmabhoomi.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":337895,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/24\/up-amendment-section-16-hama-adoption-deeds-registration-pre-1977-allahabad-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":216896,"position":3},"title":"UP Amendment to S. 16 of HAMA does not require registration of adoption deeds executed before 1-1-1977: Allahabad HC reaffirms","author":"Editor","date":"December 24, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe U.P. Amendment in Section 16 was made operative w.e.f. 01-01-1977, as such, according to the provisions under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, there shall be presumption that adoption has been made in compliance of the provisions of the Act unless and until it is disproved.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":350862,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/18\/ori-hc-order-39-rule-7-cpc-commissioner-report-not-evidence\/","url_meta":{"origin":216896,"position":4},"title":"[Order 39 Rule 7 CPC] Why Pleader Commissioner\u2019s Report cannot be taken as evidence in civil suit: Orissa HC explains","author":"Editor","date":"June 18, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The opposite parties requested to appoint a Pleader Commissioner under Order 39 Rule 7 CPC to inspect the suit land and report whether it is being used as a school or remained a paddy field, as claimed by the petitioner.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Orissa High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":198244,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/07\/consolidation-of-suits-may-be-directed-under-section-151-cpc-even-in-matters-that-are-not-entirely-similar\/","url_meta":{"origin":216896,"position":5},"title":"Consolidation of suits may be directed under Section 151 CPC even in matters that are not entirely similar","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 7, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Soumen Sen, J. allowed an application filed under Clause 13 of Letters Patent Act, 1865 for transfer of suit from City Civil Court to the High Court. The applicant filed a suit in the High Court under Section 6 of Specific\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216896","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=216896"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216896\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=216896"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=216896"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=216896"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}