{"id":216798,"date":"2019-07-12T18:00:42","date_gmt":"2019-07-12T12:30:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=216798"},"modified":"2019-07-16T15:36:04","modified_gmt":"2019-07-16T10:06:04","slug":"utt-hc-petitioner-declined-police-protection-where-efficacious-and-alternative-remedy-was-available","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/utt-hc-petitioner-declined-police-protection-where-efficacious-and-alternative-remedy-was-available\/","title":{"rendered":"Utt HC | Petitioner declined police protection where efficacious and alternative remedy was available"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Uttaranchal High Court<\/strong>: A Division Bench of Alok Singh and N.S. Dhanik, JJ. dismissed a writ petition filed by the 66-year-old petitioner, who sought mandamus against respondent authority to provide police protection to her as respondents threatened her.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioner contended that her estranged son and daughter-in-law were disowned by the husband of the petitioner from all the movable and immovable properties by way of public notice. She further alleged that she had an apprehension of being killed by the respondents.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Deputy Advocate General for the State argued that the present petition was not maintainable before this Court, in as much as the petitioner had efficacious and alternative remedy; and in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in <em>Sakiri Vasu v. State of U.P.<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/5gcSu48m\">(2008) 2 SCC 409<\/a> and <em>Lata Singh v. State of U.P.<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/14OA9JK9\">(2006) 5 SCC 475<\/a>, the petitioner cannot be granted police protection because she had an efficacious and alternative remedy. It was further contended that the petitioner should have registered an FIR if she apprehended any sort of threat to her life. The counsel submitted that the petitioner may approach the Superintendent of Police under Section 154(3) CrPC by an application in writing; even if that did not give any satisfactory result in the sense that either the FIR was not registered, or that even after registering it no proper investigation was held, it was open to the petitioner to file an application under Section 156 (3) CrPC before the Magistrate concerned. If an application under Section 156(3) CrPC was filed before the Magistrate, the Magistrate would direct the FIR to be registered and also a proper investigation to be made, in a case where, according to the aggrieved person, no proper investigation was made.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court held that, it was not a case where the Senior Superintendent of Police concerned had to be directed to provide necessary protection to the petitioner and the petitioner was not permitted to abandon or bypass that remedy and invoke the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, when she had an efficacious and adequate remedy open to her.[Sahjahan Begum v. State of Uttarakhand, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/h27wx7ZX\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Utt 567<\/b><\/a>, decided on 08-07-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench of Alok Singh and N.S. Dhanik, JJ. dismissed a writ petition filed by the 66-year-old petitioner, <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31975,36592,3043,9601,36591],"class_list":["post-216798","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-alternative-remedy","tag-jurisdiction-of-high-court","tag-Mandamus","tag-police-protection","tag-section-1543-crpc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Utt HC | Petitioner declined police protection where efficacious and alternative remedy was available | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/utt-hc-petitioner-declined-police-protection-where-efficacious-and-alternative-remedy-was-available\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Utt HC | Petitioner declined police protection where efficacious and alternative remedy was available\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench of Alok Singh and N.S. Dhanik, JJ. dismissed a writ petition filed by the 66-year-old petitioner,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/utt-hc-petitioner-declined-police-protection-where-efficacious-and-alternative-remedy-was-available\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-07-12T12:30:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-07-16T10:06:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/uttrakhandHC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/utt-hc-petitioner-declined-police-protection-where-efficacious-and-alternative-remedy-was-available\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/utt-hc-petitioner-declined-police-protection-where-efficacious-and-alternative-remedy-was-available\/\",\"name\":\"Utt HC | Petitioner declined police protection where efficacious and alternative remedy was available | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-07-12T12:30:42+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-07-16T10:06:04+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/utt-hc-petitioner-declined-police-protection-where-efficacious-and-alternative-remedy-was-available\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/utt-hc-petitioner-declined-police-protection-where-efficacious-and-alternative-remedy-was-available\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/utt-hc-petitioner-declined-police-protection-where-efficacious-and-alternative-remedy-was-available\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Utt HC | Petitioner declined police protection where efficacious and alternative remedy was available\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Utt HC | Petitioner declined police protection where efficacious and alternative remedy was available | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/utt-hc-petitioner-declined-police-protection-where-efficacious-and-alternative-remedy-was-available\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Utt HC | Petitioner declined police protection where efficacious and alternative remedy was available","og_description":"Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench of Alok Singh and N.S. Dhanik, JJ. dismissed a writ petition filed by the 66-year-old petitioner,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/utt-hc-petitioner-declined-police-protection-where-efficacious-and-alternative-remedy-was-available\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-07-12T12:30:42+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-07-16T10:06:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/uttrakhandHC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/utt-hc-petitioner-declined-police-protection-where-efficacious-and-alternative-remedy-was-available\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/utt-hc-petitioner-declined-police-protection-where-efficacious-and-alternative-remedy-was-available\/","name":"Utt HC | Petitioner declined police protection where efficacious and alternative remedy was available | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-07-12T12:30:42+00:00","dateModified":"2019-07-16T10:06:04+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/utt-hc-petitioner-declined-police-protection-where-efficacious-and-alternative-remedy-was-available\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/utt-hc-petitioner-declined-police-protection-where-efficacious-and-alternative-remedy-was-available\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/utt-hc-petitioner-declined-police-protection-where-efficacious-and-alternative-remedy-was-available\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Utt HC | Petitioner declined police protection where efficacious and alternative remedy was available"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":261358,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/09\/couples-have-to-make-their-choice-at-the-threshold-between-career-prospects-and-family-life-hp-hc-observes-in-a-case-where-a-mother-seeks-job-transfer-to-be-with-her-daughter\/","url_meta":{"origin":216798,"position":0},"title":"Couples have to make their choice at the threshold between career prospects and family life; HP HC observes in a case where a mother seeks job transfer to be with her daughter","author":"Editor","date":"February 9, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Division Bench of Tarlok Singh Chauhan and Satyen Vaidya, JJ. dismissed the petition being devoid merits. The facts of the case are such that the petitioner was appointed as Staff Nurse at IGMC Shimla, however, prior to joining the respondents Department, marriage of the petitioner\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":241433,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/29\/mp-hc-it-is-true-that-alternative-remedy-is-not-an-absolute-bar-to-a-writ-petition-but-it-is-equally-well-settled-that-if-there-is-an-alternative-remedy-the-high-court-should-not-ordinarily-interfe\/","url_meta":{"origin":216798,"position":1},"title":"MP HC | It is true that alternative remedy is not an absolute bar to a writ petition, but it is equally well settled that if there is an alternative remedy HC should not ordinarily interfere","author":"Editor","date":"December 29, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: S.A. Dharmadhikari, J., dismissed the instant petition filed under Articles 226 and 227. The facts of the case follow as, the respondent, who was a person of criminal antecedents, had come with his relatives armed with Pharsas and Guns to the petitioner and threatened to eliminate\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":256075,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/26\/exercise-of-writ-jurisdiction-by-the-high-court-when-an-efficacious-alternative-remedy-is-available\/","url_meta":{"origin":216798,"position":2},"title":"Sikk HC | Exercise of Writ Jurisdiction by the High Court when an efficacious, alternative remedy is available: a self imposed limitation","author":"Editor","date":"October 26, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Sikkim High Court: Meenakshi Madan Rai, J., decided on a petition wherein the petitioner body established under the Sikkim Municipalities Act, 2007, claimed that the provisions of the Employees\u201f Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, (\u201cEPF & MP Act, 1952\u201d) was not applicable in the State of Sikkim as\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":219336,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/10\/mp-hc-writ-of-mandamus-under-art-226-cannot-be-issued-for-compelling-police-to-perform-a-statutory-duty-under-s-154-crpc-without-availing-all-the-other-alternative-remedies-as-prescribed-in-crimin\/","url_meta":{"origin":216798,"position":3},"title":"MP HC | Writ of mandamus cannot be issued for compelling police to perform a statutory duty under S. 154 CrPC without availing all other alternative remedies prescribed in CrPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 10, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: G.S. Ahluwalia, J., dismissed a petition filed under Article 226 Constitution of India to direct the respondents to register an FIR on the basis of the complaint made by her. The main question before the High Court to decide was \u2018whether a writ petition under Article\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":223803,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/03\/ker-hc-petition-for-non-compliance-of-the-earlier-judgment-dismissed-petitioner-directed-to-seek-remedy-under-contempt-of-courts-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":216798,"position":4},"title":"Ker HC | Petition for non-compliance of earlier judgment dismissed; petitioner directed to seek remedy under Contempt of Courts Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 3, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: C.S. Dias, J. dismissed a writ petition filed by the petitioner on the basis that once any judgment is in force, a new petition cannot be filed for the same cause of action. The petitioner had filed another petition before the instant petition, where the Court rendered\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":206198,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/04\/sinister-act-of-wife-seeking-remedy-through-pil-to-foster-personal-vendetta-against-husband-not-in-public-interest-petition-declined-karnataka-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":216798,"position":5},"title":"Sinister act of wife seeking remedy through PIL to foster personal vendetta against husband not in public interest: Karnataka HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 4, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Dinesh Maheshwari, CJ and S. Sujatha, JJ. dismissed a PIL and condemned the act of petitioner wife who had filed the said petition for her personal interests in the garb of public interest. The instant petition was filed praying for a writ\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216798","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=216798"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216798\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=216798"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=216798"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=216798"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}