{"id":216796,"date":"2019-07-12T17:00:32","date_gmt":"2019-07-12T11:30:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=216796"},"modified":"2019-07-16T15:37:40","modified_gmt":"2019-07-16T10:07:40","slug":"mp-hc-high-courts-power-of-superintendence-under-art-227-not-curtailed-by-any-statute-as-it-is-a-part-of-the-basic-structure","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/mp-hc-high-courts-power-of-superintendence-under-art-227-not-curtailed-by-any-statute-as-it-is-a-part-of-the-basic-structure\/","title":{"rendered":"MP HC | High Court&#8217;s power of superintendence under Art. 227 not curtailed by any statute as it is a part of the basic structure"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Madhya Pradesh High Court<\/strong>: A miscellaneous petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India was allowed by Sanjay Dwivedi, J., where the petitioner challenged the order passed by Additional Commissioner under revenue proceedings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the instant petition, the respondent raised an objection that the petition was not maintainable under Article 227. The counsel for the respondent, D.K. Tripathi and Devika Singh, submitted that Commissioner of Revenue was not under superintendence power of the High Court and accordingly the petitioners cannot avail the superintendence jurisdiction of the High Court by filing a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. On the contrary, the petitioner submitted that in all the quasi-judicial proceedings, the High Court can entertain petition under Article 227.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The counsel for the petitioner, Sumanta Bhattacharya, relied upon <em>Manmohan Singh Jaitla v. Commissioner, <\/em>1984 (Supp) SCC 540, in which the Supreme Court had observed that \u201c<em>The High Court clearly overlooked the point that Deputy Commissioner and Commissioner are statutory authorities operating under the 1969 Act. They are quasi-judicial authorities and that was not disputed. Therefore, they will be comprehended in the expression \u2018Tribunal\u2019 as under in Article 227 of the Constitution which confers power of superintendence over all courts and tribunals by the High Court throughout the territory in relation to which it exercises jurisdiction<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court for the particular issue relied on the abovementioned judgment and observed that Commissioner under the present circumstances was considered to be a quasi-judicial authority as he was functioning as a statutory authority prescribed under M.P. Land Revenue Code, 1959; hence the petition was maintainable under Article 227.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Another issue disputed was related to a property which was purchased by the petitioner and on the basis of the said sale deed they moved an application for mutation of their names which was allowed in the year 2004 and accordingly, the revenue records were corrected entering the name of the petitioners in respect of the land in question. It was alleged that subsequently in 2011 an appeal was filed by the said respondents challenging the mutation on the ground that the property sold to the petitioners by respondent was a joint family property and the respondent was one of the co-sharers in the same and he had sold the land in excess of his share and no notice before the mutation had been issued by the revenue authorities to them and as such, that mutation which was executed in favor of the petitioners got set aside. Against the said order the petitioner had filed an appeal before Sub-Divisional Officer and subsequently before Additional Commissioner and both the appeals were rejected against the petitioner. Hence the petitioner had filed the petition under Article 227.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The respondent argued that petitioners failed to establish any grounds and to substantiate as to how the order passed by the Additional Commissioner was contrary to law, they were not entitled to get any relief in the petition preferred under Article 227. In <em>Shyam Shetty v. Rajendra Patil<\/em>, 2101 (4) MPLJ 590, the Supreme Court had laid down the parameters that when High Court can interfere under Article 227, it was held that \u201c<strong><em>the High Court in exercise of its jurisdiction of superintendence can interfere in order only to keep the tribunals and Courts subordinate to it, `within the bounds of their authority\u2019<\/em> or <em>High Court can interfere in exercise of its power of superintendence when there has been a patent perversity in the orders of tribunals and Courts subordinate to it or where there has been a gross and manifest failure of justice or the basic principles of natural justice have been flouted<\/em><\/strong><em>.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was further observed that the Supreme Court stated that \u201c<em>it may be true that a statutory amendment of a rather cognate provision, like Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code by the Civil Procedure Code (Amendment) Act, 1999 does not and cannot cut down the ambit of High Court&#8217;s power under Article 227. At the same time, it must be remembered that such statutory amendment does not correspondingly expand the High Court&#8217;s jurisdiction of superintendence under Article 227<\/em>.\u201d The reserved and exceptional power of judicial intervention was not to be exercised just for grant of relief in individual cases but was directed for promotion of public confidence in the administration of justice in the larger public interest whereas Article 226 was meant for protection of individual grievance. Therefore, the power under Article 227 may be unfettered but its exercise is subject to a high degree of judicial discipline.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court opined that it was admitted position that one of respondent executed sale deed in favor of petitioners in the year 2001 but Court was not satisfied that despite taking note of such material facts, the Sub-Divisional Officer had not given any reason as to how the mutation which took place on the basis of sale deed can be said to be illegal. The Court further observed that thereafter, the Additional Commissioner had reiterated the findings given by the Sub-Divisional Officer and rejected the appeal. None of the revenue authorities in the orders passed by them have considered the impact of the sale deed executed by the respondent in favor of the petitioners. It was noteworthy to mention that the sale deed was a valid document and was the foundation for mutating the name of the holder of the sale deed. If the document of sale is available then the revenue authorities had no option but to mutate the name of the holder of the sale deed in the revenue records and as such, mutation done in favor of the petitioners cannot be set aside unless the sale deed executed in their favor was set aside by any competent court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court thus opined that all the revenue authorities committed gross and material illegality while setting aside the mutation made in favor of the petitioners which was made, based on the sale deed. It was discussed by the Court that as far as power under Article 227 of the High Court to interfere while exercising its superintendence was concerned, it was observed that from perusal of the documents and orders passed by the revenue authorities and the discussion made that was a fit case in which Court can exercise power under Article 227 for the reasons that the order impugned was apparently illegal and suffered from errors of law and fact and was a clear example of patent perversity. Thus, the petition was allowed.[Keshri Nandan v. Pradeep Kumar, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/XVotG1yl\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine MP 1521<\/b><\/a>, decided on 03-07-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madhya Pradesh High Court: A miscellaneous petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India was allowed by Sanjay Dwivedi, J., <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":172684,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[33933,36590,36589,36588,30459],"class_list":["post-216796","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-article-227-of-constitution-of-india","tag-errors-of-law","tag-power-of-superitendence","tag-revenue-proceedings","tag-sale-deed"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>MP HC | High Court&#039;s power of superintendence under Art. 227 not curtailed by any statute as it is a part of the basic structure | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/mp-hc-high-courts-power-of-superintendence-under-art-227-not-curtailed-by-any-statute-as-it-is-a-part-of-the-basic-structure\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"MP HC | High Court&#039;s power of superintendence under Art. 227 not curtailed by any statute as it is a part of the basic structure\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court: A miscellaneous petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India was allowed by Sanjay Dwivedi, J.,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/mp-hc-high-courts-power-of-superintendence-under-art-227-not-curtailed-by-any-statute-as-it-is-a-part-of-the-basic-structure\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-07-12T11:30:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-07-16T10:07:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/07\\\/12\\\/mp-hc-high-courts-power-of-superintendence-under-art-227-not-curtailed-by-any-statute-as-it-is-a-part-of-the-basic-structure\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/07\\\/12\\\/mp-hc-high-courts-power-of-superintendence-under-art-227-not-curtailed-by-any-statute-as-it-is-a-part-of-the-basic-structure\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"headline\":\"MP HC | High Court&#8217;s power of superintendence under Art. 227 not curtailed by any statute as it is a part of the basic structure\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-07-12T11:30:32+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-07-16T10:07:40+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/07\\\/12\\\/mp-hc-high-courts-power-of-superintendence-under-art-227-not-curtailed-by-any-statute-as-it-is-a-part-of-the-basic-structure\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1093,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/07\\\/12\\\/mp-hc-high-courts-power-of-superintendence-under-art-227-not-curtailed-by-any-statute-as-it-is-a-part-of-the-basic-structure\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/12\\\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Article 227 of Constitution of India\",\"Errors of Law\",\"Power of Superitendence\",\"Revenue Proceedings\",\"sale deed\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/07\\\/12\\\/mp-hc-high-courts-power-of-superintendence-under-art-227-not-curtailed-by-any-statute-as-it-is-a-part-of-the-basic-structure\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/07\\\/12\\\/mp-hc-high-courts-power-of-superintendence-under-art-227-not-curtailed-by-any-statute-as-it-is-a-part-of-the-basic-structure\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/07\\\/12\\\/mp-hc-high-courts-power-of-superintendence-under-art-227-not-curtailed-by-any-statute-as-it-is-a-part-of-the-basic-structure\\\/\",\"name\":\"MP HC | High Court's power of superintendence under Art. 227 not curtailed by any statute as it is a part of the basic structure | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/07\\\/12\\\/mp-hc-high-courts-power-of-superintendence-under-art-227-not-curtailed-by-any-statute-as-it-is-a-part-of-the-basic-structure\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/07\\\/12\\\/mp-hc-high-courts-power-of-superintendence-under-art-227-not-curtailed-by-any-statute-as-it-is-a-part-of-the-basic-structure\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/12\\\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-07-12T11:30:32+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-07-16T10:07:40+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/07\\\/12\\\/mp-hc-high-courts-power-of-superintendence-under-art-227-not-curtailed-by-any-statute-as-it-is-a-part-of-the-basic-structure\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/07\\\/12\\\/mp-hc-high-courts-power-of-superintendence-under-art-227-not-curtailed-by-any-statute-as-it-is-a-part-of-the-basic-structure\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/07\\\/12\\\/mp-hc-high-courts-power-of-superintendence-under-art-227-not-curtailed-by-any-statute-as-it-is-a-part-of-the-basic-structure\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/12\\\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/12\\\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/07\\\/12\\\/mp-hc-high-courts-power-of-superintendence-under-art-227-not-curtailed-by-any-statute-as-it-is-a-part-of-the-basic-structure\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"MP HC | High Court&#8217;s power of superintendence under Art. 227 not curtailed by any statute as it is a part of the basic structure\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MP HC | High Court's power of superintendence under Art. 227 not curtailed by any statute as it is a part of the basic structure | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/mp-hc-high-courts-power-of-superintendence-under-art-227-not-curtailed-by-any-statute-as-it-is-a-part-of-the-basic-structure\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"MP HC | High Court's power of superintendence under Art. 227 not curtailed by any statute as it is a part of the basic structure","og_description":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: A miscellaneous petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India was allowed by Sanjay Dwivedi, J.,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/mp-hc-high-courts-power-of-superintendence-under-art-227-not-curtailed-by-any-statute-as-it-is-a-part-of-the-basic-structure\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-07-12T11:30:32+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-07-16T10:07:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/mp-hc-high-courts-power-of-superintendence-under-art-227-not-curtailed-by-any-statute-as-it-is-a-part-of-the-basic-structure\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/mp-hc-high-courts-power-of-superintendence-under-art-227-not-curtailed-by-any-statute-as-it-is-a-part-of-the-basic-structure\/"},"author":{"name":"Bhumika Indulia","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"headline":"MP HC | High Court&#8217;s power of superintendence under Art. 227 not curtailed by any statute as it is a part of the basic structure","datePublished":"2019-07-12T11:30:32+00:00","dateModified":"2019-07-16T10:07:40+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/mp-hc-high-courts-power-of-superintendence-under-art-227-not-curtailed-by-any-statute-as-it-is-a-part-of-the-basic-structure\/"},"wordCount":1093,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/mp-hc-high-courts-power-of-superintendence-under-art-227-not-curtailed-by-any-statute-as-it-is-a-part-of-the-basic-structure\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg","keywords":["Article 227 of Constitution of India","Errors of Law","Power of Superitendence","Revenue Proceedings","sale deed"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/mp-hc-high-courts-power-of-superintendence-under-art-227-not-curtailed-by-any-statute-as-it-is-a-part-of-the-basic-structure\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/mp-hc-high-courts-power-of-superintendence-under-art-227-not-curtailed-by-any-statute-as-it-is-a-part-of-the-basic-structure\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/mp-hc-high-courts-power-of-superintendence-under-art-227-not-curtailed-by-any-statute-as-it-is-a-part-of-the-basic-structure\/","name":"MP HC | High Court's power of superintendence under Art. 227 not curtailed by any statute as it is a part of the basic structure | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/mp-hc-high-courts-power-of-superintendence-under-art-227-not-curtailed-by-any-statute-as-it-is-a-part-of-the-basic-structure\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/mp-hc-high-courts-power-of-superintendence-under-art-227-not-curtailed-by-any-statute-as-it-is-a-part-of-the-basic-structure\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg","datePublished":"2019-07-12T11:30:32+00:00","dateModified":"2019-07-16T10:07:40+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/mp-hc-high-courts-power-of-superintendence-under-art-227-not-curtailed-by-any-statute-as-it-is-a-part-of-the-basic-structure\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/mp-hc-high-courts-power-of-superintendence-under-art-227-not-curtailed-by-any-statute-as-it-is-a-part-of-the-basic-structure\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/mp-hc-high-courts-power-of-superintendence-under-art-227-not-curtailed-by-any-statute-as-it-is-a-part-of-the-basic-structure\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/mp-hc-high-courts-power-of-superintendence-under-art-227-not-curtailed-by-any-statute-as-it-is-a-part-of-the-basic-structure\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"MP HC | High Court&#8217;s power of superintendence under Art. 227 not curtailed by any statute as it is a part of the basic structure"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":34731,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/04\/division-bench-of-hc-has-no-power-of-superintendence-under-article-227-over-its-own-single-bench\/","url_meta":{"origin":216796,"position":0},"title":"Division Bench of High Court has no power of superintendence under Article 227 over its own Single Bench","author":"Sucheta","date":"February 4, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court:\u00a0 Deciding the moot question as to whether a Division Bench of a High Court can exercise its power of superintendence under Article 227 of the Constitution\u00a0 against an order made in a suit by a Single Bench, the Court held that a Single Judge or a Single\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":249740,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/14\/domestic-violence-act-3\/","url_meta":{"origin":216796,"position":1},"title":"Proceedings under Domestic Violence Act, whether criminal or civil, will challenge to them be maintainable under Art. 227 of Constitution? Madras HC answers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 14, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: G.R. Swaminathan, J., held that irrespective of whether the proceedings under Central Act 43 of 2005 are of civil or criminal nature, the power under Article 227 of the Constitution would always lie to quash the proceedings if a case is really made out. Instant petition was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":248681,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/25\/domestic-violence-act-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":216796,"position":2},"title":"Madras HC | Can Criminal Proceedings instituted under DV Act be converted as Civil Proceedings, so as to transfer such proceedings before Civil Court or Family Court while exercising supervisory powers under Art. 227 of Constitution? Read on","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 25, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: S.M. Subramaniam, J., held that Protraction and prolongation of litigations affecting women can never be encouraged by the Courts. Husband and wife used to live in Singapore and when a misunderstanding arose between the two, the husband stated that the respondent\/wife deserted him in the year 2018.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":239567,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/24\/j-petition-dismissed-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":216796,"position":3},"title":"J&#038;K HC | Supervisory jurisdiction is to be exercised sparingly only in appropriate cases for purposes of keeping Subordinate courts and Tribunals within bounds of their authorities; Petition dismissed  \u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"November 24, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Javed Iqbal Wani J., while dismissing the present petition, discusses the ambit and scope of Article 227 of the Constitution and the statutory restriction of filing written statement within a stipulated period as mentioned under Order VIII Rule 1, Code of Civil Procedure. Background In\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":343167,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/07\/letters-patent-appeal-will-not-lie-against-judgment-passed-by-single-judge-in-appellate-jurisdiction-dhc\/","url_meta":{"origin":216796,"position":4},"title":"Letters Patent Appeal will not lie against judgment passed by Single Judge in appellate jurisdiction or against order by Court subject to superintendence of this Court: Delhi HC","author":"Arushi","date":"March 7, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The jurisdiction available to this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution is primarily in the nature of superintendence and accordingly the Letters Patent Appeal will not lie in the instant matter.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":212082,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/jha-hc-court-abstains-from-interfering-on-finding-no-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-under-the-garb-of-article-227\/","url_meta":{"origin":216796,"position":5},"title":"Jha HC | Court abstains from interfering on finding no error apparent on the face of record under the garb of Article 227","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 15, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: The Bench of Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. disposed of a petition seeking to make amendment in the plaint as stipulated under schedule to the petition. To state the facts briefly the petitioner had filed for declaration of right and title over the suit property in which the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216796","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=216796"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216796\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/172684"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=216796"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=216796"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=216796"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}