{"id":216746,"date":"2019-07-11T17:00:16","date_gmt":"2019-07-11T11:30:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=216746"},"modified":"2019-07-12T17:13:35","modified_gmt":"2019-07-12T11:43:35","slug":"kar-hc-court-enunciates-guidelines-for-disqualification-of-directors-demarcates-boundaries-crossing-which-it-would-be-rendered-bad-in-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/11\/kar-hc-court-enunciates-guidelines-for-disqualification-of-directors-demarcates-boundaries-crossing-which-it-would-be-rendered-bad-in-law\/","title":{"rendered":"Kar HC | Court enunciates guidelines for disqualification of directors; demarcates boundaries, crossing which, it would be rendered bad in law"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Karnataka High Court:<\/strong>\u00a0B.V. Nagarathna, J., disposed of the petitions seeking the provisions of Sections 164(2) and 167(1)(a) and the proviso to Section 167(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013, to be held unconstitutional.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the pertinent matter, the petitioner sought for declaring Section 164(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 (Act) and the press release dated 06-06-2017 vide Annexure-A as unconstitutional and in violation of the fundamental rights of the petitioner as guaranteed under the provisions of Part III of the Constitution. The petitioners further contended that there was an arbitrary exercise of power by the concerned respondent authority in disqualifying the petitioners as directors of the respective companies by giving retrospective operation to the aforesaid provisions of the Act. That the disqualification is not on account of any act\/omission of the director per se<em>, <\/em>but due to the default committed by the company in which he is a director. Also, the consequence of the default so made was serious, almost penal and disproportionate to the same; therefore, it is in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The respondents vehemently contended that the object of the provision is to keep away directors of defaulting companies from being reappointed as directors in the same company or other companies. It was further contended that if the said object and purpose is not given its complete effect and meaning, then it would be unviable. Moreover, holding the post of a director of a company is not pursuant to any fundamental right since it is a statutory right or one arising under the Memorandum of Association or Articles of Association of the company and thus contractual. Lastly, Section 164(2) of the Act is a reasonable restriction imposed in public interest vide Article 19(6) of the Constitution.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court while appreciating the assistance rendered by the respective counsels, was of the opinion that:<\/p>\n<ol style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li>Where the disqualification considering any financial year \u201cprior to 01-04-2014 as well as subsequent thereto\u201d while reckoning continuous period of three financial years under Section 164 (2)(a) of the Act, is made irrespective of whether the petitioners are directors of public companies or private companies, is bad in law.<\/li>\n<li>Writ petition would stand dismissed if the disqualification of the directors has occurred under the provisions of the 1956 Act in respect of the public companies.<\/li>\n<li>Directors would stand disqualified if the disqualification was on the basis of three continuous financial years subsequent to 01-04-2014, irrespective of whether the petitioners are directors of public companies or private companies among other things.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court further directed the respondents to restore the DIN of those directors whose disqualification has been quashed by the Court. And those petitioners who have challenged only the striking off of the companies in which they are directors have an alternative remedy of filing a proceeding before National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) under Section 252 of the Companies Act, 2013.[Yashodhara Shroff v. Union of India, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Zx5y4wn1\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Kar 682<\/b><\/a>, decided on 12-06-2017]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court:\u00a0B.V. Nagarathna, J., disposed of the petitions seeking the provisions of Sections 164(2) and 167(1)(a) and the proviso to Section <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[36568,31652,36311,35681,36567],"class_list":["post-216746","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-arbitrary-power","tag-articles-of-association","tag-disqualification-of-directors","tag-memorandum-of-association","tag-section-1642-of-companies-act-2013"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Kar HC | Court enunciates guidelines for disqualification of directors; demarcates boundaries, crossing which, it would be rendered bad in law | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/11\/kar-hc-court-enunciates-guidelines-for-disqualification-of-directors-demarcates-boundaries-crossing-which-it-would-be-rendered-bad-in-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kar HC | Court enunciates guidelines for disqualification of directors; demarcates boundaries, crossing which, it would be rendered bad in law\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Karnataka High Court:\u00a0B.V. Nagarathna, J., disposed of the petitions seeking the provisions of Sections 164(2) and 167(1)(a) and the proviso to Section\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/11\/kar-hc-court-enunciates-guidelines-for-disqualification-of-directors-demarcates-boundaries-crossing-which-it-would-be-rendered-bad-in-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-07-11T11:30:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-07-12T11:43:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/11\/kar-hc-court-enunciates-guidelines-for-disqualification-of-directors-demarcates-boundaries-crossing-which-it-would-be-rendered-bad-in-law\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/11\/kar-hc-court-enunciates-guidelines-for-disqualification-of-directors-demarcates-boundaries-crossing-which-it-would-be-rendered-bad-in-law\/\",\"name\":\"Kar HC | Court enunciates guidelines for disqualification of directors; demarcates boundaries, crossing which, it would be rendered bad in law | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-07-11T11:30:16+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-07-12T11:43:35+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/11\/kar-hc-court-enunciates-guidelines-for-disqualification-of-directors-demarcates-boundaries-crossing-which-it-would-be-rendered-bad-in-law\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/11\/kar-hc-court-enunciates-guidelines-for-disqualification-of-directors-demarcates-boundaries-crossing-which-it-would-be-rendered-bad-in-law\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/11\/kar-hc-court-enunciates-guidelines-for-disqualification-of-directors-demarcates-boundaries-crossing-which-it-would-be-rendered-bad-in-law\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kar HC | Court enunciates guidelines for disqualification of directors; demarcates boundaries, crossing which, it would be rendered bad in law\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kar HC | Court enunciates guidelines for disqualification of directors; demarcates boundaries, crossing which, it would be rendered bad in law | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/11\/kar-hc-court-enunciates-guidelines-for-disqualification-of-directors-demarcates-boundaries-crossing-which-it-would-be-rendered-bad-in-law\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kar HC | Court enunciates guidelines for disqualification of directors; demarcates boundaries, crossing which, it would be rendered bad in law","og_description":"Karnataka High Court:\u00a0B.V. Nagarathna, J., disposed of the petitions seeking the provisions of Sections 164(2) and 167(1)(a) and the proviso to Section","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/11\/kar-hc-court-enunciates-guidelines-for-disqualification-of-directors-demarcates-boundaries-crossing-which-it-would-be-rendered-bad-in-law\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-07-11T11:30:16+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-07-12T11:43:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/11\/kar-hc-court-enunciates-guidelines-for-disqualification-of-directors-demarcates-boundaries-crossing-which-it-would-be-rendered-bad-in-law\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/11\/kar-hc-court-enunciates-guidelines-for-disqualification-of-directors-demarcates-boundaries-crossing-which-it-would-be-rendered-bad-in-law\/","name":"Kar HC | Court enunciates guidelines for disqualification of directors; demarcates boundaries, crossing which, it would be rendered bad in law | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-07-11T11:30:16+00:00","dateModified":"2019-07-12T11:43:35+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/11\/kar-hc-court-enunciates-guidelines-for-disqualification-of-directors-demarcates-boundaries-crossing-which-it-would-be-rendered-bad-in-law\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/11\/kar-hc-court-enunciates-guidelines-for-disqualification-of-directors-demarcates-boundaries-crossing-which-it-would-be-rendered-bad-in-law\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/11\/kar-hc-court-enunciates-guidelines-for-disqualification-of-directors-demarcates-boundaries-crossing-which-it-would-be-rendered-bad-in-law\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kar HC | Court enunciates guidelines for disqualification of directors; demarcates boundaries, crossing which, it would be rendered bad in law"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":221924,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/08\/del-hc-scheme-of-ss-1642-and-1671a-of-companies-act-explained-in-respect-to-disqualification-of-directors-on-default-of-filing-returns\/","url_meta":{"origin":216746,"position":0},"title":"Del HC | Scheme of Ss. 164(2) and 167(1)(a) of Companies Act explained in respect to disqualification of directors on default of filing returns","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 8, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Vibhu Bakhru, J. while addressing the petitions filed in respect to the impugned list of directors stated to have been disqualified under clause (a) of Section 164(2) of the Companies Act, 2013, explained with reasons and logic, the scheme of Section 164(2) and Section 167(1)(a) of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":216221,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/28\/bom-hc-disqualification-of-directors-batch-of-petitions-to-be-heard-in-reference-to-s-164-2a-of-companies-act-2013\/","url_meta":{"origin":216746,"position":1},"title":"Bom HC | Disqualification of Directors: Batch of petitions to be heard in reference to S. 164 (2)(a) of Companies Act, 2013","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 28, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0The Division Bench comprising of S.C. Dharmadhikari and G.S. Patel, JJ. has tagged a batch of petitions to be heard in regard to disqualification of directors due to failure in filing of returns. Anil Singh, learned Additional Solicitor General has agreed to address the Court in these matters\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":221958,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/11\/mca-update-on-identification-and-flagging-of-disqualified-directors-under-s-1642a-of-companies-act-2013\/","url_meta":{"origin":216746,"position":2},"title":"MCA | Update on  &#8216;Identification and flagging of Disqualified Directors under S. 164(2)(a) of Companies Act, 2013","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 11, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Registrar of Companies (ROCs) are in the process of\u00a0\"Identification and flagging of Disqualified Directors under S. 164(2)(a) of Companies Act, 2013\"\u00a0for their default of non-filing of financial statement or annual return for a continuous period of three financial years i.e. 2015-16, 2016-17 and 2017-18. In the above regard, all the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Business News&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Business News","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/business_news\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/MCA.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/MCA.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/MCA.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/MCA.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/MCA.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":196387,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/24\/calcutta-hc-passes-interim-order-allowing-disqualified-directors-to-continue-despite-disqualification-under-s-1642-of-companies-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":216746,"position":3},"title":"Calcutta HC passes interim order allowing disqualified directors to continue despite disqualification under Section 164(2) of Companies Act","author":"Saba","date":"May 24, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court:\u00a0 The Court recently passed an interim order where it allowed certain people who were directors in multiple companies to continue in their posts despite the disqualification laid down in Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 (\u201cAct\u201d). This interim relief was only with respect to those companies\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":194306,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/22\/companies-amendment-act-2017-new-grounds-for-directors-disqualification-and-opportunities-for-correction-under-cods-2018\/","url_meta":{"origin":216746,"position":4},"title":"Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017: New grounds for Directors\u2019 disqualification and opportunities for correction under CODS, 2018","author":"Saba","date":"March 22, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"The last 15 months have been quite revolutionary in terms of an attempt to make India a transparent and global business hub as far as corporate governance is concerned. The Government has struck off more than 2,00,000 defunct companies and disqualified 3,00,000 individuals who were holding directorships in such companies.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;OP. ED.&quot;","block_context":{"text":"OP. ED.","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/Corp-Comm-Legal-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/Corp-Comm-Legal-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/Corp-Comm-Legal-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/Corp-Comm-Legal-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/Corp-Comm-Legal-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":194511,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/29\/delhi-hc-scope-and-object-of-ss-164-and-248-of-the-companies-act-2013-to-be-analysed\/","url_meta":{"origin":216746,"position":5},"title":"Delhi HC: Scope and object of Ss. 164 and 248 of the Companies Act, 2013 to be analysed","author":"Saba","date":"March 29, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Gita Mittal, Actg, CJ and C. Hari Shankar, J., adjudicated upon and listed matters relating to the Companies Act, 2013 for further hearing on 24.07.2018. The writ petitions adjudicated upon jointly were filed against notices dated 06.09.2017 and 12.09.2017 issued under Section\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216746","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=216746"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216746\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=216746"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=216746"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=216746"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}