{"id":216687,"date":"2019-07-10T16:30:16","date_gmt":"2019-07-10T11:00:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=216687"},"modified":"2019-07-11T16:50:53","modified_gmt":"2019-07-11T11:20:53","slug":"all-hc-order-upheld-on-application-of-test-of-due-diligence-for-an-application-under-or-6-r-17-cpc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/10\/all-hc-order-upheld-on-application-of-test-of-due-diligence-for-an-application-under-or-6-r-17-cpc\/","title":{"rendered":"All HC | Order upheld on application of test of due diligence for an application under Or. 6 R. 17 CPC"},"content":{"rendered":"

Allahabad High Court: <\/strong>Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, J. dismissed the revision petition on the ground that the revisionist was not able to show material error or irregularity in the order passed by the courts.<\/p>\n

A revision petition was filed against the order of Additional District Judge where the amendment sought by the revisionist-defendant in the written statement was rejected.<\/p>\n

Sanjay Maurya and Deepak Kumar Jaiswal, counsels for the revisionist submitted that under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 the court may at any stage of proceeding allow the amendment of the pleading which was rejected by the trial court without recording any finding to arrive at the conclusion that in spite of due diligence the defendant could not have sought the amendment before the commencement of the trial.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the respondent submitted that in this case after framing of issues dates were fixed for evidence of the parties and amendment was sought by the defendant tenant only as a dilatory tactic so as to delay the proceedings.<\/p>\n

The lower court while rejecting the amendment application had referred to the proviso in Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC in terms of which no application for amendment was to be allowed after the trial had commenced unless the court comes to the conclusion that in spite of the due diligence<\/em> the parties could not have raised the matter before the commencement of trial. The reason assigned by the defendant-tenant in his application to support his prayer for the amendment was the engagement of a new counsel which was held by the court below to be insufficient. Reliance was placed upon the case of Revajeetu Builders and Developers v. Narayanaswami and Sons. <\/em><\/p>\n

The Court discussed the \u201cdue diligence\u201d which was added by the Amendment Act, 2002 and opined that \u201c<\/em><\/strong>t<\/em>he term “due diligence” has been specifically used so as to provide a test for determining whether to exercise the discretion in situations where amendment is being sought after the commencement of the trial.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

The Court held that \u201ccourt below has come to the conclusion that the amendment which was being sought was not imperative for determining the real question in controversy between the parties, and also that the same was barred by the proviso to Order 6 Rule 17 CPC which curtails the discretion to allow amendment of pleadings after the trial has commenced, and introduces the \u201cdue diligence\u201d test in terms whereof the burden is on the person seeking the amendment after commencement of trial to show that in spite of \u201cdue diligence\u201d such an amendment could not have been sought earlier, and as such the order passed by the trial court cannot be faulted with\u201d.<\/em> Another judgment which was noted by the court was that of Mundri Lal v. Sushila Rani, <\/em>(2007) 8 SCC 609<\/a> in which it was held that \u201cThere are very limited<\/em> grounds on which there can be interference in exercise of<\/em> jurisdiction under Section 25 of Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887; they are, when (i) findings are perverse or (ii) based on no material or (iii) findings have been arrived at upon taking into consideration the inadmissible evidence or (iv) findings have been arrived at without<\/em> consideration of relevant evidence.\u201d <\/em><\/p>\n

The Court thus held that the revisionist was not able to point out the material error or irregularity in the order passed by the courts below so as to warrant the interference in exercise of revisional jurisdiction under Section 25 of the Provisional Small Cause Court Act, 1887.\u00a0 Thus, the revision petition was dismissed.[Hari Narayana v. Shanti Devi, 2019 SCC OnLine All 2380<\/b><\/a>, decided on 28-05-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Allahabad High Court: Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, J. dismissed the revision petition on the ground that the revisionist was not able to show <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3717,36543,36542],"class_list":["post-216687","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-due_diligence","tag-material-error","tag-order-6-rule-17-of-code-of-civil-procedure"],"yoast_head":"\nAll HC | Order upheld on application of test of due diligence for an application under Or. 6 R. 17 CPC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/10\/all-hc-order-upheld-on-application-of-test-of-due-diligence-for-an-application-under-or-6-r-17-cpc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"All HC | Order upheld on application of test of due diligence for an application under Or. 6 R. 17 CPC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad High Court: Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, J. dismissed the revision petition on the ground that the revisionist was not able to show\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/10\/all-hc-order-upheld-on-application-of-test-of-due-diligence-for-an-application-under-or-6-r-17-cpc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-07-10T11:00:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-07-11T11:20:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/10\/all-hc-order-upheld-on-application-of-test-of-due-diligence-for-an-application-under-or-6-r-17-cpc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/10\/all-hc-order-upheld-on-application-of-test-of-due-diligence-for-an-application-under-or-6-r-17-cpc\/\",\"name\":\"All HC | Order upheld on application of test of due diligence for an application under Or. 6 R. 17 CPC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-07-10T11:00:16+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-07-11T11:20:53+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/10\/all-hc-order-upheld-on-application-of-test-of-due-diligence-for-an-application-under-or-6-r-17-cpc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/10\/all-hc-order-upheld-on-application-of-test-of-due-diligence-for-an-application-under-or-6-r-17-cpc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/10\/all-hc-order-upheld-on-application-of-test-of-due-diligence-for-an-application-under-or-6-r-17-cpc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"All HC | Order upheld on application of test of due diligence for an application under Or. 6 R. 17 CPC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"All HC | Order upheld on application of test of due diligence for an application under Or. 6 R. 17 CPC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/10\/all-hc-order-upheld-on-application-of-test-of-due-diligence-for-an-application-under-or-6-r-17-cpc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"All HC | Order upheld on application of test of due diligence for an application under Or. 6 R. 17 CPC","og_description":"Allahabad High Court: Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, J. dismissed the revision petition on the ground that the revisionist was not able to show","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/10\/all-hc-order-upheld-on-application-of-test-of-due-diligence-for-an-application-under-or-6-r-17-cpc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-07-10T11:00:16+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-07-11T11:20:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/10\/all-hc-order-upheld-on-application-of-test-of-due-diligence-for-an-application-under-or-6-r-17-cpc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/10\/all-hc-order-upheld-on-application-of-test-of-due-diligence-for-an-application-under-or-6-r-17-cpc\/","name":"All HC | Order upheld on application of test of due diligence for an application under Or. 6 R. 17 CPC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-07-10T11:00:16+00:00","dateModified":"2019-07-11T11:20:53+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/10\/all-hc-order-upheld-on-application-of-test-of-due-diligence-for-an-application-under-or-6-r-17-cpc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/10\/all-hc-order-upheld-on-application-of-test-of-due-diligence-for-an-application-under-or-6-r-17-cpc\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/10\/all-hc-order-upheld-on-application-of-test-of-due-diligence-for-an-application-under-or-6-r-17-cpc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"All HC | Order upheld on application of test of due diligence for an application under Or. 6 R. 17 CPC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":320027,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/15\/sikkim-hc-rejection-application-mediation-compromise-deed-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":216687,"position":0},"title":"[S. 115 CPC] | ‘The Pension Act, 1871 not enforced in Sikkim’; Sikkim High Court holds that claims to be made under State Pension Rules","author":"Editor","date":"April 15, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court held that the Sikkim Government Pension Rules do not prohibit the revisionist from entering into a compromise deed with the respondent, therefore, the former is bound by the deed.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Sikkim High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":319682,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/08\/kanyadan-not-essential-for-solemnization-of-hindu-marriage-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":216687,"position":1},"title":"[S. 311 CrPC] Discrepancies in examination and cross examination no ground to recall witnesses: Allahabad HC","author":"Editor","date":"April 8, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cHindu Marriage Act, 1955 merely provides saptpadi as an essential ceremony of a Hindu marriage and it does not provide that the ceremony of kanyadan is essential for solemnization of a Hindu marriage\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":323864,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/07\/can-pleadings-be-amended-ground-typographical-errors-or-change-of-counsel-allahabad-hc-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":216687,"position":2},"title":"Can pleadings be amended on the ground of typographical errors or change of counsel? Allahabad HC answers","author":"Editor","date":"June 7, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIn the light of law laid down by the Courts, change of counsel cannot be a ground to file amendment application bypassing the rigorous conditions of due diligence. In fact, to meet out any mistake, no advantage can be given to litigant due to change of counsel.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":329489,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/28\/o-vi-r-17-does-not-limit-application-for-amendment-pleadings-at-any-stage-of-proceedings-sikkim-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":216687,"position":3},"title":"\u2018O. VI R. 17 does not limit amendment of pleadings at any stage of proceedings, if it is necessary for determining the real questions in controversy\u2019: Sikkim HC","author":"Editor","date":"August 28, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The amendments were imperative for the proper and effective adjudication of the dispute; refusal to allow the amendment application would have caused injustice or resulted in multiple litigations; and the amendments did not constitutionally or fundamentally change the nature of the case.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Sikkim High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":300149,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/26\/court-dismissed-appeal-directed-mother-to-pay-maintenance-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":216687,"position":4},"title":"Mother can also be made liable to pay maintenance to her minor child under Section 125 of CrPC: Uttaranchal High Court","author":"Simranjeet","date":"August 26, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cSection 125 of the Criminal Procedure Court, 1973 makes it clear that the liability to maintain a minor child is on \u201cany person\u201d, and this denotes not only a male but a female gender and it cannot be said that \u2018a person' can only qualify father and not the mother.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"uttaranchal high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/uttaranchal-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/uttaranchal-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/uttaranchal-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/uttaranchal-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":225247,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/06\/all-hc-trial-court-has-the-duty-to-ensure-that-an-accused-gets-a-fair-trial-and-real-and-effective-aid-is-provided-to-him-under-s-304-of-crpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":216687,"position":5},"title":"All HC | Trial Court has the duty to ensure that an accused gets a fair trial; and \u201creal and effective\u201d aid is provided to him under S. 304 of CrPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 6, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: Rajeev Singh, J. allowed an application of revision filed for quashing an order passed by Additional Sessions Judge (POCSO Act) under Sections 376, 506, 377 of the Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012. In\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216687","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=216687"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216687\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=216687"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=216687"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=216687"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}