{"id":216681,"date":"2019-07-10T15:30:40","date_gmt":"2019-07-10T10:00:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=216681"},"modified":"2019-07-11T16:38:59","modified_gmt":"2019-07-11T11:08:59","slug":"jhar-hc-s-2-of-forest-conservation-act-1980-not-a-penal-provision-conviction-thereunder-not-sustainable-in-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/10\/jhar-hc-s-2-of-forest-conservation-act-1980-not-a-penal-provision-conviction-thereunder-not-sustainable-in-law\/","title":{"rendered":"Jhar HC | S. 2 of Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 not a penal provision \u2013 conviction thereunder not sustainable in law"},"content":{"rendered":"

Jharkhand High Court:<\/strong> Anil Kumar Choudhary, J. disposed of a revision petition, filed against the judgment of the trial court, whereby the petitioner was convicted and sentenced for simple imprisonment for six months for offences punishable under Section 33 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 but it did not pass any separate sentence for his conviction under Section 2 of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980.<\/p>\n

The facts of the instant case were that two forest guards while patrolling through the protected forest area, had found the revision petitioner and other co-accused persons ploughing the forest land within the protected forest. On being questioned, they disclosed their names and addresses but resisted confiscation of their ploughing implements. The guards confirmed that 3.5 acres had been ploughed by the petitioner and the other co-accused persons and they had no documents proving ownership of the land. Another witness stated that the land was ploughed after being encroached upon. The trial court relied on the evidence and convicted the revision petitioner and the co-accused persons. The first appellate court conducted an independent comprehension of the evidence on the record and agreed with the decision of the trial court and dismissed the appeal.<\/p>\n

Abhilash Kumar and Anurag Kashyap, counsels for the revision petitioner, submitted that both the lower courts had made an error by convicting the revision petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 2 of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 as this was not penal provision. They also added that the appellate court did not properly consider the evidence on the record. They further stated that the petitioner was an old man of 74 years and had been facing the severity of criminal prosecution since 1993. Moreover, the petitioner had remained in custody until he was granted bail. Thus, in case his conviction was sustained, a lenient sentence could be given to him.<\/p>\n

Sanjay Kumar Pandey, counsel appeared on behalf of the State and defended the impugned judgment passed by the appellate court and contended that the appellate court had rightly upheld the conviction of the revision petitioner. He asserted that this revision was not based on any merit and hence should be dismissed.<\/p>\n

The Court held that both the lower courts had erred by convicting the revision petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 2 of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 as this was not a penal provision. Consequently, his conviction under the abovementioned Act was ‘not sustainable in law’<\/em> and thus he was acquitted for the same. It observed that the evidence on the record was adequate to establish the charge for the offence punishable under Section 33 (1) (c) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. Thus, the Court did not need to exercise revisional jurisdiction in this aspect. However, the court remarked that there was no specific evidence on the record about the dimension of the area which was cleared for cultivation by the petitioner and noted the fact that he had undergone the rigors of the criminal prosecution for a considerable period of time. Hence, it held that the sentence of the petitioner be modified to the period that he had previously spent in custody. [Prasad Paswan v. State of Jharkhand, 2019 SCC OnLine Jhar 772<\/b><\/a>, decided on 13-03-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jharkhand High Court: Anil Kumar Choudhary, J. disposed of a revision petition, filed against the judgment of the trial court, whereby the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3468,34277,3337,36539,36538],"class_list":["post-216681","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-conviction","tag-criminal-prosecution","tag-imprisonment","tag-section-2-of-forest-conservation-act","tag-section-33-1-c-of-indian-forest-act-1927"],"yoast_head":"\nJhar HC | S. 2 of Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 not a penal provision \u2013 conviction thereunder not sustainable in law | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/10\/jhar-hc-s-2-of-forest-conservation-act-1980-not-a-penal-provision-conviction-thereunder-not-sustainable-in-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jhar HC | S. 2 of Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 not a penal provision \u2013 conviction thereunder not sustainable in law\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jharkhand High Court: Anil Kumar Choudhary, J. disposed of a revision petition, filed against the judgment of the trial court, whereby the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/10\/jhar-hc-s-2-of-forest-conservation-act-1980-not-a-penal-provision-conviction-thereunder-not-sustainable-in-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-07-10T10:00:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-07-11T11:08:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/10\/jhar-hc-s-2-of-forest-conservation-act-1980-not-a-penal-provision-conviction-thereunder-not-sustainable-in-law\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/10\/jhar-hc-s-2-of-forest-conservation-act-1980-not-a-penal-provision-conviction-thereunder-not-sustainable-in-law\/\",\"name\":\"Jhar HC | S. 2 of Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 not a penal provision \u2013 conviction thereunder not sustainable in law | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-07-10T10:00:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-07-11T11:08:59+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/10\/jhar-hc-s-2-of-forest-conservation-act-1980-not-a-penal-provision-conviction-thereunder-not-sustainable-in-law\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/10\/jhar-hc-s-2-of-forest-conservation-act-1980-not-a-penal-provision-conviction-thereunder-not-sustainable-in-law\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/10\/jhar-hc-s-2-of-forest-conservation-act-1980-not-a-penal-provision-conviction-thereunder-not-sustainable-in-law\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jhar HC | S. 2 of Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 not a penal provision \u2013 conviction thereunder not sustainable in law\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jhar HC | S. 2 of Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 not a penal provision \u2013 conviction thereunder not sustainable in law | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/10\/jhar-hc-s-2-of-forest-conservation-act-1980-not-a-penal-provision-conviction-thereunder-not-sustainable-in-law\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jhar HC | S. 2 of Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 not a penal provision \u2013 conviction thereunder not sustainable in law","og_description":"Jharkhand High Court: Anil Kumar Choudhary, J. disposed of a revision petition, filed against the judgment of the trial court, whereby the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/10\/jhar-hc-s-2-of-forest-conservation-act-1980-not-a-penal-provision-conviction-thereunder-not-sustainable-in-law\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-07-10T10:00:40+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-07-11T11:08:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/10\/jhar-hc-s-2-of-forest-conservation-act-1980-not-a-penal-provision-conviction-thereunder-not-sustainable-in-law\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/10\/jhar-hc-s-2-of-forest-conservation-act-1980-not-a-penal-provision-conviction-thereunder-not-sustainable-in-law\/","name":"Jhar HC | S. 2 of Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 not a penal provision \u2013 conviction thereunder not sustainable in law | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-07-10T10:00:40+00:00","dateModified":"2019-07-11T11:08:59+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/10\/jhar-hc-s-2-of-forest-conservation-act-1980-not-a-penal-provision-conviction-thereunder-not-sustainable-in-law\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/10\/jhar-hc-s-2-of-forest-conservation-act-1980-not-a-penal-provision-conviction-thereunder-not-sustainable-in-law\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/10\/jhar-hc-s-2-of-forest-conservation-act-1980-not-a-penal-provision-conviction-thereunder-not-sustainable-in-law\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jhar HC | S. 2 of Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 not a penal provision \u2013 conviction thereunder not sustainable in law"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":246397,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/02\/indian-forest-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":216681,"position":0},"title":"Tri HC | Conviction under S. 42 Indian Forest Act, 1927 upheld; Court dismisses petition \u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"April 2, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Tripura High Court: S.G. Chattopadhyay, J., dismissed a criminal revision petition which had been filed challenging the judgment delivered by the Sessions Judge in which the Judge had affirmed the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate convicting the petitioner under Section 42 of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":269348,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/01\/formation-of-project-screening-committee-to-screen-project-proposals-for-use-of-forest-land-vide-forest-conservation-rules-2022\/","url_meta":{"origin":216681,"position":1},"title":"Formation of Project Screening Committee to screen project proposals for use of forest land vide Forest (Conservation) Rules, 2022","author":"Editor","date":"July 1, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"On 28-06-2022, Central Government notified new rules namely, \u201cForest (Conservation) Rules, 2022\u201d to further carry out the protection and preservation of forests in India under Forest Conservation Act, 1980 (Act). These rules supersede the Forest Conservations Rules, 2003 and come into immediate effect. Key Points: Ensure that each State\/UTs will\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Central Government Notification","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-226.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-226.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-226.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-226.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-226.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":280871,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/03\/land-covered-under-section-4-punjab-land-preservation-act-is-forest-land-under-forest-conservation-act-supreme-court-legal-news-legal-updates-legal-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":216681,"position":2},"title":"Explained | Is land covered under Section 4 of Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900 a \u2018forest land\u2019 under Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980?","author":"Editor","date":"January 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Supreme Court held that the lands covered by the special orders issued under Section 4 of PLPA have all the trappings of forest lands within the meaning of Section 2 of the 1980 Forest Act and, therefore, the State Government or competent authority cannot permit its use for non-forest\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-72.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":243304,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/03\/chh-hc-whether-the-land-which-is-a-forest-land-can-be-allotted-leased-without-prior-approval-of-central-government-under-s-2-iii-of-forest-conservation-act-1980\/","url_meta":{"origin":216681,"position":3},"title":"Chh HC | Whether a forest land can be allotted\/leased without prior approval of Central Government under S. 2 (iii) of Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980?\u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"February 3, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: Sanjay K Agrawal J.,\u00a0 dismissed the second appeal being devoid of merits. The facts of the case are such that the first appellate court held that the suit land was \u2018Chhote Jhad Ka Jungle'\/forest land which has been given in patta to the plaintiff, which was revoked\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":265036,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/05\/chh-hc-criminal-trial-and-confiscation-proceedings-may-run-simultaneously-once-the-information-of-confiscation-proceeding-under-s-52-e-indian-forest-act-is-given-to-dm-trial-magistrate-has-no-p\/","url_meta":{"origin":216681,"position":4},"title":"Chh HC | Criminal trial and confiscation proceedings may run simultaneously; Once the information of confiscation proceeding under S. 52 (e) Indian Forest Act is given to DM, Trial Magistrate has no power over it","author":"Editor","date":"April 5, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: Rajani Dubey, J., dismissed the petition being devoid of merits. The facts of the case are that a tractor and trolley was found carrying illegal timber woods in Tamor Pingla Sanctuary Area, Sarguja Forest Circle, Ambikapur. The said vehicle was driven by driver and the owner of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":265021,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/05\/indian-forest-act-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":216681,"position":5},"title":"Cal HC | Court orders release of vehicles confiscated under the Indian Forest Act with unprecedented observations","author":"Editor","date":"April 5, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: Rabindranath Samanta, J. allowed a criminal revision petition which was filed aggrieved by the order of Magistrate wherein he had rejected the prayers made by the petitioners for return of two vehicles which were seized by the Deputy Ranger (Beat Officer), Bamonpokhari Range Office of the Forest\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216681","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=216681"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216681\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=216681"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=216681"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=216681"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}