{"id":216562,"date":"2019-07-06T13:00:33","date_gmt":"2019-07-06T07:30:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=216562"},"modified":"2019-07-08T17:50:18","modified_gmt":"2019-07-08T12:20:18","slug":"jk-hc-bar-created-under-s-43-of-uapa-does-not-hinder-enforcement-of-default-bail-if-further-detention-of-accused-is-not-permissible","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/06\/jk-hc-bar-created-under-s-43-of-uapa-does-not-hinder-enforcement-of-default-bail-if-further-detention-of-accused-is-not-permissible\/","title":{"rendered":"J&#038;K HC | Bar created under S. 43 of UAPA does not hinder enforcement of default bail, if further detention of accused is not permissible"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>Jammu and Kashmir High Court:<\/b> Rashid Ali Dar, J. allowed an appeal against an order of the lower courts whereby appellant\u2019s bail application had been rejected.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the instant case, one of the accused had received some money from his cousins and handed over the same to the appellants so as to pass on the same to the militants for continuing their militant activities. The accused were charged under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (the Act). The appellants applied for bail in the Trial Court which was disallowed. Thereon, they preferred an application for grant of bail before the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Srinagar, which too was dismissed holding, <i>&#8221; the very seriousness of the offence alleged is sufficient ground to reasonably believe that the accused may misuse his liberty by interference with the evidence that may be available in the case, if possible or by absconding if tempering is not possible.&#8221;<\/i><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The learned counsel for the respondents, Javaid Iqbal, challenged the maintainability of this appeal while relying on Sections 21 and 22 of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 read with Section 43-D of the Act. Whereas, M. A. Qayoom, the learned counsel for the appellants, argued that both the sections should be read independently of each other. He further argued that the learned trial Judge and the Addl. Sessions Judge had not examined the matter in its proper perspective and had declined bail to the appellants on flimsy grounds. He contended that in the instant case the appellants completed 90 days in police custody without the &#8216;challan&#8217; being filed against them, on that ground the appellants were entitled to bail after the expiry of period of 90 days relying on Section 167(2) of CrPC as the police had to complete the investigation within 90 days on failure of which appellants were entitled to bail.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court relied on the judgment of the Apex Court in <i>Rakesh Kumar Paul v. State of Assam<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/hi5xPy2Z\">(2017) 15 SCC 67<\/a>, and held, <i>&#8220;the learned Additional Sessions Judge was required to examine the contention raised on behalf of the appellants herein for grant of bail by applicability of the default clause of Section 43 (D) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967 which he having not done.&#8221;<\/i> The Court observed that, <i>&#8220;Since the investigating agency has omitted to file final report in terms of Section 173 Cr PC within the time prescribed under Section 167(2) of CrPC, the appellants whose appeal is now treated as petition for bail are held entitled to default bail.&#8221;<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was held that <i>&#8220;the bar created under Section 43 of the Act would not come in the way of petitioner to seek enforcement of default bail, as their further detention is not permissible.&#8221; <\/i>Thus, the Court admitted the bail of the appellants with the condition of furnishing security to the tune of Rs 50,000\/- with one surety in the like amount and not to leave the State without Court&#8217;s permission.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span>[Abdul Rehman Mir v. State of J&amp;K, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/HK9gorc1\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine J&amp;K 420<\/b><\/a>, decided on 08-05-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Rashid Ali Dar, J. allowed an appeal against an order of the lower courts whereby appellant\u2019s bail <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[20891,3365,36480,19881],"class_list":["post-216562","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-bail-application","tag-detention","tag-section-1672-of-crpc","tag-unlawful-activities-prevention-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>J&amp;K HC | Bar created under S. 43 of UAPA does not hinder enforcement of default bail, if further detention of accused is not permissible | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/06\/jk-hc-bar-created-under-s-43-of-uapa-does-not-hinder-enforcement-of-default-bail-if-further-detention-of-accused-is-not-permissible\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"J&amp;K HC | Bar created under S. 43 of UAPA does not hinder enforcement of default bail, if further detention of accused is not permissible\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Rashid Ali Dar, J. allowed an appeal against an order of the lower courts whereby appellant\u2019s bail\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/06\/jk-hc-bar-created-under-s-43-of-uapa-does-not-hinder-enforcement-of-default-bail-if-further-detention-of-accused-is-not-permissible\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-07-06T07:30:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-07-08T12:20:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/06\/jk-hc-bar-created-under-s-43-of-uapa-does-not-hinder-enforcement-of-default-bail-if-further-detention-of-accused-is-not-permissible\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/06\/jk-hc-bar-created-under-s-43-of-uapa-does-not-hinder-enforcement-of-default-bail-if-further-detention-of-accused-is-not-permissible\/\",\"name\":\"J&K HC | Bar created under S. 43 of UAPA does not hinder enforcement of default bail, if further detention of accused is not permissible | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-07-06T07:30:33+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-07-08T12:20:18+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/06\/jk-hc-bar-created-under-s-43-of-uapa-does-not-hinder-enforcement-of-default-bail-if-further-detention-of-accused-is-not-permissible\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/06\/jk-hc-bar-created-under-s-43-of-uapa-does-not-hinder-enforcement-of-default-bail-if-further-detention-of-accused-is-not-permissible\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/06\/jk-hc-bar-created-under-s-43-of-uapa-does-not-hinder-enforcement-of-default-bail-if-further-detention-of-accused-is-not-permissible\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"J&#038;K HC | Bar created under S. 43 of UAPA does not hinder enforcement of default bail, if further detention of accused is not permissible\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"J&K HC | Bar created under S. 43 of UAPA does not hinder enforcement of default bail, if further detention of accused is not permissible | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/06\/jk-hc-bar-created-under-s-43-of-uapa-does-not-hinder-enforcement-of-default-bail-if-further-detention-of-accused-is-not-permissible\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"J&K HC | Bar created under S. 43 of UAPA does not hinder enforcement of default bail, if further detention of accused is not permissible","og_description":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Rashid Ali Dar, J. allowed an appeal against an order of the lower courts whereby appellant\u2019s bail","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/06\/jk-hc-bar-created-under-s-43-of-uapa-does-not-hinder-enforcement-of-default-bail-if-further-detention-of-accused-is-not-permissible\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-07-06T07:30:33+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-07-08T12:20:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/06\/jk-hc-bar-created-under-s-43-of-uapa-does-not-hinder-enforcement-of-default-bail-if-further-detention-of-accused-is-not-permissible\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/06\/jk-hc-bar-created-under-s-43-of-uapa-does-not-hinder-enforcement-of-default-bail-if-further-detention-of-accused-is-not-permissible\/","name":"J&K HC | Bar created under S. 43 of UAPA does not hinder enforcement of default bail, if further detention of accused is not permissible | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-07-06T07:30:33+00:00","dateModified":"2019-07-08T12:20:18+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/06\/jk-hc-bar-created-under-s-43-of-uapa-does-not-hinder-enforcement-of-default-bail-if-further-detention-of-accused-is-not-permissible\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/06\/jk-hc-bar-created-under-s-43-of-uapa-does-not-hinder-enforcement-of-default-bail-if-further-detention-of-accused-is-not-permissible\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/06\/jk-hc-bar-created-under-s-43-of-uapa-does-not-hinder-enforcement-of-default-bail-if-further-detention-of-accused-is-not-permissible\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"J&#038;K HC | Bar created under S. 43 of UAPA does not hinder enforcement of default bail, if further detention of accused is not permissible"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":214581,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/13\/del-hc-no-bail-for-an-accused-charged-under-unlawful-activities-prevention-act-where-reasonable-grounds-for-believing-prima-facie-case-exist\/","url_meta":{"origin":216562,"position":0},"title":"Del HC | No bail for an accused charged under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act where reasonable grounds for believing prima facie case exist","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 13, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Siddharth Mridul, J. dismissed an appeal filed under Section 21(4) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 assailing an order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge whereby the appellant's bail application was rejected. The appellant was standing trial under Sections 18, 18-B and 20 of the Unlawful Activities\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":222736,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/ker-hc-court-refers-to-communist-party-of-india-maoist-as-an-undisputed-banned-terrorist-organisation-under-first-schedule-to-unlawful-activities-prevention-act-bail-applicati\/","url_meta":{"origin":216562,"position":1},"title":"Ker HC | Court refers to Communist Party of India (Maoist) as an \u201cundisputed banned terrorist organisation under first schedule to Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act\u201d; bail application rejected","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 2, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: A Division Bench of A. Hariprasad and N. Anil Kumar, JJ. dismissed the appeals filed by the appellants by invoking Section 21 (4) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 (\u201cNIA Act\u201d) as they were accused under Sections 20, 38 and 39 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention)\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":226625,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/06\/utt-hc-bail-granted-to-accused-in-a-cow-slaughter-case-under-the-uttarakhand-protection-of-cow-progeny-act-and-the-prevention-of-cruelty-to-animals-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":216562,"position":2},"title":"Utt HC |Bail granted to accused in a cow-slaughter case under the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 6, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: Alok Kumar Verma, J., allowed a bail application filed in connection for the offences punishable under Sections 3, 5, 11 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007 and Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960. The FIR stated that police party\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":319679,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/08\/raj-hc-grants-bail-to-sfj-members-accused-of-uttering-words-khalistan-zindabad-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":216562,"position":3},"title":"Rajasthan High Court grants bail to SFJ members accused of uttering words \u2018Khalistan Zindabad\u2019; finds invocation of UAPA incomprehensible","author":"Ritu","date":"April 8, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court held that the continuation of the incarceration would be an abuse of the legal process, especially considering the likelihood of a prolonged trial.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":216599,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/09\/ker-hc-assault-on-an-injured-person-not-pre-meditated-bail-application-granted\/","url_meta":{"origin":216562,"position":4},"title":"Ker HC | Assault on an injured person not pre-meditated; bail application granted\u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 9, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: B Sudheendra Kumar J., allowed a bail application and relieved the accused person from the custody.\u00a0 In the instant case, the accused persons were charged under Section 143 (Punishment for being member in unlawful assembly), Section 147 (Punishment for rioting), Section 148 (Rioting, armed with deadly weapon),\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":259324,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/31\/unlawful-activities-prevention-act-1967-interpretation-on-rigours-of-grant-of-bail\/","url_meta":{"origin":216562,"position":5},"title":"Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967: Interpretation on Rigours of Grant of Bail","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 31, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Kapil Madan \u2020 and Pulkit Pandey\u2020\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-205.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-205.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-205.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-205.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-205.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216562","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=216562"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216562\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=216562"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=216562"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=216562"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}