{"id":216558,"date":"2019-07-06T11:00:13","date_gmt":"2019-07-06T05:30:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=216558"},"modified":"2019-07-08T17:18:03","modified_gmt":"2019-07-08T11:48:03","slug":"pat-hc-application-for-quashing-cognizance-order-passed-in-a-dowry-harassment-case-dismissed-on-ground-of-gross-delay-of-10-years-in-filing-the-said-application","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/06\/pat-hc-application-for-quashing-cognizance-order-passed-in-a-dowry-harassment-case-dismissed-on-ground-of-gross-delay-of-10-years-in-filing-the-said-application\/","title":{"rendered":"Pat HC | Application for quashing cognizance order passed in a dowry harassment case \u2013 dismissed on ground of gross delay of 10 years in filing the said application"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>Patna High Court:<\/b> Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. dismissed an application filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 praying for quashing of cognizance taken against petitioner, in a case pertaining to demand of dowry and torture therefor.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Petitioner, along with eight others, was charged with offence of torture, assault, demand of dowry and conspiracy to kill the opposite party 2 (daughter-in-law of the petitioner herein). In a complaint case filed by opposite party 2, the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate passed an order taking cognizance of offences under Sections 323, 498-A of Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. Aggrieved thereby, the instant application was filed praying for quashing of the said order.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Learned counsel for the petitioner, Sanjay Kumar Ojha, contended that the opposite party 2 did not reside in the matrimonial home and she had got divorced from the petitioner\u2019s son in 2011.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, Jharkhandi Upadhyay contended that the matrimonial case wherein divorce was granted to opposite party 2, was filed in the year 2010 while the complaint case in question was filed in 2004. Thus, the opposite party 2 was still the petitioner\u2019s daughter-in-law when the complaint case was filed. Hence, the petitioner&#8217;s main contention of divorce was of no relevance. Further, the cognizance order in complaint case, was passed in the year 2003, i.e., ten and a half years ago, which made the application unfit for consideration.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court noted that the complaint case was of the year 2004 and the order of cognizance was also of the same year. Thus, the present application, filed in the year 2015, challenging cognizance order of the year 2004 was clearly unfit to be entertained on the ground of gross delay and laches. Further, the main contention of the petitioner that her son and opposite party \u00a02, were already divorced, was of no consequence, as the matrimonial case (for divorce) was filed in the year 2010 by opposite party 2; and that itself was proof of the fact that she was tortured in the matrimonial home.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the above, it was held that the cognizance order did not suffer from any infirmity, and it did not warrant any interference by the Court in exercise of its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.[Sushila Devi v. State of Bihar, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/cj2y8kh9\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Pat 653<\/b><\/a>, decided on 13-05-2019]<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Patna High Court: Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. dismissed an application filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 praying for <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[9781,36475,2846,36476,13021],"class_list":["post-216558","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-conspiracy","tag-demand-of-dowry","tag-divorce","tag-matrimonial-house","tag-section-482-crpc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Pat HC | Application for quashing cognizance order passed in a dowry harassment case \u2013 dismissed on ground of gross delay of 10 years in filing the said application | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/06\/pat-hc-application-for-quashing-cognizance-order-passed-in-a-dowry-harassment-case-dismissed-on-ground-of-gross-delay-of-10-years-in-filing-the-said-application\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pat HC | Application for quashing cognizance order passed in a dowry harassment case \u2013 dismissed on ground of gross delay of 10 years in filing the said application\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Patna High Court: Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. dismissed an application filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 praying for\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/06\/pat-hc-application-for-quashing-cognizance-order-passed-in-a-dowry-harassment-case-dismissed-on-ground-of-gross-delay-of-10-years-in-filing-the-said-application\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-07-06T05:30:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-07-08T11:48:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/06\/pat-hc-application-for-quashing-cognizance-order-passed-in-a-dowry-harassment-case-dismissed-on-ground-of-gross-delay-of-10-years-in-filing-the-said-application\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/06\/pat-hc-application-for-quashing-cognizance-order-passed-in-a-dowry-harassment-case-dismissed-on-ground-of-gross-delay-of-10-years-in-filing-the-said-application\/\",\"name\":\"Pat HC | Application for quashing cognizance order passed in a dowry harassment case \u2013 dismissed on ground of gross delay of 10 years in filing the said application | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-07-06T05:30:13+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-07-08T11:48:03+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/06\/pat-hc-application-for-quashing-cognizance-order-passed-in-a-dowry-harassment-case-dismissed-on-ground-of-gross-delay-of-10-years-in-filing-the-said-application\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/06\/pat-hc-application-for-quashing-cognizance-order-passed-in-a-dowry-harassment-case-dismissed-on-ground-of-gross-delay-of-10-years-in-filing-the-said-application\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/06\/pat-hc-application-for-quashing-cognizance-order-passed-in-a-dowry-harassment-case-dismissed-on-ground-of-gross-delay-of-10-years-in-filing-the-said-application\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pat HC | Application for quashing cognizance order passed in a dowry harassment case \u2013 dismissed on ground of gross delay of 10 years in filing the said application\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pat HC | Application for quashing cognizance order passed in a dowry harassment case \u2013 dismissed on ground of gross delay of 10 years in filing the said application | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/06\/pat-hc-application-for-quashing-cognizance-order-passed-in-a-dowry-harassment-case-dismissed-on-ground-of-gross-delay-of-10-years-in-filing-the-said-application\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pat HC | Application for quashing cognizance order passed in a dowry harassment case \u2013 dismissed on ground of gross delay of 10 years in filing the said application","og_description":"Patna High Court: Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. dismissed an application filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 praying for","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/06\/pat-hc-application-for-quashing-cognizance-order-passed-in-a-dowry-harassment-case-dismissed-on-ground-of-gross-delay-of-10-years-in-filing-the-said-application\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-07-06T05:30:13+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-07-08T11:48:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/06\/pat-hc-application-for-quashing-cognizance-order-passed-in-a-dowry-harassment-case-dismissed-on-ground-of-gross-delay-of-10-years-in-filing-the-said-application\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/06\/pat-hc-application-for-quashing-cognizance-order-passed-in-a-dowry-harassment-case-dismissed-on-ground-of-gross-delay-of-10-years-in-filing-the-said-application\/","name":"Pat HC | Application for quashing cognizance order passed in a dowry harassment case \u2013 dismissed on ground of gross delay of 10 years in filing the said application | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-07-06T05:30:13+00:00","dateModified":"2019-07-08T11:48:03+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/06\/pat-hc-application-for-quashing-cognizance-order-passed-in-a-dowry-harassment-case-dismissed-on-ground-of-gross-delay-of-10-years-in-filing-the-said-application\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/06\/pat-hc-application-for-quashing-cognizance-order-passed-in-a-dowry-harassment-case-dismissed-on-ground-of-gross-delay-of-10-years-in-filing-the-said-application\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/06\/pat-hc-application-for-quashing-cognizance-order-passed-in-a-dowry-harassment-case-dismissed-on-ground-of-gross-delay-of-10-years-in-filing-the-said-application\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pat HC | Application for quashing cognizance order passed in a dowry harassment case \u2013 dismissed on ground of gross delay of 10 years in filing the said application"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":213114,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/02\/pat-hc-allegations-against-husbands-relatives-must-be-scrutinized-with-great-circumspection-in-proceedings-under-section-498-a-of-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":216558,"position":0},"title":"Pat HC | Allegations against husband\u2019s relatives must be scrutinized with great circumspection in proceedings under S. 498-A of IPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 2, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: The Bench of Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. quashed criminal proceedings against relatives of a man accused of torturing his wife and demanding dowry from her, holding that allegations against them were of general nature and as such, allowing proceedings against them to continue would amount to abusing the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":259938,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/13\/kar-hc-while-deciding-the-petition-under-s-482-of-crpc-evidence-cannot-be-appreciated-as-it-lies-within-the-domain-of-trial-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":216558,"position":1},"title":"Kar HC |\u00a0 While deciding the petition under S. 482 of CrPC evidence cannot be appreciated as it lies within the domain of Trial Court","author":"Editor","date":"January 13, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: Sreenivas Harish Kumar J. dismissed the petition being devoid of merits. The facts of the case are such that the 1st petitioner is the husband of 2nd respondent. On certain allegations that the petitioners subjected the 2nd respondent to harassment in connection with demand for dowry, FIR\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":207787,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/08\/patna-hc-criminal-case-quashed-under-inherent-powers-after-parties-amicably-settle-their-grievance\/","url_meta":{"origin":216558,"position":2},"title":"Pat HC | Criminal case quashed under inherent powers after parties amicably settle their grievance","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 8, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: A Bench of Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. allowed the quashing of the criminal case owing to the amicable compromise between the parties. The petitioners have approached this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for the alleged offence under Section 498-A of the Indian\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":319968,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/12\/not-providing-food-to-wife-over-dowry-demands-constitutes-physical-mental-harassment-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":216558,"position":3},"title":"Not providing food to married woman over dowry demands constitutes physical &amp; mental harassment: Madhya Pradesh High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"April 12, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Regarding the timing of the FIR in relation to the divorce petition, the Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the pendency of a civil proceeding does not bar criminal proceedings.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":218626,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/26\/mp-hc-petitioner-claiming-to-have-no-source-of-personal-income-is-liable-to-maintain-his-wife-if-he-has-interest-in-agricultural-lands-of-joint-family\/","url_meta":{"origin":216558,"position":4},"title":"MP HC | Petitioner claiming to have no source of personal income is liable to maintain his wife if he has interest in agricultural lands of joint family","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 26, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: S.K. Awasthi, J., dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 482 CrPC for quashing the maintenance order passed by the Additional Principal Judge. The respondent filed an application under Section 125 CrPC to claim maintenance from the petitioner as she was forced to live\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":205635,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/24\/false-dowry-case-filed-by-daughter-in-law-against-mother-in-law-amounts-to-abuse-of-process-of-the-court-fir-against-mother-in-law-quashed-karnataka-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":216558,"position":5},"title":"False dowry case filed by daughter-in-law against mother-in-law amounts to abuse of process of the court; FIR against mother-in-law quashed: Karnataka HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 24, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of K.S Mudagal, J. slammed a daughter-in-law for filing a false case of dowry against her mother-in-law and quashed the FIR registered against petitioner mother-in-law. The instant criminal writ petition was filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, (CrPC)\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216558","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=216558"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216558\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=216558"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=216558"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=216558"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}