{"id":216547,"date":"2019-07-05T17:15:46","date_gmt":"2019-07-05T11:45:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=216547"},"modified":"2019-07-08T15:40:21","modified_gmt":"2019-07-08T10:10:21","slug":"mp-hc-imposition-of-fine-in-criminal-case-as-a-punishment-is-also-conviction-service-of-petitioner-terminated-for-suppressing-information","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/05\/mp-hc-imposition-of-fine-in-criminal-case-as-a-punishment-is-also-conviction-service-of-petitioner-terminated-for-suppressing-information\/","title":{"rendered":"MP HC | \u2018Imposition of fine in criminal case as a punishment is also conviction\u2019; service of petitioner terminated for suppressing information"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Madhya Pradesh High Court<\/strong>: Vishal Mishra, J. dismissed a writ petition, where the petitioner challenged the order passed against the petitioner whereby the service was terminated because of a criminal case registered against the said petitioner and was accused of not disclosing the relevant information at the time of appointment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Neeraj Shrivastava, counsel for the petitioner submitted that prior passing the impugned order the procedure as provided under Rules 9 and 52 of Rules M.P. Nagar Palika, Karamchari (Appointment and Services Condition) Rules, 1968 had not been taken care of as no opportunity of hearing was provided to the petitioner prior to passing of impugned order. It was further argued that the offence under Section 3 of the Public Gambling Act was registered against the petitioner wherein he had only been punished with a fine of Rs 75, which he had already deposited. The petitioner contended that the offence was trivial in nature and termination of service based upon such a past act was unfair and unjust.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for the respondent, S.P. Jain submitted that the petitioner had stated that no criminal case was registered against him and no information had been furnished by the petitioner hence he had concealed all necessary information and verified the same. An affidavit was also submitted by the petitioner to the effect that all the information which he had furnished in the form was true and correct to the best of his knowledge and no part was suppressed or false.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court observed that the petitioner had concealed the necessary information related to his criminal background, it was when the character verification took place, and the authorities came to know about the alleged crime. The aforesaid act of the petitioner amounted to suppression of information. The Court held that, \u201c<em>It is settled position of law that imposition of fine in the criminal case by the competent Court is also in category of conviction, therefore, the petitioner cannot be exhorted from its liabilities that he was required to give the complete information in Column 12 of the form submitted by him<\/em>.\u201d Court further cited the established principle of law that suppression of information was moral turpitude though the crime itself was not, in that eventuality, the service was liable to be terminated, even if there had been no further trial and the petitioner was discharged.[Rajesh Balmik v. State of M.P, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/MUb5Qt4r\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine MP 1349<\/b><\/a>, decided on 28-06-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madhya Pradesh High Court: Vishal Mishra, J. dismissed a writ petition, where the petitioner challenged the order passed against the petitioner whereby <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3468,31928,36464,30652,36465],"class_list":["post-216547","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-conviction","tag-criminal-case","tag-imposition-of-fine","tag-moral-turpitude","tag-section-3-of-public-gambling-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>MP HC | \u2018Imposition of fine in criminal case as a punishment is also conviction\u2019; service of petitioner terminated for suppressing information | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/05\/mp-hc-imposition-of-fine-in-criminal-case-as-a-punishment-is-also-conviction-service-of-petitioner-terminated-for-suppressing-information\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"MP HC | \u2018Imposition of fine in criminal case as a punishment is also conviction\u2019; service of petitioner terminated for suppressing information\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Vishal Mishra, J. dismissed a writ petition, where the petitioner challenged the order passed against the petitioner whereby\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/05\/mp-hc-imposition-of-fine-in-criminal-case-as-a-punishment-is-also-conviction-service-of-petitioner-terminated-for-suppressing-information\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-07-05T11:45:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-07-08T10:10:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/05\/mp-hc-imposition-of-fine-in-criminal-case-as-a-punishment-is-also-conviction-service-of-petitioner-terminated-for-suppressing-information\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/05\/mp-hc-imposition-of-fine-in-criminal-case-as-a-punishment-is-also-conviction-service-of-petitioner-terminated-for-suppressing-information\/\",\"name\":\"MP HC | \u2018Imposition of fine in criminal case as a punishment is also conviction\u2019; service of petitioner terminated for suppressing information | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-07-05T11:45:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-07-08T10:10:21+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/05\/mp-hc-imposition-of-fine-in-criminal-case-as-a-punishment-is-also-conviction-service-of-petitioner-terminated-for-suppressing-information\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/05\/mp-hc-imposition-of-fine-in-criminal-case-as-a-punishment-is-also-conviction-service-of-petitioner-terminated-for-suppressing-information\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/05\/mp-hc-imposition-of-fine-in-criminal-case-as-a-punishment-is-also-conviction-service-of-petitioner-terminated-for-suppressing-information\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"MP HC | \u2018Imposition of fine in criminal case as a punishment is also conviction\u2019; service of petitioner terminated for suppressing information\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MP HC | \u2018Imposition of fine in criminal case as a punishment is also conviction\u2019; service of petitioner terminated for suppressing information | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/05\/mp-hc-imposition-of-fine-in-criminal-case-as-a-punishment-is-also-conviction-service-of-petitioner-terminated-for-suppressing-information\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"MP HC | \u2018Imposition of fine in criminal case as a punishment is also conviction\u2019; service of petitioner terminated for suppressing information","og_description":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Vishal Mishra, J. dismissed a writ petition, where the petitioner challenged the order passed against the petitioner whereby","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/05\/mp-hc-imposition-of-fine-in-criminal-case-as-a-punishment-is-also-conviction-service-of-petitioner-terminated-for-suppressing-information\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-07-05T11:45:46+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-07-08T10:10:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/05\/mp-hc-imposition-of-fine-in-criminal-case-as-a-punishment-is-also-conviction-service-of-petitioner-terminated-for-suppressing-information\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/05\/mp-hc-imposition-of-fine-in-criminal-case-as-a-punishment-is-also-conviction-service-of-petitioner-terminated-for-suppressing-information\/","name":"MP HC | \u2018Imposition of fine in criminal case as a punishment is also conviction\u2019; service of petitioner terminated for suppressing information | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-07-05T11:45:46+00:00","dateModified":"2019-07-08T10:10:21+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/05\/mp-hc-imposition-of-fine-in-criminal-case-as-a-punishment-is-also-conviction-service-of-petitioner-terminated-for-suppressing-information\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/05\/mp-hc-imposition-of-fine-in-criminal-case-as-a-punishment-is-also-conviction-service-of-petitioner-terminated-for-suppressing-information\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/05\/mp-hc-imposition-of-fine-in-criminal-case-as-a-punishment-is-also-conviction-service-of-petitioner-terminated-for-suppressing-information\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"MP HC | \u2018Imposition of fine in criminal case as a punishment is also conviction\u2019; service of petitioner terminated for suppressing information"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":327193,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/allahabad-high-court-upholds-termination-candidate-appointed-class-iv-post-district-judgeship\/","url_meta":{"origin":216547,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Employer may pass order cancelling candidature on suppression of pending criminal case\u2019; Allahabad HC upholds termination of candidate appointed to Class-IV post in District Judgeship","author":"Apoorva","date":"July 24, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA candidate seeking an appointment in the District Court judgeship should be of impeccable character and high integrity, and his antecedents should be clean and if a person whose integrity is doubtful or his antecedents are not clean is appointed, that can damage the institution.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":319694,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/08\/protection-officer-appointed-contract-basis-allowed-continue-completing-year-cannot-termed-appointed-under-r-33-pwdv-rules-madras-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":216547,"position":1},"title":"Extension of Protection Officer\u2019s contract cannot be termed to be an appointment under PWDV Rules: Madras High Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"April 8, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cMadras High Court said that the petitioner was not appointed under Rule 3(3) of the PWDV Rules 2006. She was appointed only on temporary basis, that too on consolidated salary.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":332839,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/10\/mere-involvement-in-criminal-case-not-automatically-negate-candidates-appointment-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":216547,"position":2},"title":"Mere involvement in criminal case does not automatically negate candidate\u2019s appointment: Rajasthan High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"October 10, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cBefore reaching to the conclusion as to whether a person is unfit to be appointed in the Government job or not, each case is required to be scrutinized by the competent authorities considering the facts involved in that particular criminal case.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":358332,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/29\/bhc-on-termination-over-non-disclosure-of-gambling-offence\/","url_meta":{"origin":216547,"position":3},"title":"Employee cannot be terminated by \u2018stroke of pen\u2019: Bombay High Court reinstates employee terminated over non-disclosure of trivial gambling offence","author":"Editor","date":"August 29, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe employer should take into consideration all relevant facts and circumstances available as to antecedents and keeping in view the objective criteria, while taking appropriate decision. Mere suppression does not mean that employer can arbitrarily terminate the services of employee.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"termination over non-disclosure of gambling offence","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/termination-over-non-disclosure-of-gambling-offence.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/termination-over-non-disclosure-of-gambling-offence.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/termination-over-non-disclosure-of-gambling-offence.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/termination-over-non-disclosure-of-gambling-offence.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":202247,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/26\/employer-to-exercise-discretion-in-matters-of-canceling-candidature-in-accordance-with-law-laid-down-by-the-apex-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":216547,"position":4},"title":"Employer to exercise discretion in matters of cancelling candidature in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 26, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Ashwani Kumar Mishra, J. disposed of a petition where petitioner was selected for appointment to the post of Constable in U.P. Police in the recruitment exercise initiated in the year 2015. He had to be trained but his candidature was not\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":308190,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/01\/family-pension-assam-services-rules-1969-entitlement-determination-criminal-appeal-gauhati-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":216547,"position":5},"title":"Pensioner entitled for provisional family pension till determination of criminal appeal with respect to Rule 22(1) of Assam Services (Pension) Rules, 1969: Gauhati HC","author":"Sucheta","date":"December 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The High Court opined that pension being a very valuable right, the legislature in its wisdom, had incorporated Rule 22 of the 1969 Rules, so that a pensioner survives till the allegations attain finality.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"gauhati high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gauhati-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gauhati-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gauhati-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gauhati-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216547","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=216547"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216547\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=216547"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=216547"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=216547"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}