{"id":216540,"date":"2019-07-05T14:15:23","date_gmt":"2019-07-05T08:45:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=216540"},"modified":"2019-07-08T16:43:34","modified_gmt":"2019-07-08T11:13:34","slug":"ori-hc-quasi-judicial-body-ought-to-provide-grounds-of-dismissal-of-employee-from-services","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/05\/ori-hc-quasi-judicial-body-ought-to-provide-grounds-of-dismissal-of-employee-from-services\/","title":{"rendered":"Ori HC | Quasi-Judicial body ought to provide grounds of dismissal of employee from services"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Orissa High Court: <\/strong>A Division Bench of S.K. Mishra and Dr A.K. Mishra, JJ., dismissed a writ appeal and provided the impugned judgment does not suffer from any infirmity as the respondent-individual was denied the right of being heard and dismissed without any reason by a quasi-judicial authority.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the instant case, an officer (respondent) working for the appellants, National Bank for Agricultural and Rural Development (NABARD) was dismissed from the service without getting an opportunity of being heard. The present writ appeal was filed by the appellants to assail the earlier judgment passed by the writ court in favour of the respondent stating the respondent was dismissed from the services without any opportunity of being heard and also, the Single Judge Bench had found that the reasons provided by the appellant was insufficient and was lacking the reasons for the dismissal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Senior Counsel representing the appellants, J.K. Tripathy, submitted that the delinquent officer did not avail of the opportunity provided by the appellants in course of departmental proceedings and it put forth, the respondent had not refuted any findings of the charges of the authority hence remitting the matter for a fresh consideration would not be fruitful.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The respondent in person refuted the submissions by the appellant counsel, stating that the order by the appellant authority (Executive Committee of the Board of Directors, NABARD) failed to provide the reason for the dismissal. The respondent stated that he had prayed to defer the departmental inquiry and the same was concluded in one day. Upon appeal by the respondent, the same was also handled negligently and the appeal was thereby rejected.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The High Court upon perusal of the order by the Executive Committee noted that the order was unspeakable of the exact nature of the cause for dismissal. The Court also noted that the appellant body being a Quasi-Judicial body bears the responsibility of providing proper reasons for attaining the conclusion. With regard to the maintainability of the writ petition, the Court placed reliance on the case of<em> S.L. Agarwal v. Hindustan Steel Ltd.,<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/O8c0T4L4\">(1970) 1 SCC 177<\/a> and stated that the NABARD is found to be a creation of statute and writ under Article 226 of the Constitution is maintainable. The High Court put forth that the infirmity of the impugned judgment, violation of principles of natural justice and disregard to the rules of procedure are to be dealt with separately and factually, thus it has no bearing on the maintainability of the petition. Thus, the impugned judgment does not suffer from any infirmity.[National Bank for Agriculture &amp; Rural Development v. Durgaprasad Sangramjit Mallick, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/gYLSC84K\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Ori 203<\/b><\/a>, decided on 17-05-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Orissa High Court: A Division Bench of S.K. Mishra and Dr A.K. Mishra, JJ., dismissed a writ appeal and provided the impugned <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[36459,36460,33508,36458],"class_list":["post-216540","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-dismissal-of-employee","tag-maintainability-of-petition","tag-nabard","tag-quasi-judicial-body"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Ori HC | Quasi-Judicial body ought to provide grounds of dismissal of employee from services | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/05\/ori-hc-quasi-judicial-body-ought-to-provide-grounds-of-dismissal-of-employee-from-services\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ori HC | Quasi-Judicial body ought to provide grounds of dismissal of employee from services\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Orissa High Court: A Division Bench of S.K. Mishra and Dr A.K. Mishra, JJ., dismissed a writ appeal and provided the impugned\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/05\/ori-hc-quasi-judicial-body-ought-to-provide-grounds-of-dismissal-of-employee-from-services\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-07-05T08:45:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-07-08T11:13:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/orissa-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/05\/ori-hc-quasi-judicial-body-ought-to-provide-grounds-of-dismissal-of-employee-from-services\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/05\/ori-hc-quasi-judicial-body-ought-to-provide-grounds-of-dismissal-of-employee-from-services\/\",\"name\":\"Ori HC | Quasi-Judicial body ought to provide grounds of dismissal of employee from services | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-07-05T08:45:23+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-07-08T11:13:34+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/05\/ori-hc-quasi-judicial-body-ought-to-provide-grounds-of-dismissal-of-employee-from-services\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/05\/ori-hc-quasi-judicial-body-ought-to-provide-grounds-of-dismissal-of-employee-from-services\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/05\/ori-hc-quasi-judicial-body-ought-to-provide-grounds-of-dismissal-of-employee-from-services\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ori HC | Quasi-Judicial body ought to provide grounds of dismissal of employee from services\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ori HC | Quasi-Judicial body ought to provide grounds of dismissal of employee from services | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/05\/ori-hc-quasi-judicial-body-ought-to-provide-grounds-of-dismissal-of-employee-from-services\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ori HC | Quasi-Judicial body ought to provide grounds of dismissal of employee from services","og_description":"Orissa High Court: A Division Bench of S.K. Mishra and Dr A.K. Mishra, JJ., dismissed a writ appeal and provided the impugned","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/05\/ori-hc-quasi-judicial-body-ought-to-provide-grounds-of-dismissal-of-employee-from-services\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-07-05T08:45:23+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-07-08T11:13:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/orissa-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/05\/ori-hc-quasi-judicial-body-ought-to-provide-grounds-of-dismissal-of-employee-from-services\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/05\/ori-hc-quasi-judicial-body-ought-to-provide-grounds-of-dismissal-of-employee-from-services\/","name":"Ori HC | Quasi-Judicial body ought to provide grounds of dismissal of employee from services | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-07-05T08:45:23+00:00","dateModified":"2019-07-08T11:13:34+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/05\/ori-hc-quasi-judicial-body-ought-to-provide-grounds-of-dismissal-of-employee-from-services\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/05\/ori-hc-quasi-judicial-body-ought-to-provide-grounds-of-dismissal-of-employee-from-services\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/05\/ori-hc-quasi-judicial-body-ought-to-provide-grounds-of-dismissal-of-employee-from-services\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ori HC | Quasi-Judicial body ought to provide grounds of dismissal of employee from services"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":222322,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/20\/raj-hc-court-can-exercise-its-power-of-judicial-review-if-the-quantum-of-penalty-is-disproportionate\/","url_meta":{"origin":216540,"position":0},"title":"Raj HC | Court can exercise its power of judicial review if the quantum of penalty is disproportionate","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 20, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Narendra Singh Dhaddha and Mohammad Rafiq, JJ. dismissed the appeal filed by Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (RSRTC) challenging a judgment passed by the single judge of the present court. In the instant case, the respondent-writ petitioner was appointed in the service of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":289300,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/12\/sc-upholds-dismissal-of-civil-judge-for-pronouncing-unprepared-judgments-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":216540,"position":1},"title":"Pronouncing unprepared judgments is gross negligence and callousness of Judicial Officer; SC upholds Civil Judge&#8217;s dismissal","author":"Editor","date":"April 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court upheld the penalty of dismissal of Civil Judge and said that providing an unprepared judgment, fait accompli, is completely unacceptable and unbecoming of a Judicial Officer.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Dismissal of Civil Judge","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1094.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1094.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1094.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1094.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":211173,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/01\/jk-hc-appellant-unable-to-produce-any-record-relating-to-respondents-resignation-order-passed-to-release-his-salary-upheld\/","url_meta":{"origin":216540,"position":2},"title":"J&#038;K HC | Appellant unable to produce any record relating to respondent\u2019s resignation: Order passed to release his salary upheld","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 1, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: The Bench of Gita Mittal, CJ and Sanjeev Kumar, J. dismissed the appeal filed against the order wherein a direction to the appellants was given to consider the case of the respondent which was in relation to his unreleased salary. The facts of the case\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":267456,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/law-helps-the-vigilant-and-not-those-who-sleep-over-their-rights\/","url_meta":{"origin":216540,"position":3},"title":"SL CoA | Law helps the vigilant and not those who sleep over their rights; Appeal dismissed for sleeping over rights  \u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"May 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Court of Appeal of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka: The Division Bench of Prasantha De Silva and K.K.A.V. Swarnadhipathi, JJ. dismissed an appeal which was filed against the dismissal of the revision application citing no exceptional circumstances to invoke the revisionary jurisdiction. The 2nd Party Respondent-Petitioner-Appellants (Appellants) had\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":206979,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/18\/discretionary-order-for-condonation-of-delay-passed-by-quasi-judicial-powers-cannot-be-interfered-with-in-writ-jurisdiction\/","url_meta":{"origin":216540,"position":4},"title":"Discretionary order for condonation of delay passed by quasi-judicial powers cannot be interfered with in writ jurisdiction","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 18, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sanjeev Kumar, J., dismissed the current writ petition invoked for quashing the order of the district judge whereby the appeal of the petitioner was held as non maintainable and the order passed by the Assistant Labour Commissioner regarding the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":202151,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/24\/court-may-substitute-penalty-imposed-on-employee-without-remanding-matter-to-employer-on-unfair-harassment\/","url_meta":{"origin":216540,"position":5},"title":"Court may substitute penalty imposed on employee without remanding matter to employer on unfair harassment","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 24, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Rekha Palli and Siddhartha Mridul, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed against the order of a Single Judge of the High Court whereby he allowed the petition of the respondent-employee against the order of his dismissal from service. The respondent was removed from\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216540","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=216540"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216540\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=216540"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=216540"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=216540"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}