{"id":216454,"date":"2019-07-04T12:00:28","date_gmt":"2019-07-04T06:30:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=216454"},"modified":"2019-07-04T10:42:53","modified_gmt":"2019-07-04T05:12:53","slug":"kar-hc-cognizance-of-complaint-about-negligence-against-a-medical-practitioner-cannot-be-taken-without-obtaining-an-opinion-from-an-expert-doctor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/04\/kar-hc-cognizance-of-complaint-about-negligence-against-a-medical-practitioner-cannot-be-taken-without-obtaining-an-opinion-from-an-expert-doctor\/","title":{"rendered":"Kar HC | Cognizance of complaint about negligence against a medical practitioner cannot be taken without obtaining an opinion from an expert doctor"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Karnataka High Court: <\/strong>Alok Aradhe, J. allowed a petition praying for quashing an order whereby the Principal Civil Judge took cognizance of an alleged negligent act against a doctor; on the grounds of violation of the due process of law and action being barred by limitation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioner, a medical practitioner, on being consulted by the respondent who was a chronic tobacco chewer having difficulty in opening his mouth, administered treatment to the respondent for a period of 13 days. Following which, the respondent allegedly encountered side effects of medicines and developed a puss formation in the back jaw. Three years later, the respondent filed a complaint against the petitioner for offences under Sections 284 and 326 of the Penal Code, 1860. The same was taken cognizance of and the petitioner <em>inter alia<\/em> sought quashing of proceedings. Hence, this petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Issue:<\/strong> Whether cognizance of a complaint about offence constituting medical negligence can be taken without referring to an expert&#8217;s opinion?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioner was represented by Bharath Kumar who contested that taking cognizance for offence as alleged was in violation of the prescribed process of law inasmuch as no expert opinion was obtained before doing so. Reliance was placed on <em>Martin F. D&#8217;Souza v. Mohd. Ishfaq, <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/8nvc6H6A\">(2009) 3 SCC 1<\/a>. Further, it was contested that limitation for one year was overdue to which the complaint could not have been admitted. else the same would be impermissible in law. The counsel for the respondent, however, did not concur with such claims and supported the passed order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court&#8217;s conclusion relied on the two-fold argument presented. It relied on the <em>Martin F D&#8217;Souza <\/em>case and held that taking cognizance of offence against a medical practitioner without referring to an opinion of an expert doctor is impermissible. It was also held that and the complaint filed by the respondent was barred by limitation as it was filed beyond the statutorily prescribed period of one year.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In light of the aforesaid rationale, the Court allowed the petition and quashed the impugned order. [Prabhakar v. K. Sigbathulla, Criminal Petition No. 2678 of 2017, decided on 31-05-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court: Alok Aradhe, J. allowed a petition praying for quashing an order whereby the Principal Civil Judge took cognizance of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[36430,3485,36432,36431],"class_list":["post-216454","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-cognizance-of-complaint","tag-medical_negligence","tag-medical-practitioner","tag-negligent-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Kar HC | Cognizance of complaint about negligence against a medical practitioner cannot be taken without obtaining an opinion from an expert doctor | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/04\/kar-hc-cognizance-of-complaint-about-negligence-against-a-medical-practitioner-cannot-be-taken-without-obtaining-an-opinion-from-an-expert-doctor\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kar HC | Cognizance of complaint about negligence against a medical practitioner cannot be taken without obtaining an opinion from an expert doctor\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Karnataka High Court: Alok Aradhe, J. allowed a petition praying for quashing an order whereby the Principal Civil Judge took cognizance of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/04\/kar-hc-cognizance-of-complaint-about-negligence-against-a-medical-practitioner-cannot-be-taken-without-obtaining-an-opinion-from-an-expert-doctor\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-07-04T06:30:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/04\/kar-hc-cognizance-of-complaint-about-negligence-against-a-medical-practitioner-cannot-be-taken-without-obtaining-an-opinion-from-an-expert-doctor\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/04\/kar-hc-cognizance-of-complaint-about-negligence-against-a-medical-practitioner-cannot-be-taken-without-obtaining-an-opinion-from-an-expert-doctor\/\",\"name\":\"Kar HC | Cognizance of complaint about negligence against a medical practitioner cannot be taken without obtaining an opinion from an expert doctor | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-07-04T06:30:28+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/04\/kar-hc-cognizance-of-complaint-about-negligence-against-a-medical-practitioner-cannot-be-taken-without-obtaining-an-opinion-from-an-expert-doctor\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/04\/kar-hc-cognizance-of-complaint-about-negligence-against-a-medical-practitioner-cannot-be-taken-without-obtaining-an-opinion-from-an-expert-doctor\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/04\/kar-hc-cognizance-of-complaint-about-negligence-against-a-medical-practitioner-cannot-be-taken-without-obtaining-an-opinion-from-an-expert-doctor\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kar HC | Cognizance of complaint about negligence against a medical practitioner cannot be taken without obtaining an opinion from an expert doctor\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kar HC | Cognizance of complaint about negligence against a medical practitioner cannot be taken without obtaining an opinion from an expert doctor | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/04\/kar-hc-cognizance-of-complaint-about-negligence-against-a-medical-practitioner-cannot-be-taken-without-obtaining-an-opinion-from-an-expert-doctor\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kar HC | Cognizance of complaint about negligence against a medical practitioner cannot be taken without obtaining an opinion from an expert doctor","og_description":"Karnataka High Court: Alok Aradhe, J. allowed a petition praying for quashing an order whereby the Principal Civil Judge took cognizance of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/04\/kar-hc-cognizance-of-complaint-about-negligence-against-a-medical-practitioner-cannot-be-taken-without-obtaining-an-opinion-from-an-expert-doctor\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-07-04T06:30:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/04\/kar-hc-cognizance-of-complaint-about-negligence-against-a-medical-practitioner-cannot-be-taken-without-obtaining-an-opinion-from-an-expert-doctor\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/04\/kar-hc-cognizance-of-complaint-about-negligence-against-a-medical-practitioner-cannot-be-taken-without-obtaining-an-opinion-from-an-expert-doctor\/","name":"Kar HC | Cognizance of complaint about negligence against a medical practitioner cannot be taken without obtaining an opinion from an expert doctor | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-07-04T06:30:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/04\/kar-hc-cognizance-of-complaint-about-negligence-against-a-medical-practitioner-cannot-be-taken-without-obtaining-an-opinion-from-an-expert-doctor\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/04\/kar-hc-cognizance-of-complaint-about-negligence-against-a-medical-practitioner-cannot-be-taken-without-obtaining-an-opinion-from-an-expert-doctor\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/04\/kar-hc-cognizance-of-complaint-about-negligence-against-a-medical-practitioner-cannot-be-taken-without-obtaining-an-opinion-from-an-expert-doctor\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kar HC | Cognizance of complaint about negligence against a medical practitioner cannot be taken without obtaining an opinion from an expert doctor"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":251733,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/26\/medical-negligence-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":216454,"position":0},"title":"NCDRC | In case a medical practitioner chooses to follow one procedure instead of another, which turned out to be a failure, Can the said act be negligent? Read on","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 26, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): Dr S.M. Kantikar (Presiding Member) while addressing an allegation of medical negligence, remarked that, At times, the professional is confronted with making a choice between the devil and the deep sea and he has to choose the lesser evil. The medical professional is often\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":256718,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/03\/medical-negligence-4\/","url_meta":{"origin":216454,"position":1},"title":"Medical Negligence | Kidney instead of Kidney Stones removed: Whether hospital will be vicariously liable for its employee\u2019s negligent act? Read to know","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 3, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Gujarat State, Ahmedabad: Noting the fact that a patients Kidney was removed instead of the stones in the Kidney, Dr J.G. Mecwan (Presiding Member) expressing its\u2019 opinion on medical negligence and hospital\u2019s vicarious liability expressed that, Hospital is liable with respect to medical negligence that may\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":267062,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/19\/medical-negligence-consumer-protection-act-should-not-be-a-halter-round-the-neckncdrc\/","url_meta":{"origin":216454,"position":2},"title":"[Medical Negligence] Consumer Protection Act should not be a halter round the neck: NCDRC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 19, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"National Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): In an alleged medical negligence case, the Coram of R.K. Agrawal, President and Dr S.M. Kantikar, Member, reiterates that the \u201cConsumer Protection Act should not be a halter round the neck.\u201d An instant appeal under Section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 was filed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":356934,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/18\/ker-hc-s-304a-ipc-applies-only-if-doctor-negligence-directly-causes-death\/","url_meta":{"origin":216454,"position":3},"title":"S. 304-A IPC attracted only when death is direct or proximate result of doctor\u2019s rash or negligent act: Kerala HC","author":"Editor","date":"August 18, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhile negligence was an omission to do something which a reasonable man would do, or the doing of something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do, medical negligence occurred when a healthcare professional breached his duty of care, causing harm to a patient.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"doctor's negligence directly causes death","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/doctors-negligence-directly-causes-death.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/doctors-negligence-directly-causes-death.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/doctors-negligence-directly-causes-death.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/doctors-negligence-directly-causes-death.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":179624,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/03\/lack-necessary-care-attention-skill-treating-patient-ruled-registering-case-medical-practitioner-complainants-request-not-allowed\/","url_meta":{"origin":216454,"position":4},"title":"If lack of necessary care, attention or skill in treating patient is ruled out, registering case against medical practitioner shall not be allowed","author":"Saba","date":"January 3, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of J&K at Jammu: A Bench comprising of M.K. Hanjura J., recently dealt with a petition wherein the petitioner primarily seeked the quashment of the order passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate in the case wherein an FIR had been filed under Section 304-A of the Ranbir Penal\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":326454,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/12\/private-complaint-of-doctors-negligence-cannot-entertained-unless-credible-opinion-another-doctor-jhc\/","url_meta":{"origin":216454,"position":5},"title":"Private complaint regarding doctor\u2019s rashness or negligence cannot be entertained, unless accompanied by credible opinion of another doctor: Jharkhand HC","author":"Arushi","date":"July 12, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court stated that allowing the proceedings to continue will amount to an abuse of the process of law.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jharkhand High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216454","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=216454"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216454\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=216454"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=216454"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=216454"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}