{"id":216280,"date":"2019-07-01T09:00:15","date_gmt":"2019-07-01T03:30:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=216280"},"modified":"2019-07-03T11:46:20","modified_gmt":"2019-07-03T06:16:20","slug":"bom-hc-maratha-reservation-full-report-validity-of-sebc-act-providing-for-reservation-to-maratha-upheld-quantum-of-165-reservation-held-not-justifiable","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/01\/bom-hc-maratha-reservation-full-report-validity-of-sebc-act-providing-for-reservation-to-maratha-upheld-quantum-of-165-reservation-held-not-justifiable\/","title":{"rendered":"Bom HC | Maratha Reservation [Full Report] Validity of SEBC Act providing for reservation to Maratha upheld, quantum of 16% reservation held not justifiable"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><em>&#8220;Bowed by the weight of centuries, he leans\u00a0upon his hoe and gazes on the ground the emptiness of ages in his face and on his back, the burden\u00a0of the world.&#8221;<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Bombay High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>These lines from Nehru&#8217;s autobiography were quoted by Ranjit More, J. in the judgment delivered for himself and Bharati H. Dangre, J. to describe the social status of the Maratha community and the need of a solution to the peculiar problem brought before the Court. In a 487-pages long Judgment, the High Court upheld the validity of the Maharashtra\u00a0State Reservation (of seat for admission in educational institutions in the State and for appointments in the public services and posts under the State) for Socially and Educationally Backward Classes (SEBC) Act, 2018 providing reservation for the Maratha community. However, at the same time, the Court held that the quantum of reservation at 16% was not justifiable and therefore the same was partially set aside.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em><strong>The challenge\u00a0<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court was dealing with a batch of writ petitions posing a challenge to the SEBC Act which categorise Marathas as &#8216;Socially and Educationally Backward Class&#8217; and confers 16% reservation in their favour in the seats for admission in educational institutions and to the posts for appointments in public services in the State of Maharashtra. One of the prime contentions of the petitioners was that the said Act was a fraud on the Constitution as it hiked the reservation available in the State of Maharashtra from 52% to 68% and thereby crossed the barrier of the ceiling limit of 50% imposed by the Supreme Court in <em>Indra Sawhney v. Union of India,\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/lHvSz4DM\">1992 Supp (3) SCC 217<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em><strong>Government&#8217;s stand<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Government of Maharashtra justified the enactment of SEBC Act as being warranted by these extraordinary circumstances &#8212; (a) Gradual deterioration in educational and social backwardness of Marathas; (b)Deterioration in income as well as the desperation of families to survive; (c) Substantial \u00a0backlog in services under the State; (d) Increase in the number of suicides as a result of form indebtedness and shift to manual labour; (e) Inability to raise the standard of living as a result of adverse conditions.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em><strong>The issue<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00a0The Court considered the question &#8212; Whether the SEBC Act, 2018 is constitutionally invalid on account of lack of legislative competence on the following sub-heads: (a) the subsisting interim order passed by the Bombay High Court in\u00a0<em>Sanjeet Shukla v. State of Maharashtra,\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/553h7hU3\">2014 SCC OnLine Bom 1672<\/a>, thereby granting stay to a similar enactment and ordinance of the State, which was pending for adjudication before the Court; (b) the Constitution (102nd Amendment) Act, 2018 depriving the State legislature of its power to enact a legislation determining the Socially and Educationally Backward Class and conferring the benefits on the said class in exercise of its enabling power under Articles 15(4) and 16(4) of the Constitution as now such classes are those as declared under Article 342-A of the Constitution; (c) the limitation of 50% reservation set out by the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in\u00a0<em>Indra Sawhney.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em><strong>Conclusions of the Court<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The conclusion of the High Court on various points as formulated and deliberated upon are summarised in seriatim:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(i) The State possesses the legislative competence to enact the Maharashtra State Reservation (of seats for \u00a0admission in educational institutions in the State and for appointments in the public services and posts under the State) for Socially and Educationally Backward Classes (SEBC) Act, 2018, and the interim order passed by the Bombay High Court in\u00a0<em>Sanjeet Shukla v. State of Maharashtra,\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/553h7hU3\">2014 SCC OnLine Bom 1672<\/a>. We resultantly uphold the impugned enactment except to the quantum of reservation as set out in Point 6.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(ii) The report of the Maharashtra State Backward Class Commission under the Chairmanship of Justice Gaikwad is based on quantifiable and contemporaneous data and it has conclusively established the social, economic and educational backwardness of the Maratha Community and it has also established the inadequacy of representation of the Maratha Community in public employment\/posts under the State. Accordingly, the MSBCC Report is upheld.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(iii) The classification of the Maratha class into &#8220;Socially and Educationally Backward Class&#8221; complies the twin test of reasonable classification permissible under Article 14 of the Constitution of India &#8212; namely, (a) intelligible differentia and (b) rational nexus to the object sought to be achieved.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(iv) The limit of the reservation should not exceed 50% however in exceptional circumstances and extraordinary situations, this limit can be crossed subject to availability of quantifiable and contemporaneous data reflecting backwardness, the inadequacy of representation and without affecting the efficiency in administration.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(v) The report of the Gaikwad Commission has set out the exceptional circumstances and extraordinary situations justifying crossing of the limit of 50% reservation as set out in\u00a0<em>Indra Sawhney v. Union of India,\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/553h7hU3\">1992 Supp (3) SCC 217<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(vi) The State Government in the exercise of its enabling power under Articles 15(4) and (5) and 16(4) of the Constitution is\u00a0justified, in the backdrop of the report\u00a0of MSBCC, in making provision for a separate reservation to Maratha community. However, the quantum of the reservation set out by the SEBC Act in Section 4(1)(a) and 4(1)(b) as 16% is not justifiable and resultantly the quantum of reservation under the said provisions over and above 12% and 13% respectively as recommended by the Commission is quashed and set aside.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em><strong>Hope and trust<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">While concluding its judgment, the Court stated:\u00a0<em>At present, we have dealt with the extraordinary situation with which the State is confronted with where it justified the exceeding of limit, and we, by taking consideration the exceptional circumstances, have upheld this exercise\u00a0of power by the State. We hope and trust that the said situation would be reviewed by the State in the near future so that it follows the rule of caution and do not forever continue with this &#8220;Exceptional circumstances and extraordinary situation.&#8221;<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em><strong>Note of appreciation for the counsel<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Before concluding the Court placed n record the appreciation for the erudite submissions advanced by the Senior Counsel who ably assisted the Court in delivering the judgment. TheCourt stated that it deeply valued the assistance rendered by Senior Advocates Arvind Datar, S.G. Aney and Pradeep Sancheti assisted by the junior counsel on record. The Court also acknowledged the valuable assistance rendered by Gunratan Sadavarte and S.B. Talekar, Advocates. The Court further acknowledged the valuable assistance rendered by the Senior Advocate Ranjeet Thorat who was ably assisted by Akshay Shinde and Prachi Tatke, Advocates, for his strenuous efforts. The court also acknowledged the special assistance rendered by the Senior Advocates Mukul Rohatgi and Paramjeet Singh Patwalia. It was also noted that the Court was deeply assisted in its endeavour by Senior \u00a0Advocates Rafiq Dada, Arif Bookwala, A.Y. Sakhare, Prasad Dhakephalkar, Vineet Naik and Mihir Desai. Assistance of Rajesh Tekale, Ashish Gaikwad and Abhijeet Patil, Advocates were also acknowledged. [Jishri Laxmanrao Patil v. State of Maharashtra, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/pD8Iu4C8\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Bom 1107<\/b><\/a>, decided on 27-06-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;Bowed by the weight of centuries, he leans\u00a0upon his hoe and gazes on the ground the emptiness of ages in his face <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":74381,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[36255,3634,36254,36349,36350],"class_list":["post-216280","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-16-reservation","tag-educational_institutions","tag-maratha-reservation","tag-public-service","tag-socially-and-economically-backward-class"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Bom HC | Maratha Reservation [Full Report] Validity of SEBC Act providing for reservation to Maratha upheld, quantum of 16% reservation held not justifiable | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/01\/bom-hc-maratha-reservation-full-report-validity-of-sebc-act-providing-for-reservation-to-maratha-upheld-quantum-of-165-reservation-held-not-justifiable\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bom HC | Maratha Reservation [Full Report] Validity of SEBC Act providing for reservation to Maratha upheld, quantum of 16% reservation held not justifiable\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"&#8220;Bowed by the weight of centuries, he leans\u00a0upon his hoe and gazes on the ground the emptiness of ages in his face\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/01\/bom-hc-maratha-reservation-full-report-validity-of-sebc-act-providing-for-reservation-to-maratha-upheld-quantum-of-165-reservation-held-not-justifiable\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-07-01T03:30:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-07-03T06:16:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/07\\\/01\\\/bom-hc-maratha-reservation-full-report-validity-of-sebc-act-providing-for-reservation-to-maratha-upheld-quantum-of-165-reservation-held-not-justifiable\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/07\\\/01\\\/bom-hc-maratha-reservation-full-report-validity-of-sebc-act-providing-for-reservation-to-maratha-upheld-quantum-of-165-reservation-held-not-justifiable\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"headline\":\"Bom HC | Maratha Reservation [Full Report] Validity of SEBC Act providing for reservation to Maratha upheld, quantum of 16% reservation held not justifiable\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-07-01T03:30:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-07-03T06:16:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/07\\\/01\\\/bom-hc-maratha-reservation-full-report-validity-of-sebc-act-providing-for-reservation-to-maratha-upheld-quantum-of-165-reservation-held-not-justifiable\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1158,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/07\\\/01\\\/bom-hc-maratha-reservation-full-report-validity-of-sebc-act-providing-for-reservation-to-maratha-upheld-quantum-of-165-reservation-held-not-justifiable\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"16% Reservation\",\"educational institutions\",\"Maratha Reservation\",\"Public Service\",\"Socially and Economically Backward Class\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/07\\\/01\\\/bom-hc-maratha-reservation-full-report-validity-of-sebc-act-providing-for-reservation-to-maratha-upheld-quantum-of-165-reservation-held-not-justifiable\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/07\\\/01\\\/bom-hc-maratha-reservation-full-report-validity-of-sebc-act-providing-for-reservation-to-maratha-upheld-quantum-of-165-reservation-held-not-justifiable\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/07\\\/01\\\/bom-hc-maratha-reservation-full-report-validity-of-sebc-act-providing-for-reservation-to-maratha-upheld-quantum-of-165-reservation-held-not-justifiable\\\/\",\"name\":\"Bom HC | Maratha Reservation [Full Report] Validity of SEBC Act providing for reservation to Maratha upheld, quantum of 16% reservation held not justifiable | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/07\\\/01\\\/bom-hc-maratha-reservation-full-report-validity-of-sebc-act-providing-for-reservation-to-maratha-upheld-quantum-of-165-reservation-held-not-justifiable\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/07\\\/01\\\/bom-hc-maratha-reservation-full-report-validity-of-sebc-act-providing-for-reservation-to-maratha-upheld-quantum-of-165-reservation-held-not-justifiable\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-07-01T03:30:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-07-03T06:16:20+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/07\\\/01\\\/bom-hc-maratha-reservation-full-report-validity-of-sebc-act-providing-for-reservation-to-maratha-upheld-quantum-of-165-reservation-held-not-justifiable\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/07\\\/01\\\/bom-hc-maratha-reservation-full-report-validity-of-sebc-act-providing-for-reservation-to-maratha-upheld-quantum-of-165-reservation-held-not-justifiable\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/07\\\/01\\\/bom-hc-maratha-reservation-full-report-validity-of-sebc-act-providing-for-reservation-to-maratha-upheld-quantum-of-165-reservation-held-not-justifiable\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/07\\\/01\\\/bom-hc-maratha-reservation-full-report-validity-of-sebc-act-providing-for-reservation-to-maratha-upheld-quantum-of-165-reservation-held-not-justifiable\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bom HC | Maratha Reservation [Full Report] Validity of SEBC Act providing for reservation to Maratha upheld, quantum of 16% reservation held not justifiable\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bom HC | Maratha Reservation [Full Report] Validity of SEBC Act providing for reservation to Maratha upheld, quantum of 16% reservation held not justifiable | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/01\/bom-hc-maratha-reservation-full-report-validity-of-sebc-act-providing-for-reservation-to-maratha-upheld-quantum-of-165-reservation-held-not-justifiable\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bom HC | Maratha Reservation [Full Report] Validity of SEBC Act providing for reservation to Maratha upheld, quantum of 16% reservation held not justifiable","og_description":"&#8220;Bowed by the weight of centuries, he leans\u00a0upon his hoe and gazes on the ground the emptiness of ages in his face","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/01\/bom-hc-maratha-reservation-full-report-validity-of-sebc-act-providing-for-reservation-to-maratha-upheld-quantum-of-165-reservation-held-not-justifiable\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-07-01T03:30:15+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-07-03T06:16:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/01\/bom-hc-maratha-reservation-full-report-validity-of-sebc-act-providing-for-reservation-to-maratha-upheld-quantum-of-165-reservation-held-not-justifiable\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/01\/bom-hc-maratha-reservation-full-report-validity-of-sebc-act-providing-for-reservation-to-maratha-upheld-quantum-of-165-reservation-held-not-justifiable\/"},"author":{"name":"Bhumika Indulia","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"headline":"Bom HC | Maratha Reservation [Full Report] Validity of SEBC Act providing for reservation to Maratha upheld, quantum of 16% reservation held not justifiable","datePublished":"2019-07-01T03:30:15+00:00","dateModified":"2019-07-03T06:16:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/01\/bom-hc-maratha-reservation-full-report-validity-of-sebc-act-providing-for-reservation-to-maratha-upheld-quantum-of-165-reservation-held-not-justifiable\/"},"wordCount":1158,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/01\/bom-hc-maratha-reservation-full-report-validity-of-sebc-act-providing-for-reservation-to-maratha-upheld-quantum-of-165-reservation-held-not-justifiable\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","keywords":["16% Reservation","educational institutions","Maratha Reservation","Public Service","Socially and Economically Backward Class"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/01\/bom-hc-maratha-reservation-full-report-validity-of-sebc-act-providing-for-reservation-to-maratha-upheld-quantum-of-165-reservation-held-not-justifiable\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/01\/bom-hc-maratha-reservation-full-report-validity-of-sebc-act-providing-for-reservation-to-maratha-upheld-quantum-of-165-reservation-held-not-justifiable\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/01\/bom-hc-maratha-reservation-full-report-validity-of-sebc-act-providing-for-reservation-to-maratha-upheld-quantum-of-165-reservation-held-not-justifiable\/","name":"Bom HC | Maratha Reservation [Full Report] Validity of SEBC Act providing for reservation to Maratha upheld, quantum of 16% reservation held not justifiable | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/01\/bom-hc-maratha-reservation-full-report-validity-of-sebc-act-providing-for-reservation-to-maratha-upheld-quantum-of-165-reservation-held-not-justifiable\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/01\/bom-hc-maratha-reservation-full-report-validity-of-sebc-act-providing-for-reservation-to-maratha-upheld-quantum-of-165-reservation-held-not-justifiable\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","datePublished":"2019-07-01T03:30:15+00:00","dateModified":"2019-07-03T06:16:20+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/01\/bom-hc-maratha-reservation-full-report-validity-of-sebc-act-providing-for-reservation-to-maratha-upheld-quantum-of-165-reservation-held-not-justifiable\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/01\/bom-hc-maratha-reservation-full-report-validity-of-sebc-act-providing-for-reservation-to-maratha-upheld-quantum-of-165-reservation-held-not-justifiable\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/01\/bom-hc-maratha-reservation-full-report-validity-of-sebc-act-providing-for-reservation-to-maratha-upheld-quantum-of-165-reservation-held-not-justifiable\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","width":1331,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/01\/bom-hc-maratha-reservation-full-report-validity-of-sebc-act-providing-for-reservation-to-maratha-upheld-quantum-of-165-reservation-held-not-justifiable\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bom HC | Maratha Reservation [Full Report] Validity of SEBC Act providing for reservation to Maratha upheld, quantum of 16% reservation held not justifiable"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":225226,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/05\/maharashtra-reservation-sc-to-begin-final-hearing-in-maratha-quota-issue-from-march-17\/","url_meta":{"origin":216280,"position":0},"title":"Maharashtra reservation| SC to begin final hearing in Maratha Quota issue from March 17","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 5, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Court will start from March 17 the final hearing on the petitions challenging the constitutional validity of a Maharashtra law, which grants reservation to the Maratha community in education and jobs. A bench of Justices L Nageswara Rao and Deepak Gupta refused to pass an interim order\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":216181,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/27\/breaking-bombay-hc-upholds-16-maratha-reservation-given-by-maharashtra-government\/","url_meta":{"origin":216280,"position":1},"title":"Breaking | Bombay HC upholds Maratha Reservation given by Maharashtra Government!","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"As reported by media, the Division Bench of the High Court has upheld the Maratha Reservation for educational institutions and appointments to posts in public services as provided by the Maharashtra Government but says \"16% is not justifiable\". A petition had challenged its constitutional validity. The Judgment was reserved after\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":235609,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/10\/maratha-reservation-implementation-of-maharashtra-state-reservation-act-stayed-larger-bench-to-interpret-constitution-102nd-amendment-act-2018\/","url_meta":{"origin":216280,"position":2},"title":"Maratha Reservation| Implementation of Maharashtra State Reservation Act stayed; Larger bench to interpret Constitution (102nd Amendment) Act, 2018","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"September 10, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of L. Nageswara Rao, Hemant Gupta and S. Ravindra Bhat, JJ has referred to a larger bench, the substantial question of the interpretation of the provisions inserted by the Constitution (102nd Amendment) Act, 2018. It further stayed the implementation of the Maharashtra State Reservation (of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":216256,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/28\/maharashtra-govt-files-caveat-in-sc-anticipating-challenge-to-bombay-hcs-maratha-quota-verdict\/","url_meta":{"origin":216280,"position":3},"title":"Maharashtra Govt files caveat in SC anticipating challenge to Bombay HC&#8217;s Maratha Quota verdict","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"June 28, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Maharashtra government has filed a caveat in the Supreme Court anticipating challenge to the verdict passed by the Bombay High Court which upheld the constitutional validity of reservation for Maratha community in education and government jobs in the state. In its plea, the Maharashtra government said no\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6322,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/25\/maratha-quota-in-maharashtra-put-on-hold\/","url_meta":{"origin":216280,"position":4},"title":"Maratha Quota in Maharashtra put on hold","author":"Sucheta","date":"November 25, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: In an interim order, a bench comprising of MS Shah, CJ and MS Sonak, J stayed the ordinance to provide 16% reservation to the Maratha community in government jobs and educational institutions in Maharashtra. The Court also stayed the 5% quota for Muslims in government jobs but\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;High Courts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":216080,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/25\/breaking-maratha-reservation-judgment-to-be-pronounced-on-27-03-2019-by-bombay-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":216280,"position":5},"title":"[Breaking] Maratha Reservation | Judgment to be pronounced on 27-03-2019 by Bombay High Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 25, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"As reported by ANI, Division Bench comprising of Ranjit More and Bharti Dangre, JJ. will pronounce the Judgment on Maratha Reservation on 27-03-2019. The Judgment was reserved after hearing the petitions on 26-03-2019. Background: In accordance with the amendment in Socially Economically Backward Class (SEBC) Act, 2018, 16% reservation was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216280","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=216280"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216280\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/74381"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=216280"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=216280"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=216280"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}