{"id":216168,"date":"2019-06-27T19:00:48","date_gmt":"2019-06-27T13:30:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=216168"},"modified":"2019-07-05T12:12:25","modified_gmt":"2019-07-05T06:42:25","slug":"all-hc-power-under-s-482-crpc-to-be-used-for-limited-purpose-as-frequent-and-uncalled-interference-at-preliminary-stage-may-obstruct-the-progress-of-inquiry","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/27\/all-hc-power-under-s-482-crpc-to-be-used-for-limited-purpose-as-frequent-and-uncalled-interference-at-preliminary-stage-may-obstruct-the-progress-of-inquiry\/","title":{"rendered":"All HC | Power under S. 482 CrPC to be used for limited purpose as frequent and uncalled interference at preliminary stage may obstruct the progress of inquiry"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Allahabad High Court<\/strong>: Dinesh Kumar Singh, J. disposed of the petition on the ground that no substantial ground was made for exercising the power under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A petition was filed in order to quash the summoning order passed by 1<sup>st<\/sup> Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate under Section 498-A, 323, 504 and 506 of the Penal Code, 1860.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Rajendra Prasad, counsel for the petitioner submits that First Information Report had been lodged against the petitioner on the basis of false and fabricated facts. It was also submitted that the petitioner was ready to surrender before the court below and some protection may be granted to him.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Additional Government Advocate had opposed the petition. It was discussed that the\u00a0 power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was not to be exercised in a routine manner, but it is for limited purposes, namely, to give effect to any order under the Code, or to prevent abuse of process of any Court or otherwise to secure ends of justice. It was reiterated that according to the precedents the power under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 <em>should not preempt a trial and cannot be used in a routine manner so as to cut short the entire process of the trial before the courts below<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Case of\u00a0 <em>Lee Kun Hee<\/em> v. <em>State of U.P.,<\/em> JT 2012 (2) SC 237, was brought in light,\u00a0 in which it was held that \u201c<em>Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC cannot go into the truth or otherwise of the allegations and appreciate evidence, if any, available on record. Interference would be justified only when a clear case of such interference is made out. Frequent and uncalled interference even at the preliminary stage by High Court may result in causing an obstruction in the progress of inquiry in a criminal case which may not be in public interest\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">High Court after perusal of matter on record opined it cannot be said that a cognizable offence was not made out and thus there was no sufficient ground to quash the impugned proceedings, although it was directed that if the petitioner surrenders before the court within ten days with an application for bail the same shall be considered and disposed of expeditiously in accordance with the law.[Anil Kumar Srivastava v. State of U.P, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/nkWvDNde\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine All 2299<\/b><\/a>, decided on 01-04-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Allahabad High Court: Dinesh Kumar Singh, J. disposed of the petition on the ground that no substantial ground was made for exercising <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[33741,28294,36305,13021],"class_list":["post-216168","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-cognizable-offence","tag-inquiry","tag-preempt-trial","tag-section-482-crpc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>All HC | Power under S. 482 CrPC to be used for limited purpose as frequent and uncalled interference at preliminary stage may obstruct the progress of inquiry | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/27\/all-hc-power-under-s-482-crpc-to-be-used-for-limited-purpose-as-frequent-and-uncalled-interference-at-preliminary-stage-may-obstruct-the-progress-of-inquiry\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"All HC | Power under S. 482 CrPC to be used for limited purpose as frequent and uncalled interference at preliminary stage may obstruct the progress of inquiry\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad High Court: Dinesh Kumar Singh, J. disposed of the petition on the ground that no substantial ground was made for exercising\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/27\/all-hc-power-under-s-482-crpc-to-be-used-for-limited-purpose-as-frequent-and-uncalled-interference-at-preliminary-stage-may-obstruct-the-progress-of-inquiry\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-06-27T13:30:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-07-05T06:42:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/27\/all-hc-power-under-s-482-crpc-to-be-used-for-limited-purpose-as-frequent-and-uncalled-interference-at-preliminary-stage-may-obstruct-the-progress-of-inquiry\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/27\/all-hc-power-under-s-482-crpc-to-be-used-for-limited-purpose-as-frequent-and-uncalled-interference-at-preliminary-stage-may-obstruct-the-progress-of-inquiry\/\",\"name\":\"All HC | Power under S. 482 CrPC to be used for limited purpose as frequent and uncalled interference at preliminary stage may obstruct the progress of inquiry | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-06-27T13:30:48+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-07-05T06:42:25+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/27\/all-hc-power-under-s-482-crpc-to-be-used-for-limited-purpose-as-frequent-and-uncalled-interference-at-preliminary-stage-may-obstruct-the-progress-of-inquiry\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/27\/all-hc-power-under-s-482-crpc-to-be-used-for-limited-purpose-as-frequent-and-uncalled-interference-at-preliminary-stage-may-obstruct-the-progress-of-inquiry\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/27\/all-hc-power-under-s-482-crpc-to-be-used-for-limited-purpose-as-frequent-and-uncalled-interference-at-preliminary-stage-may-obstruct-the-progress-of-inquiry\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"All HC | Power under S. 482 CrPC to be used for limited purpose as frequent and uncalled interference at preliminary stage may obstruct the progress of inquiry\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"All HC | Power under S. 482 CrPC to be used for limited purpose as frequent and uncalled interference at preliminary stage may obstruct the progress of inquiry | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/27\/all-hc-power-under-s-482-crpc-to-be-used-for-limited-purpose-as-frequent-and-uncalled-interference-at-preliminary-stage-may-obstruct-the-progress-of-inquiry\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"All HC | Power under S. 482 CrPC to be used for limited purpose as frequent and uncalled interference at preliminary stage may obstruct the progress of inquiry","og_description":"Allahabad High Court: Dinesh Kumar Singh, J. disposed of the petition on the ground that no substantial ground was made for exercising","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/27\/all-hc-power-under-s-482-crpc-to-be-used-for-limited-purpose-as-frequent-and-uncalled-interference-at-preliminary-stage-may-obstruct-the-progress-of-inquiry\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-06-27T13:30:48+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-07-05T06:42:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/27\/all-hc-power-under-s-482-crpc-to-be-used-for-limited-purpose-as-frequent-and-uncalled-interference-at-preliminary-stage-may-obstruct-the-progress-of-inquiry\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/27\/all-hc-power-under-s-482-crpc-to-be-used-for-limited-purpose-as-frequent-and-uncalled-interference-at-preliminary-stage-may-obstruct-the-progress-of-inquiry\/","name":"All HC | Power under S. 482 CrPC to be used for limited purpose as frequent and uncalled interference at preliminary stage may obstruct the progress of inquiry | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-06-27T13:30:48+00:00","dateModified":"2019-07-05T06:42:25+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/27\/all-hc-power-under-s-482-crpc-to-be-used-for-limited-purpose-as-frequent-and-uncalled-interference-at-preliminary-stage-may-obstruct-the-progress-of-inquiry\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/27\/all-hc-power-under-s-482-crpc-to-be-used-for-limited-purpose-as-frequent-and-uncalled-interference-at-preliminary-stage-may-obstruct-the-progress-of-inquiry\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/27\/all-hc-power-under-s-482-crpc-to-be-used-for-limited-purpose-as-frequent-and-uncalled-interference-at-preliminary-stage-may-obstruct-the-progress-of-inquiry\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"All HC | Power under S. 482 CrPC to be used for limited purpose as frequent and uncalled interference at preliminary stage may obstruct the progress of inquiry"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":206969,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/18\/petition-in-nature-of-second-revision-not-a-proper-case-in-which-inherent-power-could-be-invoked-under-section-482-crpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":216168,"position":0},"title":"Petition in nature of second revision not a proper case in which inherent power could be invoked under Section 482 CrPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 18, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: This Criminal Case was filed before a Single Judge Bench of Rajendra Kumar Srivastava, J., by petitioner under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code for quashing the charge sheet pending before the JMFC and order passed by Additional Sessions Judge under Section 3 and 22\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":241875,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/06\/hp-hc-inherent-powers-under-s-482-crpc-is-not-inhibited-by-s-320-crpc-and-fir-as-well-as-criminal-proceedings-can-be-quashed-by-exercising-the-same-hc-reiterates\/","url_meta":{"origin":216168,"position":1},"title":"HP HC | Inherent powers under S. 482 CrPC is not inhibited by S. 320 CrPC and FIR as well as criminal proceedings can be quashed by exercising the same; HC reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"January 6, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: \u00a0Vivek Singh Thakur, J., while exercising powers under Section 482 CrPC, allows the present petition,\u00a0 stating, \u201c\u2026 power of High Court under Section 482 CrPC is not inhibited by the provisions of Section 320 CrPC and FIR as well as criminal proceedings can be quashed by\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":308475,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/05\/directions-for-investigation-u-s-1563-crpc-cannot-be-given-mechanically-by-magistrate-application-of-mind-must-dhc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":216168,"position":2},"title":"Directions for investigation u\/s 156(3) CrPC cannot be given mechanically by Magistrate; application of mind necessary: Delhi High Court","author":"Simranjeet","date":"December 5, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cMagistrate is not bound to direct investigation by police even if all allegations made in complaint disclose ingredients of cognizable offence. Each case must be viewed depending upon facts and circumstances involved therein.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":306023,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/31\/maintainability-second-petition-under-section-482-crpc-on-grounds-available-at-time-of-first-petition-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":216168,"position":3},"title":"Is Second Petition under Section 482 CrPC maintainable on grounds available at the time of First Petition? Supreme Court determines","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 31, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court was deciding the appeal against Allahabad High Court\u2019s order wherein it had held that the petitioner could not continue to challenge the proceedings when he had not raised objections to the charge sheet or cognizance order in his first petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Second Petition under Section 482 CrPC","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Second-Petition-under-Section-482-CrPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Second-Petition-under-Section-482-CrPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Second-Petition-under-Section-482-CrPC.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Second-Petition-under-Section-482-CrPC.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":259938,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/13\/kar-hc-while-deciding-the-petition-under-s-482-of-crpc-evidence-cannot-be-appreciated-as-it-lies-within-the-domain-of-trial-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":216168,"position":4},"title":"Kar HC |\u00a0 While deciding the petition under S. 482 of CrPC evidence cannot be appreciated as it lies within the domain of Trial Court","author":"Editor","date":"January 13, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: Sreenivas Harish Kumar J. dismissed the petition being devoid of merits. The facts of the case are such that the 1st petitioner is the husband of 2nd respondent. On certain allegations that the petitioners subjected the 2nd respondent to harassment in connection with demand for dowry, FIR\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":208941,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/29\/del-hc-plea-of-debt-being-time-barred-becomes-inconsequential-where-issuance-of-cheque-gives-rise-to-presumption-of-amount-being-due\/","url_meta":{"origin":216168,"position":5},"title":"Del HC | Plea of debt being time barred becomes inconsequential where issuance of cheque gives rise to presumption of amount being due","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 29, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0The Bench of R.K. Gauba, J. dismissed a petition filed under Section 482 CrPC holding it to be an abuse of process of law. Petitioner was accused for committing an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (dishonour of cheque). It was alleged that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216168","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=216168"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216168\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=216168"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=216168"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=216168"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}