{"id":216130,"date":"2019-06-26T16:00:47","date_gmt":"2019-06-26T10:30:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=216130"},"modified":"2019-07-05T12:25:48","modified_gmt":"2019-07-05T06:55:48","slug":"ph-hc-litigants-to-exercise-due-diligence-in-pursuing-remedy-when-judgment-and-decree-already-assailed-before-lower-appellate-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/26\/ph-hc-litigants-to-exercise-due-diligence-in-pursuing-remedy-when-judgment-and-decree-already-assailed-before-lower-appellate-court\/","title":{"rendered":"P&H HC | Litigants to exercise due diligence in pursuing remedy when judgment and decree already assailed before lower appellate court"},"content":{"rendered":"

Punjab and Haryana High Court:<\/strong> Amit Rawal J., dismissed the second appeal petition on the ground that there was no substantial question for determination.<\/p>\n

The regular second appeal was preferred at the instance of the appellant\/defendant against the decretal suit against the injunction order to her to not to interfere in the subject land.<\/p>\n

The respondent-plaintiff alleged that plaintiff and defendant had joint land which was purchased by the plaintiff for Rs 1 lakh for the purpose of passage. The defendants were extending threats for construction on the land including 1 biswa and perpetually requested but resulted into celandra under Section 107(151) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.<\/p>\n

Sanjiv Gupta, counsel for the appellant\/defendant submitted that suit for the injunction prima facie as per the record of local commissioner reflecting the possession of 1 biswa more than her ownership, was not maintainable. In the absence of relief of mandatory injunction, decree qua relief of possession could not be moulded under the provisions of Order 7 Rule 7 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.<\/p>\n

The defendant opposed the suit and denied the averments and stated that she was the owner of the land measuring six biswa as per the registered sale deed.<\/p>\n

Court opined that \u201clitigants are required to exercise the due diligence in the pursuing the remedy particularly when the appellant had assailed the judgment and decree of the trial Court before the Lower Appellate Court. There is no equity on the person who has been found to be in alleged encroachment\u201d <\/em>Thus, the petition was dismissed.[Sabri v. Gulzar Ahmed, 2019 SCC OnLine P&H 708<\/b><\/a>, decided on 24-05-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Punjab and Haryana High Court: Amit Rawal J., dismissed the second appeal petition on the ground that there was no substantial question <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[20521,2713,36279,3717],"class_list":["post-216130","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appellate-court","tag-decree","tag-decretal-suit","tag-due_diligence"],"yoast_head":"\nP&H HC | Litigants to exercise due diligence in pursuing remedy when judgment and decree already assailed before lower appellate court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/26\/ph-hc-litigants-to-exercise-due-diligence-in-pursuing-remedy-when-judgment-and-decree-already-assailed-before-lower-appellate-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"P&H HC | Litigants to exercise due diligence in pursuing remedy when judgment and decree already assailed before lower appellate court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Punjab and Haryana High Court: Amit Rawal J., dismissed the second appeal petition on the ground that there was no substantial question\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/26\/ph-hc-litigants-to-exercise-due-diligence-in-pursuing-remedy-when-judgment-and-decree-already-assailed-before-lower-appellate-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-06-26T10:30:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-07-05T06:55:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/26\/ph-hc-litigants-to-exercise-due-diligence-in-pursuing-remedy-when-judgment-and-decree-already-assailed-before-lower-appellate-court\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/26\/ph-hc-litigants-to-exercise-due-diligence-in-pursuing-remedy-when-judgment-and-decree-already-assailed-before-lower-appellate-court\/\",\"name\":\"P&H HC | Litigants to exercise due diligence in pursuing remedy when judgment and decree already assailed before lower appellate court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-06-26T10:30:47+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-07-05T06:55:48+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/26\/ph-hc-litigants-to-exercise-due-diligence-in-pursuing-remedy-when-judgment-and-decree-already-assailed-before-lower-appellate-court\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/26\/ph-hc-litigants-to-exercise-due-diligence-in-pursuing-remedy-when-judgment-and-decree-already-assailed-before-lower-appellate-court\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/26\/ph-hc-litigants-to-exercise-due-diligence-in-pursuing-remedy-when-judgment-and-decree-already-assailed-before-lower-appellate-court\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"P&H HC | Litigants to exercise due diligence in pursuing remedy when judgment and decree already assailed before lower appellate court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"P&H HC | Litigants to exercise due diligence in pursuing remedy when judgment and decree already assailed before lower appellate court | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/26\/ph-hc-litigants-to-exercise-due-diligence-in-pursuing-remedy-when-judgment-and-decree-already-assailed-before-lower-appellate-court\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"P&H HC | Litigants to exercise due diligence in pursuing remedy when judgment and decree already assailed before lower appellate court","og_description":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: Amit Rawal J., dismissed the second appeal petition on the ground that there was no substantial question","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/26\/ph-hc-litigants-to-exercise-due-diligence-in-pursuing-remedy-when-judgment-and-decree-already-assailed-before-lower-appellate-court\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-06-26T10:30:47+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-07-05T06:55:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/26\/ph-hc-litigants-to-exercise-due-diligence-in-pursuing-remedy-when-judgment-and-decree-already-assailed-before-lower-appellate-court\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/26\/ph-hc-litigants-to-exercise-due-diligence-in-pursuing-remedy-when-judgment-and-decree-already-assailed-before-lower-appellate-court\/","name":"P&H HC | Litigants to exercise due diligence in pursuing remedy when judgment and decree already assailed before lower appellate court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-06-26T10:30:47+00:00","dateModified":"2019-07-05T06:55:48+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/26\/ph-hc-litigants-to-exercise-due-diligence-in-pursuing-remedy-when-judgment-and-decree-already-assailed-before-lower-appellate-court\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/26\/ph-hc-litigants-to-exercise-due-diligence-in-pursuing-remedy-when-judgment-and-decree-already-assailed-before-lower-appellate-court\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/26\/ph-hc-litigants-to-exercise-due-diligence-in-pursuing-remedy-when-judgment-and-decree-already-assailed-before-lower-appellate-court\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"P&H HC | Litigants to exercise due diligence in pursuing remedy when judgment and decree already assailed before lower appellate court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":271912,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/19\/it-is-not-for-the-court-to-decide-the-validity-of-the-allotment-of-land-by-the-government-tripura-high-court-dismisses-appeal-in-suit-for-recovery-of-possession-of-land\/","url_meta":{"origin":216130,"position":0},"title":"“It is not for the court to decide the validity of the allotment of land by the Government”; Tripura High Court dismisses appeal in suit for recovery of possession of land","author":"Editor","date":"August 19, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Tripura High Court: T. Amarnath Goud, J. dismissed a second appeal which was filed under section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 against the judgment which dismissed the appeal affirming the judgment passed by Civil Judge ( Senior Division) in connection with declaring the right, title & interest of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Tripura High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/tripura-high-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/tripura-high-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/tripura-high-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/tripura-high-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/tripura-high-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":240810,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/17\/chh-hc-whether-transfer-sale-of-abadi-land-is-complete-without-delivery-of-possession-of-the-land-along-with-superstructure-in-favour-of-the-purchaser-hc-decides\/","url_meta":{"origin":216130,"position":1},"title":"Chh HC | Whether transfer\/sale of Abadi land is complete without delivery of possession of the land along with superstructure in favour of the purchaser? HC decides","author":"Editor","date":"December 17, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Chattisgarh High Court: Sanjay K Agrawal J., dismissed the second appeal being devoid of merits. The facts of the case are such that the plaintiff's father, Kanhaiya Kori (Defendant 2) purchased the suit property including suit land along with the kutcha house by registered sale deed from one Rajim Bai\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":263180,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/05\/permanent-injunction-cant-be-granted-against-true-owner-once-the-title-dispute-is-settled-sc-reverses-three-concurrent-findings\/","url_meta":{"origin":216130,"position":2},"title":"Permanent Injunction can’t be granted against true owner once the title dispute is settled; SC reverses three concurrent findings\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 5, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Reversing the concurrent findings of all the Court below in a case where the plaintiff was granted the relief of permanent injunction despite having lost the title, the bench of MR Shah* and BV Nagarathna, JJ has held that the plaintiff is not entitled to a relief of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Permanent-Injunction-cant-be-granted-against-true-owner-once-the-title-dispute-is-settled-Supreme-Court-reverses-three-concurrent-findings.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Permanent-Injunction-cant-be-granted-against-true-owner-once-the-title-dispute-is-settled-Supreme-Court-reverses-three-concurrent-findings.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Permanent-Injunction-cant-be-granted-against-true-owner-once-the-title-dispute-is-settled-Supreme-Court-reverses-three-concurrent-findings.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Permanent-Injunction-cant-be-granted-against-true-owner-once-the-title-dispute-is-settled-Supreme-Court-reverses-three-concurrent-findings.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Permanent-Injunction-cant-be-granted-against-true-owner-once-the-title-dispute-is-settled-Supreme-Court-reverses-three-concurrent-findings.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":223684,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/30\/sl-sc-no-relief-against-dispossession-by-bona-fide-purchaser-where-vendor-fails-to-show-retention-of-beneficial-interest\/","url_meta":{"origin":216130,"position":3},"title":"SL SC | No relief against dispossession by bona fide purchaser\u00a0where vendor fails to show retention of beneficial interest","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 30, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka: A Full Bench of Sisira J. de Abrew, L.T.B. Dehideniya and Murdu N.B. Fernando, JJ., dismissed an appeal which was filed before the Court aggrieved by the judgment dated 17-09-2010 of the Civil Appellate High Court which had upheld the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217252,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/24\/ph-hc-money-decree-set-aside-in-absence-of-evidence-to-be-established-actual-loss-occurred-to-the-plaintiff\/","url_meta":{"origin":216130,"position":4},"title":"P&H HC | Money decree set aside in absence of evidence to be established actual loss occurred to the plaintiff","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 24, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court:\u00a0 Augustine George Masih, J. upheld the decision of the lower court as there was no evidence on record to prove the contentions made by the appellant. An appeal was made against the judgment and decree passed by the Additional District Judge whereby the suit filed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":270781,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/28\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-co-owners-of-the-joint-property-cannot-prevent-each-other-from-using-the-property-appeal-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":216130,"position":5},"title":"Punjab and Haryana High Court | Co-owners of the joint property cannot prevent each other from using the property; appeal dismissed","author":"Editor","date":"July 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Punjab and Haryana High Court: Alka Sarin, J., while dismissing the appeal preferred by the plaintiff against the judgments passed by the trial court and the appellate court held that when a suit land is not partitioned and the parties to the suit are the co-sharers and co-owners,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216130","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=216130"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216130\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=216130"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=216130"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=216130"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}