{"id":216086,"date":"2019-06-25T15:00:59","date_gmt":"2019-06-25T09:30:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=216086"},"modified":"2019-06-27T15:35:28","modified_gmt":"2019-06-27T10:05:28","slug":"mp-hc-no-legal-impediment-found-in-issuing-the-appointment-order-in-favor-of-petitioner-petition-allowed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/25\/mp-hc-no-legal-impediment-found-in-issuing-the-appointment-order-in-favor-of-petitioner-petition-allowed\/","title":{"rendered":"MP HC | No legal impediment found in issuing the appointment order in favor of petitioner; petition allowed"},"content":{"rendered":"

Madhya Pradesh High Court<\/b>: Subodh Abhyankar, J. allowed writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the order issued by M.P. Public Service Commission.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The petitioner contended that her name was kept in the waiting list at Serial 1 but despite the availability of post, she was not appointed. She appeared in the State Civil Services Exam, 2015, thereafter was selected under the waitlisted handicapped category. It was further contended that private-respondent had not been appointed on account of criminal cases registered against him and he was declared disqualified, the criminal cases registered against him were already decided by the Court against him. Thus it was submitted that the petitioner\u2019s name cannot be kept in the waiting list for an unlimited period.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Learned counsel for the respondents had submitted that although the petitioner was selected and her name was kept in the waiting list at Serial 1, but as the private-respondent had filed the petition, no order could be passed in favour of the petitioner due to the pendency of the said petition.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The Court found that insofar the petition filed by the private-respondent was concerned, the said petition had been dismissed by the Court under a separate order and thus in its considered opinion the Court held, that there was no legal impediment in issuing the appointment order in favour of the petitioner, which difficulty has been expressed by the respondents in their reply. Hence, there was a direction to issue an appointment letter in favour of the petitioner.\u00a0<\/span>[Pooja Dwivedi v. State of M.P., 2019 SCC OnLine MP 1154<\/b><\/a>, decided on 20-06-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Madhya Pradesh High Court: Subodh Abhyankar, J. allowed writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the order <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":172684,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[35912,31370,36258,36257],"class_list":["post-216086","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appointment-order","tag-article-226-of-constitution-of-india","tag-legal-impediment","tag-m-p-public-service-commissio"],"yoast_head":"\nMP HC | No legal impediment found in issuing the appointment order in favor of petitioner; petition allowed | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/25\/mp-hc-no-legal-impediment-found-in-issuing-the-appointment-order-in-favor-of-petitioner-petition-allowed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"MP HC | No legal impediment found in issuing the appointment order in favor of petitioner; petition allowed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Subodh Abhyankar, J. allowed writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the order\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/25\/mp-hc-no-legal-impediment-found-in-issuing-the-appointment-order-in-favor-of-petitioner-petition-allowed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-06-25T09:30:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-06-27T10:05:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/25\/mp-hc-no-legal-impediment-found-in-issuing-the-appointment-order-in-favor-of-petitioner-petition-allowed\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/25\/mp-hc-no-legal-impediment-found-in-issuing-the-appointment-order-in-favor-of-petitioner-petition-allowed\/\",\"name\":\"MP HC | No legal impediment found in issuing the appointment order in favor of petitioner; petition allowed | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/25\/mp-hc-no-legal-impediment-found-in-issuing-the-appointment-order-in-favor-of-petitioner-petition-allowed\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/25\/mp-hc-no-legal-impediment-found-in-issuing-the-appointment-order-in-favor-of-petitioner-petition-allowed\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-06-25T09:30:59+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-06-27T10:05:28+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/25\/mp-hc-no-legal-impediment-found-in-issuing-the-appointment-order-in-favor-of-petitioner-petition-allowed\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/25\/mp-hc-no-legal-impediment-found-in-issuing-the-appointment-order-in-favor-of-petitioner-petition-allowed\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/25\/mp-hc-no-legal-impediment-found-in-issuing-the-appointment-order-in-favor-of-petitioner-petition-allowed\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/25\/mp-hc-no-legal-impediment-found-in-issuing-the-appointment-order-in-favor-of-petitioner-petition-allowed\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"MP HC | No legal impediment found in issuing the appointment order in favor of petitioner; petition allowed\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MP HC | No legal impediment found in issuing the appointment order in favor of petitioner; petition allowed | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/25\/mp-hc-no-legal-impediment-found-in-issuing-the-appointment-order-in-favor-of-petitioner-petition-allowed\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"MP HC | No legal impediment found in issuing the appointment order in favor of petitioner; petition allowed","og_description":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Subodh Abhyankar, J. allowed writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the order","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/25\/mp-hc-no-legal-impediment-found-in-issuing-the-appointment-order-in-favor-of-petitioner-petition-allowed\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-06-25T09:30:59+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-06-27T10:05:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/25\/mp-hc-no-legal-impediment-found-in-issuing-the-appointment-order-in-favor-of-petitioner-petition-allowed\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/25\/mp-hc-no-legal-impediment-found-in-issuing-the-appointment-order-in-favor-of-petitioner-petition-allowed\/","name":"MP HC | No legal impediment found in issuing the appointment order in favor of petitioner; petition allowed | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/25\/mp-hc-no-legal-impediment-found-in-issuing-the-appointment-order-in-favor-of-petitioner-petition-allowed\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/25\/mp-hc-no-legal-impediment-found-in-issuing-the-appointment-order-in-favor-of-petitioner-petition-allowed\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg","datePublished":"2019-06-25T09:30:59+00:00","dateModified":"2019-06-27T10:05:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/25\/mp-hc-no-legal-impediment-found-in-issuing-the-appointment-order-in-favor-of-petitioner-petition-allowed\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/25\/mp-hc-no-legal-impediment-found-in-issuing-the-appointment-order-in-favor-of-petitioner-petition-allowed\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/25\/mp-hc-no-legal-impediment-found-in-issuing-the-appointment-order-in-favor-of-petitioner-petition-allowed\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/25\/mp-hc-no-legal-impediment-found-in-issuing-the-appointment-order-in-favor-of-petitioner-petition-allowed\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"MP HC | No legal impediment found in issuing the appointment order in favor of petitioner; petition allowed"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":301980,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/20\/employment-agreement-allows-transfers-for-administrative-reasons-madhya-pradesh-hc-legal-research-news-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":216086,"position":0},"title":"Madhya Pradesh High Court allows transfer of Contractual Employees for administrative reasons under special circumstances","author":"Ritu","date":"September 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court held that Contractual Employee are not entitled to claim non-transferability due to employment agreement allowing administrative transfers.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":326948,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/20\/construction-of-public-utility-premises-near-hanuman-mandir-not-detrimental-to-atmosphere-and-ecological-balance-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":216086,"position":1},"title":"Construction of public utility premises near Hanuman Mandir not detrimental to temple\u2019s atmosphere and ecological balance: MP High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"July 20, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court stated that the petitioner\u2019s failure to provide sufficient details and his criminal background further undermined his petition","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":324848,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/21\/kshetriya-shri-gandhi-ashram-not-state-under-art-12-constitution-not-amenable-writ-jurisdiction-under-art-226-all-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":216086,"position":2},"title":"Kshetriya Shri Gandhi Ashram not State under Art. 12 of Constitution: Allahabad High Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"June 21, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cKshetriya Shri Gandhi Ashram is a regional body. Its parent body is the Shri Gandhi Ashram, Lucknow. There is no statute regulating the functioning of society or providing the State and its Officers with control over their affairs.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":346839,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/30\/mp-high-court-upholds-civil-judges-dismissal-for-acquitting-accused-without-writing-judgments-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":216086,"position":3},"title":"MP High Court upholds Civil Judge\u2019s dismissal for delivering verdicts in several criminal cases without writing judgments","author":"Ritu","date":"April 30, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA judicial officer cannot pronounce the concluding portion of his judgment in open court without the entire text of the judgment being prepared\/dictated.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":378711,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/18\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-state-article-12-jk-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":216086,"position":4},"title":"Vaishno Devi Shrine Board not \u201cState\u201d under Art. 12 Despite Statutory Status; Lacks Governmental Control: J&K and Ladakh HC","author":"Sunaina","date":"March 18, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe guiding factor is the nature of duty imposed upon the person or body against whom a writ is being sought. If the nature of duty imposed on a body is public in nature, it is amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution but if the rights\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"vaishno devi shrine board not State","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-State.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-State.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-State.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-State.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":311397,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/13\/press-news-article-defamation-refrain-private-citizen-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":216086,"position":5},"title":"\u201cPress must refrain from publishing contents that are manifestly defamatory in nature, Must duly verify such content\u201d; J&K and Ladakh HC observes","author":"Editor","date":"January 13, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The High Court further stated that, truth is no defence for publishing defamatory material against a private citizen where no public interest is involved.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"jammu and kashmir and ladakh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216086","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=216086"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216086\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/172684"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=216086"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=216086"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=216086"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}